Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LITERACY
Volume 22
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN
CHILDREN’S READING
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN
CHILDREN’S READING
Edited by
KEITH TOPPING AND
SHEILA WOLFENDALE
i~ ~~o~!~~n~~~up
LONDON AND NEW YORK
First published in 1985 by Croom Helm
This edition first published in 2018
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa
business
© 1985 Keith Topping and Sheila Wolfendale
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or
reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical,
or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and
explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Publisher’s Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this
reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies
may be apparent.
Disclaimer
The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and
would welcome correspondence from those they have been unable to
trace.
Parental
Involvement
in Children 1s
Reading
qp
CROOM HELM
London & Sydney
Preface
PART I: INTRODUCTION
A. Parent Listening 33
3. An Introduction to Parent Listening Sheila Wolfendale 35
4. Parental Involvement and Reading Attainment:
Implications of Research in Dagenham and Haringey
Jenny Hewison 42
5. Implementation and Take-up of a Project to Involve
Parents in the Teaching of Reading Peter Hannon,
Angela Jackson and Beryl Page 54
6. Encouraging Parents to Listen to their Children Read
Jeremy Swinson 65
7. The Elmwood Project, Somerset David Knapman 75
8. PACT: Development of Home-reading Schemes in the
ILEA Alex Griffiths and Alastair King 82
9. Parental Involvement Programmes and the Literacy
Performance of Children Paul Widlake and Flora
~~~ ~
10. Teachers Working Together: A Workshop Approach
Mary Robertson 99
D. Variations 225
24. An Introduction to Variations Sheila Wolfendale 227
25. The Kings Heath Project Trevor Bryans, Anne Kidd
and Marie Levey 231
26. A Comparative Study of Three Methods of Parental
Involvement in Reading Lorraine Wareing 241
27. An Inner-city Home-reading Project Tessa Cooknell 246
28. 'Have You a Minute?' The Fox Hill Reading Project
Hilda Smith and Margaret Marsh 255
29. Parents as Coaches for Dyslexic and Severely Reading-
Retarded Pupils Colin Tyre and Peter Young 260
30. Teaching Parents to Teach Reading to Teach
Language: a Project with Down's Syndrome Children
and their Parents Sue Buckley 270
Contents
Index 331
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION
1 OVERVIEW OF PARENTAL PARTICIPATION IN
CHILDREN'S EDUCATION
Sheila Wolfendale
Introduction
The story of the American Head Start and Follow-through ventures has
been extensively documented (Lazar, 1979)and summarised (Curtis and
Blatchford, 1981)and the particular relationship between 'disadvantage'
and compensatory education, especially within the British context,
chronicled (Woodhead, 1976;Mortimore and Blackstone, 1982; also see
Chapter 2). This author (Wolfendale, 1983) considers the foundations
for intervening - that is, for making educational provision over and above
or complementary to existing curriculum. Children from allegedly
'depriving' backgrounds have been the recipients of 'compensatory' in-
tervention approaches. These are characterised by: extra input in the way
of resources, including staff, equipment and in-service; special curricula,
language programmes, cognitively oriented approaches; fostering of
home-school-community links.
In recent years, the inherently negative approach of directing
3
4 Parental Participation in Children's F.ducation
intervention mainly to those children who are deemed to be 'at risk', who
apparently need the inoculation of special programmes, has been
transformed. Intervention can be defined as an intentional match between
carefully articulated education and curricular aims and the necessary ob-
jectives towards realisation of these. In recent years this has broadened
to encompass all children. People working in compensatory milieux have
transmitted such knowledge and experience about effective ways of
matching teaching methods, task analyses and learning sequences with
short- and longer-term objectives.
Pedagogic principles of optimising human potential become applicable
then to all children. Broadening the conceptual base of intervention does
not mean reverting to the notion of an undifferentiated curriculum. On
the contrary, the variety of approaches, rooted within a number of dif-
fering theoretical foundations, which are now available means that con-
tent and method can be selectively targeted to meet the learning needs
of all specific children.
