Professional Documents
Culture Documents
code: PRE03273
• For a heterogeneous reservoir, the inflow performance might differ from one well
to another.
• This plot is defined as inflow performance relationship (IPR) curve and is very
useful in estimating well capacity, designing tubing string, and scheduling an
artificial lift method.
Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) – Types 7
Calculate:
1. Productivity index (J)?
2. AOF (absolute open flow)?
3. Qo at Pwf= 600 psi?
4. Pwf at Qo=250 STB/day?
Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR)- Single phase
flow (Liquid)-Under saturated reservoir – Example (1) 15
solution:
Given: 3. Qo at Pwf= 600 psi
Qo= 110 stb/day Qo at pwf (600)= J(pr-pwf)
Pwf= 900 psi Qo= (0.275)(1300-600) = 192.5 Stb/DAY
Pr= 1300 psi
4. Pwf at Qo=250 STB/day
Solution: Qo= J(Pr-Pwf) →
𝑄𝑜
= 𝑝𝑟 − 𝑝𝑤𝑓
𝑸𝒐 𝐽
1. Productivity index =(J) 𝑱 = 𝑄𝑜
110
(𝒑𝒓−𝒑𝒘𝒇) Pwf= pr-
𝐽
J= = 0.275 Stb/day/psi 250
1300−900 Pwf= 1300 -
0.275
Pwf= 390.9 psi
2. AOF (absolute open flow) when pwf=0.
𝑸𝒐 𝑸𝒎𝒂𝒙
AOF=Qmax=? 𝑱 = (𝒑𝒓−𝒑𝒘𝒇) 𝑱 = 𝒑𝒓
Qmax= (J)(pr) = (0.275)(1300)= 375.5 Stb/Day
Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR)- Two phase
inflow performance (Liquid + Gas). 16
• When a reservoir pressure is below
the bubble point pressure, the
simple equation of inflow
performance (e.g., the productivity
index is constant) is no longer valid,
because at this condition the oil
flowrate will decline much faster at
increasing drawdown than would be
predicted by Equations mentioned
previously in single phase flow.
• No straight line IPR would be existed
anymore, after having two phases in
the reservoir.
Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR)- Two
phase inflow performance (Liquid + Gas). 17
• The oil relative permeability concept can be introduced in the equation:
Using the permeability general equation try to derive the equation to get an above version of
the equation:
using Kro=ko/k
• Muskat and Evinger(1942) and Vogel (1968) observed that when the pressure drops below
the bubble-point pressure, the IPR deviates from that of the simple straight-line
relationship:
Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR)- Two
phase inflow performance (Liquid + Gas). 18
• where (Qo)max is the flow rate at zero wellbore pressure, i.e., AOF.
Vogel's Method -1968 21
• Vogel plotted the dimensionless IPR curves for all the reservoir cases and arrived
at the following relationship between the above dimensionless parameters:
Vogel's Method -1968 22
• The method requires the following data:
1. Curent average réservoir pressure (pr)
2. Bubble-point pressure (pb)
3. Stabilized flow test data that include (Qo at pwf)
• Vogel’s methodology can be used to predict the IPR curve for the following two
types of reservoirs:
1. Saturated oil reservoirs Pr ≤ Pb
2. Under saturated oil reservoirs Pr > Pb
Vogel's Method - Saturated Oil Reservoirs 23
• When the reservoir pressure equals the bubble-point pressure, the oil
reservoir is referred to as a saturated-oil reservoir. The computational
procedure of applying Vogel’s method in a saturated oil reservoir to generate
the IPR curve for a well with a stabilized flow data point, i.e., a recorded Qo
value at pwf, is summarized below:
Step 1. Using the stabilized flow data, i.e., Qo and pwf, calculate the (Qo)max
using the Vogel's method after organizing it:
Vogel's Method - Saturated Oil Reservoirs 24
Step 2. Construct the IPR curve by assuming various values for (pwf) and
calculating the corresponding (Qo) from:
Vogel's Method - Saturated Oil Reservoirs –
Example (2) 25
• Case 1. The Value of the Recorded Stabilized pwf ≥ pb: Beggs outlined the
following procedure for determining the IPR when the stabilized bottom-hole
pressure is greater than or equal to the bubble point pressure:
Step 1. Using the stabilized test data point (Qo and pwf) calculate the
productivity index J:
The maximum oil flow rate (Qo max or AOF) occurs when the bottom hole flowing
pressure is zero, i.e. pwf = 0, which can be determined from the above expression as:
It should be pointed out that when pwf ≥ pb, the IPR is linear and is described by:
Vogel's Method – under Saturated Oil Reservoirs –
Example (3) 32
Example (3): An oil well is producing from an under saturated reservoir that is
characterized by a bubble-point pressure of 2130 psig. The current average
reservoir pressure is 3000 psig. Available flow test data show that the well
produced 250 STB/day at a stabilized pwf of 2500 psig.
