Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Material
Material
/ J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138 131
Abstract: A numerical investigation of thin-walled complex section steel columns with intermediate stiffeners was performed
using finite element analysis. An accurate and reliable finite element model was developed and verified against test results. Veri-
fication indicates that the model could predict the ultimate strengths and failure modes of the tested columns with reasonable
accuracy. Therefore, the developed model was used for the parametric study. In addition, the effect of geometric imperfection on
column ultimate strength and the effect of boundary conditions on the elastic distortional buckling of complex section columns
were investigated. An equation for the elastic distortional buckling load of fixed-ended columns having different column lengths
was proposed. The elastic distortional buckling load obtained from the proposed equation was used in the direct strength method to
calculate the column ultimate strength. Generally, it is shown that the proposed design equation conservatively predicted the
ultimate strengths of complex section columns with different column lengths.
Key words: Complex section column, Distortional buckling, Finite element method (FEM), Intermediate stiffener
doi:10.1631/jzus.A1000185 Document code: A CLC number: TU391
material (Schafer, 2002). Recent research on the ap- were brake-pressed from thin-walled structural steel
plication of the DSM on cold-formed steel structures sheets. The minimal column length of each specimen
has also been reported (Sputo and Tovar, 2005; Tovar was about 400 mm. The ends of the specimen were
and Sputo, 2005; Yu and Schafer, 2007; Kwon et al., then welded to 10 mm thick steel plates to ensure full
2009; Dawe et al., 2010). However, the DSM em- contact between the specimen and the end bearings.
phasizes the use of finite strip analysis for the deter- The nominal cross section dimensions of specimens
mination of elastic buckling. Finite strip analysis is a are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. The specimens are
general tool that provides accurate elastic buckling labeled according to their cross sections and column
solutions with a minimum of effort and time. Finite lengths. For example, “S1L400A” defines the
strip analysis, as implemented in conventional pro- specimens as follows: (1) The first two letters indicate
grams, does have limitations: it provides a solution the section type of the specimen. (2) The third letter
for member ends which are pinned only (AISI, 2006). “L” refers to the column length. (3) The following
Previous research has indicated that distortional three or four digits are the nominal specimen length
buckling can be influenced by additional restraint (400 mm). (4) The last letter “A” or “B” means re-
provided at the ends, but no direct way exists to cap- peated test of the same section.
ture this effect in a traditional finite strip analysis Bl
Bl
(AISI, 2006). The buckling mode of the proposed
complex section is general distortional buckling;
therefore, the effect of boundary conditions on the
distortional buckling of complex section fixed-ended
Bf
Bf
ri
columns was investigated. w3
The purpose of this study is firstly to develop an
w1 w2 w4 w5
accurate finite element model to investigate the be-
havior of complex section columns with intermediate Bw Bw
f2
f1
f3
f3
Bf
f4 w3
f4
f5
2 Test program
f5
w1 w2 w4 w5
Bw Bw
The test program conducted by Chen et al.
(c) (d)
(2010) provided experimental ultimate strengths and
failure modes of complex section stub columns com- Fig. 1 Cross sections of test specimens (Chen et al., 2010)
pressed between fixed ends. The test specimens (a) Section 1; (b) Section 2; (c) Section 3; (d) Section 4
The material properties of test specimens were ficient of variation (COV) of 0.031. The comparison
measured by tensile coupon tests (Table 2). The de- indicates that the developed finite element model is
tails of the experimental investigation are presented in accurate and reliable.
(Chen et al., 2010).
Table 3 Compressive strengths and failure modes of test
Table 2 Measured material properties obtained from specimens
tensile coupon tests (Chen et al., 2010) Test FEA
E σy σu Specimen PEXP Failure PFEA Failure PEXP/PFEA
Specimen (kN) mode (kN) mode
(GPa) (MPa) (MPa)
Steel sheet 204 401 520 S1L400A 173 D 175 D 0.99
S1L400B 175 D 176 D 0.99
Cold-formed specimen 210 413 528
S2L400A 232 D 252 D 0.92
E: elastic modulus; σy: yield strength; σu: ultimate strength
S2L400B 243 D 253 D 0.96
S3L400A 342 D 340 D 1.01
S3L400B 347 D 340 D 1.02
3 Finite element model S4L400A 344 D 347 D 0.99
S4L400B 342 D 347 D 0.99
Mean 0.98
The finite element program ABAQUS (2004)
COV 0.031
was used in the simulation of complex section
D: distortional buckling; COV: coefficient of variation
fixed-ended columns with intermediate stiffeners
tested by Chen et al. (2010). The measured geometry The failure modes of each specimen from the FEA
and initial geometric imperfections were incorporated and the tests are also compared in Table 3. It can be
in the finite element model. The simulation consisted seen that the failure modes from FEA and the tests are
of two steps. The first was eigenvalue analysis to all distortional buckling. The deformed shape obtained
determine the buckling modes, and the second was from the FEA was compared with the test specimen
load-displacement nonlinear analysis (ABAQUS, (Fig. 2). The load-displacement curves of the speci-
2004). men S4L400B from the FEA and test are compared in
The four-node doubly curved shell element with Fig. 3, and it is shown that the finite element model is
reduced integration and hourglass control (S4R5) was able to predict the load-displacement curve with rea-
used in the model. Convergence studies were con- sonable accuracy.
