You are on page 1of 3

PE R S PE C T IV E Confronting Health Worker Burnout and Well-Being

ers to step up and do their part. sionals, more robust public health the status quo. Health workers
The government can ensure con- infrastructure, and well-being edu- throughout the country have told
tinued focus and accountability cation programs for health work- me they are reaching their break-
by supporting a National Health ers. President Biden has called ing point — that “something has
Care Workforce Commission to for billions of dollars in addition- to change.” They are right. May
drive coordinated federal action al funding to sustain these in- our country never forget our mor-
and by collaborating vestments. al obligation to care for those
An audio interview
with Dr. Murthy is with state and local Outside government, the Na- who have sacrificed so greatly to
available at NEJM.org governments and the tional Academy of Medicine Action care for us.
private sector on a Collaborative on Clinician Well- Disclosure forms provided by the author
are available at NEJM.org.
national agenda for health worker Being and Resilience has boosted
well-being. The Joint Commis- stakeholder engagement and com- From the Office of the Surgeon General,
Washington, DC.
sion can add worker well-being mitment with its National Plan
measures to institutional accredi- for Health Workforce Well-Being. This article was published on July 13, 2022,
at NEJM.org.
tation standards. And health sys- Various health systems are estab-
tem leaders must make worker lishing executive-level positions 1. Prasad K, McLoughlin C, Stillman M, et
al. Prevalence and correlates of stress and
well-being a measurable priority, with the charge, resources, and burnout among U.S. healthcare workers dur-
with accountability at the highest authority to institutionalize com- ing the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-
level of the organization, and in- prehensive agendas for health sectional survey study. EClinicalMedicine
2021;​35:​100879.
clude health workers in designing worker well-being. Finally, a rising 2. Bryant-Genevier J, Rao CY, Lopes-Cardo-
and implementing a comprehen- generation of health workers are zo B, et al. Symptoms of depression, anxiety,
sive well-being strategy. using their voices at work and in post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicidal
ideation among state, tribal, local, and ter-
Despite years of inaction, there educational institutions, profes- ritorial public health workers during the
are hopeful signs that this time sional associations, and the pub- COVID-19 pandemic — United States,
can be different. At the federal lic square to advocate for organi- March–April 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2021;​70:​1680-5.
level, the Dr. Lorna Breen Health zational and policy changes that 3. Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, et al. Alloca-
Care Provider Protection Act of address burnout. They under- tion of physician time in ambulatory prac-
2022 and billions of dollars in stand that when their well-being tice: a time and motion study in 4 special-
ties. Ann Intern Med 2016;​165:​753-60.
funding from the 2021 American and the health security of their 4. Columbia University Department of Bio-
Rescue Plan will provide new in- communities are at stake, silence medical Informatics. Report from the 25 by
frastructure and resources to is not an option. 5: symposium series to reduce documenta-
tion burden on U.S. clinicians by 75% by
strengthen programs affecting As a nation, we cannot allow 2025. 2021 (https://www​.­dbmi​.­columbia​.­edu/​
health worker well-being. These ourselves to fail health workers ­wp​-­content/​­uploads/​­2021/​­08/​­25x5_Executive_
resources are supporting increased and the communities they serve. Summary_V2​.­pdf).
5. Ashton M. Getting rid of stupid stuff.
mental health services, health We must build on these steps, N Engl J Med 2018;​379:​1789-91.
workforce expansion, loan-forgive- boldly taking on entrenched in- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2207252
ness programs for health profes- terests, bureaucratic inertia, and Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Confronting Health Worker Burnout and Well-Being

Tecovirimat and the Treatment of Monkeypox

Tecovirimat and the Treatment of Monkeypox — Past, Present,


and Future Considerations
Adam Sherwat, M.D., John T. Brooks, M.D., Debra Birnkrant, M.D., and Peter Kim, M.D.​​

I n 1988, the human immuno-


deficiency virus (HIV) was rap-
idly spreading worldwide and dis-
sex with men. Even after promis-
ing new pharmacologic therapies
were finally developed, the exist-
tion to Unleash Power (ACT UP)
and other advocacy groups, fed-
eral scientists and policymakers
proportionately devastating certain ing processes for approving their worked with affected persons to
communities, most notably gay, use in humans were painfully find a way forward that balanced
bisexual, and other men who have slow. Spurred by the AIDS Coali- two ethical imperatives: honoring

n engl j med 387;7  nejm.org  August 18, 2022 579


The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on December 13, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PERS PE C T IV E Tecovirimat and the Treatment of Monkeypox

