Search Our Archives

N E W S & A N A LY S I S

Enter keyword 

Autopsy Results From People Who Died

Unexpectedly Within Days of COVID-19
Vaccination
BY ARJUN WALIA · DECEMBER 12, 2022 ·  14 MINUTE READ

Image via Shutterstock

 Pause - set your Pulse...


Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your
 physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on
 feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A recent paper published in Clinical Cardiology on November 27, 2022 titled

“Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-
SARS-CoV-2-vaccination” describes the autopsy findings and common
characteristics of myocarditis in untreated persons who received the COVID-
19 vaccination.

The researchers explain,

“Standardized autopsies were performed on 25 persons who had

died unexpectedly and within 20 days after anti-SARS-CoV-2
vaccination. In four patients who received a mRNA vaccination, we
identified acute (epi-)myocarditis without detection of another
significant disease or health constellation that may have caused an
unexpected death. Histology showed patchy interstitial myocardial
T-lymphocytic infiltration, predominantly of the CD4 positive
subset, associated with mild myocyte damage. Overall, autopsy
findings indicated death due to acute arrhythmogenic cardiac
failure. Thus, myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication
following mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.”

In this particular paper, they describe the cardiac autopsy findings in five
persons who died unexpectedly within seven days following COVID-19
vaccination. They point out the high likelihood that these deaths were a result
of the vaccine, and explain why.

“Our findings establish the histological phenotype of lethal

vaccination-associated myocarditis.”

The data on the autopsies were obtained from the COVID autopsy and
biomaterial registry Baden-Württemberg. Itʼs a federal state registry that
contains autopsy, clinical and pathological data as well as tissue samples from
patients who have died from what appears to be COVID-19 infection (which
has also been shown to induce myocardial deaths and complications in
some), as well as persons who have died briefly after COVID-19 vaccination.

Many of the autopsies revealed other causes of death. There were 35

examined originally, and 10 were excluded where the cause of death was
determined to be due to pre-existing illnesses.

As far as the remaining 25 bodies, the researchers explain their results,

“Cardiac autopsy findings consistent with (epi-)myocarditis were

found in five cases of the remaining 25 bodies found unexpectedly
dead at home within 20 days following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination…
Three of the deceased persons were women, two men. Median age
at death was 58 years (range 46–75 years). Four persons died after
the first vaccine jab, the remaining case after the second dose. All
persons died within the first week following vaccination (mean
2.5 days, median 2 days). Clinical findings, blood tests, ECGs or
imaging data were not available as deceased persons did not seek
medical attention prior to death. Person 1 was found dead 12 h after
the vaccination. A witness described a rattling breath shortly
before discovering circulatory failure. Person 2 complained about
nausea and was found dead soon thereafter. Resuscitation was
started immediately but without success, respectively. The other
persons were found dead at home without available information
about terminal symptoms. According to the available information
provided at the time of autopsies, none of the deceased persons
had SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination and nasopharyngeal
swabs were negative in all cases.”

Whatʼs interesting about these specific cases, as the paper points out, is that
all cases lacked significant coronary heart disease, acute or chronic
manifestations of ischaemic heart disease, manifestations of cardiomyopathy
or other signs of a pre-existing, clinically relevant heart disease. Therefore
there were no pre-existing cardiac conditions that these people were already
suffering from. They had healthy hearts.

The paper also cites several other studies pointing to the fact that many cases
of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination have been published, but that
the majority of them reported showed a mild version of the issue, with
resolution of symptoms without treatment. That does not imply that these
cases are not serious and that these people will not suffer adverse health
outcomes later on in life.

A number of top cardiologists — such as Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. John

Mandrola, Dr. Amy Kontorovich, and Dr. Venk Murthy — have publicly spoken
out against minimization of vaccine-induced myocarditis. They feel the
message being portrayed by Big Media and government is suggesting
myocarditis is not a big deal, and not something to be considered so serious.