Calculate:
Construct the IPR data?
Given:
Under saturated reservoir
Pb=2130 psig
Pr=3000 psig
Qo= 250 STB/day
Pwf= 2500 psig
Vogel's Method – under Saturated Oil Reservoirs
– Example (3) - Solution 33
The problem indicates that the flow test data were recorded above the bubble-
point pressure, therefore, the Case 1 procedure for under saturated reservoirs as
outlined previously must be used:
Vogel's Method – under Saturated Oil Reservoirs –
Example (3) - Solution 34
Calculate:
Generate the IPR data using the new test data givin?
Giving:
Pwf= 1700 psig
Qo = 630.7 STB/day
Pb=2130 psig
Vogel's Method – under Saturated Oil Reservoirs
– Example (4) -Solution 40
Vogel's Method – under Saturated Oil Reservoirs –
Example (4) -Solution 41
Fetkovich’s Method: 42
• Fetkovich’s method is also based on the Darcy radial law.
• Fetkovich’s method can be used for both (gas and saturated reservoir).
• There are two unknowns (the performance coefficient C) and (the flow exponent
n). The n values ranges from 1 for a complete laminar flow to 0.5 for highly
turbulent flow.
• The process Requires a multiple rate test (at least two) to evaluate C & n,
assuming.
Fetkovich’s Method-steps of solving: 43
• Taking the log of both sides of the equation in previous slide, you will end up
getting such equation:
• A log-log plot of the (Pr^2–Pwf^2) vs. Qo is a straight line. The inverse of the slope
yields n, the flow exponent.
• The flow coefficient C can be estimated by selecting a flow rate and pressure on
the log-log plot and using the information in Eq. above to calculate C.
Fetkovich’s Method-Example (5) 44
Example (5): A four-point stabilized flow test was conducted on a well producing
from a saturated reservoir that exists at an average pressure of 3600 psi.
Answer: C = 0.00079
46
Fetkovich’s Method-Example (5)-Solution 47
Fourth step: Generate the IPR by assuming values for pwf and calculating the
corresponding flow rate from this equation:
Fetkovich’s Method 48
Example (6):
• Once the petroleum engineer has estimated the current productive capacity of
a well, it is often desired to predict future performance for planning purposes.
1. Standing’s Method
2. Fetkovich’s Method
Future Performance Methods – Standing’s Method 52
Standing’s Method: Standing (1970) extended the application of Vogel’s equation to
predict future IPR of a well as a function of reservoir pressure.
• He related current well performance to future performance.
• His relationship requires knowledge of fluid properties (Viscosity and formation
volume factor) and relative permeability behaviour. The current and future
properties must be known.
• Standing defined the present (current) (J*p) productivity index as:
• Standing suggested that future productivity index J*f can be estimated from the
present value of J*p by:
Future Performance Methods – Standing’s Method –
Example (7) 53
• If the relative permeability data are not available,
J*f can be roughly estimated by:
Solution:
1. Calculate the current (Qo)max:
(Qo)max = 600 / {1 –0.2*(3200/4000) –0.8*(3200/4000)^2} = 1829 STB/d
2. Calculate J*p from this equation:
J*p = 1.8* (1829/4000) = 0.823
3. Calculate the following pressure function:
• To construct the future IPR when the average reservoir pressure declines to
(Pr)f, Fetkovich assumes that the performance coefficient C is a linear function
of the average reservoir pressure and, the value of C can be adjusted as follow:
• Fetkovich assumes that the value of the exponent n would not change as the
reservoir pressure declines.
Future Performance Methods – Fetkovich’s Method –
Example (8) and solution: 57
Example (8): Construct the IPR when the reservoir pressure (previous Fetkovich
example): Pr= 3600 psi, C= 0.00079, n = 0.854) declines to pr= 2000 psi.
Solution:
1. Calculate future C by applying Equation above:
• Boyun Guo, (Inżynieria Petrochemiczna, Xinghui Liu, Xuehao Tan and Elsevier
(Amsterdam (2017). Petroleum production engineering. Cambridge, Ma ;
Oxford, Uk: Gulf Professional Publishing/Elsevier, Copyright.
60