ducted to choose the reasonable finite element mesh,
and finally, a 10 mm×10 mm (length by width) size
was used in modeling the test columns. The fixed-
ended boundary condition and loading application
were simulated as described in (Chen and Young,
2007).
The measured material properties were used in
the finite element model. The true stresses and true
plastic strains were used in the material model. De- (a)
tails of the imperfection measurement are reported in
(Chen et al., 2010).
4 Test verification
300 200
Load (kN)
200 150
IMP (mm)
FEA 100 0.0025
100 0.025
TEST 0.25
50 1.0
0 2.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Displacment (mm) 0
300
(b)
Fig. 3 Comparison of load-displacement curves
250
Load (kN)
0
the parametric study. The overall imperfection mag-
450
nitude was 1/1000 of the column length. The size of 400
(c)
the finite element mesh for all columns was almost 350
10 mm×10 mm (length by width). The measured 300
250 IMP (mm)
material properties were also used in the parametric 0.0025
200
study. 150
0.025
0.25
100
5.2 Effect of different initial local imperfection 1.0
50
2.0
The effect of initial geometry imperfection on 0
450
the FEA model of column with intermediate stiffeners 400
(d)
mode are used to obtain the distortional buckling Fig. 4 Imperfection sensitivity analysis of complex column
stress in the FEA. Normally the distortional buckling sections
mode has two different deformation shapes, i.e., de- (a) Section 1; (b) Section 2; (c) Section 3; (d) Section 4. IMP:
formation of lips in the outward and inward direc- initial local geometry imperfection, mm
tions. In this study, the elastic distortional buckling
loads of lip inward deformation (Pcrd-in) and lip out- Table 4 Effect of deformation shapes on the buckling
ward deformation (Pcrd-out) were compared (Table 4), load in the FEA
and were similar for specimens with different buck- Pcrd-in Pcrd-out
Specimen
ling deformation shapes. (kN) (kN)
S1L400A 169.6 175.3
5.4 Effect of boundary condition on distortional
S2L400A 199.7 201.8
buckling
S3L400A 744.8 766.3
The elastic distortional buckling loads (Pcrd-FEA) S4L400A 352.7 365.4
of columns having different lengths were obtained Pcrd-in and Pcrd-out are the elastic distortional buckling loads of the lip
using eigenvalue analysis. The analysis results are inward deformation and outward deformation, respectively
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138 135
compared with elastic buckling load obtained from from Eq. (1) are generally non-conservative. There-
the finite strip method (FSM) (Pcrd-FSM) (Papangelis fore, a modified equation was proposed:
and Hancock, 1995) (Table 5). The comparison indi-
cates that the elastic distortional buckling load ob- Pcrd-FEA 0.3
= 1 + 1.5 , (2)
tained from the FEA decreases when the column length Pcrd-FSM λ
increases. It is also shown that the elastic distortional
buckling load obtained from the FEA approaches that and it is shown that the equation curve is generally the
obtained from the FSM when the column length in- lower boundary of all the data.
