The Strategy of International Business Learning Objectives
LO 13-1 Explain the three basic decisions that firms
contemplating foreign expansion must make: which markets to enter, when to enter those markets, and on what scale. LO 13-2 Compare and contrast the different modes that firms use to enter foreign markets.
LO 13-3 Identify the factors that influence a firm’s choice of entry mode. LO 13-4 Recognize the pros and cons of acquisitions versus greenfield ventures as an entry strategy. Chapter 13: Entering Foreign Markets
A firm expanding internationally must decide Did you know • Which markets to enter increasingly more • When to enter them companies are born • Scale of entry global?
Handout 6-1 Basic Entry Decisions 2 of 7 Basic Entry Decisions 3 of 7 Which Foreign Markets? Timing of Entry Firms need to assess the long run profit potential of each After a firm identifies which market to enter, it must market determine the timing of entry The most favorable markets are politically stable developed and Entry is early when a firm enters a foreign market before other developing nations with free market systems, low inflation, and foreign firms low private sector debt Entry is late when a firm enters after other firms have already The less desirable markets are politically unstable developing established themselves in the market nations with mixed or command economies, or developing nations where speculative financial bubbles have led to excess borrowing The value an international business can create in a foreign market depends on the suitability of its product offering to that market and the nature of indigenous competition
Basic Entry Decisions 4 of 7 Is First-Mover Advantage Always a Good Thing?
Timing of Entry continued Timing of entry into a foreign market is one of the most critical aspects of going international. Popularized by Marvin Lieberman and David Montgomery Firms entering a market early can gain first mover in 1988, first-mover advantage was an idea that resonated with every advantages company. But, 10 years later, in 1998, Lieberman and Montgomery actually backed off their own idea that taking advantage of being the first mover was The ability to pre-empt rivals and capture demand by establishing always a good strategy. At this time, it was too late: Venture capitalists, a strong brand name companies, people, and many scholars had already latched on to the positive The ability to build up sales volume in that country and ride down things about being first in a new foreign market and stressed this approach the experience curve ahead of rivals and gain a cost advantage over any other timing of entry. Now we are some 15 years into the twenty- over later entrants first century, and the realization is that first-mover advantages also come with The ability to create switching costs that tie customers into their pioneering costs. If you had a choice of being the first-mover into a new products or services making it difficult for later entrants to win emerging foreign market (e.g., Turkey) and being the fifth company entering business that market with your product, what would you choose and why? Sources: M. B. Lieberman and D. B. Montgomery, “First-Mover Advantages,” Strategic Management Journal, 9 (1988), pp. 41–58; M. B. Lieberman and D. B. Montgomery, “First-Mover (Dis)Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View,” Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1998), pp. 1111–25.
Basic Entry Decisions 5 of 7 Basic Entry Decisions 6 of 7
Timing of Entry continued Scale of Entry and Strategic Commitments First mover disadvantages: the disadvantages associated Firms that enter foreign markets on a significant scale with entering a foreign market before other international make a major strategic commitment that changes the businesses competitive playing field These may result in pioneering costs (costs that an early Involves decisions that have a long-term impact and are difficult to entrant has to bear that a later entrant can avoid) such as: reverse The costs of business failure if the firm, due to its ignorance of the foreign environment, makes some major mistakes Small-scale entry can be attractive because it allows the The costs of promoting and establishing a product offering, firm to learn about a foreign market, but at the same time including the cost of educating the customers it limits the firm’s exposure to that market
Handout 6-2 Basic Entry Decisions 7 of 7 Entry Modes 1 of 11 Market Entry Summary Modes to enter foreign markets There are no “right” decisions with foreign market entry, 1. Exporting just decisions that are associated with different levels of 2. Turnkey projects risk and reward 3. Licensing Firms in developing countries can learn from the 4. Franchising experiences of firms in developed countries 5. Joint ventures 6. Wholly owned subsidiaries
