Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUBJECT TEACHER:
MRS YASMEEN TABASSUM
(VICE PRINCIPAL)
UNIT I
Muslim law as personal law Personal law is that branch of civil law which
regulates the personal matters of the individual e.g. Marriage, divorce,
guardianship, inheritance etc they are all called personal matters of individuals,
as they relate to the affairs of an individual & is affected by the family in which
the individual is born. Personal law is also called family law.
Prophet Mohammed (PBUH)
Birth – 571 AD at Mecca
Father – Abdullah
Mother-Amina
Grandfather – Abdul Mutalib
Uncle – Abu Talib
From childhood prophet was serious child, & began to think about what he saw
around him .At the age of 13 he joined his uncle at his business. Being a keen
observer he noticed many customs & practices in Arab society. At 25 yrs he got
married to Kathija for looking after the business, prophet lived with her till she
died from her he had two sons & four daughters. But only his fourth daughter
Fatima survived him. From other wives he had no children. After her death
prophet married another women Ayesha, a daughter of his friend & his disciple
Abu Baker. Prophet began to think seriously about the evils in the society &
became anxious to find a remedy for removing them; he often visited alone a
cave in mountain (Hira) where he thought the concept of God, religion& the
reforms in the society. It was believed in the holy month of Ramadan in
609A.D, when prophet was meditating in the cave, the voice from the angle
(Gabriel)sent to him by God(Allah) whispered in his ears, “Read in the name of
Allah, the creator of all things, who made man from the clot of blood. Read for
thy Lord is most generous, he who teaches the use pen , teaches man what he
does not know.”This was the first message to Prophet, followed by a series of
divine communication or messages of god were revealed to him on different
occasions till his death. Quran is the collection of such divine messages
revealed to prophet (PBUH) from time to time.
Through his preaching Prophet laid down new principles of life & abolished the
existing evil customs in the society. First to believe was his wife Kathija later
the rest of the people. But majority of the people opposed his preaching's &
made things difficult for him, he left Mecca & went to Medina in 622A.D, this
journey is considered as ‘holy mission’ (Hejarat), at Medina he was welcomed
with open hands by the people & majority of them became his followers.
Prophet not only united the people through his new faith but also organized
them as a strong political group to face strong opposition, many wars were
fought & the personality of Prophet Mohammed dominated the minds of Arabs
to such an extent that within a very short period he succeeded in spreading the
new religion(Islam) among majority of the people. At the time of his death in
632A.D Prophet was the religious, social & administrative head of a big Islamic
commonwealth.
1. First period(622-632AD)
2. Second period(632-661AD)
3. Third period(661-900AD)
4. Fourth period(900-1924)
5. Fifth period(1924AD to present)
Third Period (661-900A.D): The fourth & the rightly guided caliphs had two
sons. After Ali death his first son (Hasan) was made the caliph. As he being a
saint did not want to involve in administration, he resigned from the post in
favour of Muavia of Ummaiyad family, & from him began the Ummaiyad
dynasty.
Two notable events of this period, the seat of caliphate were shifted from
Medina to Damascus. The elective office for caliphate was made hereditary.
Muavias son ‘Yezid’ became the next head of Muslim empire. Hasan was
poisoned mean while, his brother who opposed & revolted against Yezid, but he
too was killed mercilessly at Karbala .Caliphate became a regular kinship. In
750A.D the Umayad dynasty was captured by the Abbasids who were decedents
of Prophets Uncle Abbas. They made they capital at Baghdad & proclaimed
religious or spiritual headship of Muslim empire. In absence of states lawful
authorities the scholars began expound the laws themselves, & began to claim
his interpretation of law to be correct. The academic differences among the
scholars lead to the formation of different schools of Sunni sect.
DRAWBACKS
Some of the traditions have a doubtful origin and some are even contradictory
to each other. There are no uniform or certain rules on certain issues. Mixture of
law and religious or moral principles makes the extraction of the actual law a
rather tedious task. Traditions derive authority from the writers, with the death
of successors and others; this means could no longer be practised. In addition,
the Shias followed only those traditions that came from the Prophet’s family.
The importance and role of traditions is immense but another source of law was
needed to deal with the expanding Islamic Society.
3) IJMA: UNANIMOUS DECISIONS OF THE JURISTS
Ijma means the opinion of the learned. When persons knowledgeable in law
would agree upon a point, such consensual opinion was referred to as Ijma.