According to Dr. Kontorovich, professor of Medicine and Cardiology at the

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,

The Pulse is a reader supported. If you appreciate our work, please become a
paid subscriber today.Click Here to Support.

“[M]any of those affected are young people who were previously

healthy and are now on three or more heart medications and
potentially out of work due to symptoms, even if their heart
function is ‘back to normal.’”

University of Michigan cardiologist Dr.Venk Murthy has also noted,

“People with myocarditis are usually counseled to limit activity,

placed on 1 or more meds and are at lifetime increased risk of
cardiac complications. This can have profound consequences.”
“[They] are typically told to limit activity for several months,
sometimes longer. This means no sports. Some kids are told not to
carry books to school.”

According to cardiologist Aseem Malhotra,

“Although vaccine-induced myocarditis is not often fatal in young

adults, MRI scans reveal that, of the ones admitted to hospital,
approximately 80% have some degree of myocardial damage. It is
like suffering a small heart attack and sustaining some – likely
permanent – heart muscle injury. It is uncertain how this will play
out in the longer-term, including if, and to what degree, it will
increase the risk of poor quality of life or potentially more serious
heart rhythm disturbances in the future.”

The researchers point out that in rare instances individuals required

intensive care support or even died from acute heart failure following COVID-
19 vaccination.

Never Miss A Beat.

Join our newsletter to keep your finger on The Pulse!

First Name...

Your Email Address...

Subscribe

No real definitive conclusions can be drawn from this study due to the fact
that the cohort size was very small. If more autopsies were available, it would
have been better. Even examining the autopsies of letʼs say, 1000 deaths
within a few months of vaccination would have been quite intriguing to see.
Unfortunately, the time to perform such studies has passed. The researchers,
because of the small size of the study, cannot make any conclusions regarding
the incidence rates of death by myocarditis via COVID-19 vaccination or an
estimation of risk compared to COVID-19 infection. Itʼs just not possible.

The risk of death and complications by myocarditis from a COVID-19

infection, although rare, may be greater than the risk of death and
complications via myocarditis from a COVID-19 vaccination, which may also
be classified as a rare event. We already know that COVID-19 infection and
other related viruses pose a risk of myocarditis. There is plenty of data
showing this. I however, believe that the vaccine poses a much greater risk
for people under the age of 50. I will explain how I came to this conclusion
later on in the article.

Itʼs a topic heavily debated within the scientific community and medical
experts across the globe. One thing that can be said with certainty however, is
that both COVID-19 infection and vaccination have caused cases of mild and
severe myocarditis, with some infections and vaccinations leading to death.

The last autopsy report of this kind that I came across was done by three
pathologists who published a piece in the journal, Archives of Pathology &
Laboratory Medicine regarding their examination of autopsies conducted of
two teenage boys who died days after receiving Pfizerʼs COVID-19 vaccine.
According to the three pathologists, two of whom are medical examiners,
“The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from
typical myocarditis.” They concluded the vaccine was responsible.

There are also concerning reports from the Vaccine Adverse Events Report
System (VAERS) that are never really included in official ʻdataʼ which include
autopsy reports as well. For example, a 15-year-old boy who died six days
after receiving his first dose (Pfizer). The VAERS report (I.D. 1764974) states
that the previously healthy teen ʻwas in his usual state of good health. Five
days after the vaccine, he complained of shoulder pain. He was playing with
two friends at a community pond, swinging from a rope swing, flipping in the
air, and landing in the water feet first. He surfaced, laughed, told his friends
“Wow, that hurt!”, then swam towards the shore, underwater as was his usual
routine. The friends became worried when he did not reemerge. This
occurred within a couple of weeks of vaccination.

His body was retrieved by local authorities more than an hour later. The
autopsy revealed ʻsmall foci of myocardial inflammation.ʼ

There are other reports like this in the VAERS database.

24-year-old New York college student George Watts Jr. died on October 27,
2021, due to complications related to the Pfizer Covid-19 shots he took in
August and September. It was revealed that the Bradford County Coronerʼs
Office listed the COVID vaccine as the cause of death.

