(https://theindianlaw.

in/)

H O M E ( H T T P S : / / T H E I N D I A N L AW. I N / ) A R T I C L E S ( H T T P S : / / T H E I N D I A N L AW. I N / C AT E G O RY / A R T I C L E S / )

R E S O U RC E S  ( H T T P S : / / T H E I N D I A N L AW. I N / R E S O U R C E S / ) C A S E S & L AW S  ( H T T P S : / / T H E I N D I A N L AW. I N / C A S E S - L AW S / )

H OW T O ( H T T P S : / / T H E I N D I A N L AW. I N / C AT E G O RY / H OW - T O / ) ABOUT  ( H T T P S : / / T H E I N D I A N L AW. I N / A B O U T / )

C O N TAC T U S ( H T T P S : / / T H E I N D I A N L AW. I N / C O N TAC T / )

Indecent Representation Of Women Search

(Prohibition) Act, 1986

Recent Posts

Legal Principles On Conversion To Islam

(https://theindianlaw.in/legal-principles-on-
conversion-to-islam/)

Muslim Law of Guardianship; Guardianship

& Wards Act, 1890.
(https://theindianlaw.in/muslim-law-of-
guardianship-guardianship-wards-act-1890/)

Doctrine Of Laches with Relevant Case

Laws (https://theindianlaw.in/doctrine-of-
laches-with-relevant-case-laws/)

Critical Analysis Of Rights & Privileges Of

Women With Respect To Dower
(https://theindianlaw.in/critical-analysis-of-
rights-privileges-of-women-with-respect-to-
dower/)
 The Indian Law (https://theindianlaw.in/author/trainee-ninja/) -  October 25, 2020 -
Classification Of Dower, Difference in Shia
 Bare Act Analysis (https://theindianlaw.in/category/bare-act-analysis/)
& Sunni Law
(https://theindianlaw.in/classification-of-
dower-difference-in-shia-sunni-law/)

Table of Contents 
Categories
1. Introduction
2. Preamble of the Act
3. Salient Features Of the Act Select Category 

3.1. Section 2 
3.2. Section 3 
3.3. Section 4  Archives

3.4. Section 5 
3.5. Section 6  Select Month 

3.6. Section 7 
3.7. Section 8 
3.8. Section 9 
3.9. Section 10
4. The process of making Rules
5. Important Case Laws 
5.1. Ajay Goswami V. Union of India 
5.2. In Chandra Raja Kumari Vs Police Commissioner, Hyderabad 
5.3. Ranjit D. Udeshi vs State Of Maharashtra
 6. Bare Act

Introduction

The introduction of the Bill against indecent representation of women in the Rajya Sabha in 1986
was in response to the demand by the women’s movement for a legislative action against the
derogatory depiction of women in India.  Introduced in the Rajya Sabha by Margaret Alva, the bill
became law by way of enactment with effect from October 1987.

The law aimed to regulate the representation and portrayal of women in mainstream media,
particularly in print media. It was brought into force to ensure that the portrayal of women in
media by means of advertisements, writings, publications and illustrations was not such that could
be termed “indecent”. Given the time-period it was enacted, the 1986 Act, which continues to be
in force, focused primarily on print media and advertising.

Preamble of the Act

The act is aimed to prohibit and regulate the Representation of and portrayal of women in
mainstream media, particularly in print media. This Act was enforced to ensure that the portrayal
of women in media by the means of advertising, writings, publications, paintings and figures or in
any other form is not such that it could be termed as indecent.

Salient Features Of the Act

This act may be called the Indecent Representation Of Women (Prohibition) Act 1986. The
jurisdiction of this act extends to the whole of India including Jammu and Kashmir. This act came
into force on October 2, 1987 by the appointment of the Central Government by the notification in
the Official Gazette. 

Section 2

This section of the act deals with the definition of the act, thereby giving meaning to the words
which are used in this act. We need to consider this definition of the Act to understand its
interpretation, unless the context itself refers to some other definition. Some of these definitions
are:

1. Advertisement: It includes any form of notice, circular, label, wrapper, or other document and
any visual representation by means of any light, sound, smoke or gas.