Thus, Ijma is the unanimous decision of jurists for a particular question with
reference to that age or communal legislation. It is through the tradition of the
Prophet that Ijma derives its validity and authority as a source of law. The
Prophet is believed to have said that, ‘God will not allow his people to agree on
an error’. The Hanafi doctrine of law changing along with times found support
in the Maliki view that new facts require new decisions.
FORMATION OF IJMA
Whenever law needed a new principle, the jurists used to give a consensual
opinion so as to enable a solution. To be a jurist or Mujtahid, it was essential
that a person was a Muslim with adequate knowledge of law and was competent
to form logical deducements. Ijtihad refers to the process of creating law
through consensus on the basis of ‘exercise of one’s reasoning so as to create a
new rule of law’. The Ijma had to be justified with references to the principles
given in the Quran or the tradition as well as public policy, interest of the
community and equity. The Mujtahtids are the recognised interpreters of law.
KINDS OF IJMA
i) Ijma of the Companions: the consensual opinion of the Companions is
believed to be most authoritative and accurate. It cannot be overruled or
modified by subsequent Ijmas.
ii) Ijma of the Jurists: the opinion of learned scholars was believed to be the
next best Ijma after the Ijma of the Companions.
iii) Ijma of the People: At times, the mass acceptance of a principle as law was
also accepted. Nevertheless, it is of little consequence with respect to core
issues and principles of the Islam.
As can be seen, the authority of Ijma depends upon the capabilities of the
people participating in its formation.
IMPORTANCE
A major concept of the fiqh or actual Muslim law came through Ijma. It
explained the Quran and traditions in terms of actual applicability as well as laid
down new principles of law so as to help the society to cope up with growth and
progress. It was through Ijma that the real opportunities for interpretation of the
hereto rigid Quran and Traditions came up. It is even referred to as the ‘living
tradition’ at times.
DEFECTS
The Ijma lead to various reading and versions or interpretation of the Quran,
Sunna, custom etc. As a result, different sub-sects were formed. The choice of
unanimous opinion or majority opinion is another bone of contention. The Ijma
of the jurists and the people could be overruled at any time; thus, they were not
able to contribute substantially to certainty in law. With the spread of Islam and
lack of a well- established communication network, obtaining consensus of all
the jurists was a major problem. Again the stock of learned and accepted
scholars ran short of the requirement and by 10th century, the Ijma had to be
abandoned.
PRESENT POSITION
The Shariat act, 1937 has abolished most of the customs. Section 2 lists ten
matters including inheritance, marriage, divorce, wakf and, maintenance
wherein customs and usages cannot be applied anymore. Customs are still
applicable to Muslims with regard to agricultural lands, charities and religious
endowments. Even in matters of wills, adoption
and legacies, the customary law will apply unless a Muslim expressly states that
the Shariat should regulate them.
Additionally, the Shariat Act is not applicable to the state of Jammu and
Kashmir. Thus, the rules of Muslim law there are subjected to customs and
usages.
2) JUDICIAL DECISIONS
The Privy Council decided many a case related to Muslim law. These cases
continue to have a binding force on all the High courts and the lower courts of
India and a persuasive value in the Supreme Court of India. This box of
precedents will lose its binding force only if the Supreme Court overrules a
particular decision. Elsewhere, an opinion seems to be forming that judges are
now making the law the way the early Muslim jurists did.
Judgments of a superior Court are an authority for the lower courts. Plus the
judgments of the higher court become the law of the land and thus are binding
on all the lower courts. This is called the principle of Precedents. Law of pre-
emption, validity of gifts to minor wife, additional grounds of dissolution of
marriage and even interest on unpaid dower are few of the fields where courts
have stepped in with new interpretations or discretion on the basis of justice,
equity and good conscience to develop the law further.
Many a times, legislations have overruled or negated the rules; they are still a
source of law.
3) LEGISLATIONS
God is the Supreme legislator as per Islam. Thus, sometimes, legislative
modifications are also treated as encroachment. Still, there are a few acts that
modify or lay down principles of Muslim law and serve as a source of law for
the courts with respect to the content covered by them.
a) The Mussalman Waqf Validating Act, 1913 – It merely re-established the
validity of family-wakfs.
b) The Child Marriage Restraint Act- It makes the marriage of a boy under 21
years of age and a girl under 18 years a ‘child marriage’ and punishable without
affecting the validity of it.
c) The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 – It reiterated the
Muslim Stand that custom couldn’t be an independent source of Muslim law all
the time
d) Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 – It provided rights to judicial
divorce under the grounds mentioned in it to women who traditionally had no
independent right to seek divorce.
e) Muslim Women (protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 – The issues of
maintenance after divorce, maintenance during idddat are dealt with
comprehensively.
f) Punjab and Haryana’s Muslim in Muslim Shrine’s Act, 1942.