These are a few of many examples.

Then there were other signals throughout the pandemic. For example, in
April 2022 a study published in the Journal Nature under Scientific
Reports titled “Increased emergency cardiovascular events among under-40
population in Israel during vaccine rollout and third COVID-19 wave” was one
of many to raise safety concerns about COVID-19 vaccines.

Dr. Madhava Setty points out that independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr.
analyzed nearly seven years of Massachusetts death certificates he obtained
through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Beaudoinʼs findings
demonstrate that the COVID-19 death toll in Massachusetts was largely
confined to a short window of time in 2020, and that COVID-19 deaths in 2020
resulted from pulmonary causes — in contrast to COVID-19 deaths in 2021,
which were more closely linked to illnesses of the heart and blood.

There is no reasonable way to explain how SARS-CoV-2 dramatically changed

the way it attacks and kills human beings and why it did so at precisely the
time the experimental mRNA inoculations were deployed. You can read more
about that story here.

This is why, for me at least, I chose to go beyond the data and factor in other
concerning findings and research to determine for myself what is really going
on from my perspective and what the best decision for me really is.

The concerning thing is, during the pandemic at least, many people were
coerced with travel and employment restrictions to take the jab. Given all of
the uncertainty with regards to the shot, which was promoted as completely
safe and effective for everyone, this was very immoral and unethical.

Below are some of the reasons to me, in my opinion, COVID-19 vaccines are
far more dangerous than the infection itself, especially for someone who is
under the age of 50. But let me be clear, to make the statement that COVID-19
vaccines are “far more dangerous” than the vaccine itself is simply an
opinion, one that I cannot definitavely prove. That being said, itʼs ok, itʼs my
opinion and my right to have that opinion, share it freely and explain how I
arrived at that conclusion should remain.

Why I Took My Chances With COVID-19 Infection & Not The Vaccine

One of the main reasons for me is the fact, as Iʼve mentioned many times
before, that vaccine injury reporting systems from across the world have
logged millions of serious adverse reactions (hospitalizations, disabilities and
death). These are recorded in the World Health Organization (WHO)
VigiAccess system, and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, among
others (VAERS). There are also dozens of social media pages documenting the
experiences of those who perceive themselves to be vaccine injured. Despite
the fact that social media pages like this cannot be included in any type of
ʻofficial dataʼ, itʼs quite concerning to me nonetheless. Furthermore,
approximately 50 percent of vaccine injuries reported to VAERS in the last 30
years are all from COVID vaccines. Systems like the ones mentioned above
have never seen such an influx of reports in human history. To me, this is
extremely significant, and there are good reasons why these reports shouldnʼt
be ignored.

Sure, one is not able to determine whether the vaccine was actually the real
cause of all these events, we simply donʼt know. Self-reporting systems of
adverse events are known to have self-reporting bias and both under and
over-reporting problems. They are still quite eye opening however and do
present concerning safety signals that seem to be ignored within the
mainstream. Many papers Iʼve read throughout the years have also claimed
that a very small percent of actual injuries are reported and accepted in to
these systems, so thatʼs another red flag for me. How this happens, I am not
sure, but I recently came across an interview with Dr. Eric T. Payne, a
Paediatric Neurologist, Alberta Childrenʼs Hospital & University of Calgary.
He explained that potential vaccine injuries arenʼt even being reported to
injury reporting systems, and that the basic idea and possibility of even
reporting a complication due to a COVID-19 vaccine is being completely
scrapped at hospitals in Canada.

I couple the information above with some published data as well. For
example, an international group of eminent academics and physicians went
back and analyzed safety data from the original clinical trials that were the
backbone of the FDAʼs decision to authorize the mRNA vaccines in December
2020. It was published in the peer-reviewed journal, Vaccine in September
2022. The analysis showed that mRNA vaccines were associated with 1
additional serious adverse event for every 800 people vaccinated.

