Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THERMASPEC
MICROWAVE THERMOTHERAPY (TUMT)
TREATMENT FOR BPH AND CPPS
2
Contents
• About Medispec
• The Thermaspec
• Thermaspec Applications
• CPPS
• BPH
• Thermaspec Advantages
• Marketing
• Summary
• Appendix
• Operations
• Clinical data
• Current Technology in the Market
3
About Medispec
• Founded in 1992
Our Vision:
To improve quality of people’s lives everywhere, through meaningful
profitable innovations
Our Mission:
To continuously explore new medical
applications where Shockwave Therapy
can be used to heal and better people’s
lives, wherever it's needed
5
Products Line
The Thermaspec
Main Unit
Applicator
8
CE Approved
9
The Mechanism
Thermaspec Highlights
• Ideal for:
• Sexually active men
• When anesthesia or an invasive procedure are not advisable
• For moderate BPH patients who do not wish to undergo an invasive procedure
• Extremely safe system and treatment – low energy and
temperatures using thermocouples
• The only non-surgical proven specific medical treatment alternative
as well as safe and efficient treatment to BPH
• Can be used in addition to TURP
• No need of rectal probe
• Outpatient solution
13
Advantages
* Controlled heating by the software – 2 thermocouples with 2 heating points – if one is not
functioning properly the systems shuts down automatically
14
Thermaspec Applications
• Prostatitis
• Chronic prostatitis/Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS),
• Bacterial Prostatitis
CP/CPPS*
CP/CPPS Manifestations
Severe impact
• History of Recurrent UTI on quality of life
• Pain and burning sensation during urination
• Decreased Urinary Stream
• Urinary Hesitancy
• Frequent Urination
• Incontinence
CP/CPPS Prevalence
Saw palmetto
Anti-Inflammatory
Medications Muscle Relaxants Drinking Extra
Fluids
* According to Dr. Leroy Nyberg, Jr., director of Urology Programs, US National Institutes of Health,
January 2008
BPH
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
21
BPH
BPH Prevalence
• Elderly Patients
Treatment Protocol
Insertion of catheter
(containing the Applicator)
Potential Users
• Hospitals
• Private clinics
• Mobile service
28
• System cost
• Applicator – 30 patients
• System cost
• Personnel cost
• Payment per visit pre and post treatment, follow up visit - out of
pocket money? Reimbursed?
30
• Applicator – 30 patients
• Technician fee
• Physician fee
31
Summary
• Ideal for sexually active & high risk, as well as no-option patients
Summary- Continuation
Catheter
Applicator Assembly
Balloon Balloon
inflation port
Maximal heating point marker Maximal heating point- Urine bag Thermocouple
mirrored marker port connector
40
Applicator Placement
Heating Point
Balloon
Heating
point center
42
Heat Distribution
60
Heating point center
cm
Statistics
Clinical Data
50
Treatment Methods
• Comparison
• TURP
• TUNA
• RF
• Laser
• TUMT (Thermaspec) technology
58
TUMT TURP
Laser TUNA RF
(Thermaspec) (gold standard)
Minimal Minimal Minimal Minimal
Treatment invasive
invasive invasive invasive invasive
Topical
Anesthesia No need yes yes n/a
anesthesia
Hospitalization No need yes yes n/a n/a
Minor – see Yes – see Minor –
Side Effects Yes – see list Yes – see list
table list see table
Requires Additional
possible Less cases n/a n/a n/a
Treatment
Only beginning Throughout
Supervision During Throughout
and end of treatment n/a n/a
Treatment treatment time
treatment time
59
TURP Summary
Advantages Disadvantages/Complications
• The most spread modality of BPH’s • Requires anesthesia
treatment • Requires hospitalization
• The “Gold Standard” • Potential complications:
• Transfusion rate (7.1%)
• Clot retention (5%)
• Urinary tract infection (8.2%)
• Urinary retention (9%)
• Bleeding (2%)
• Incontinence (30-40%)
• ED (30%)
• Bladder neck contracture (9.2%)
• Urethral strictures (9.8%)
• Infection (4%)
• TURP syndrome (1.1%)
61
Laser
Laser Summary
Advantages Complications
• Minimal invasive therapy • Retrograde ejaculation and in rare instances,
• Fewer side effects than TURP erectile dysfunction (impotence, about 1%)
• Quicker recovery • Intraoperative bleeding (1.4%)
• Shorter hospital stays • Postoperative clinically non-significant
• Short treatment time hematuria (78.5%)
• Hematuria requiring clot evacuation (1.4%)
• Urinary retention requiring recatheterization
(2.8%)
• Urinary tract infection (4.3%)
• Prostatitis (1.4%)
• No need of anesthesia
• Less complications rate
• Treatment is more tolerable by the patient
• Less catheterization time post treatment
• Thermaspec treatment can be done under physician supervision
only in the beginning and end of each treatment session
66
TUNA*
TUNA Summary
Advantages Complications
• Minimal invasive treatment • Post-operative urinary retention (13-41%)
• Treatment can be performed under topical • Irritative voiding symptoms (40%)
anesthesia • Bleeding (32%)
• Urinary tract infection (8%)
• Urethral stricture (1.5%)
• Re-operation rate within 2 years (14%)
68
RF*
RF
Advantages Complications
• Generate in-depth precise tissue necrosis • Acute urinary retention (5.71%)
using an external applicator, with no effect • Urinary infection (5.71%)
on the surrounding structures • Rest of complication similar to other non-
• Ideal for Prostate Cancer treatments invasive treatments
• Not advisable for patients with pacemaker