There are other Acts too which deal with Muslim personal Law. Some lay down
the procedure rather than altering substantive rules of Muslim personal Law.
Acts like the following replaced or restricted the application of those personal
law principles with reference to the Act’s objectives and aims:
a) The Caste Disabilities Removal Act, 1850 changed the laws of the pre-
existing rights of converts;
b) The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 changes the traditional outlook on legitimacy
via Section 112;
c) The Indian Majority Act, 1875 differed on its definition of majority; and
d) The Dowries Prohibition Act, 1961
Similarly, alternate legislation available to all religions have made its impact
felt on the Muslim personal law. For example, a couple that marries under the
Special Marriage Act, 1954 will be regulated by, the inheritance and intestate
succession of the spouse or heirs will also be governed under the Indian
Succession Act, 1925. It does not matter whether the persons getting married
under this law are from the same religion or sect or not.
MARRIAGE
DEFINATION OF MARRIAGE:
Muslim marriages are termed as contract, because the elements constituted are
similar to contract. Contractual in nature on the basis of the following facts,
Like contract, parties to the contract must be competent. Marriage is not
complete without offer, acceptance, & consideration.
Social aspects:
Religious aspect:
I. Capacity to marry:
Every Muslim of sound mind, who has attained puberty, may enter into a
contract of marriage. Puberty means the age at which a person comes to a
marriageable age. A person is presumed to have attained the age of puberty on
the completion of 15 years. So the boy and girl who has attained puberty can
validly contract a marriage .A marriage under Muslim law is perfectly valid if
the parties have attained puberty and satisfied all other conditions specified by
the law.
Thus if two Muslims marry before attaining the age prescribed under the child
marriage restraint Act they are liable to be punished. However the marriage
between two Muslims who have attained puberty is valid though they have
violated the provisions of Child Marriage Restraint Act.
2. Free consent:
Free consent of the parties is absolutely necessary for a valid marriage.
If there is no free consent a Muslim marriage is void. Under the Muslim Law, a
marriage of a Mohammedan who is of sound mind and has attained puberty is
void; if it is brought about without his consent. The marriage of a girl who has
attained puberty and is of sound mind would be void if her consent is not
obtained.
When the consent to the marriage has been obtained by force or fraud, the
marriage will be invalid, unless it is ratified. When a marriage was
consummated against the will of the women, the marriage is void. The person
who has been defrauded can repudiate the marriage. Lunatics and minors who
have not attained puberty may be validly contracted by their respective
guardians.
When the consent to the marriage has been obtained by force or fraud, the
marriage will be invalid, unless it is ratified. When a marriage was
consummated against the will of the women, the marriage is void. The person
who has been defrauded can repudiate the marriage. Lunatics and minors who
has not attained puberty may be validly contracted by their respective guardians.
A minor is incompetent to give valid consent. The right to contract a minor in
marriage belongs to the following persons:
i)Father
ii)Paternal Grand Father (How high so ever)
iii)Brother and other male relations on the fathers side
iv)Mother
v) The maternal uncle or aunt and other maternal relations.
Under the Shia law only the father and the paternal grandfather are recognized
as guardian for contracting marriage of a minor.
If a minor, whether male or female, be contracted in marriage by a remoter
guardian, while a nearer guardian is present and available and such nearer
guardian does not give consent to the marriage, the marriage is void.
But if the parties ratify it after attaining puberty, it will be valid. However if the
nearer guardian is absent at such a distance relative can also give consent on
behalf .The marriage contracted by the remoter is also lawful.
THE CHILD MARRIAGE RESTRAINT ACT 1929
This act is applicable to every person including Muslims. Sec 2 of this Act
provides for Minimum age for marriage i.e. 18yrs & 21yrs for girl & boy.
Marriage conducted below the prescribed age by the guardians is deemed to be
a penal offence. The amendment of 1978 includes provision for strict
implementation of the act. According to Sec 7, it is a cognizable offence & the
police can investigate it in the same manner as it does for offences under CrPC .
