Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Examples of job costing and process costing in the service, merchandising and manufacturing
sectors
Service Sector Merchandising Manufacturing
Sector Sector
Job Costing System Accounting Firm Sending a catalogue Aircraft assembly
audits to a mailing list House Construction
Advertising agency Special promotion
campaign of a new store
product
Process Costing Deposit processing Grain dealing Oil refining
System Postal delivery Processing new Beverages
magazine production
subscriptions
Features of Job Costing System
Each job has its own characteristics and need a separate treatment.
Each job is taken as a job unit.
For each job, a distinct number is assigned and a separate job cost sheet if used.
The costing department keeps a separate work in process account for each job.
Profit or loss is determined for each job.
The cost of production of every job is ascertained or known after the completion of each
job.
Steps to be involved in Job costing System
Step 1: Identify the Job That Is the Chosen Cost Object:
Step 2: Identify the Direct Costs of the Job.
Step 3: Select the Cost-Allocation Bases to Use for Allocating Indirect Costs to the Job.
Step 4: Identify the Indirect Costs Associated with Each Cost-Allocation Base.
Step 5: Compute the Rate per Unit of Each Cost-Allocation Base Used to Allocate Indirect Costs
to the Job.
Step 6: Compute the Indirect Costs Allocated to the Job.
Step 7: Compute the Total Cost of the Job by Adding All Direct and Indirect Costs Assigned to
the Job.
Actual Costing Vs Normal costing
Actual costing is a costing system that:
1) Traces direct costs to a cost object by using the actual direct cost rates times the
actual quantities of the direct-cost inputs.
2) It allocates indirect costs based on the actual indirect-cost rates times the actual
quantities of the cost-allocation bases. The actual indirect-cost rate is calculated by
dividing actual total indirect costs by the actual total quantity of the cost-allocation base.
As its name suggests, actual costing systems calculate the actual costs of jobs.
Yet, actual costing systems are not commonly found in practice because actual
costs cannot be computed in a timely manner. The problem is not with
computing direct-cost rates for direct materials and direct manufacturing
labor.
Normal costing is a costing system that
1) Traces direct costs to a cost object by using the actual direct-cost rates times the actual
quantities of the direct-cost inputs and;
2) Allocates indirect costs based on the budgeted indirect-cost rates times the actual
quantities of the cost-allocation bases.
The budgeted indirect-cost rate for each cost pool is computed as follows:
450,000
¿
75,000
= Br. 6 per machine hour
Manufacturing Overhead Applied = 6 x 80,000 = Br. 480,000
Work in process 480,000
MOH Allocated 480,000
i Finished Goods 900,000
Work in process 900,000
j Accounts Receivable 1,500,000
Sales 1,500,000
Cost of goods Sold 870,000
Finished goods 870,000
Generally, the difference, actual with allocated, is resulted from the computation of the
predetermined rate; i.e.
Budgeted allocation base vary from actual allocation base.
Budgeted indirect cost rate vary from actual indirect cost rate.
There are three approaches to dispose/clear any balance in the manufacturing overhead account
at the end of an accounting period.
I. Proration Approach
Proration spreads under allocated/over allocated overhead costs among ending work in process,
finished goods and cost of goods sold balances.
II. Adjusted allocation rate approach
The adjusted allocation-rate approach restates all overhead entries in the general ledger and
subsidiary ledgers using actual cost rates rather than budgeted cost rates. First, the actual
manufacturing overhead rate is computed at the end of the fiscal year. Then, the manufacturing
overhead costs allocated to every job during the year are recomputed using the actual
manufacturing overhead rate (rather than the budgeted manufacturing overhead rate). Finally,
end-of-year closing entries are made. The result is that at year-end, every job-cost record and
finished goods record—as well as the ending Work-in-Process Control, Finished Goods Control,
and Cost of Goods Sold accounts—represent actual manufacturing overhead costs incurred.
The adjusted allocation-rate approach yields the benefits of both the timeliness and convenience
of normal costing during the year and the allocation of actual manufacturing overhead costs at
year-end.
III.Write-off to cost of goods sold approach
In this case, the total under/over applied/allocated overhead cost is included in the current year’s
cost of goods sold amount.
Illustration
ABC company uses a normal costing with a single manufacturing overhead cost pool and
machine hours as cost allocation base. The following data were for 2013:
Budgeted MOH Br. 4,800,000
Overhead allocation base Machine hours
Budgeted machine hours 80,000
MOH Incurred Br. 4,900,000
Actual machine hours 75,000
Machine hours data and the ending balances (before proration of under/over allocated overhead)
are as follows:
Actual Machine hours 2013, end of year balances
Cost of goods sold 60,000 Br. 8,000,000
Finished goods 11,000 Br. 1,250,000
Work in process 4,000 Br. 750,000
Required:-
1. Compute the predetermined allocation rate for 2013.
2. Compute the under/over allocated MOH for 2013 and dispose the amount using:
a. Proration approach
1. If allocated MOH cost of Finished goods, cost of goods sold, and work in
process is the base for proration.
2. If ending balance of Finished goods, cost of goods sold, and work in process
is the base for proration.
b. Write –off to cost of goods sold approach
Solutions
Budgetd Annual Indirect Costs
1. Predetermined Indirect Cost Rate=
Budgetd annual quantity of cost allocationbase
4,800,000
¿ = Br. 60/machine hour
80,000
2. MOH allocated = Predetermined allocation rate x actual allocation base
= 60 x 75,000 = Br. 4,500,000
Under/ over applied MOH = Actual MOH incurred – MOH allocated
= 4,900,000 – 4,500,000
= Br. 400,000 (MOH under applied)
MOH applied for the three items will be:-
Cost of goods sold = 60,000 x 60 = Br. 3,600,000
Finished goods = 11,000 x 60 = Br. 660,000
Work in process = 4,000 x 60 = Br. 240,000
Total MOH applied = Br. 4,500,000
a. Proration approach
Item Account balance Proration Base Proration Proration Account balance
before Proration amount after proration
CGS 8,000,000 3,600,000 3.6 320,000 8,320,000
x 400,000
4.5
Finished goods 1,250,000 660,000 0.66 58,667 1,308,667
x
4.5
400,000
WIP 750,000 240,000 0.24 21,333 771,333
x
4.5
400,000
Total 10,000,000 4,500,000 100% 400,000 10,400,000
NB: - Some Companies base the ending balance of finished goods, CGS, and WIP to prorate
the under/over applied MOH.