igure cm. 2 cee The Queen, on the application of ‘RiAngot) =v Secreta Sate or HeOODUBTOGRT ORDER made by the Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Lewison Recerca ot he appetar's neice and acorneanfing document without an fa Mest oc aon fa perisson 1 appeal agar re real fhe gh Cou ogra permission to apy for ual cei “Decision: Permission to apply for judicial review granted in part — - | an xser gating person may sent theses fo be hers of be nase suet 1 Cans © Poxmission to appeal: GRANTED IN PART or ‘permission to apply forjudca coview: Granted in parton grounds 2 () and 2 (vi) Refused onal ther grounds Were permission te apply for judicial review is granted the application should be [=] | ature tote Adeninistratve Court ~ oR ‘There are special reasons (st out below) wy the aplleation should be retained nthe] Cour of Apps ~ Reasons 1 Theteter of 20 December 2020 plainly rst adecsion capable of chalenge by JR Buti guste fat if he aaare eee are oe ct nee was 8 contr sae oars” sore respects, sien 3816 pemt a ratenge by way ofa cetaraion of maneatory oder Faaanae oto oppicaton fo JR is olan aperprate veil fr thedtermination of cotesea scifi Pa ee nc Peon of bo statement of facts and rounds al wh ascertens abou he say (or ‘Sretuse} 0 SC, whch ae no rope be subject an aptcation for sere pun fom te gous of estance that HM have ken avin he salty of SG om 3 vary of an a ng IGNAIP tne Che! Madea! Ofer PHE and COMARE Toe ett of avice Pat 9 pic ct anes arate fx publ auory concer. srt arguatie fst aking aGvc n De ree ec tchaleng on pubic lm rors, Nor arabe that he Secretary of Stat nity Inase bse Suc Ga fe NG Act 2000 fa tha reasons quen i the grounds fesstance aaa onan te ceendant ey adresses the poston of hicren as wall as aduts Tne alegation of fale toconan he bet toes of iden et arguable rpercie we carting dy teary out ah assessment compliant wih the PSED. Tis aagaton coud ory an cyte graves docoone were naw ecavte of fale a compy wih he PSED 8 Cae iy ascoans on approval! 36, dacnors on pernsbielocatons of 5G and he asin Sears AA gutainer Sut any challange o Hose deci fg out ote Sess sin (@ and (2) aso a ay to ge reasons. The applants donc porto ary domes sunt Oe ny reasons nace ets The appears ren Gacanel Ray 63 But a cas des ‘equrg OVE Of acon fhe sides on which the pic aor has eed It does not held ek re a io groans Nevers n Guo ay 1996) EHH 357 a0] ECIHR does ste an Sect poste at 9 cormuneaterormaten onenwcrmertl mates Ths gourd does | rere aot poss te relavely ow testa requre er pemisson to appl fr JR Peres rpourrertary unde not elvan to hose grounds of ped and there sn reason why te cout rau yoni Bree ns spec eason ty he applaton shoul remain nthe Coun of Appeal The Admnitatwe Co¥t 2 resis ter arectons, cluding econ: o excise rom the Ries fr te contests scenic‘Where permission has been granted, or the application adjourned, ary directions tothe parties (including, rece state ny abradgement of tho 35 ay teint or hing evidence provided form CPR 54.14) ‘Signed Date: 25 May 2022 By THE COURT oo Sa ert CELT mccuresenensmnarsm cat “eee cseetntor €A-2021-00381 and 31818