No arrest can be done without the order of the Magistrate. U/sec 12, a child
marriage may be prevented by means of an injunction from the court before
such marriage takes place. Violation of such an injunction is also punishable.
In regards to this the Sunnie law & the Shia law are different.
Sunnie law: under this school the Boy is entitled to marry a Muslim girl of any
sect & also is entitled to marry any Kitabia girl. A girl is kitabia if she belongs
to community the origin of which is believed from the heavenly revealed kitab.
Under this schools law the Christians & the Jews are regarded as Kitabia
community people. Hence the sunnie male is entitled to marry these
communities (kitabia) of girls & the marriage is regarded to be as perfectly
valid.
If a Sunnie male marries a female who is neither a Muslim nor a kitabia, the
marriage is not void but it is merely irregular. Marriage with a fire worshipper
(Parsi) or a Hindu girl becomes valid only when the irregularity is removed i.e.
when the girl converts to Islam or katibia. Hence it can be said that sunnie male
marriage with a non Muslim & non kitabia is not void but is just irregular.
Shia Law: A Shia male has no right to contract marriage with a non-Muslim &
a katibia girl. The marriage of a Shia man with a Hindu, Jew. Christian or a
Parsi girl is void.
But a Shia male is entitled to enter into a Muta marriage with a kitabia or a Parsi
female it is considered as valid.
Oral or written: the acceptance may be either oral or in writing ie to say the
offer or the acceptance may be through words of mouth or may be reduced to
writing. When it is put down in writing it is called as Kabinnamha which acts as
an important document of marriage.
In the valid marriage the offer & acceptance should be in one sitting. It means
the proposal for the marriage & its subsequent acceptance are at one palce of
meeting.
2. Presence of witness.
Witnesses are essential, a male who has attained the age of majority can be a
witness.
Two male witnesses or one male & two adult female witnesses are essential to a
Muslim marriage are essential. According to Sunni law
According to shia law the presence of witnesses is not essential.
-Conditional of contingent (promise to marry in future)
Registration of Muslim marriage;
Registration of Muslim marriages is not necessary. But in some places of India
like Assam, Bengal, Bihar,Orrissa,Punjab registration of marriages as well as
divorce is essential.
In certain places in India it is a customary practice & law to register the
marriage.
In Jainoon V/S Amanullah Khan(AIR 2000, Mad 381)
Madras HC stated that though under the Muslim law registration of marriage is
not compulsory it cannot also be said that it is prohibited.
Hence Suit filed for recovery of violation of customary right & causing mental
agony would be maintainable.
Court held that secretary of jamath (congregation of people for non political
purpose) & ordered him to pay Rs 5000 to compensate the plaintiff.
1. Absolute
a. Consanguinity
b. Absolute
c. Affinity
Fosterage
2. Relative prohibitation
Unlawful conjunction
Marriage with 5th wife
marriage with non-Muslim.
Marriage without witness.
Marriage during Iddat.
ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION
RELATIVE PROHIBITION
1.Unlawful conjunction : A Muslim is prohibited from having two wives at a
time who are related to each other (consanguinity, fosterage, affinity). Muslim
cannot marry his aunts (phuphu or Khala) or niece of his wife. He can marry his
wifes sister after his wifes death or divorce. This is Sunni law. According to the
shia law, marriage with the aunt is not unlawful conjunction. But cannot marry
his wifes niece without the consent of his wife.
2. Marriage with the fifth wife:
Polygamy limited for four wives. Marriage with fifth wife is irregular, after the
death or divorce of any of the four wives this irregularity is removed & the
marriage is regular.
3. Marriage with non-Muslim: Sunni male cal lawfully contract marriage with
the Kitabia women.
Marriage with a non Katabia is irregular & not void.
Shia, Marriage with non-Muslim is void.
4.Marriage without witnesses: Sunni law prohibits a marriage without witnesses
or with incompetent witnesses, is irregular.
Shia : under shia law, the presence of witness is not necessary . A marriage
contract without witness is held valid .
5. Marriage during Iddat: Iddat is one which the married women has to undergo
after divorce or death of the husband.
Marriage with a women undergoing Iddat is merely irregular, but according to
Shia law the marriage is void.