Then, you have all of the eminent experts and academics in this area that
have raised cause for concern. There seem to be hundreds like Dr. Peter
Doshi, Senior Editor at the British Medical Journal and one of of the authors
of the paper mentioned above.

All of these concerns, from my perspective, seem to emphasize a greater risk

from COVID-19 vaccines than any risks associated with COVID-19 infection.
Perhaps thatʼs because the risks associated with COVID-19 infection have
been a bit overblown given peopleʼs chances of hospitalization and death
from infection. Lockdowns, mandates and mass hysteria also pushed the fear
alarm bells a little more. The risks associated with COVID-19 infection are
and were given to the masses every single day, while any discussion around
the data that suggested any type of risk via the COVID-19 vaccines was simply
not had.

I much more prefer the protection natural immunity can provide, which has
an excellent track record for various viruses, including COVID. This was
another reason.

My second main concern was the lack of bio-distribution data during the
emergency approval of COVID shots. Bio-distribution refers to the
examination and study of where the vaccine and its ingredients go once
injected into the body. A May 2021 article published in the British Medical
Journal (BMJ) by Dr. Peter Doshi shows this was a concern.

Doshi explained,

“Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to The BMJ’s questions

regarding why no biodistribution studies were conducted on their
novel mRNA products, and none of the companies, nor the FDA,
would say whether new biodistribution studies will be required
prior to licensure.”

Data has also shown that the contents of the vaccine, in animal studies, did
not stay at the injection site, and that one major site of distribution was the
liver, among various other organs. As a result, the animals that received the
Pfizer injection experienced adverse effects. The vaccine contents are
distributed by what are called Lipid Nanoparticles (LNP), and it has been
shown that empty LNP without mRNA does not result in any significant liver
injury.

So to add to my concerns above, we now have mechanisms of action that are

concerning, and we donʼt know what this means. For me to take this product,
I would have to be certain of what this means and what the implications of
this are, if any.

Spike Protein from COVID Vaccines vs Spike Protein From Natural Infection

Furthermore, differences between the ʻfakeʼ spike protein via the vaccine and
the spike protein from natural infection also had me pondering.

The mRNA molecules via the vaccine have been deliberately manipulated and
modified to become more stable once inside the cell. A “pseudouridine”
molecule has been added to the mRNA to give it a longer half-life than normal
mRNA. Therefore, the production of spike protein within the cell is not being
turned off, and we donʼt know for how long. The implications of this are not
well understood, and itʼs something that should be well understood, in my
opinion, before mass administration.

Itʼs also important to mention that the spike protein that is being
manufactured inside the cells can be excreted from the cells and can find its
way into the blood stream. A study showed that spike protein could be
detected in the blood of 11 of the 13 participants following vaccination with
the Moderna mRNA vaccine. The potential danger of vaccination is yet to be
fully understood or quantified, and the long term significance of the
accumulation of mRNA-lipid nanoparticles in various organs, remains
unknown.

Dr. Bonnie Mallard, Professor, BSc, MSc, PhD from the University of Guelph
in Ontario, Canada, explains further,

“These are genetic vaccines, and so you get the recipe for the spike,
you don’t get the spike protein, and so you’re given the recipe. And
each individual, man woman or child, has their own metabolism,
their own genetics and they will produce different amounts of
spike. So, clearly, when you take a drug that you did not know what
dose you were taking, and that every person was getting some
different dose, I don’t think so.

And nobody knows that, and that’s the problem. So one, you don’t
know the dose and it’s in lipid nano particles which we know
deliver the message for spike throughout the body. And so
normally for vaccines you want them to stay in the muscles and
draining lymph-nodes. You don’t want the foreign protein to go
everywhere and be widely distributed, particularly when the spike
protein is not the same as the spike protein on the virus, it’s being
modified, it’s synthetic and it has different characteristics and one
of the characteristics it now seems that we’re coming to
understand is that it stays in the circulation and in certain cells
such as exosomes, little bubbles which allow communication
between cells and non classical monocytes.

