Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Inverter topologies
Different inverter topologies are available in the market. A multilevel inverter is most suitable as the output
wave shape is close to the idea (sinusoidal) AC wave and thereby reduces the size of the filter circuit along with
reducing THD, improving operating p.f. and improving efficiency. Currently the commercially available
inverters, Huawei and Sungrow, uses 5 level topologies.
More recently the transformer less topologies played an important role to provide slim, light weight but
efficient inverter configurations. Transformers were used in the inverters to provide galvanic isolation.
Basically, galvanic protection ensures that there is no complete path in a circuit to flow. The AC side of the
inverter must be grounded as that is a part of requirements for connection to the grid and with grounded
arrays even the DC side of the inverter becomes grounded. So, a transformer is provided in between the two
sides so that there is no physical path for the current to flow from one side to the other. This creates a need for
an internal transformer in inverters. There are several drawbacks of this transformer which includes electrical
losses which decrease the efficiency of the inverter and additional weight of the transformer increasing the
shipping costs.
A transformer-less inverter has higher conversion efficiency for greater yield and lighter weight therefore
lower shipping costs. This also led to greater safety as now the inverter can detect ground fault currents at
lower levels.
2. DC Oversizing/Inverter oversizing
Inverter oversizing refers to adding more DC power to an inverter than it is rated for. For example, if you
connect 6 kWp of DC power to a 5 kW inverter, you oversize the system by 20%. This makes total sense,
because the peak power of 6 kWp will only come up in very few and short moments – so using a 6 kWp inverter
(no oversizing) would be unnecessary and therefore a waste of money. In situations where the system actually
generates more than 5 kW, the inverter would clip are so rare and so short, that it is negligible. The advantages
you gain by oversizing clearly outweigh the effects of clipping. Similarly, a system with 100 KW inverter having
a 130 kWp PV array connected to its DC side has Array-to-Inverter ratio of 1.3.
With the drastic fall of PV module prices oversizing the array (or under sizing the inverter) has become
increasingly lucrative. Under low light conditions, oversizing would lead to better utilization of the inverter
capacity. On the other hand, during the peak production period oversizing could lead to clipping of output
power. Therefore, an optimization is required to find out the ideal load ratio for a PV plant.
The factors influencing DC/AC ratio are the plant location, design specific DC loss factors (tilt angle, orientation,
mounting method, DC cable losses, mismatch and soiling). These factors affect the output of the solar panel thus
increasing the number of panels would provide a bigger output even from a lossy array.
With oversizing, the PV power plant’s nominal power is achieved faster in the morning, and the PV power plant
remains connected to the grid longer in the evening. Calculated for the total operating time of the PV project,
higher energy yields can thus be generated. Adequate oversizing increases the profitability of a PV power plant.
Multi-master configuration: In this configuration the inverter system acts as a series of independent inverters
with power rating of each inverter equal to that of individual conversion module. Each inverter has its MPPT
system.
Multi-master/Slave configuration: In this configuration the inverter system acts as a series of separate
inverters with every two modules having one MPPT system. The power rating of the individual inverter is
double that of the individual constituent module.
Master/Slave configuration (with a single master): In this configuration the entire inverter system
functions as a single inverter with the power rating of the system equal to the sum of power rating of its
individual constituent modules. The whole system has a single MPPT system.
8. Efficiency of an Inverter
The efficiency of an inverter is an important but not the only consideration while choosing an inverter.
Inverters have an efficiency curve which means they have different efficiencies at different levels of loading.
There are three kinds of efficiencies:
Peak Efficiency: The efficiency of an inverter when it is operating at its rated capacity. For some inverter
it can be as high as 99% but this is not the final word when it comes to inverter efficiency.
CEC (California Energy Commission) Efficiency:
𝜂𝐶𝐸𝐶=0.04∗𝜂10%+0.05∗𝜂20%+0.12∗𝜂30%+0.21∗𝜂50%+0.53∗𝜂75% +0.05∗𝜂100%
European Efficiency:
𝜂𝐸𝑈=0.03∗𝜂5%+0.06∗𝜂10%+0.13∗𝜂20%+0.10∗𝜂30%+0.48∗𝜂50% +0.20∗𝜂100%
Tenders mention a minimum efficiency requirement. They also ask for efficiency at different loading such as
25%, 50%, 75% and 100%.
9. Derating
This is a protective measure taken by manufacturers to avoid high inverter and module temperature as this
causes damage to the PV system. Today, inverters have very high efficiency sometimes reaching as high as 99%.
The rest are losses which are dissipated in the environment as heat. Taking example of an inverter with 2500
kVA output at 50 degree centigrade, even 1% is large amount of heat, enough to damage ICs. When the ambient
temperatures reach beyond a certain level the inverter even with its cooling measures are not able to cool to
safe levels and so it starts reducing its output (this is termed as derating). This reduction in output generally
starts at around 42-45 degree centigrade. Many a times the customer asks for the inverter output at a
temperature (50 degree centigrade). Thus, inverter companies provide ‘extra capacity’ (over the capacity
mentioned in the name) so that when the temperature reaches 50 degree centigrade it provides the named
power.
The following features differentiate a ‘smart inverter’ from an ordinary inverter. Therefore, must be
considered as desirable features before considering an inverter.
It is to be noted that when the voltage drops the inverter provides leading capacitive reactive power (positive
cos ϕ) while when the voltage rises the inverter supplies inductive lagging reactive power (negative cos ϕ).
This way the inverter is able to provide a grid stabilizing service.