This document is an abstract from an academic journal article that studies the structural evolution of the postwar U.S. economy. The authors use a time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model with stochastic volatility and mixture innovations to analyze whether the Lucas critique applies. They find that while some monetary policy parameters changed independently of reduced-form inflation and unemployment parameters, contradicting Lucas, the U.S. economy has seen considerable evolution, like a reduction in the impact of monetary policy on inflation in the late 1980s. They also detect changes in the Phillips curve relationship between inflation and cyclical unemployment in the 1970s and mid-1990s.
This document is an abstract from an academic journal article that studies the structural evolution of the postwar U.S. economy. The authors use a time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model with stochastic volatility and mixture innovations to analyze whether the Lucas critique applies. They find that while some monetary policy parameters changed independently of reduced-form inflation and unemployment parameters, contradicting Lucas, the U.S. economy has seen considerable evolution, like a reduction in the impact of monetary policy on inflation in the late 1980s. They also detect changes in the Phillips curve relationship between inflation and cyclical unemployment in the 1970s and mid-1990s.
This document is an abstract from an academic journal article that studies the structural evolution of the postwar U.S. economy. The authors use a time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model with stochastic volatility and mixture innovations to analyze whether the Lucas critique applies. They find that while some monetary policy parameters changed independently of reduced-form inflation and unemployment parameters, contradicting Lucas, the U.S. economy has seen considerable evolution, like a reduction in the impact of monetary policy on inflation in the late 1980s. They also detect changes in the Phillips curve relationship between inflation and cyclical unemployment in the 1970s and mid-1990s.
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Volume 42, 2014, Pages 50-68, ISSN 0165-1889, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2014.03.002. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016518891400061X) Abstract: We consider a time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model with stochastic volatility and mixture innovations to study the empirical relevance of the Lucas critique for the postwar U.S. economy. The model allows blocks of parameters to change at endogenously estimated points of time. Contrary to the Lucas critique, there are large changes at certain points of time in the parameters associated with monetary policy that do not correspond to changes in “reduced-form” parameters for inflation or the unemployment rate. However, the structure of the U.S. economy has evolved considerably over the postwar period, with an apparent reduction in the late 1980s in the impact of monetary policy shocks on inflation, though not on the unemployment rate. Related, we find changes in the Phillips curve tradeoff between inflation and cyclical unemployment (measured as the deviation from the time-varying steady-state unemployment rate implied by the model) in the 1970s and especially since the mid-1990s. Keywords: Time-varying parameters; Mixture innovations; Lucas critique; Great Moderation; Natural rate of unemployment; Phillips curve