2. Distribution: it includes distribution by way of samples, whether free or paid.

3. Indecent Representation Of Women: It has been defined as depiction of a women’s form,

body, or any part in such a manner which has the effect of being Indecent and derogatory
towards women or denigrating them, and is likely to deprave, corrupt or injure the public
morality or order.

4. Label: Means any written, marked, stamped, printed or graphic matter, affixed to or appearing
upon the package.

5. Package: Includes a box, carton, tin or any other container. 

6. Prescribed: Means prescribed by rules made under this act.

Section 3

This section of the act particularly deals with prohibition of advertisement showcasing Indecency
of a woman. It states that no person has a right to publish or intend to publish in future or make
arrangements to take part in the publication or exhibition of any advertisement which may tend to
lower down the reputation and dignity of women in the society or which is indecent according to
the social standards.

Section 4 

This section of the act directly deals with restricting the production, distribution, hiring, selling,
circulation of any books, pamphlets, paper, slide, films, writing, drawing, painting, photograph or
figures which contain material that represent or tend to represent women Indecently or in an
obscene manner. 

However there are certain exceptions to this:

1. This section does not apply to the publication of such items which are approved and justified
for public interest and good. For example, If any such books, drawings or pictures are used for
the purpose of learning such as science, literature or other objects of general concern, it can be
published and distributed.

2. If such publication is kept or used with a bona fide intention for religious purposes, such
publication of books and drawings can not amount to restriction under this section. For
example- Pictures of Shiva’s Linga and Yoni will not amount to Indecent Representation.

3. Any sculptures, paintings, engravings on Ancient monuments which comes within the meaning
of Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act 1958 does not amount to
Indecent Representation.

4. Any temple, or any car which has any publications, drawings, printing and are used for the
conveyance of Idols or kept or used for any religious purposes does not comes under the ambit
of this section

5. Similarly, production of any films in respect of which the provisions of Part II of the
Cinematograph Act, 1952,  have been applied does not amount to Indecent Representation Of
Women.

Section 5 

This section of the act grants the following powers to any Gazetted officer, authorised by the State
Government for an area under his jurisdiction:

1. With any assistance if required, he may enter and search any place at any reasonable time, if he
has the reason to believe that an offence under this act has been committed or is being
committed.

2. Seize any advertisement or any books, pamphlets, papers, slide films, writings, drawings,
paintings and photographs which he believes to be Indecent and contravenes the provisions of
the act.

3. Examine any record, register, document or any other material object found in any place and
seize the same if he has reasons to believe that it may furnish evidence that an offence has been
committed under this act.

However, there are exceptions to this rule that:

1. Any officer can not enter into a private dwelling without a legal warrant.
2. Power of seizure of documents is restricted to only those documents which are depicting
Indecency and that are against the provisions of this act. Therefore only such articles,
documents or advertisements need to be separated from the rest, without affecting the integrity,
utility or saleable value thereof.
3. The provisions of the Code Of Criminal Procedure 1973, shall also be applied to any search or
seizure of documents under this act because Section 94 of this act has laid guidelines or rules
for conducting such seizures and searches with a warrant.

4. Lastly, any officer who seizes anything under this act shall as soon as possible have to inform
the nearest magistrate and take his orders as to the custody thereof.

Section 6 

This section of the act gives various legal penalties or punishments to any person who has
breached the provisions of  section 3 and section 4 shall be punishable as following:

1. On first conviction he shall be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 2 years and with a
fine which may extend to 2000 rupees.
2. On second conviction he shall be imprisoned for a term of not less that 6 months which may
extend to 5 years and also with a fine of not less than 10,000 which may extend to 1 lakh
rupees.

Section 7 

This section of the act deals with any offence which has been committed by a company, stating
that every person who was in charge, at the time when the offence was committed shall be deemed
to be guilty and liable and thus, punished accordingly.

