UTS

Philosopical
One of the main reasons it is vital for any educated person to possess a broad worldview is that it allows
that person to comprehend the significance of the emanations from the surrounding reality, which in
turn improves that person's prospects of achieving social prominence. In my essay, I'll seek to elaborate
on the intricacies of my worldview and how it influences how I approach life's issues. The most
important component of my worldview is that it is dialectical. I'll also analyze the veracity of this
suggestion in great detail. To put it another way, I think that we should evaluate the actual relevance of
the reality's manifestations within the conceptual framework of how causes define the character of
matching effects. The discussion of a particular phenomenon as a "thing in itself," separate from its
dialectically predetermined causes, is not acceptable in my opinion for this reason. This in turn helps to
explain why I identify as a materialist and do not think that concepts that are basically metaphysical
actually exist.

The discussion of a particular phenomenon as a "thing in itself," separate from its dialectically
predetermined causes, is not acceptable in my opinion for this reason. This in turn helps to explain why I
identify as a materialist and do not believe in the reality of what are essentially metaphysical ideas. It
also helps to explain why I believe that the Darwinian theory of evolution is the only one that offers
scientifically supported explanations for what caused biological life to first emerge on Earth and what
caused those life forms to begin evolving toward ever-greater complexity.

Since I am in a position to define the discursive significance of people's very sense of religiosity, it goes
without saying that the fact that I support the provisions of the Darwinian theory of evolution
automatically makes me an atheist. In essence, I believe that a person's level of religiosity is positively
correlated with the degree of their evolutionary underdevelopment. Such people's underdevelopment is
manifested in their propensity to approach problems from a holistic standpoint, which leads them to
subjectualize nature, much like primitive savages and high mammals do.

For instance, it has been noted that bears that cut themselves on protruding tree branches while
crawling over the log frequently punish those branches by striking them with both of their paws. The
obvious explanation for this is that in bear's mind, the "bad" branch resembles nothing less than a
separate entity. This shows the true beginnings of "spirituality!" And, as we are all too aware,
"spirituality" is the conceptual basis for almost every major religion in the world. This indicates that the
more individuals are inclined to profess a specific religion, the closer they are to animals, and the
opposite is also true.’

Although I believe that people are constantly becoming less "animalistic" as a part of their evolutionary
development, I still believe that biologically speaking, the representatives of the Homo Sapiens species
are nothing but primates. The validity of this suggestion can even be visually confirmed, for example, in
regards to what appears to be the anthropological constitution of many Islamic fundamentalists. Men's
main existential concerns are, after all, having children (sowing the seed), exactly as it is with the
existential anxiety of male monkeys within a certain community, and asserting their dominance over
others. When I evaluate the scope of various currently prevalent socio-political ideas, having a
knowledge of this fundamental reality comes in extremely handy for me.

For instance, from the perspective of my worldview, the ideology of feminism is completely false
because in primate societies, male dominance is what truly ensures the structural integrity of these
societies. The aforementioned conceptual foundations of my worldview are completely consistent with
what I believe to be this worldview's most important socio-political, ethical, and epistemological
implications. As a result, if feminists are successful in advancing their agenda, Western civilization as we
know it will unavoidably come to an end. The following is a formulation of the implications: a) The
linearity of development. I firmly believe in the total impartiality of the sociopolitical and scientific
advancement concepts.

Contrary to the claims made by proponents of "multiculturalism" and "cultural relativism," who assert
that the concept of progress is fundamentally "euro-centric" and, as a result, "wicked," the very fact that
the realities of modern life are becoming more discursively complex and technologically intensive over
time suggests that this concept does, in fact, help to explain the very nature of historical laws, to which
people never cease to be subjected. Accordingly, this implies that human societies can either be in a
condition of continuous improvement (like Western nations) or a state of constant degeneration (Third
World societies).

b) The fallacies inherent in the idea of "people's equality." It was previously mentioned that
representatives of the Homo Sapiens species never stop being the objects of evolutionary laws, so this
eliminates even the possibility of people being equal, regardless of the specifics of their genetically
predetermined capacity to work with abstract categories.