A logical extension of this line of argument is that it is not necessary
(and indeed may be invidious) to apply labels to groups of children to
whom we direct a particular approach. It can be seen that some of the
work reported in this book has been with children who traditionally have
been ascribed to categories depending upon the way in which their 'pro-
blems' have been assessed and diagnosed. Accounts are also included
of work that makes no distinction between the special needs of some
children and the learning needs and requirements of all children. Thus,
this formulation of intervention is demonstrated as being robust enough
to be applied to children with transient or enduring special educational
needs in ordinary and special schools, and to children whose learning
in and adjustment to school have never caused concern.
What has also been in recent times amply demonstrated is the fact
that parents are actively interested in their children's development and
educational progress. Even the minority of parents with whom teachers
find contact difficult, tum out to have well-founded reasons for not
responding to schools' overtures. There is, therefore, no philosophical
justification to preclude the potential involvement in children's educa-
tion by parents. There is every justification for taking the view that parents
are entitled to have knowledge of and access to educational decision-
making. To create a structure for the provision and manifestation of these
rights would be one formal way of ensuring support and encouragement
for parents whose enthusiasm and activation are sapped by adverse sup-
port and encouragement for circumstances (Wilson and Herbert, 1978).
The willingness of a significant number of parents to participate in
Parental Participation in Children '.sEducation 5
and learning processes, and urges a match between the respective provi-
sions of the home and of preschool.
A major influence has undoubtedly been the growth of the preschool
playgroups, the majority of which are managed by a parent committee
and run largely by parents. The original impetus in the 1960s was the
insufficiency of nurseries and day-care facilities - as a model of parent
initiation and parent power, the playgroups have been hugely influential.
There are now a number of different sorts of initiative in the preschool
arena which seek to explore a variety of ways in which parents and staff
can work together. A current DHSS-funded project entitled 'Services for
Families with YoungChildren' is based at the National Children's Bureau.
The main aims are:
(i) To explore the extent to which services for families with children
under five are planned, implemented and delivered in partner-
ship with those families for whom they are intended.
(ii) To identify and examine a number of initiatives in which a work-
ing partnership is achieved between parents and workers in the
health, education, social service and voluntary sectors.
(iii) To disseminate information and promote discussion of parent-
professional partnerships.
The area of preschool and early childhood education has been a pace-
setter for educational innovation for many years, and latterly this
honourable tradition is extending to a rapprochement between home, com-
munity and preschool provision. As to whether or not the outcomes from
programmes of parental involvement vindicate the setting up of such pro-
grammes, in terms of measurable gains, there are clearly broader criteria
by which to gauge the success of the ventures. As Smith (1984) makes
clear in her discussion, we cannot and should not regard only 'gains' as
the index; less tangible factors to do with parental confidence-building,
teachers' positive perceptions, the manifest spin-off to children, probable
enhanced competence in managing and teaching children by the adult
care-givers, and so on, are equally important. The reader will see that
in the accounts of parental involvement in reading which follow that the
postulated benefits which underlie the hypothesis in each case are seen
to be wider than 'just' hoped-for gains on test/retest measures of reading
attainment.
and within the community is that of the ecological approach (Hobbs, 1978;
Bronfenbrenner, 1979)and the notion of mapping out the ecosystem for
each child, so that one can see the juxtaposition of that child to his or
her parents (care-givers), siblings, relatives, locality, friends, clubs, even
shops, amenities - and, of course, the school network with relation to
teachers and peers. Such an approach enables us, too, to analyse the
systems of which each child is a part, and use this as a basis for problem-
definition and problem-resolution (Apter, 1982).
The Educational Priority Area projects (Halsey, 1972)explored in prac-
tice the possibilities for making accessible the provisions of educational
institutions (schools, adult education) to parents and other adults in the
wider community, and also of creating opportunities for group support
and 'self-help' groups to be generated and sustained by the local com- ·
munity, adults and children. Much of this work was and remains seminal;
Wolfendale (1983) provides a view of a number of well-known earlier
and current initiatives.
