Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN COCAINE DEPENDENCE:
NEW APPROACHES
Teobaldo Llosa, M.D,, PhD (*)
Luis M Llosa, M.D.
IRP/NIDA, June 18, 2012, Baltimore , MD
(*) COCA MÉDICA, LIMA
Biological treatments tested for cocaine
dependence in the last 100 years
• SUBSTANCES: After 100 years of use and test many pharmacological
treatments, from Veronal (1903), Scopolamine, Bromocriptine,
d-Amphetamine, Carbamazepine, to cocaine Vaccines, Topiramate,
etc., studies have Identified mainly the substances that are not
effective, and very few substances that are partially effective
(statistically significant). To date, the FDA nor neither any
international organization not approved treatment to control the
addiction to cocaine dependence.
1. Bumke O (1917) Über psychische Erkrankungen (On mental illness), Breslau, Germany
2. Gorelick DA (2009) Pharmacologic interventions for cocaine, methamphetamine, and other
stimulant addiction. in Ries RK,Fiellin DA, Miller SC, & Saitz R (Eds) Principles of
Addiction Medicine, 4th edition, (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins),
2009, chapter 51, pp. 707-721.
Seminar Objective
|
SUBSTITUTION TYPE II (Agonist): uses a different substance (mainly synthetic) than
the addictive substance but it is similar in its chemistry to the original substance, it is
equivalent but with less pharmacological, psychological and behavioral negative
effects (methadone, buprenorphine, methylphenidate, amphetamine).
SUBSTITUTION TYPE III (non specific substances): uses different substances to the
above to control or attenuate the physiological and behavioral effects of the original
addictive substance. This may include a variety of agonist and antagonist substances,
antipsychotics, lithium, disulfiram, antidepressants, anti-parkinsonians, prophylactic
antibody or vaccines, topiramate, tiagabine, ibogaine, vigabatrin, or naltrexone.
Note: Substitute I and II must meet the criteria of an agonist substance in all cases.
At this time no non-pharmacological treatment fits the criteria for substitution
therapy.
ORAL COCAINE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE
(Cocalization Schedule)
• Cocalization is the use of natural cocaine (alkaloid), which can be
extracted by chewing coca leaves, drinking coca infusions (teas) or
ingesting food products containing coca flour, as a substitution
therapy.
• Under this schedule, the patient needs to take a large amount of coca
leaves (as tea or flour) to obtain the necessary dose of oral cocaine.
ORAL COCAINE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE TREATMENT
(Cocainization schedule)
• Cocainization schedule is the treatment of patients with
pure cocaine alkaloid or cocaine hydrochloride taken in
capsules.
REF: Llosa T, Chang-Fung E (2007) Efficient Absorption of oral cocaine contained in coca powder: a new form of use oral
cocaine in Andean regions, NIDA/CPDD 69 th meeting, Quebec City, Canada, June 16-21
TREATMENT SCHEDULE: Cocalization
Llosa T, Llosa LM (2005) Oral Cocaine as Agonist Therapy in Cocaine Dependence, CPDD 67 th meeting, June
• Negative toxicological BE urine test during treatment indicates that the patient is not
following the treatment correctly. Crack and coca paste addicts must be forbidden to
smoke tobacco. Cotinine urine test must show negative results.
MONITORING AND CONTROL: New Approaches
No.Sub sex drug trial oral coc dose vehicle time r-avg(E) r-avg(e) year Pub.
• (*) During 20 years we have more patients in cocalization schedule, but not all under control studies.
• CCP: coca paste CCPC: coca paste cigarettes HCC: hydrochloride cocaine CCT: coca tea CF: coca flour
CT: coca tablets r-avg (E): relapse at entry (per week/ month) r-avg (e): relapse at end (per
week/month) mo: month wk: week d:day m: men f: female , Pub: published Pre: presented in
meeting n/p non published nor presented in meeting
Coca Paste (CCP) dependence: oral cocaine
treatment schedules
• Coca Paste is a smokable double addiction: cocaine plus nicotine (or THC)
• It has been shown that when coca paste addicts relapse, first they relapse in smoking tobacco.
• It has been shown that many patients stop coca paste smoking, but continue smoking tobacco.
• Therefore Coca Paste must be treated as a double addiction, that is, for cocaine and nicotine simultaneously.
• Coca paste use should not be considered primarily as an addiction to cocaine but as an addiction to both
substances, so it is valid qualify them as addiction to cocaine plus nicotine or nicotine plus cocaine smoked.
Our schedules
• oral cocaine + nicotine transdermal/oral nicotine (double agonist therapy)
• oral cocaine + bupropion + nicotine (mixed double agonist therapy)
• other substitute therapy (topiramate, disulfiran, antidepressants, etc) + nicotine (mixed
simple agonist therapy).
• in all cases must be accompanied by counseling
Comments:
• When crack appeared in the USA, researchers decreased their interest in studying coca paste.
REF: 1- Llosa T, Henningfield JE, Analysis of coca paste cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 2:333, 1993
2- Llosa T, Crack and Coca Paste must be Treat as Double Dependence, Substance Abuse, 30:81, 2009, AMERSA
Provisional Results of 20 Coca Paste-addicted Patients Under
Simple, Double or Mixed Schedule Treatment with Oral Cocaine
with or without Anti-Nicotine Treatment
Aim: study of variation of number of CCP cigarettes (CCPC) smoked under oral cocaine
treatment.
20 Coca Paste addicted-patients (CCPA) male, average 14 (range 8-22) CCPC a day during the
last month, non tobacco cigarette smokers, avg 32 y.o. (16-38), urban citizens, volunteers,
entered an 8-week open/control study with oral cocaine treatment, with or without anti-
nicotine treatment between 2009 and 2012, in a private organization (Coca Médica), Lima, Perú.
Group A- 10 CCPA : 100 mg oral cocaine daily (coca tea) + transdermal nicotine (8 week
schedule), plus counseling
Group B- 10 CCPA control group: 100 mg oral cocaine daily (coca tea) + clonazepan (2-4 mg)
daily, plus counseling
Provisional results:
Group A: avg CCPC 4 (0-8) daily at end of 8 weeks . All subjects completed the study.
Group B: avg CCPC 7 (0-16) daily at end of 8 weeks. All subjects completed the study.
In 1999, Rush CR Baker R, Wright K, concluded that oral cocaine could be safely administered
under controlled laboratory and clinical conditions. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 55: 1-12
In 2000, Walsh SL, Haberny KA, Bigelow GE, published the results of the effects of the
modulation of intravenous cocaine by chronic oral cocaine in humans. Psychopharmacology
150: 361-373
In 2002, Filmore MT, Rush CR, Hays L study the Acute effects of oral cocaine on inhibitory
control of behavior in humans. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 67: 157-167
In 2009, Walsh SL, Stoops WW, Moody DE, Lin S.N, Bigelow GE, indicate that exposure to
controlled high doses of cocaine hydrochloride (875 mg(day) produces modest symptoms
consistent with cocaine withdrawal within hours of cessation of dosing but provide no
evidence of symptoms persisting beyond 24 hours. Exp Clin Psychopharmacology, August,
17(4): 205-216