DIFFERENT KINDS OF MARRIAGE
Different kinds of marriage according to Sunnis & shia school
Sunni;
Valid(sahih)
Void(Batil)
Irregular(Fasid)
Shia ;
valid(sahih)
2. Void(Batil)
3. Temporary(Muta)
Kinds of Sunni marriages,
Valid marriages: Under all schools of Muslim law a valid marriage is that
which has been constituted with the essential conditions prescribed under the
law. Marriage is valid only if it is constituted according to prescribed essential
conditions.
Competency of parties.
Consent of the parties or guardians is free.
Offer & acceptance has been made by the parties is free.
There is no prohibition for marriage b/w the parties.
Void Marriage: such marriages are no marriage at all. They exist neither in fact
nor in law.
Following are void marriages.
Marriage in violation of absolute prohibition.
Marriage with a lawful married women.
Shia law: under shia law following marriages are deemed to be void.
Marriages against the prohibition of unlawful conjunction.
Marriage with fifth wife.
Marriage during pilgrimage.
Marriage with any non-Muslim
Marriage with a women undergoing Iddat.
Irregular marriage: These are recognized only under Sunni law. They are
incompetent marriage if the irregularity is removed it is termed to be regular &
valid. Marriage contracted in violation of any of the relative prohibition is
considered as irregular marriage. As they could be removed afterwards as they
are temporary in nature.
Following marriages are termed to be as irregular.
1. Marriages against the rule of unlawful conjunction.
2.Marriage with the fifth wife.
3. Marriage without two competent witnesses.
4. Marriage with a non-Muslim &
5. Marriage with a women undergoing Iddat.
Cohabitation is lawful.
Children are legitimate.
Husband & wife no rights or inheritance to property.
Wife not entitled to dower.
5. Where consummation takes place wife entitled to specific or proper dower
which ever is less.
6. If the marriage is not consummated the wife is not entitled to Iddat.
7. On consummation the wife is to observe the period of Iddat only for 3 months
on divorce or death of the husband.
8. Unionism is not perfect but unholy .
9. Dissolution of marriage takes place through Kazi,court or by parties
themselves.
Shia law; Irregular marriages are not recognized.
Temporary Marriages (Muta);
This is only recognized by the Itna Ashara sub sect.
Muta, means ‘enjoyment’ in Arabic . Literally muta means marriage for
pleasure.
Explanation of Section 2:
Section 2 of the Shariat Act provides that in a case where both the parties are
Muslims the rule for decision shall be Muslim Law, if the case involves any of
the following matters:
(1)Intestate succession (i.e. inheritance),
(2)Special property of the females,
(3)Marriage (including all incidents of marriage),
(4)Dissolution of marriage (including all kinds of divorce),
(5)Maintenance,
(6)Dower,
(7)Guardianship,
(8)Gift,
(9) Trust and trust properties, and
(10)Wakf.
b. In the cases involving adoption, wills and legacies, the courts have no
authority to apply Muslim law under Section 2 of the Act, because these
subjects are not included in the said section. But Section 3 of the Shariat Act
provides that courts may apply the rules of Muslim law in cases of adoption,
will and legacies provided a Muslim expressly declares that he wants to be
governed by Muslim law also in respect of these matters in addition to the
aforesaid ten matters. On this point the relevant provisions of
Explanation of Section 3:
(1)Any person who satisfies the prescribed authority:
(a)That he is a Muslim, and
(b) That he is competent to contract within the meaning of Section 11 of the
Indian Contract Act, 1872, and;
(c) That he is a resident of a territory to which this Act extends.
may by declaration in the prescribed form and filed before the prescribed
authority declare that he desires to obtain the benefit of the provisions of this
section, and thereafter the provisions of Section 2 shall apply to the declarant
and all his minor children and their descendants as if in addition to the matters
enumerated therein, adoption, wills and legacies were also specified.”
It is, therefore, clear that since adoption wills and legacies are not mentioned in
Section 2, the courts will not apply Muslim law to all the Muslims in these three
matters unless they desire to be governed by Muslim law also in these matters.
This desire must be expressed through a declaration to that effect. Procedure for
such a declaration has been laid down in Section 3(2) and Section 4 of this Act.
It may be noted that the effect of such a declaration is that not only the declarant
but also his children and all the descendants shall be governed by Muslim law in
these three additional subjects.
On the other hand, if there is no such declaration by a Muslim, the courts are not
bound to apply Muslim personal law on these matters and they may freely apply
customs and usages or the local enactments, if any.
(c) The Shariat Act, 1937, was enacted by the Central Legislature and it was
beyond its legislative competence to make laws for provincial (State) subjects.
