You are on page 1of 20
229 SNAANA H14e RS 2010. 6. pp. 229~ 248 Zzuepgs] Esa aa Aga we AS ay: ABPASS vs. AU BA FICS 96 H agus Baas asst a> cmhlab@hanyang.ac.kr Bape ws 7g Fetovla PVTWS| RES-HAs ES AGsto Qelol Ae ASA APolch. Ss B AMES 27+] Bol 7/B aes atest SDA SIAC. AM SH-alFe) sz solo AHS Te 7s saree ge] EY AMO BAstDA sitich | WME Bate Aes wash A}U7|Yt BAOIM BALMS AHsta ols Vole) sas ASerwAt each. 7 ANG ANLICe HMISSA BAIA Hey gelel Bee ABS| ASS a 234g, aelD Ael7|e WHOM ZeY oigate AsstD Aselact. Ole Hal SAIS Tse Buy lel 12671 Hale aAtoe ASAE at ALSISACh. az Za, 72] Bee ongzAte 2e¥obilg =21W RES B=stel A(E)2| BAS UES AOS LEH veo], Bee Alaeig ele sayoe FOS BATE ME We Etch. ole Jigs] S2tiohle ZerwH!S sss SEY PASC ABE BAO WSs Weol USS Arse Stoic. iinet hase eaeiaO AA: PVWOA, WeAI-PlAls!, ABASE, ates 7iet of 230 see! What Determines Standardization vs. Adaptation in Global Marketing Program?: An Empirical Study with Contingency and Resource-based Views C. Min Han Hanyang University, College of Business cmhlab@hanyang.ac.kr This study is intended to empirically investigate determinants of the degree of standardization vs. adaptation in global marketing programs for Korea firms. Our study has two main focuses. First, our study takes a global perspective instead o f a binational, i. e., home vs. foreign perspective. Second, we accommodated two conflicting veiws - contingency and resource-based views in explaining determin ants of global marketing strategy. As such determinants, we considered global m arket dynamism and complexity from a contingency view and global marketing a ssets from a resource-based view. Surveys were conducted with 128 Korean fir ms engaged in global marketing. Our study found that Korean firms with global assets tend to engage in highly standardized global marketing programs. On the other hand, global market dynam ism and complexity did not show statistically significant relationships with the d egree of standardization vs. adaptation. The findings suggest that a resource~bas ed view may be more powerful than a contingency view in explaining global ma rketing strategies of Korean firms. —_—_—_—— ———— Keyword: Global Marketing Strategy, Standardization vs. Adaptation, Contingency View, Resource-based View PSHOMS BESTS AIL Ae As IF 291 1.42 Ade] F2BrAQ AGS FAH oo} glo 7d BAAU Aale Me F AAA yeVYLZIAS & QE EEB EE BATS AF Fee aa HE Ald. lat Ada 1S] Gd AIS we aPpEAS sea HALTS fet 7142 APA BAANE WF SAS sale FF Wet. ANE AFAA FAM AD HVAP HEH-AAFH AES AVste adeoze RAGA 22, AB SY, BAS, 24 SA, ND faba, ae S44, Aa AS asst 199 WH F 34 Ras0] AAlse} Met (Jain 1989; Ozsomer and Prussia 2000; Zou and Cavusgil 2002). 