However, there are certain exceptions which are as follows:

1. Any such person liable for punishment proves that the offence was committed without his
knowledge or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the offence from being
committed. 

Under this section if it is proved that an offence which was committed by a company, was
committed with the consent or connivance of any director, secretary, manager or any other officer
of the company. then they shall be published accordingly.

Section 8 

This section of the act states that not taking into consideration anything contained in the Code Of
Criminal Procedure 1973, an offence under this act shall be bailable and cognizable. 

Section 9 

This section of the act justifies the actions or acts of the central government, state government or
any gazetted officer under them which are done in good faith, and exempts them from legal suit,
prosecution and other legal proceedings.

Section 10

This section of the act has granted powers to the central government, by notification in the Official
Gazette to make rules to carry out the provisions of this act. Some of the provisions are as
follows: 

1. The Central Government without any prejudice can make rules in regards to seizure of articles,
documents or advertisement, making a list of the seized documents, articles and from whose
custody such advertisement and articles have been seized.

2. Central government can make rules in other matters as required, or for the ones prescribed in
the above provision.
The process of making Rules

Every rule that the central government has made under this act shall be presented before each
house of the parliament, while it is in session for a period of 30 days, and if both the houses agree
to make such modifications or decline it, such decisions will have effect on the act, however any
such modifications or amendments shall be without any prejudice.

Important Case Laws 

Ajay Goswami V. Union of India

This is a relevant case which drew provisions from the Indian Penal Code, Indecent
Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act etc. to challenge obscene content in newspapers. It
also stated that the Press Council’s power to censure needs to be reviewed.

The petitioner’s grievance was that the freedom of speech and expression enjoyed by the
newspaper industry was not in balance with the protection of children from harmful and disturbing
materials while reading the newspaper which may corrupt their morality.

However the Court dismissed Goswami’s petition for failure “to establish the need and
requirement to curtail the freedom of speech and expression” because the newspaper did not have
any intention of catering to the prurient interest or harming minors also there are certain regulatory
measures in place to ensure that no objectionable material gets published.

In Chandra Raja Kumari Vs Police Commissioner, Hyderabad

In this case, it has been held that the right to life includes right to live with human
dignity or decency and therefore conducting beauty contests is repugnant to dignity
or decency of women and offends Art 21 of the Constitution.

The decision came in light because a the petition opposing the beauty contests of women in
general as they are unconstitutional because they offend Article 51 A (e), Article 21 and Article 14
of the Constitution of India and they are repugnant to international conventions and covenants and
the resolutions of the United Nations and conferences on women.  They are opposed to the
decency, public morality and dignity of women in general and women of Indian society in
particular and repugnant to Indian culture, traditions, and the social values. These contests are
intended to exploit women for commercial purposes and enrich the organizers at the cost of the
indecent representation of women.

Ranjit D. Udeshi vs State Of Maharashtra

Ranjit D. Udeshi was one of the four partners of a firm that owned a book-stall. The partners were
prosecuted under section 292 of the IPC for selling copies of an allegedly obscene book, Lady
Chatterley’s Lover, by DH Lawrence. Udeshi argued that section 292 is violative of the rights to
freedom of speech and expression under article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and that the
book is not obscene if considered as a whole.

The Court examined the text of Lady Chatterley’s Lover and concluded that it was obscene
under the Hicklin test. The appeal against conviction was thus dismissed.

Bare Act

Indecent Representation Of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 Bare Act   (https://theindianlaw.in/wp-

content/uploads/2020/10/IROWP-1986-compressed-1.pdf) Download (https://theindianlaw.in/wp-

content/uploads/2020/10/IROWP-1986-compressed-1.pdf)
 ok.com %2Fth
S H A R E W I T H YO U R F R I E N D S : 2FtheinFtheind
men-pr %29% a+in+1
men-pro f%20W

Leave a Reply

Your comment here...

Name (required) Email (required) Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

POST C O MMENT

© C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 - T H E I N D I A N L AW