Utilitarianism has a problem with partiality because it requires acting impartially to maximize well-being for all those affected by decisions. Mill's principle of harm holds that the only time authority can infringe on individual liberty is to prevent significant harm to others. Rule utilitarianism is criticized for "rule worship", rigidly following rules even when breaking them could produce more good. Utilitarianism also undermines trust and social stability by lacking predictable, consistent behaviors needed to sustain relationships and institutions like legal systems. Rule utilitarianism responds by advocating consistent rule-following to maintain predictability and trust.
Utilitarianism has a problem with partiality because it requires acting impartially to maximize well-being for all those affected by decisions. Mill's principle of harm holds that the only time authority can infringe on individual liberty is to prevent significant harm to others. Rule utilitarianism is criticized for "rule worship", rigidly following rules even when breaking them could produce more good. Utilitarianism also undermines trust and social stability by lacking predictable, consistent behaviors needed to sustain relationships and institutions like legal systems. Rule utilitarianism responds by advocating consistent rule-following to maintain predictability and trust.
Utilitarianism has a problem with partiality because it requires acting impartially to maximize well-being for all those affected by decisions. Mill's principle of harm holds that the only time authority can infringe on individual liberty is to prevent significant harm to others. Rule utilitarianism is criticized for "rule worship", rigidly following rules even when breaking them could produce more good. Utilitarianism also undermines trust and social stability by lacking predictable, consistent behaviors needed to sustain relationships and institutions like legal systems. Rule utilitarianism responds by advocating consistent rule-following to maintain predictability and trust.
Why does utilitarianism have a problem with partiality?
What is Mill’s “principle of harm”?
Distinction between harm and mere offence - not every unwelcome consequence for others counts as harm. The only instance in which a government or authority can exercise power over an individual, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. In other words - free to do whatever you want to do, until those actions that you undertake impact significantly on others
What is the “rule worship” objection to rule utilitarianism?
Act utilitarians criticize rule utilitarians for irrationally supporting rule-based actions in cases where more good could be done by violating the rule than obeying it. E.g. breaking the speed limit in order to get someone to hospital faster
What is the “undermining trust” objection to utilitarianism?
In an act utilitarian society, people’s behaviour would lack the kind of predictability and consistency that are required to sustain trust and social stability. We wouldn’t be able to trust friends and family to keep promises as they are just going act in a way that maximises utility. Can’t trust that judges will act according to the law.
Response to this – rule utilitarianism
Ethicism purely because I can’t think of a piece of art or music that promotes something and it