224} ods} BE WEE PSHE ASAPAVE, AMA AtHe Cel, FabebAG S2rgs Byap aAsa BQ Aoly GS FS Ao] Aol. S BF aT AF BV ft aya HEH AF ayn WA sole Ge VHA yeABESrgs| ol Ae! jae APS AAHS AME Bako] seb Aeto]tt (Zou and Cavusgil 2002). AGS FAv-AGESIa Fao Yo 7s SUASS BAe Ts sal a, F349 idee eeu ddd = $9 ZB3Is Aaet % S78S ZA@ FE Meh. Levitt (1983)3} Johansson (2006) F HEME Ase Ihe 2 gaz 224 gaa gee Bs Waid. B ATIAS Feu Bal AAS FAAG Herds AIT F ste BAIA Assay ad. F 2 aFE SA SA] ESHA Bde sey vay awdad FS -BA ASS AVHE NMI Madd AS RFa AMaUS ASA 22 asaya U4. #evdAg serge] HER-VAH AES AVFE AML VA BI 4 Ade 4 Ud. dae ARATER Bald. + Beals Vee ge 1G] AFL telah} Pet Ae] (Ozsomer and Prussia 2000; Zou and Cav usgil 2002; Xu, Cavusgil, and White 2006). 43 Bu 7)7S2 zeus 2a o) Aujoe Hae APole ReHUde ase aged + ad. ¥e aval AS Seat BAe NBAISYH ABRAAS BST ARN (Desarbo, Benedetto, Song, and Sinha 2004; Karimi, Somers, and Gupta 2004). S WAS ale Balola ASe + We (Barney 1991; Barney and Arike n 2001). $ 71de] FLY HABATS UH Shae 1S Bs) aa a AswE HERS AGT eel eS F7t Wo (Man and Kim 2003). 71& sapAy EMIS WAS Peuee ZB21d4I ES3-85 AES AQ BE BRASSA BAA ads ge Axe] Be AOS B 232 sto! Ut. ole Gal Zou and Casvugil (2002) 72 71%b4 BAWS Alo] Bary lk BS AAD Md. le AAI FaAQe Lay aye oeq a Ao] WAS Aza Bad] SE As GAS qe Aol. ld 2 aTINS SF 7199 Seg ZVrgo] REa-aH ae = AVte RMON AM Mo] So ZeAe 7199 FAY agza o UF AUAASHIA BAe APALSEA aay sew gag aag = Aj] RAs 2 AHS ASAoe Assay dd. 0. 124 4 8 2] 1Ag az SAA SKA EEB-AAB SAS Levitt (1983) ER oF geal ATH} RA Fal, REBE F7 MY aly Ut opt A Maaoes Fey FAGZSIYA AGZSHIAS APIe AZ, Levite 7e4aq] gh 2 SUR PETE YASS AAD] SAAD go] aA AAAs Sa SAG AaS APs Ae] wealstchs AAlsAch. Onkvist and Shaw (19 BAAS 459] AAS] Yay Be aaayel abel Easgae ot ae Sao) dal a AA ADA, EB, PATE Sol Habedozy a Aart SUED 4 Fav}aAQ] RE Saxe Qasg. EHEHA PAY o] P22 Buzzell (19682 ws at, HaAow Sug W719) Ad, AMs SAY AA, 2D YA ofojcjojg} a AAaa ola & AIS YF 3le}. Backhaus, Muhlfeld, and Van Doorn (2001)9] ato] 4 2 4AS SA NSAIDs, 719 B AFM AI9] Aa aya Vee aga 49 FUst Sa} olde) ads AANA. wad FEIN vA dao 2 a4 AS 24, Hal SI AA GaAs} Avjzo] aq PHS] Se + Q Se fe] AabSel 2] a FES] A7]S]0] Meh (Saimee and Roth 1992; Shoham 1996; Zou and Cavusgil 2002). 710) FAAGS AA Vol 71g] +e PSs EE aaa a Be AS y) Ade] (Cavusgil and Zou 1994). He FPALSRA Baal A aa, ZIMA, 37, 19 2 td 22S ys y 9H age] age a Fate SaebAgs FEI-AIH ALS 2As=E Ae] Ate: asaya Uo] Axwtalel 212}B Az gle} (Solberg 2000; Theodosiou and Katsileas 200 1s Xu et al. 2006). $A] BERI-AAH= Fav}ay_ Zerg Gee ar we ° oof ZSwogo| TEH-OHAs ABQ Be aS Ae 233 2 epg AAG Asta AGA BRE We Zou and Cavusgil 2002). 