Several programmes have now become fixtures of the local and regional
scene, being funded by the Local Education Authority (LEA) and/or
government, by voluntary organisations, and even by the EEC. Some ex-
amples: the Coventry Community Education Development Centre is LEA-
funded (see Chapter 9 in this book; Widlake and Macleod, 1984) as in
Home-School Link in Milton Keynes and the Liverpool Parent Support
Programme (Davis, 1984). The Newham Parents' Centre receives funds
from the LEA, the EEC and other sources - now that the London
Borough of Newham has initiated a 'Going Community' policy, the links
between the voluntary Newham Parents' Centre and the LEA are
strengthened and the groundwork of the NCP as a ginger group, which
has initiated a number of projects over a period of several years, has borne
fruit (e.g. Crisp et al., 1983). The Southampton-based organisation
SCOPE (Poulton and Poulton, 1979)incorporates parent education groups
and helps prepare children for school. Among other sources, SCOPE
has received grants from a bank.
These and other examples attest to the effectiveness, as judged by the
organisers and participants, of drawing together, within local networks,
the people who most significantly impinge upon and affect the lives and
well-being of children.
International Perspectives
There is an international backcloth to the growing preoccupation with
developing effective home-school partnership. The Americans and
Canadians are well advanced in this whole topic area, conceptually and
practically; books and manuals stream out of publishing houses, full of
guidance, tasks and exercises (for just one example, see Berger, 1983).
In at least one Canadian province, parental involvement is mandatory
by law. North American experience is ahead of ours in some respects,
Parental Participation in Children's Education 9
1985).
The premiss on which this work is based are:
(i) parents and teachers have in common a pedagogic role which in-
corporates a protective, nurturing aspect into the training one;
(ii) parents and teachers share responsibility for maximising the learn-
ing potential of their charges and for creating opportunities for
enjoyable and enhancing experiences;
(iii) parents and teachers have some shared aspirations for children's
progress and successful coping in a variety of life situations.
about the relativities (the 'amount' being done by each adult participant).
Despite the assertion that has just been made, the reality is that there
must remain a demarcation in definition, as well as in practice, between
teachers' responsibilities and the maintenance of professionalism, and
parents' own rightful territory and responsibilities. Thus, the checks and
balances to maintain the status quo are inbuilt. Involvement by parents
can certainly take a variety of forms and in fact can be extensive.
But this author is cautious about the free-and-easy way in which some
writers confuse 'involvement' with 'partnership'. For each term differs
in semantic and in executive senses. There have been recent attempts to
define partnership between parents and professionals in education and
other child-focused services (Mittler and McConachie, 1983). This author
has written elsewhere (Wolfendale, 1983) about partnership concepts and
has enumerated a list of 'partner' characteristics, which include:
References
Bullock, Lord A. (Chairman) (1975), A Language for Life, report of the Committee of In-
quiry, HMSO, London
Cameron, R.J. (ed.) (1982), Working Together: Portage in the UK, NFER-Nelson, Windsor
Carr, J. (1980), Helping 'lbur Handicapped Child, Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex
COPE (undated), School-Home-Community Relations, Committee on Primary Education
Court, D. (Chairman) (1976), Fit for the Future, report of the Committee on Child Health
Services, vol. 1, HMSO, London
Craft, M., Raynor, J. and Cohen, L. (eds) (1980), Linking Home and School, 3rd edn,
Harper and Row, London
Crisp, A., Cockburn, P., Eversley, J. and Phillips, R. (1983), Books, Schools and an Ur-
ban Committee, Newham Parents Centre, 747 Barking Road, London, El3
Cunningham, C. and Sloper, P. (1984), 'The Relationship between Maternal Ratings of First
Word Vocabulary and Reynell Language Series', British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 54, 160-7
Curtis, A. and Blatchford, C. (1981), Meeting the Needs of Socially Handicapped Children,
NFER-Nelson, Windsor
Cyster, R., Clift, PS. and Battle, S. (1979), Parental Involvement in Primary Schools, NFER,
Windsor