creases. The load ratio of Pcrd-FEA/Pcrd-FSM is plotted
against the number of distortional half-waves along 9
the column length (λ) in Fig. 5. The distortional 8 Section 1
7
Pcrd-FEA/Pcrd-FSM
Section 2
half-wave length is obtained from the FSM. It is 6 Section 3
5
shown that the load ratio of Pcrd-FEA/Pcrd-FSM for dif- 4
Section 4
Eq. (1)
ferent sections could fit a single curve when the 3 Eq. (2)
2
number of distortional half-waves along the column 1
length is larger than 1. When the number of distor- 0
0 1 2 3 4 5
tional half-waves along column length is smaller than λ
1, the load ratio of Pcrd-FEA/Pcrd-FSM are different for Fig. 5 Effect of the number of distortional half-waves
different sections. along the length on the elastic distortional buckling load
Table 5 Elastic distortional buckling load obtained from 5.5 Effect of different column lengths
numerical analysis
As shown in Fig. 6, the ultimate strengths of the
Length Distortional buckling load, Pcrd (kN) columns decrease when the column lengths increase
Method
(mm) Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4
from 400 to 1000 mm. It is shown that the ultimate
400 169.6 199.7 744.8 352.7
strengths of column sections 1 and 2 almost remain
500 153.3 180.4 565.6 305.7
600 141.0 166.9 426.8 275.9 constant when the column length increases from 1000
700 131.3 151.4 301.7 252.4 to 3000 mm. For column sections 3 and 4, the ulti-
800 121.5 137.1 289.6 231.9 mate strengths slightly decrease when the column
FEA 900 113.0 126.0 250.0 214.5 lengths increase from 1000 to 2500 mm.
1000 107.8 118.8 216.6 200.9
1500 99.5 108.7 171.1 174.6 400 Section 1-FEA Section 2-FEA
2000 89.2 97.0 157.2 159.6 350 Section 3-FEA Section 4-FEA
Section 1-DSM Section 2-DSM
2500 86.9 94.5 142.4 150.8 300 Section 3-DSM Section 4-DSM
Load (kN)
as torsional buckling (lez) are assumed to be equal to axial strength for flexural, torsional, or flexural-
half of the column length (L) for the fixed-ended torsional buckling, and Pnl and Pnd are the nominal
concentrically-loaded columns in the design. axial strengths for local buckling and distortional
buckling, respectively. Py is the nominal section yield
6.2 Comparison of FEA results with design
strength. fy is the material yield strength, which is the
predictions
static 0.2% proof stress (σ0.2). Pcrl and Pcrd are the
The DSM is used to predict the strengths of critical elastic buckling loads for the local columns
complex section columns with intermediate stiffeners and distortional columns, respectively. λc, λd, and λl
as follows: are the slendernesses of the overall buckling, distor-
tional buckling, and local buckling, respectively. A is
PDSM=min(Pne, Pnl, Pnd), (3) the cross section area, Ag is the full cross section area,
⎪⎪( y c )
⎧ 0.658 λc2 P , λ ≤ 1.5, E is the elastic modulus, and r is the radius of gyration
of gross cross section about the minor y-axis of
Pne = ⎨⎛ 0.877 ⎞ (4) buckling.
⎪⎜ 2 ⎟ Py , λc > 1.5, The ultimate strengths predicted by the DSM
⎪⎩⎝ λc ⎠
with Pcrl and Pcrd calculated using the FSM (Papan-
⎧ Pne , λl ≤ 0.776, gelis and Hancock, 1995) were compared with the
⎪⎪
Pnl = ⎨ ⎡ ⎛ Pcrl ⎞ ⎤ ⎛ Pcrl ⎞ FEA parametric study results (Fig. 6). Since the ul-
0.4 0.4
(5)
⎪ ⎢1 − 0.15 ⎜ P ⎟ ⎥ ⎜ P ⎟ Pne , λl > 0.776, timate strengths calculated by Eq. (6) have no rela-
⎩⎪ ⎣⎢ ⎝ ne ⎠ ⎦⎥ ⎝ ne ⎠ tionship with the column length, the design curves are
⎧ Py , λd ≤ 0.561, all horizontal straight lines. It is shown that the ulti-
⎪⎪ mate strengths predicted by the DSM are very con-
Pnd = ⎨ ⎡ ⎤⎛ P
0.6 0.6
⎛ Pcrd ⎞ ⎞ (6) servative for column sections 2, 3, and 4. The current
⎪ ⎢1 − 0.25 ⎜⎜ P ⎟⎟ ⎥ ⎜ crd ⎟⎟ Py , λd > 0.561,
⎢ ⎝ y ⎠ ⎥ ⎜⎝ Py ⎠ DSM was developed based on open sections rather
⎩⎪ ⎣ ⎦
than complex sections. Hence, the predictions of the
DSM on the complex sections may differ from those
where Py=fyAg, Pcre=π2EA/(le/r)2, λc = Py /Pcre , of simple channel sections.