Agricultural lands, charities and charitable endowments, being provincial
(State) subjects, had to be expressly excluded from Section 2 of the Act.
The result is that the courts cannot apply Muslim law on these questions under
the authority of the Shariat Act. But State legislatures are competent to enact
laws on these subjects. In most of the States of India, therefore, succession to
agricultural lands is regulated by local tenancy laws and not according to the
Muslim law of inheritance.
However, in the States of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, in the matters of
agricultural lands, charities and charitable institutions, Muslims are governed by
Muslim personal law.
The reason is that in these States an amendment in Section 2 of the Shariat Act
has been made under which these matters have not been exempted from the
application of Muslim personal law.
(d) Section 6 of the Shariat Act repeals certain provisions of those earlier
enactments which gave authority to the courts to apply Muslim law before the
commencement of the Shariat Act. For example, Section 26 of Bombay
Regulation Act, 1827, Section 16 of the Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873, Section
3 of Oudh Law Act, 1876, Section 5 of Punjab Laws Act, 1872 and the Central
Provinces Laws Act, 1875, have been repealed and are now not in force.
But two points must be noted regarding the repeal of these provisions:
(1) The whole of the above mentioned Acts have not been repealed by Section 6
of the Shariat Act. Therefore, except the repealed sections, other provisions of
these Acts are still enforceable within their own limitations.
(2) The provisions which have been repealed were such provisions which
authorised the courts to apply customs or usages to the Muslims. At present,
therefore, all customs and usages, contrary to Muslim personal law, have been
abolished and cannot be applied on matters enumerated in the Shariat Act.
SEC 4 RULE MAKING POWER
(1) The State Government may make rules to carry into effect the purposes of
this Act.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing powers,
such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—
(a) for prescribing the authority before whom and the form in which
declarations under this Act shall be made;
(b) for prescribing the fees to be paid for the filing of declarations and for the
attendance at private residences of any person in the discharge of his duties
under this Act; and for prescribing the times at which such fees shall be payable
and the manner in which they shall be levied.
(3) Rules made under the provisions of this section shall be published, in the
Official Gazette and shall thereupon have effect as if enacted in this Act.
6 (4) Every rule made by the State Government under this Act shall be laid, as
soon as it is made, before the State Legislature.
5. Dissolution of marriage by Court in certain circumstances.
DOWER
FIXATION OF DOWER
KINDS OF DOWER,
PROMPT DOWER
It is a kind of specified dower. Dower which the wife can demand any time
during her marriage is called prompt dower. As soon as prompt dower is
demanded by the wife, it is the duty of the husband to pay it immediately. Wife
may refuse consummation of marriage, until the dower demanded by her is paid
by the husband.
DEFERED DOWER
UNSPECIFIED DOWER
Unspecified during marriage.
Proper amount of dower is fixed by the court in case if the parties have not
specified it negligently or intentionally.
In Hamida Bibi V/S Zubaida Bibi(1916, 43, IA 294) ,
Mahr is essential & Integral part of the marriage.What is unspecified at the time
of marriage, the law declares that it must be adjudged on definite principles.
In Marina Jatoi V/S Nuruddin jatoi (1967, SC PLD 580)
Marriage b/w a Muslim & Christian wife in Pakistan, through reg marriage.SC
of Pakistan held that, though it is valid marriage & competent Talaq. Wife is
enatitled to get proper dower if it was not specified at the time of marriage.
Obligation of the husband to pay dower No proper amount which may be
regarded as proper dower, it could vary.
REMISSION OF DOWER
Right to dower is the personal right of a wife.wife has a liberty to claim or not
claim her dower from her husband.Wife also has a right to relinquish or remit
her right to dower in favour of her husband. Remittance can be for full amount
or for a part of the amount.
Right to dower is an inherent right of the wife. She can enforce this right
through various means like;
Refusal of conjugal rights (no consummation and dower is prompt)
Claim it as debt (consummation)
Widow’s right of retention (when husband dies without paying dower).
Marriage subsists – claim could be made within 3 years from the date on which
dower was demanded.
Marriage dissolves on divorce or on death of the husband – claim could be
made within 3 years from the date of death or dissolution.
If wife dies before claiming dower – claim can be filed by her legal heirs as per
limitation Act, 1963.
Therefore, dower is a personal right, exclusive right and inherent right of every
Muslim wife. And it is the fundamental of every Muslim marriage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------