4491 gz 19S SaAAVS Ags 7154 BIE PRAY ASE Bo) lt. 1S Sa, As Ate BES age, ada Fa 2 FS Ae AAs of SABE AGS AGA + ME Belt (Johansson 2006). sapAQ Z23gd} Bs AES age adoe Ae ate qazZ RRACEA BAI GEG adss AVIT ach. Jain (1989)9] Ate FH ae Wa AAS AANA UF geoz 7199 ABI, BA-ASARI B A, 222 AG] AY AS Sa BUG 24 as ABS asp ass] EA) AYUsy Be ABQ SYRUS AMAA, HRAMSSS Ae alla AA) 3 AAA AUS BPE SENT Ba ads AB WARE, ABZA, 4 AAES EME WGEAA HA ae aqa a4 22,44 24, a4 a2, FAQUZGS BPE 24 Ba ales AASB. Lages (2000)21 AFA Jain (1980)3 He BYR, UF aoe 7a) Sas BIA, AQadaa SA, BIBeAY as BAA, aaa A S4e AATAD, yadese 8d54, adage $4, 24a BSAa SAS alatact Waheeduzzaman and Dube (2004) 29] BU Ava 22, AB, 24, 24, ABA, 4 aya BABII ae F 7M WFES AAS a ad. #2 ASA APS AHUA, Cavusgil and Zou gas Feral ZS 3299 aa} aso de ue aAgadee 199 Sas alee] $4e ae a yy agadess AY SYS TENT SAS Agta LAG As, ye 2 lead BF Leys FAs FAG BS ae ale 4 ehath. Zou and Cavusgil (2002) Zea sagas] ag adeey yi Badoe 7149 344 BUF FRB AMIS, ada Ay agdeze 24 o} 7] Fo Me, asa Hae a4 BE, SAAMI AFRESH RES Be ade Ane. AS asd, BE also] FAAS FIG As BReq, Ba) 1S FRASER BAe ya, Aare Baar 71a SAAB at FEU AGT SAAS Arla dad FSV ga7t ac. Sag EEA BIG Fy Fae Baud, daz Ass oe ad AP deed. S SArAe FFe AGATE aed ae AtatS Aso FHS vale AF ae As Soe se FIs Bal Ar. TH ASA dS AE BAH BE (01 1992; FS 1994; AVA 1996; HSE 19 965} BAS Arla (HSA 1999) Sol, AS arlsyt Ayo] 2Qqo=e nals aoe vehi. aay lad ade tase Ba Bad Foyt AS = A. SF FAA Berg} Arla - ass) BAS Baad ae oe} GS + 37] Fc (Han and Kim 2003). 234 BO! 2. $7 APY WAY AS ATS SRA aa) 37h4] FAIA F7tAd AP Was + Md. A, 7S ATES PEH-AAH EMI QD AY AFH= Ge] AS ATAA = SRUWAI BAIA olFola AP BUALE HHA AE HIT + Act. At AS ATE Fa AG Z27GS BHs WAZ VY Apolo] 29k F FS Be] Ad. oleae PH Ae Fu Ata Fda YE Ket. + BSH Valse) AF VA] HAbsea RSH AG ae] V8 Asol7} eB FIA VHAQTSIGY odo] Ae AF AIFS AMHE BF] 3h che Aelo|c} (Zou and Cavusgil 2002). 71AS°) Farha ZVI2Is| PEF -8798 BS SY4oe AQe Fs MAG, Ase ASS FEU Ba oA) 2 S95) AGS FUE F S7We ZAA FE AG. ATA] Baa Map a de AASS $A FLY ESHAYES AVHT, 1S GOS aaa Aoz FU] Vast FAR ASHIS Musto Wa F7} M-AVZSIG + ado waAlziaa te Bol Uc. SLY RES} ATH7] VE BokIAS a7) dda AES Adar, a7 WIS ad AM S+A4 He PEI-S As} ASE AVY FE Id. leat Bad wai, edd UIs Ee sas VG AS AT7 BAM F AA. EA, 71S ATSANE SAMAG] PEH-AUzlH AVAMCSH BRAS 24 2494 GSt 24 2dSS ANAT YOU, 2A 2USS WAZ a AA S90] Fe AGS HAIR F AS ROE vad. osys Ao ee Ao] men FWA VIIAES BAIA WILVESM GA FAA 2asol AVI AFF PIS MAF US Rol. AtIaH sAole4Aje B gat] $a aAg_adicos BA] BAAMXo] BAS|o} set (Daft 2004; Goll a nd Rasheed 1997). 4% ¥W, Miller and Friesen (1983) 4 8B 480] BETS 71 FA AF] DAM, Porter (190E A¥ BWI] HIVES AQ AGBGE AUS Aol HAE AFYS FPAD Ut. Milliken (1987) & BAY RHRAIAS IRAIY URS ASsp7] oles AMoze Alsen, FR BHRIY] 2VOBe AEYMH HAG] HFoVAD At(Desarbo et al. 2 004; Karimi et al. 2004). ol} Zo] BAS] RAIIs} 71q] Ashe] BAS #4 oles} AGAY wot AA Ta Bes) ATH ASAE SPAR, JaAP Lode aA F Buz] £8 VY] Me ALS Bad. oo Be ATAae BI] BHIYS) Sao 2de Fo] FLU AF ASA Fag YES FEW IAG 222 yo) EEHR-AIF