Daly, B., Addington, J., Kerfoot, S. and Sigston, A. (eds) (1985), Portage: The Impor-
tance of Parents, NFER-Nelson, Windsor
Davie, C., Hutt, SJ., Vincent, C. and Mason, M. (1984), The Young Child at Home, NFER-
Nelson, Windsor
Davis, J. (1984), Evaluation Reports, Liverpool Parent Support Progmmme, School of Educa-
tion, Liverpool University
Day, C. (1984), External Consultancy: Supporting School-based Curriculum Development,
School of Education, Nottingham University
Dessent, T. (ed.) (1984), What ls Important about Portage?, NFER-Nelson, Windsor
Halsey, A.H. (ed.) (1972), Educational Priority: EPA Problems and Policies, vol. I, HMSO,
London
Hargreaves Report (1984), Improving London Schools, Inner London Education Authority
Harris, S. (1983), Families cifthe Developmentally Disabled: A Guide to Behaviouml In-
tervention, Pergamon, Oxford
Hills, R. (1984), Parental Participation in the Education of 'lbung Children, project reports,
Centre for Educational Research and Development, Lancaster University
HMI Survey (1978), Primary Education in England: A Survey, HMSO, London
Hobbs, N. (1978), 'Families, Schools and Communities: An Ecosystem for Children',
Teachers' College Record, vol. 79, no. 4, May
Institute for Responsive Education, 605 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, Mass. 02215, Davies,
D. (ed.), Schools where Parents Make a Difference
-- Clasby, M., Community Perspectives on the Role of the School in the Community,
IRE Report no. 3
-- Collins, C., Noles, 0. and Cross, M. (1982), The Home-School Collllection, Selected
Partnership Progmmme in Large Cities
Lazar, I. (ed.) (1979), Lasting Effects after the School, US Printing Office, Washington
Macbeth, A. (1984), The Child Between, HMSO, London
Mittler, P. and McConachie, H. (eds) (1983), Parents, Professionals and Mentally
Handicapped People, Croom Helm, London
Mortimore, J. and Blackstone, T. (1982), Disadvantage and Education, Heinemann, London
Newsom, E. and Hipgrave, T. (1982), Getting Through to Your Handicapped Child, Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge
Pizzo, P. (1983), Parent to Parent, Beacon Press, Boston, Mass.
Plowden, B. (chairman) (1967), Children and their Primary Schools, HMSO, London
Poulton, L. and Poulton, G. (1979), 'Neighbourhood Support for Young Families', Early
Child Development and Care, vol. 6, nos I and 2
16 Parental Participation in Children's Education
An Introduction to Variations
Ayres, J. (1984), Parental Involvement with Remedial Reading, unpublished MSc
dissertation, Institute of Education, University of London
Coulson, N. and Howells, R. (1975), Parental Involvement in Childrens Reading,
Reading (United Kingdom Reading Association), vol. 9, no. 3, 913
English, A. (1983), A Study to Measure Attitude Change Following a Parental
Involvement with Reading Scheme, unpublished MSc dissertation, North East
London Polytechnic
Greening, M. and Spenceley, J. (1984), Paired Reading Made Easy, Cleveland
County Psychological Services
Irving, A. (1980), Promoting Voluntary Reading for Children and Young People,
UNESCO, Paris
Obrist, C. (1978), How to Run Family Reading Groups, Occasional Publication,
United Kingdom Reading Association
Thorpe, D. (1982), Family Reading Groups: The Beginnings of a Community
Experience in West Hertfordshire, Reading (United Kingdom Reading Association),
vol. 16, no. 3, 143152
Waites, T. and Swindon, M. (1981), Family Reading Group, Reading (United
Kingdom Reading Association), vol. 15, 4147
A Comparative Study of Three Methods of Parental
Involvement in Reading
Ashton, C. and Jackson, J (1982), Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics, Journal of the
Association of Educational Psychologists, vol. 5, no. 10, 4348
Bushell, R. , Miller, A. and Robson, D. (1982), Parents as Remedial Teachers,
Journal of the Association of Educational Psychologists, vol. 5, no. 9, 813
Dyson, J. and Swinson, J. (1982), Involving Parents in the Teaching of Reading,
Journal of the Association of Educational Psychologists, vol. 5, no. 9, 1822
Friend, P. (1981), Backing up the Parents, Times Educational Supplement, 30
October
Jackson, A. and Hannon, P. (1981), The Belfield Reading Project, Belfield
Community Council, Rochdale
Morgan, R. and Lyon, E. (1979), Paired Reading: A Preliminary Report on a
Technique for Parental Tuition of Reading-retarded Children, Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 20, no. 2, 151160
Tizard, J. , Schofield, W.N. and Hewison, J. (1982), Collaboration between
Teachers and Parents in Assisting Childrens Reading, British Journal of
Educational Psychology, vol. 52, 115