the right of people with serious Tecovirimat is an antiviral drug fected with rabbitpox virus. In
illness to access potentially ben- that was approved for the treat- these studies, survival rates were
eficial treatment and upholding ment of smallpox disease under markedly higher among animals
the responsibility of the health a regulation known as the “Ani- that received tecovirimat than
care and public health communi- mal Rule.”2 This pathway allows among those that received pla-
ties to ensure that those treat- for approval of drugs for serious cebo. Safety in humans was eval-
ments were safe and effective. or life-threatening conditions uated by assessing adverse reac-
The result was improvements to when it is not ethical to conduct tions in healthy volunteers who
the regulatory process designed to efficacy studies in humans and received tecovirimat. The recom-
accelerate access to and expedite not feasible to conduct field trials mended dose of tecovirimat for
approvals for drugs that treat a se- to study the effectiveness of a drug the treatment of smallpox in hu-
rious disease. or biologic product. Under the An- mans was established by com-
Now, 34 years later, we are imal Rule, efficacy is established paring plasma concentrations of
faced with an uncannily similar on the basis of adequate and well- the drug in healthy volunteers with
situation. An unprecedented out- controlled studies in animal mod- those in animal models at doses
break of monkeypox has emerged, els of the human disease or con- that had been shown to have full
which at present is dispropor- dition of interest; safety must be effectiveness against monkeypox
tionately affecting men who have adequately evaluated in people. and rabbitpox. The recommend-
sex with men in numerous coun- Since smallpox is an eradicated ed duration of therapy in hu-
tries where the disease is not en- disease and conducting efficacy mans was also based on findings
demic, including the United States. studies in humans would be nei- from studies in animals and in
Although not as life-threatening ther ethical nor feasible, the Ani- healthy people.
as HIV, monkeypox can cause se- mal Rule was the only regulatory In contrast to smallpox, mon-
rious illness, including ocular in- pathway for approving a product keypox disease remains endemic
volvement, soft-tissue superinfec- for the treatment of smallpox. in some parts of the world (pri-
tions, and excruciating anogenital Smallpox is a severe and highly marily West and Central Africa),
lesions.1 In the current situation, lethal human illness caused by and researchers can design clinical
there is a drug — tecovirimat, variola virus, a member of the trials that would be both ethical
available for clinical use under orthopoxvirus genus of viruses. and feasible. Although there are
an expanded-access protocol Animal studies using variola vi- case reports of using tecovirimat
(https://www​.­cdc​.­gov/​­poxvirus/​ rus, including nonhuman primate to treat patients with monkeypox
­monkeypox/​­clinicians/​­obtaining​ models, are not consistently repro- and other non-variola orthopox-
-­tecovirimat​.­html) — that might ducible and require unnaturally virus infections, these data are in-
conceivably speed resolution of high viral challenge doses; more- sufficient to demonstrate efficacy.
monkeypox illness and improve over, variola virus infection in Animal studies may be compel-
outcomes yet poses the same co- animals does not mimic human ling,3 but efficacy observed in ani-
nundrum: how to manage com- smallpox disease. In addition, mals does not always translate
passionate access to a drug whose studies of variola virus present directly into efficacy observed in
safety and efficacy in humans have substantial feasibility challenges humans in subsequent clinical tri-
not been established. Since small- because research involving the vi- als.4 Safety data for tecovirimat
pox and monkeypox are caused rus is restricted to two maximum- could be obtained from persons
by the same genus of viruses, to containment laboratories located with monkeypox illness rather
better understand the role that in the United States and Russia. than just healthy volunteers. Thus,
tecovirimat might play in our re- Therefore, tecovirimat’s effica- studies in humans with monkey-
sponse to the monkeypox out- cy for the treatment of smallpox pox are both needed and possible.
break, it is important to under- was established, and the drug ap- To that end, and before the
stand the basis for its approval proved, on the basis of studies onset of the current outbreak,
by the U.S. Food and Drug Ad- in animal models using related the National Institutes of Health
ministration (FDA) for the treat- orthopoxviruses — specifically, (NIH) had initiated planning for
ment of smallpox and the knowl- nonhuman primates infected with a randomized, controlled trial
edge gaps that remain. monkeypox virus and rabbits in- (RCT) in the Democratic Republic