ASS APHeE YF 2UOs HAs aA Va. AA, FA} AQ] HE-V7AS ALS AVHE AMOe IY VA Aas yee] We Mase] AANHTD Ise Ay Aas vy} ae. MA AAS SRO NG WESI-HNs BAL BS WS AP 295 we 2ae 7199 als Uae wae wzeeo] de Ad. Sa 7d Ba a, Ae Sa, 2a Sas As SA) ase SavpAY AGS apart wa oy Ase F Beh A771 EA Vad, 199 BE 71a SH] Aaa We S384 AR 8 BSAA FAC (Day 1994; Hooley, Fahy, Cox, Beracs, Fonfara, and Sno} 2000; Lockett, Thompson, and Morgenstern 2009). ae 2244 Ba, Sarbas at Aa) 1H 244 2a FHF 7 del me SRUACS BFaa sat, 1S gal Bea Lue edad + 2 ya e + Mth. Saag AMO se AEBAA (Cavusgil and Zou 1994), 4 @e a4 (Dutta, Narasimhan, and Rajivet 1999), 14 744 (Kobrin 1994), Fal £2) (Workman, Homburg, and Gruneret 1998), 2232 1342 (Day 1994) go] alals|at gett. oleae zd 2a) Ba, ZEW gas BRE AISS 1S AM AFAR Ae F RESAFS Agar t Aol tc (Johansson 2006). HA, FUASS As] VAT # Me ato] AeaAel 7) de aaa + aq Ata was (customization) $a] 2VAS FBepa Ae AGS ATA F US Bele. WM. at 7a Ra 1.at 7a VIA ee SA MAS vos, BATS ZeurAaAg 22199 EB E3-U2s BES AVHE AAS ASAE TAS vo} 2 S3e] th. aq aloey, Aawolsayy BH 71M FSW mbAIA aaa a qzaed4 Bee PIPASEA BAIA FSH NARA AUS FAM se Baap Beet. J}. BBY Alege BIA aewoAs ZerAS| einlst 24 way ae vo Qo] B azaAve FeUMG Zsade E Sage ALS aated Ads MAE AAS adozy feu At agg Biase aAsaas te. Ba4 Baye SF B89 Use AS a7] Ae ABLES Milliken (1987) BD No, $2 BHAA ae Ze AEs} BRO] AAG F AUF (Desarbo et al. 2004; Karimi, Somers, and Gupta 2004). AA] ASQo]a AGHA 22S BIBS Satz das Was] 4B = 9]n) x1 (Achrol and Stern 1988; Dess and Beard 1984; Karimi et al. 2004), 236 steel ATHBAUM RAMS UA 71S, 71a, 28 FR WISH TE GM Ra So] ¥eadc(Cui, Griffith, and Cavusgil 2005). aa] sts} Ze] FIA w AAs Wee BA WHE 7199 Bese] AS Ast ROB ABAS Aol Deis|4) xu ct (Lawrence and Lorsch 1973; Pfeffer and Salancik 1 978). UALS Als] AEA] STS 71AS ASS Artage] Waar} (Pearce 1997), ¥22 4S¥4e] RE ADAME Araal We ASye Ba 4°) ZozBs ur AFs] WAAAAIS UF ME BA] FlaAgua ete + a ™ (Wiersema and Bantel 1993). ZEBtAD aAsy Pads, AS4d fea ATHAIAS 71US Pearce (1997)7} FARE wes} Bo] ASM Ah AQst YS SAA HAVIS Fas Bs 2 AG. F2U AFTRA] FEAA Me MASS FA AAA alse a4 Fe &4e] Anaqoe Fea + Mo. Muse BIBS Hay AqWS She 2B1GS ALAD Aya Su, 2 GE FA FAsV FoF B27) HEA Ze] (Buzzell 1968: Johansson 2006). 19 S#3a Z2IAYe AF 224°] wast Ad aAvssya qevyseo=e YU FE Ad. As Sa, as Sette AUS AMA Sasa Aol BaS7} BaRs7] Geo Faw Aoze wa yeas AS RP waAS YAS Aa Besa ac. ge Mae Ee AAoy Sas7} eas Aa cl Be ARS aAsoltp BYES E a] Awsojoe Ht Ret}. o] AF E ca) AWS Syste asol4 Zergs Awaaz sea 7AASMAS Aad FA YH] Ae US Ald. Ay ar AA AAHE AAA S F7AU NS Hol BF RS) AAe vt ae (Han and Kim 2003) ma Saad sed eso Aa RE ade asa Te Fz wc AB Aso] SAYS ASs7] AE ATA LAD A He FAS as @ eA BS Ald. Ade] AYIA Adaos Ay Boe TEA ASH PHAPZSIAS BAF VE AE WAR FY AFD Ket. mee A439 UF 7ae] Ast AOS ABA, WAL: SBUANFT ASA SL APAMS SSUTAY =BUGY REM AS SD aH AEE VS Rol. a8, 149 Sage 249 Be Bad BAar94 4YxyoR AA] B Bak HE BY SH] 129s A") Bet (Dess and Beard 1984; Duncan 197 2; Freel 2005; Karimi et al. 2004). 