The ultimate strengths (PDSM-M) predicted using
λl = Pne /Pcrl , λd = Py /Pcrd . Pcre is the critical elastic
the DSM with Pcrd calculated by Eq. (2) were com-
buckling load in flexural buckling. Pne is the nominal pared with the FEA parametric study results in Table 6.
Table 6 Comparison of the column strengths of the sections from the FEA with the DSM predictions
Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4
Length
(mm) PFEA PDSM-M PFEA PDSM-M PFEA PDSM-M PFEA PDSM-M
Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN)
400 176.0 195.7 0.90 252.0 210.5 1.20 340.0 264.5 1.29 347.0 267.8 1.30
500 170.4 183.1 0.93 236.6 195.0 1.21 328.0 260.3 1.26 328.7 247.9 1.33
600 165.0 173.5 0.95 226.7 184.8 1.23 318.1 244.8 1.30 315.0 234.3 1.34
700 160.8 166.9 0.96 218.4 177.7 1.23 316.0 233.7 1.35 302.7 224.7 1.35
800 159.3 162.0 0.98 212.5 172.6 1.23 309.7 225.5 1.37 292.4 217.5 1.34
900 156.7 158.4 0.99 205.4 168.7 1.22 294.7 219.2 1.34 283.6 212.1 1.34
1000 151.2 155.6 0.97 197.7 165.7 1.19 279.7 214.2 1.31 276.2 207.8 1.33
1500 144.7 147.9 0.98 184.7 157.4 1.17 252.0 200.1 1.26 252.5 195.9 1.29
2000 143.8 144.5 1.00 180.7 153.7 1.18 241.0 193.8 1.24 246.3 190.6 1.29
2500 141.1 142.7 0.99 178.5 151.8 1.18 231.3 190.4 1.21 232.5 187.7 1.24
3000 138.4 141.6 0.98 176.1 150.6 1.17 184.7 188.3 0.98 205.3 185.9 1.10
Mean 0.97 1.20 1.27 1.30
COV 0.030 0.020 0.084 0.055
COV: coefficient of variation; ratio: PFEA/PDSM-M
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138 137
It is shown that the ultimate strengths predicted by the Method Design Guide. AISI, Washington, DC.
DSM generally agree with the FEA results well for Chen, J., Young, B., 2007. Cold-formed steel lipped channel
columns at elevated temperatures. Engineering Struc-
column series section 1. The mean value of the
tures, 29(10):2445-2456. [doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.
PFEA/PDSM-M ratio is 0.97 with the corresponding 12.004]
COV being 0.030. For column series sections 2, 3, Chen, J., Yong, H., Jin, W.L., 2010. Stub column tests of
and 4, the DSM predictions are all conservative. The thin-walled complex section with intermediate stiffeners.
mean values of the PFEA/PDSM-M ratio for column Thin-Walled Structures, 48(6):423-429. [doi:10.1016/j.
tws.2010.01.008]
series are 1.20, 1.27, and 1.30, with the corresponding
Dawe, J.L., Liu, L., Li, J.Y., 2010. Strength and behavior of
COV of 0.020, 0.084, and 0.055, respectively. cold-formed steel offset trusses. Journal of Construc-
tional Steel Research, 66(4):556-565. [doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.
2009.10.015]
7 Conclusions Kaitila, O., 2002. Finite Element Modeling of Cold-Formed
Steel Members at High Temperatures. PhD Thesis, Hel-
sinki University, Finland.
Numerical investigations and design of fixed- Kwon, Y.B., Kim, B.S., Hancock, G.J., 2009. Compression
ended complex section columns using the FEA have tests of high strength cold-formed steel channels with
been presented. A finite element model, including buckling interaction. Journal of Constructional Steel
geometric and material nonlinearities, has been de- Research, 65(2):278-289. [doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.07.005]
veloped and verified against experimental results. Papangelis, J.P., Hancock, G.J., 1995. Computer analysis of
thin-walled structural members. Computers and Struc-
The FEA predictions were generally in good agree-
tures, 56(1):157-176. [doi:10.1016/0045-7949(94)00545-
ment with the experimental ultimate strengths and E]
failure modes of the test columns. The columns un- Schafer, B.W., 2002. Progress on the Direct Strength Method.
derwent distortional buckling. An extensive paramet- Proceeding of 16th International Specialty Conference on
ric study of initial geometric imperfection, buckling Cold-Formed Steel Structures, Orlando, Florida.
p.647-662.