580 n engl j med 387;7  nejm.org  August 18, 2022

The New England Journal of Medicine


Downloaded from nejm.org on December 13, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PE R S PE C T IV E Tecovirimat and the Treatment of Monkeypox

of Congo (DRC) to evaluate the have efficacy in animal models ily represent those of the FDA, the CDC, or
the NIH.
safety and efficacy of tecovirimat of monkeypox and an acceptable Disclosure forms provided by the authors
in treating monkeypox. However, safety profile in healthy people. are available at NEJM.org.
the current worldwide outbreak Therefore, while RCTs are under
involves a different clade of mon- development, the Centers for Dis- From the Office of Infectious Diseases,
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
keypox virus than that which ease Control and Prevention (CDC) Food and Drug Administration, Silver
generally causes monkeypox in- and the FDA have worked together Spring (A.S., D.B.), and the National Insti‑
fection in the DRC, and some of to streamline the expanded-access tute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
Bethesda (P.K.) — both in Maryland; and
the clinical manifestations of the process by reducing paperwork the Multinational Monkeypox Outbreak Re‑
current outbreak (substantial ano- and data collection,5 and we will sponse, Centers for Disease Control and
genital and oral mucosal involve- continue to fine-tune these mech- Prevention, Atlanta (J.T.B.).
ment with resultant severe pain) anisms with input from health
This article was published on August 3,
and affected populations at this care providers using this process. 2022, at NEJM.org.
time (men who have sex with men) In parallel, we believe that it re-
differ from those in countries mains critical to conduct RCTs in 1. Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S, et al.
where monkeypox is endemic.1 the United States to determine Monkeypox virus infection in humans across
16 countries — April–June 2022. N Engl J
Therefore, the NIH is now also whether tecovirimat is a safe and Med. DOI:​10.1056/NEJMoa2207323.
developing a U.S.-based RCT to effective treatment for monkeypox 2. Chan-Tack KM, Harrington PR, Choi
assess the safety and efficacy of disease, especially given the dis- S-Y, et al. Assessing a drug for an eradicated
human disease: US Food and Drug Adminis-
tecovirimat for the treatment of ease’s clinical presentation in the tration review of tecovirimat for the treat-
monkeypox disease. This trial will current outbreak. As was the case ment of smallpox. Lancet Infect Dis 2019;​
be conducted by the AIDS Clini- with antiretrovirals for HIV in the 19(6):​e221-e224.
3. Qiu X, Wong G, Audet J, et al. Reversion
cal Trials Group, the research 1980s, without data from RCTs, of advanced Ebola virus disease in nonhu-
network that was established in we will not know whether tecoviri- man primates with ZMapp. Nature 2014;​
the late 1980s to rapidly assess mat would benefit, harm, or have 514:​47-53.
4. Mulangu S, Dodd LE, Davey RT Jr, et al.
the safety and efficacy of antiret- no effect on people with monkey- A randomized, controlled trial of Ebola vi-
roviral drugs for HIV infection. pox disease. The CDC, the FDA, rus disease therapeutics. N Engl J Med 2019;​
We anticipate that these trials and the NIH will continue to work 381:​2293-303.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Preven-
will provide data needed for clin- together to provide access to tion. New streamlined process to provide
ical and regulatory decision mak- tecovirimat for compassionate use tecovirimat (TPOXX) for treatment of mon-
ing in the United States. while appropriately evaluating its keypox. July 22, 2022 (https://emergency​.­cdc​
.­gov/​­newsletters/​­coca/​­072222​.­htm).
We recognize that monkeypox safety and efficacy in RCTs.
can cause severe disease and that The views expressed in this article are DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2210125
tecovirimat has been shown to those of the authors and do not necessar- Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Tecovirimat and the Treatment of Monkeypox

Framing Traumatic Injury as a Chronic Condition

From Survival to Survivorship — Framing Traumatic Injury


as a Chronic Condition
Juan P. Herrera‑Escobar, M.D., M.P.H., and Jeffrey C. Schneider, M.D.​​

O n April 15, 2013, Mr. B. re-


ceived a traumatic injury af-
ter two bombs detonated near the
‘healed’ satisfactorily from the ini-
tial injuries and surgery, but my
life since the bombings has been
athon bombing are rare, but
traumatic injuries are not. Such
injuries — including those caused
finish line of the Boston Mara- changed. I constantly face physi- by motor vehicle crashes, falls, and
thon. Nearly a decade later, this cal, mental, and related emotion- firearms — are responsible for
event seems like ancient history al challenges. It’s hard to think more than 3.5 million U.S. hospi-
to most Americans, but not to that this is my new normal.” Ca- tal admissions per year. They are
Mr. B., who told one of us, “I lamities like the 2013 Boston Mar- the leading cause of death among

n engl j med 387;7  nejm.org  August 18, 2022 581


The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on December 13, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

You might also like