Section 17-20

By Amber Singh
BALLB 3C
Submitted to Dr. Garima Goswami
Section 17
According to Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, admission is
defined as any statement made by any of the persons, which suggests
any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact, and under certain
circumstances. Admissibility simply means the power to approach.
Admission can be oral or documentary or contained in electronic form.
Thus, the admissibility of evidence means any evidence or document
used in the court of law to prove or disprove alleged matters of fact.
• An accused of murder, sustained injuries and during his treatment he
told the reason of injury to the doctor. The said explanation was
regarded as an admission.
Section 18
Statements made by a party to the proceeding, or by an agent to any
such party, whom the Court regards, under the circumstances of the
case, as expressly or impliedly authorized by him to made them, are
admissions.
By suitor in representative character– Statements made by parties to
suits suing or sued in a representative character, are not admissions,
unless they were made while the party making them held that
character.
Section 18
Statements made by-
(1) by party interested in subject matter; persons who have any
proprietary or pecuniary interest in the subject-matter of the
proceeding and who make the statement in their character of persons
so interested; OR
(2) by person from whom interest derived; persons from whom the
parties to the suit have derived their interest in the subject-matter of
the suit, are admissions, if they are made during the continuance of
the interest of the persons making the statements.
Section 19
Statements made by persons whose position or liability it is necessary
to prove as against any party to the suit, are admissions, if such
statements would be relevant as against such persons in relation to
such position or liability in a suit brought by or against the made if they
are made whilst the person making them occupies such position or is
subject of such liability.
• A undertakes to collect rent for B.
B sues A for not collecting rent due from C to B.
A denies that rent was due from C to B.
A statement by C that he owned B rent is an admission, and is a
relevant fact as against A, if A denies that C did owe rent to B.
Section 20
Statements made by persons to whom a party to the suit has expressly
referred for information in reference to a matter in dispute are
admissions.
• The question is, whether a horse sold by A to B is sound.
A says to B “Go and ask C. C knows all about it” C’s statement is an
admission.
Basant Singh v. Janki Singh
The Supreme court held: Section 17 of Indian Evidence Act ,1872 makes
no distinction between an admission made by a party in a pleading
and other admissions. Under the Indian law, an admission made by a
party in a plaint signed and verified by him may be used as evidence
against him in other suits. In other suits, this admission cannot be
regarded as conclusive, and is open to the party to show that it is not
true.
All the statements made in the plaint are admissible as evidence. The
court is, however, not bound to accept all the statements as correct.
The state of Gujarat v. Ashulal Nanji Bismol
The Court held that the expression means “admissible and relevant”,
there is no implied or explicit provision set out in this Act, which laid
down the evidence “admissible and relevant”, in respect to the
consideration of the judge to pronounce the judgment. However, it
cannot be determined that any statements or documents which are not
admissible or relevant can be put on record or not. Hence, the Act does
not guarantee that the information which is insignificant or
inadmissible cannot be recorded and put on a record of facts if the
judge’s found it unfit. Any Evidence or information that may be
inappropriate or admissible cannot be avoided or precluded from the
record.