deformation shape, boundary condition, and column
Schafer, B.W., Peköz, T., 1998. Direct Strength Prediction of
length effects on elastic distortional buckling load has Cold-formed Steel Members Using Numerical Elastic
been performed using the developed finite element Buckling Solutions. Proceedings of the 14th International
model. It is shown that for more complex sections, the Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures,
effect of initial local geometry imperfection is University of Missouri-Rolla, USA, p.69-76.
smaller. The buckling deformation shape has no sig- Sputo, T., Tovar, J., 2005. Application of direct strength
method to axially loaded perforated cold-formed steel
nificant effect on the buckling load. It is also shown
studs: long wave buckling. Thin-Walled Structures,
that the elastic distortional buckling load of a column 43(12):1852-1881. [doi:10.1016/j.tws.2005.08.005]
obtained from the FEA approached that obtained from Tovar, J., Sputo, T., 2005. Application of direct strength
the FSM when the column lengths increases. A method to axially loaded perforated cold-formed steel
comparison of the column strengths obtained from the studs: distortional and local buckling. Thin-Walled
FEA and the design column strengths calculated using Structures, 43(12):1882-1912. [doi:10.1016/j.tws.2005.
08.004]
the DSM has also been presented. Results showed
Yan, J., Young, B., 2002. Column test of cold-formed steel
that the design column strengths calculated using the channels with complex stiffeners. Journal of Structural
critical elastic distortional buckling load obtained Engineering, ASCE, 128(6):737-745. [doi:10.1061/
from the proposed equation were generally conser- (ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(737)]
vative for fixed-ended complex section columns. Young, B., 2004. Design of channel columns with inclined
edge stiffeners. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,
60(2):183-197. [doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.09.001]
References Young, B., Rasmussen, K.J.R., 1998. Tests of fixed-ended
ABAQUS, 2004. Analysis User’s Manual. Version 6.5. plain channel columns. Journal of Structural Engineer-
ABAQUS, Inc. ing, ASCE, 124(2):131-139. [doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute), 2004. Supplement to 9445(1998)124:2(131)]
the North American Specification for Design of Young, B., Yan, J., 2004a. Channel columns undergoing local,
Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members. AISI, Washing- distortional, and overall buckling. Journal of Structural
ton, DC. Engineering, ASCE, 128(6):728-736. [doi:10.1061/
AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute), 2006. Direct Strength (ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(728)]
138 Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138
Young, B., Yan, J., 2004b. Design of cold-formed steel channel built-up closed sections with intermediate stiffeners.
columns with complex edge stiffeners by direct strength Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 134(5):727-
method. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 738. [doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:5(727)]
130(11):1756-1763. [doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445 Yu, C., Schafer, B.W., 2007. Simulation of cold-formed steel
(2004)130:11(1756)] beams in local and distortional buckling with applications
Young, B., Ellobody, E., 2007. Design of cold-formed steel to the direct strength method. Journal of Constructional
unequal angle compression members. Thin-walled Steel Research, 63(5):581-590. [doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.
Structures, 45(3):330-338. [doi:10.1016/j.tws.2007.02. 07.008]
015] Yu, W.W., 2000. Cold-Formed Steel Design (3rd Ed.). Wiley,
Young, B., Chen, J., 2008. Design of cold-formed steel New York.
These journals are among the best of China’s University Journals. Here’s why:
¾ JZUS (A/B/C) have developed rapidly in specialized scientific and technological areas.
JZUS-A (Applied Physics & Engineering) split from JZUS and launched in 2005
JZUS-B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology) split from JZUS and launched in 2005
JZUS-C (Computers & Electronics) split from JZUS-A and launched in 2010
¾ We are the first in China to completely put into practice the international peer review system in
order to ensure the journals’ high quality (more than 7600 referees from over 60 countries,
http://www.zju.edu.cn/jzus/reviewer.php)
¾ We are the first in China to pay increased attention to Research Ethics Approval of submitted
papers, and the first to join CrossCheck to fight against plagiarism
¾ Since the start of an international cooperation with Springer in 2006, through SpringerLink,
JZUS’s usage rate (download) is among the tops of all of Springer’s 82 co-published Chinese
journals
¾ JZUS’s citation frequency has increased rapidly since 2004, on account of DOI and Online
First implementation (average of more than 60 citations a month for each of JZUS-A &
JZUS-B in 2009)
¾ JZUS-B is the first university journal to receive a grant from the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (2009–2010)