Hasil scatter plot menunjukkan bahwa lari lintasan aspal dan lari lintasan shuttle ban memperlihatkan hubungan

yang linier, baik di

kelas yang diajar dengan metode lari interval, circuit training, dan lari ketahanan.

Box's Test of Equality of Covariance Matricesa

Box's M 16,471
F 2,667
df1 6
df2 259299,692
Sig. ,014
Tests the null hypothesis that the observed covariance matrices of the dependent
variables are equal across groups.

a. Design: Intercept + Usia + Metode

Nilai Box’s M yang dihasilkan adalah sebesar 16,471 (p = 0,14).

Dengan demikian, matriks kovarian antar kelompok diasumsikan sama

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

 Type III Sum of
Source Dependent Variable Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model Aspal 51,540 a
5 10,308 6,496 ,000
Shuttle Ban 14,076 b
5 2,815 2,582 ,031
Intercept Aspal 13,959 1 13,959 8,797 ,004
Shuttle Ban 38,423 1 38,423 35,245 ,000
Metode Aspal 1,141 2 ,571 ,360 ,699
Shuttle Ban ,263 2 ,132 ,121 ,886
Usia Aspal ,640 1 ,640 ,403 ,527
Shuttle Ban ,375 1 ,375 ,344 ,559
Metode * Usia Aspal 2,539 2 1,269 ,800 ,452
Shuttle Ban ,598 2 ,299 ,274 ,761
Error Aspal 157,088 99 1,587
Shuttle Ban 107,924 99 1,090
Total Aspal 3603,000 105
Shuttle Ban 5267,000 105
Corrected Total Aspal 208,629 104
Shuttle Ban 122,000 104
a. R Squared = ,247 (Adjusted R Squared = ,209)
b. R Squared = ,115 (Adjusted R Squared = ,071)

Asumsi kemiringan dari regensi homogen atau terpenuhi

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Residual for Aspal ,094 105 ,025 ,978 105 ,077
Residual for ShuttleBan ,118 105 ,001 ,942 105 ,001
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Uji Shapiro-Wilk dilakukan untuk menganalisa kenormalan residual data Lintasan aspal dan Lintasan Shuttle Ban. Hasil analisis
tersebut menginformasikan bahwa residual data lintasan aspal [W(105) = 0,978, p > 0,077] artinya data berdistribusi normal.
Sedangkan residual data lintasan shuttle ban [W(105) = 0,942, p = 0,001 artinya data tidak berdistribusi normal.

Multivariate Testsa
 Partial Eta
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Squared

Intercept Pillai's Trace ,350 26,959b 2,000 100,000 ,000 ,350

Wilks' Lambda ,650 26,959b 2,000 100,000 ,000 ,350
Hotelling's Trace ,539 26,959 b
2,000 100,000 ,000 ,350
Roy's Largest Root ,539 26,959 b
2,000 100,000 ,000 ,350
Usia Pillai's Trace ,007 ,349b
2,000 100,000 ,706 ,007
Wilks' Lambda ,993 ,349b 2,000 100,000 ,706 ,007
Hotelling's Trace ,007 ,349b
2,000 100,000 ,706 ,007
Roy's Largest Root ,007 ,349b
2,000 100,000 ,706 ,007
Metode Pillai's Trace ,342 10,405 4,000 202,000 ,000 ,171
Wilks' Lambda ,684 10,476b 4,000 200,000 ,000 ,173
Hotelling's Trace ,426 10,544 4,000 198,000 ,000 ,176
Roy's Largest Root ,305 15,399 c
2,000 101,000 ,000 ,234
a. Design: Intercept + Usia + Metode
b. Exact statistic
c. The statistic is an upper bound on F that yields a lower bound on the significance level.

Hasil Uji Multivariat menginformasikan terdapat perbedaan signifikan Lintasan Lari yang mendapatkan metode latihan yang berbeda
setelah mengontrol literasi awal mereka, F (4,200) = 10,476, p < 0,001 ; Wilk’s = 0,684, np2 = 0,173

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Type III Sum of Partial Eta
Source Dependent Variable Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared
Corrected Model Aspal 49,001 a
3 16,334 10,335 ,000 ,235
Shuttle Ban 13,478 b
3 4,493 4,181 ,008 ,110
Intercept Aspal 13,450 1 13,450 8,510 ,004 ,078
Shuttle Ban 38,669 1 38,669 35,989 ,000 ,263
Usia Aspal ,773 1 ,773 ,489 ,486 ,005
Shuttle Ban ,392 1 ,392 ,365 ,547 ,004
Metode Aspal 47,745 2 23,872 15,105 ,001 ,230
Shuttle Ban 13,166 2 6,583 6,127 ,003 ,108
Error Aspal 159,627 101 1,580
Shuttle Ban 108,522 101 1,074
Total Aspal 3603,000 105
Shuttle Ban 5267,000 105
Corrected Total Aspal 208,629 104
 Shuttle Ban 122,000 104
a. R Squared = ,235 (Adjusted R Squared = ,212)
b. R Squared = ,110 (Adjusted R Squared = ,084)

Selanjutnya hasil univariat menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan metode latihan menunjukkan perdedaan signifikan pada kemampuan lari
personil baik di Lintasan Aspal maupun Lintasan Shuttle Ban dengan nilai significant keduanya : p < 0,05

Pairwise Comparisons
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Difference Differenceb
Dependent Variable (I) Metode Latihan (J) Metode Latihan (I-J) Std. Error Sig.b Lower Bound Upper Bound
Aspal 1 2 ,906 *
,301 ,003 ,309 1,502
3 -,744 *
,301 ,015 -1,340 -,148
2 1 -,906* ,301 ,003 -1,502 -,309
3 -1,650* ,301 ,000 -2,247 -1,054
3 1 ,744 *
,301 ,015 ,148 1,340
2 1,650 *
,301 ,000 1,054 2,247
Shuttle Ban 1 2 ,635* ,248 ,012 ,143 1,127
3 ,830* ,248 ,001 ,338 1,321
2 1 -,635 *
,248 ,012 -1,127 -,143
3 ,195 ,248 ,433 -,297 ,687
3 1 -,830* ,248 ,001 -1,321 -,338
2 -,195 ,248 ,433 -,687 ,297
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the ,05 level.
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments).
 Descriptive Statistics
Metode Latihan Mean Std. Deviation N
Aspal 1 5,74 1,540 35
2 4,83 1,071 35
3 6,49 1,095 35
Total 5,69 1,416 105
Shuttle Ban 1 7,49 ,919 35
2 6,86 1,004 35
3 6,66 1,162 35
Total 7,00 1,083 105