Exporting Turnkey projects Often the first method firms use to enter foreign market • Involve a contractor that agrees to handle every detail of Advantages the project for a foreign client, including the training of It is relatively low cost operating personnel Firms may achieve experience curve economies • At completion of the contract, the foreign client is Disadvantages handed the "key" to a plant that is ready for full Lower-cost manufacturing locations exist operation Transport costs can be high Tariff barriers can make it uneconomical Foreign agents fail to act in the exporter’s best interest
Turnkey Projects continued Licensing Advantages An arrangement whereby a licensor grants the rights to Allow firms to earn great economic returns from the know-how intangible property to another entity for a specified time required to assemble and run a technologically complex process period, and in return, receives a royalty fee Less risky in countries where the political and economic environment is such that a longer-term investment might expose Intellectual property includes patents, inventions, the firm to unacceptable political and/or economic risk formulas, processes, designs, copyrights, and trademarks Disadvantages Advantages The firm has no long-term interest in the country The firm does not have to bear the development costs and risks The firm can create a competitor associated with opening a foreign market The firm's process technology is a source of competitive advantage The firm avoids barriers to investment It allows a firm with intangible property that might have business applications, but which doesn’t want to develop those applications itself, to capitalize on market opportunities
Handout 6-3 Entry Modes 6 of 11 Exporting or Licensing? In Chapter 13, we discuss as series of advantages and disadvantages of Licensing continued exporting and licensing (as well as turnkey projects, franchising, joint Disadvantages ventures, and wholly owned subsidiaries as other entry mode choices). The firm doesn’t have the tight control over manufacturing, Exporting refers to the sale of products produced in one country to residents marketing, and strategy necessary to realize experience curve and of another country. Licensing refers to an arrangement in which a licensor grants the rights to intangible property to the licensee for a specified period location economies and receives a royalty fee in return. Both of these modes of entry into a The firm’s ability to coordinate strategic moves across countries by foreign market have unique advantages and disadvantages. Oftentimes, using profits earned in one country to support competitive attacks selecting exporting or licensing depends on myriad factors—one being the in another is compromised global mindset of the business owner. Assume you have a choice to enter three emerging markets—Bolivia, Chile, and Peru, neighboring countries in There is the potential for loss of proprietary (or intangible) South America. You have a great product, with lots of technological technology or property innovation and a lightweight packaging. Would you opt for exporting or To reduce this risk, firms can use cross-licensing agreements or link licensing, and why? the agreement with the decision to form a joint venture
Entry Modes 7 of 11 So, You Think You Want to Own a Franchise?
Franchising Franchising is a specialized form of licensing in which the franchiser not only sells intangible property to the franchisee but also insists that the franchisee A form of licensing in which the franchisor sells intangible agree to abide by strict rules as to how it does business. Some of the property and requires the franchisee agree to abide by advantages of franchising include branding, advertising, reputation, and strict rules as to how it does business headquarters/ company support for development of the infrastructure needed to operate the franchise business. Some of the disadvantages of Advantages franchising include restrictions on territory and pricing, not being completely It can avoid costs and risks of opening up a foreign market independent, franchise fee and ongoing royalty payments, and dependence Disadvantages on other franchise owners for nurturing the brand. Well-known worldwide It may inhibit the firm's ability to take profits out of one country to franchise systems include Subway, 7-Eleven, Pizza Hut, and McDonald’s. support competitive attacks in another Assume you are interested in being an international entrepreneur. Would franchising be your choice of starting a business? The geographic distance of the firm from its foreign franchisees Source: T. Hult, D. Closs, and D. Frayer, Global Supply Chain Management: Leveraging Processes, Measurements, and Tools for can make poor quality difficult for the franchisor to detect Strategic Corporate Advantage (New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2014).