The truth of this claim can be easily demonstrated by looking at what, on the one hand, determines the
difference in living standards between Western nations and those in Third World nations, and on the
other hand, the non-religious core of the people's sense of ethics and morality. Even though many
people still hold the misconception that a person's capacity for moral behavior is a reflection of the
depth of their religious convictions, recent advances in biology, genetics, and sociology expose the utter
absurdity of this notion. This is because these findings revealed a positive relationship between people's
capacity for moral behavior and the degree of their intellectual development. However, as was already
mentioned, the concepts of intellectual progress and religion are wholly irreconcilable.

e) The eventual emergence of a brand-new "post-human" age. The fact that ongoing research in the
fields of biology, genetics, medicine, and IT has reached a clearly defined exponential momentum as of
right now establishes an objective prerequisite for humanity to be eligible for yet another "evolutionary
jump"!

The ability to rapidly learn a language, grow new limbs through genetic engineering, and even achieve
immortality through having one's consciousness stored on a computer's hard drive are all predicted to
be attainable in twenty years. Naturally, this will immediately be viewed as rendering the social,
economic, and ethical norms that are already in place as hopelessly out of date. The fact that I was able
to specify the real-world applications of my philosophical worldview, as was already demonstrated,
implies that this worldview has general discursive relevance. Nevertheless, such a development is
unavoidable. The fact that my viewpoint is incompatible with the political correctness dogmas, however,
is also indicative of what might be the primary cause of my worldview's challenge.

CONCLUSION

According to research, most people will see their surroundings when visualizing themselves in the near
future. It seems like you are living in your own head. But when you look into the far future, you're more
likely to adopt an omniscient perspective and regard yourself as an outsider who is distanced from the
action. Your life turns into a third-person account. Although worrying about the future might be
harmful, we cannot survive without it. We typically evaluate our past successes and extrapolate them
into the world of tomorrow. Without a doubt, thinking about what lies ahead is inadequate and futile in
the face of conflicting questions. Despite the fact that new challenges arise constantly, we must
continue to think about and plan for our growth.

A failure to design clearly leads to a poor understanding of intended behavior. Important and significant
question for any young people yearning for a fulfilling existence. Even though it was difficult to imagine
the future, it is fundamental to live with the hope that today will be better tomorrow. Living in an
infantasy land continually succeeds in daily life. Without much effort, ten years can go by more quickly
when there are no unified plans for the time frame. However, those very many years can be challenging
for busy individuals. Speaking about the present is more simpler because there are prepared realities
and supporting evidence.

In any event, setting goals and anticipating outcomes is the most that we can accomplish in a significant
amount of time from now. I would have finished college and completed my résumé by the time I found
my perfect job. We cannot live without focus, but thinking too much about the future can be
traumatizing. We constantly assess our prior accomplishments and extrapolate them into the world of
tomorrow. With so many conflicting questions, thinking about the future is undoubtedly fruitless and
incomplete. Even though we face a number of obstacles every day, we must continue to consider and
plan for our advancement. Planning to fail is the exact same thing as failing to plan.

Every student who hopes to lead a respectable life asks themselves this common and important
question: "Where do I see myself in ten years?" Though it was challenging, it is essential to live in the
expectation that today would be better than tomorrow. Wishful thinking consistently succeeds in life.
When there are no formal preparations in place for the time frame, ten years can simply pass more
quickly. The same decades, though, can be difficult for those with active minds. Speaking about the
current is more simpler because the claims can be supported by ready facts and evidence. Setting goals
and imagining the end result, though, is something we can accomplish a lot of in 10 years. In ten years,
I'd have finished college, worked on my résumé, and landed the job of my dreams.
All of us lack a crystal ball, but I have given my career a lot of thought and am fairly certain of my career
goals. I did some research on the position in question as well as your business as soon as I saw this job
advertised. I didn't submit an application until I was certain that it was the best fit for my career path
and that your business was one I could see myself working for in the future.

I want to become an effective team member in the near future, which means I need to learn the new job
quickly and acquire the necessary skills.

In the long run, my goals are to improve my technical and soft skills, establish a solid reputation with the
company, and evolve into a dependable employee who can eventually take on more responsibility and
help train new team members.

Currently, I am in a place of life where I want to change. Despite years of hard work and accomplishment
in my current field, I no longer feel an intense passion for it. In order to better utilize my abilities and
skills, I wish to transition into a more gratifying line of work. I've been interested in your business for a
while, and I think this position with you is a great fit for me.