Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alignment – Effective integration and coordination of different aspects of the work so that it fits together in service of the shared
direction. Everyone is cleared about each other’s role and responsibilities. Sense of coordination- synchronization
Everybody fit in with each other
Commitment – Success of the collective as the priority rather than individual success.
People give extra efforts needed for group to succeed
There is sense of trust and mutual responsibility for the work. People express passion
and motivation for the work
4 Purposes of Measurement:
1. Inform – Primary use is to answer questions, identify key trends and share activity
2. Monitor -
3. Evaluate & Analyse
4. Manage
3 Types of measures:
Efficiency measures
Provide insight into the quantity of Provide insight into the quality of the Demonstrate the impact of
training delivered, its utilization, cost, programs using models such as learning on business or HR
and reach within the organization. Kirkpatrick and Phillips goals.
Quantity Reaction Impact on sales growth
Classroom utilization
Instructor utilization
Cost
Charan describes seven levels of leadership with SIX TRANSITIONS OF LEADERSHIP in between. The best leaders in every organization are the leaders who have
grown through each of these levels, in order to learn the values and skills on their way to the next level
managing yourself to managing others
managing others to leading managers
leading managers to functional manager
functional manager to business manager
business manager to group manager
group manager to Enterprise manager, or CEO
SCRAP TRAINING :
• Misdirected training : Wrong people or time
• Poor Delivery
• Misuse : Training is not the right solution
• Lack of follow-up
Gagne-Briggs Model
Gain Attention – Inform learner of objectives – Prior Learning – Present Content – Provide Guidance – Practice – Provide
Feedback – Assess Performance – Enhance Retention and Transfer to the Job
This model is an instructional systems design (ISD) model taking a systems approach
2. Conduct instructional analysis, or identification of the skills, knowledge and attitudes learners need to be able
to succeed.
5. Develop assessment instruments to measure learners’ ability to perform the objectives from step 4.
6. Develop instructional strategy, including pre-instructional activities, instruction, practice and feedback, testing,
and follow-up activities.
7. Develop and select instructional materials, typically including a learner’s manual, instructor’s guides,
multimedia, and assessments.
8. Design and conduct a formative assessment to determine how to improve instruction. This assessment can be a
one-on-one evaluation, small group evaluation or field evaluation.
Assure
Evaluate & Revise – Summative evaluation of material, method, what worked, what didn’t
SAM
The Successive Approximation Model (SAM) is a simplified version of the ADDIE Model designed specifically to elicit
feedback and build working models earlier in the process. Developed by Dr. Michael Allen of Allen Interactions, this model uses
a recursive rather than linear process for course development. The simplest SAM model is composed of three parts: Preparation,
Iterative Design, and Iterative Development. The key word here is iterative, which is the basis for this model and signals that
each step is meant to be repeated and revisited.
The Preparation phase begins with gathering all needed information and context for the project; the content and scope of this
phase will vary greatly depending on the project or course. The hallmark of the end of the first phase of this model is the “Savvy
Start”, which encourages brainstorming, sketching, and prototyping and involve as many interested parties as you can as you
develop the material: colleagues, advisors, and, if you’re lucky enough to have them as a resource, students.
In the second, Iterative Design phase, the goal is to design and prototype the material so that it can be evaluated by the
interested parties. The logic here is that it is easier to give feedback and evaluate a product that exists rather than one that is only
an idea and allows for more extensive review and testing.
In the final Iterative Development phase, the finished prototype is fully developed and implemented. Once it has been used, it
can be evaluated and run back through development and implementation phases, if necessary
pro
con
The lot like agile methods approach (LLAMA) marries the best practices of the IT world’s agile project management with
instructional design best practices to deliver truly effective eLearning in an orderly-but-flexible way
Philips model
The Phillips ROI model takes results from various corporate training programs and answers the the question, “what’s the ROI
from this program behind every dollar spent?”
It also produces a set of intangible benefits for evaluating and measuring the quality and effectiveness of a training program
Phillips ROI Model builds on the Kirkpatrick Model, which is one of the most commonly used models to evaluate training
programs. It classifies data from different types employee training programs to measure:
Throughout the first four levels of the Phillips ROI Methodology, data helps identify reasons for positive or negative ROI in the
resulting fifth level. This model suggests that the final ROI of the training program is a result of a series of events:
following conditions are met before you put the process to use:
● Conduct a needs assessment for your training program. Don’t use the ROI method when no needs assessment data is
available.
● Include one or more strategies to isolate the training effect.
● Base the estimates only on the most reliable and credible sources.
● Calculate costs and benefits with a conservative approach.
● Don’t compare the training ROI with other financial returns until it’s absolutely essential.
● Don’t isolate the management from the ROI calculation process.
● Be cautious in deciding what’s measurable and what’s not. Take input from business teams on inclusion/exclusion of
sensitive factors.
A chain of impacts develops as participants gain skills and knowledge (level 2), apply them on the job (level 3), and
generate business impact (level 4). So, measuring data across all levels .
2. Measures intangibles
The Phillips ROI model accepts that you cannot measure certain outcomes in monetary value and the final ROI won’t represent
such outcomes.
Outcomes such as customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, and team bonding are hard to measure in numbers.
Attention – Relevance – Satisfaction (reward, allow them to make use of learnings) – Confidence (provide achievable goals,
motivate students, give positive feedback)
A Model of Learning
The skill is the student’s prior or subsequent achievement; the will relates to the student’s various dispositions towards
learning; and the thrill refers to the motivations held by the student.
Reinforcement Theory
• Individuals are motivated to perform or avoid behaviours because of past outcomes of behaviour
• Trainers need to identify what outcomes learners find most positive and negative and then link these outcomes to
acquiring new knowledge and skills
Expectancy Theory
• Ensure valued rewards are received if trainees successfully learn and transfer (instrumentality)
Implications
1. Business Need
What current business needs or strategies are being affected or perhaps caused by the
assumed problem?
• What business problems exist? (Look for such measures as amount of increase or decrease
productivity, quality, and complaints. If the client doesn’t know the actual measures, it is
critical to find this information during data collection.)
• What is going on in the external environment that is related to this problem (for example,
• What other data exist (that your business unit already collects) that may provide information
• What change(s) in these business indicators are you seeking to achieve with this training
plan? What measures will tell you that you have been successful?
• What business opportunities are inherent in this business need (for example, new markets or
new products)?
• What business strategy(ies) are you seeking to support with this requested training
initiative?
2. Performance Needs
What results should employees be achieving? What is their current level of achievement?
• What does perfect performance look like? What does current performance look like?
• Is anyone performing those skills correctly now? How many people are doing it correctly
• What else might be getting in the way of employees performing as they should, other than
• What will the nature of management support be for job application and practice after
training?
3. Learning Needs
What knowledge and skills do you think the targeted employees need to learn to perform
• How important is each knowledge item and skill that you have listed?
• How well should the targeted employees be performing the skills by the end of the training?
• How well are they performing? Are they meeting business goals?
4. Learner’s Need
What are the targeted learners’ backgrounds and experience in this subject matter?
• What are the expectations regarding when and how they will attend the training (during
• How durable does the course need to be? (Does it need to exist for one-time use, a month, a
year, or ongoing?)
• What access to course documents do learners need before, during, and after the course?
(Does there need to be a reference manual, job aids, performance support, or a knowledge
management database?)
Business needs - ideal source - manager, client interview