So the spike protein is staying around for extended periods of time,

so we’ve got a foreign protein hanging around. And this could be
one of the reasons that we now see if you look, even Ontario data,
it’s the triple vaxxed that have the highest number of cases, if you
look right now they actually have about double the cases
(compared to the unvaccinated). And so now you need to ask
yourself, if that was a child, and now they’re at a high risk of
infection, why would we do that. But it also should be alarming for
everyone to look at those statistics and they need to ask
themselves the question, why is it, the more of these vaccines that
a person gets, the more chance, the more likely it is they’re going
to get COVID-19.

And this could be because of the effects on the immune system…

These vaccines cause suppression of the innate immune system.
And we talked about why the innate immune system is important,
and one of the reasons are these type 1 interference which are
critical for controlling viral infections, and it seems that these are
adversely effected by these genetic vaccines.”
Stop The Shots Expert Video – Why is naturally acquired immunity the gold standard?

Again, these are a simply a few of multiple concerns that had and have me
quite hesitant. I could share more but I think you get the point.

Last but not least, the vaccines are simply ineffective at stopping
transmission the transmission the virus. To me, it appeared that efficacy of
the vaccines was near zero when it came to this, although there can be an
argument made for efficacy in preventing severe symptoms and death in the
elderly more vulnerable population for a few months. I came to this
conclusion by looking in to studies examining viral load differences between
the vaccinated and unvaccinated early on in the pandemic, as well as the fact
that some of the most highly vaccinated populations around the globe were
experiencing the greatest outbreaks. You can read more about that as Iʼve
gone quite in-depth previously in articles both here, and here.

Concluding Remarks

Itʼs hard to believe that by explaining what I have explained above, someone
would not understand and empathize with my perspective. Iʼve come across a
lot of vaccinated people that do, and a lot of vaccinated people that donʼt. I
think one of the main issues is a lack of access to proper, transparent and
informed education. These days people are more concerned with what is
politically correct rather than what is actually true.

Furthermore, I think legacy media and governments played a large role in not
really providing a balanced, honest and transparent perspective regarding all
things COVID-19. Instead, what we saw was the extreme ridicule,
stigmatization and censorship of those who questioned what we were told.
When this happens, itʼs all those who rely on legacy media for information
see and, as a result, they repeat and embody that message and take it out in to
the real world. It was sad to see that families were broken up and friendships
were lost over something like this. This is why I believe independent media is
more important today than ever before.

Dive Deeper
Our new 8 week course called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking'
instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino is here.

If you want build your self awareness, improve your critical thinking, and be
more aware of bias, this is the perfect course.Click here to check out a sneak
peek and learn more.

COVID Vaccine COVID-19 Myocarditis Science

 Tweet  Share  Share

Related Posts

N E W S & A N A LY S I S N E W S & A N A LY S I S N E W S & A N A LY S I S N E W S & A N A LY S I S

COVID Bivalent Booster Falls YouTube Deleted This Elon Musk States That Twitter Will No Longer
Flat in First ‘Real-World’ Video… Twitter “Has Interfered in Enforce “COVID-19
Test, CDC Report Shows Elections” Misleading Information
Big Tech is horrendous at trying to
tackle the misinformation problem. And
Policy”
In September, the U.S. Food and Drug On Wednesday, Elon Musk stated that
Administration (FDA) — over the one issue is that average people… Twitter interfered with elections. In “In every case the answer to bad speech
objections of the agency’s own response to a report from Reuters is not censorship, the answer to bad
BY JOE MARTINO · DECEMBER 1, 2022
advisors… about… speech is more…
BY JOSH MITTELDORF, PHD AND BY ARJUN WALIA · NOVEMBER 30, 2022 BY ARJUN WALIA · NOVEMBER 29, 2022
BY MADHAVA SETTY, MD
· DECEMBER 9, 2022

About Membership Contact Us Privacy Policy

    
Editorial Policy

Copyright The Pulse. 2021