Joint ventures Joint Ventures continued The establishment of a firm that is jointly owned by two or Disadvantages more otherwise independent firms The firm risks giving control of its technology to its partner Advantages The firm may not have the tight control over subsidiaries that it A firm can benefit from a local partner's knowledge of the host might need to realize experience curve or location economies country's competitive conditions, culture, language, political Shared ownership can lead to conflicts and battles for control if systems, and business systems goals and objectives differ or change over time The costs and risks of opening a foreign market are shared with the partner They can help firms avoid the risk of nationalization or other adverse government interference
Handout 6-4 Entry Modes 10 of 11 Entry Modes 11 of 11 Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Wholly Owned Subsidiaries continued 100% ownership of the subsidiary Advantages Set up a new operation in that country They reduce the risk of losing control over core competencies Acquire an established firm They allow for the tight control over operations in different countries that is necessary for engaging in global strategic coordination They may be required if a firm is trying to realize location and experience curve economies Disadvantages Firms bear the full costs and risks of setting up overseas operations
Selecting an Entry Mode 1 of 3 Selecting an Entry Mode 2 of 3
Core Competencies and Entry Mode Core Competencies and Entry Mode continued Management Know-How Technological Know-How The competitive advantage of many service firms is based upon When competitive advantage is based on proprietary technological management know-how know-how, firms should avoid licensing and joint venture International trademark laws are generally effective for arrangements in order to minimize the risk of losing control over protecting trademarks the technology Since the risk of losing control over management skills to franchisees or joint venture partners is not high, the benefits If a technological advantage is only transitory, or the firm can from getting greater use of brand names is significant establish its technology as the dominant design in the industry, then licensing may be attractive
Selecting an Entry Mode 3 of 3 Greenfield or Acquisition? 1 of 5
Pressures for Cost Reductions and Entry Mode Pros and Cons of Acquisitions Firms facing strong pressures for cost reductions are likely Are quick to execute to pursue some combination of exporting and wholly Enable firms to preempt their competitors owned subsidiaries Can be less risky than greenfield ventures Allows the firm to achieve location and scale economies as well as retain some degree of control over worldwide product However, many acquisitions are not successful manufacturing and distribution Firms pursuing global standardization or transnational strategies tend to prefer establishing wholly owned subsidiaries
Handout 6-5 Greenfield or Acquisition? 2 of 5 Greenfield or Acquisition? 3 of 5 Pros and Cons of Acquisitions continued Pros and Cons of Acquisitions continued Why Do Acquisitions Fail? • Reducing the Risks of Failure • The firm overpays for the assets of the acquired firm • Through careful screening of the firm to be acquired • There is a clash between the cultures of the acquiring and • By moving rapidly once the firm is acquired to implement an acquired firm integration plan • Attempts to realize synergies by integrating the operations of the acquired and acquiring entities run into roadblocks and take much longer than forecast • There is inadequate pre-acquisition screening
Greenfield or Acquisition? 4 of 5 Greenfield or Acquisition? 5 of 5
Pros and Cons of Greenfield Ventures Which Choice? Greenfield ventures are attractive because they allow the Dependent on circumstances confronting the firm firm to build the kind of subsidiary company that it wants Well-established incumbents might be best for an Are slower to establish acquisition as greenfield too slow Are risky because they have no proven track record Can be problematic if a competitor enters via acquisition and If no incumbents, then greenfield might be best quickly builds market share
How Risky Would Indonesia Be for a New Greenfield Investment? Summary
Business is all about risk, the right risks. Choosing which risks to accept and which to avoid is at the heart of international business. These risks increase In this chapter we have and become more interesting with entry into foreign markets. David Conklin discusses the idea of managing risk through planned uncertainty. By “planned Explained the three basic decisions that firms uncertainty,” he means an awareness of contingencies, with possible what-if contemplating foreign expansion must make: which scenarios developed in advance. The key idea here is that through an ongoing markets to enter, when to enter those markets, and on monitoring of the various risk areas, decision makers can have much of the what scale. data they may need to address a number of possible outcomes. Of course, we have to know what uncertainty to plan for, and we don’t know what we don’t Compared and contrasted the different modes that firms know. Planning for everything is impossible, but what Conklin suggests is that use to enter foreign markets. planned uncertainty is a way of thinking. Given that we don’t know the future, this way of thinking may be helpful in career development and other Identified the factors that influence a firm’s choice of entry parts of our lives. Who ever said business wasn’t like surfing? So, as just one mode. country example, how big do you think the risk is by entering Indonesia with a new greenfield investment? Recognized the pros and cons of acquisitions versus Sources: D. Conklin, “Analyzing and Managing Country Risks,” Ivey Business Journal: Improving the Practice of Management, greenfield ventures as an entry strategy. January/February 1992. Also, see “Indices” for countries on globalEDGE.msu.edu.