Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quasi-experimental Studies
1
Objective
2
Continuum of Research
Descriptive Exploratory Experimental
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Describe Find
Cause and Effect
Populations Relationships
True experimental /
randomized controlled
trial (RCT)
Single-subject design
Quasi-experimental design
Major characteristics:
OR/AND
2. No control/comparison group
4
Quasi-experimental Design
1. One group pretest-posttest design
4. Historical controls
Study sample
Treatment Group
M1 (pre-test)
Treatment Period
M2 (post-test)
6
1. One Group Pretest-Posttest Design
Disadvantages:
Lack of control group
History effect
Maturation effect
Testing/Practice effect
7
2. Interrupted Time-Series Design
8
2. Interrupted Time-Series Design
10
2. Interrupted Time-Series Design
Disadvantages:
More time consuming.
12
3. Patient as Own Control
Study sample
Measurement
Control Period
Measurement
Treatment 1
Measurement
13
3. Patient as Own Control
Study sample
Measurement
Control period
Measurement
New treatment 1
Measurement
New treatment 2
Measurement
14
3. Patient as Own Control
Advantage:
Have some control over maturation/practice.
Disadvantages:
A period of no treatment or delayed treatment
(ethics?)
Carry-over effect possible.
No control over history.
15
4. Historical Controls
Use of a control group who received a
different intervention during an earlier time
period.
16
4. Historical Controls: Example
Objective: To compare the effects of robotic therapy and
conventional training on gait velocity in patients with
incomplete SCI.
months.
Advantages:
Having a comparison group.
Alternative when ethical concerns may
preclude a true control group.
18
4. Historical Controls
Disadvantages:
Different subject characteristics of the
treatment and historical control groups (no
randomization, subjects from the past).
Concerns with how the data were collected
from historical controls (measurement
error/bias).
19
4. Historical Controls
Disadvantages: (Cont’d)
Exposure to different factors for the two
groups
Different study environment.
Different time of the year.
20
5. Non-equivalent Pretest- Posttest
Control Group Design
But
21
5. Non-equivalent Pretest-Posttest
Control Group Design
Sample
Non-
Random
assignment
Treatment Group Control Group
M1 (pre-test) M1 (pre-test)
M2 (post-test) M2 (post-test) 22
5. Non-equivalent Pretest-Posttest
Control Group Design
Advantages:
Strongest quasi-experimental design.
Some control over history, maturation,
testing/practice, and instrumentation effects.
An alternative to RCT.
Disadvantages:
Comparison groups may not be equivalent
(What are the consequences?).
23
Summary: Quasi-experimental Design
Advantages:
Practical.
Do not have to deny treatment to one group.
More generalizable to clinical setting.
A reasonable alternative when use of
randomization and control groups are not
feasible.
Disadvantages:
Less control over factors that influence internal
validity.
24
Test Yourself #1
An occupational therapist wanted to determine whether the
OT training is effective in improving UE function for people
with brain injury.
A. History
B. Maturation
C. Recall bias
D. Placebo
E. Rater/tester bias
26
References
27
Test Yourself #1 (Answer)
An occupational therapist wanted to determine whether the
OT training is effective in improving UE function for people
with brain injury.
A. History
B. Maturation
C. Recall bias
D. Placebo
E. Rater/tester bias
29