3a-de] HE AD BAIA IAS Aad FY RASH He ZA] AS Yada, ss olewalzste] vba Bet Aa +¥el GW Belt} (Dess and Beard 1984). Sharfman and Dean (1991) Aa] Hato] as] AS AS, As GSA, aya 71S) Saas as yu aaa Ma. Be Falebaes Aes} Baste, S2UNF Sago] & BEYOM TSI BIL Be aS er 237 Sf BAAS 1VS 49H S74 ASU HAGLSS 2942 FHI ASE lease] FUS|a aA29 eso] |sy7] Weel FSS we aa] Ho ASHE AGS AG? Aso] SS AS AGE F Ad. He FEW AM SAU} HET AS] VS AVS 4H do] ABs + US Bold. AZ SZBNA HAA] HE APAE FSWIAD ZZ1G BAe ASM HU RES ARE VS Alt. U. 224 OPA Besos RES HAA EAM vo} Po], Az woy= edd ua seeupag Acts] a AS Ao] Me AUS VHAU AD, 1S PA Beseua wea + Ad2 SF Ad. as SA, 294e] SS AFS BHU YE FHY 714 2 A APN aa ABH) AVVS BBs7] HAVE FEY ASS IF BAU, He AS UPLS He REA AIPZSIVS AGE S40 %@ Alc (Han and Kim 2003). 4+, U7=7} we FSU BYES UH @ ANS BAS ADE BIH Me ASS HACE ESHA BUS R wal ol Jeo] BA] Atel AYA 7hedol H&S Aeltt (Baalbaki and Malh otra 1995). leet atau aaa] wa, SeBrbAPGAIS we 1YS2 oe Ae] FFACe lage SF RERHAFS AAs uA GY Alc} (Johans son 2006), #2, Fa aAos as} Ad + ME MkAgate) EAA YL aaa SF a4 ADA DAIS FH AVIS Ansa se AGS AG Bsr AS Alc. ooo GS SE WAS AVA. AALS: 71D] FZ ADA BH ASA STS FAAP BSH Aan SU VAS AEE RS AM. 2.97 3H At. AFA BAY Aolst SA Be BU agate 7149 AS B 71e BAA (Hooley, et. al 2001; Zahra an d Das 1993)3} ¥@= 7}Ab(Dutta et al. 1999; Keller 1992S Bete] FAA GD payee OAPI VE ASH AWA BH CD, QF AMAY 4S A AE (x2), O1F9 TAY CA FAA FR AS (x3), OHA BVI + D 71 AFAAE TBE obAGALEE alalet5t 91044 (Hooley et al. 2000), 14) PA 7H RE aid) HE ago apse ABs} BUE AHLoe WeaIIE. 238 see! QE ASA FAI (x4), OQHUESMH 71ND AMAA FAM MMA AE (x 5) & S74] Vel Wa 74 AAS AES ‘A SAAA VS) “WF SI HOLS SAA. FEU ATISIS AGHA 2929 BWS}(Duncan 1972)B ASH OAT BS SAME (x6), OU: Ba- 7A AY] Ws (x7), OVA 71ZS] Wt (x8), Aega Os 499 71e AF (x9)B 49+ (Homburg, Krohmer, and Wo rkman 1999). )#44t-g& Zo] ze] aor st B&B] W9(Dess and Beard 1 984; Duncan 1972) Ase] OFS BA ZA/ZAA + (x10), QH7Ht AAS Als] ol (xl), OBAHE AFI] GY QE(12), OUAWY Poa Al Bee MAE BA S98 (x13) TAD @ 9H] AB We (x14) SLE SATAY. SAL 74 YAS AES 4AA4 ATASVS ‘AY sp UH) “WF Bs} AH'Des, JAPHTIS'ag SIs] VS) “MF FS JHDNLZ2 FAaGaq, SLAY PEHR-AA1G Bas BBad AYR zAIAG. AWA 22 AWE BAIME FAMAD ZPEH-AAHS ZBIYR BEHAS YY AW SFstat Wet (YJain 1989: Shoham 1995). Tei} ¥YIe Lear va a FE WAS AAI AF Wteelya asad AEE Ss] aUaad Ayo] VSS PUR F Wd. GF4 SVs} EEH-AASH WE CA Bet F lata, 243}] Bae JE Ald ssy/algszd we Ae aya ste. He} B APA) SSMAG PSH-AIHS ZBI Ay 2 Ag 2a Saaac. = UTIMES EER-AzAH AES 27 AOE, SF ABs SA YYOR FRAY SARA. 71S LRAA AAS vbs} Do] EER AE SA a 24 AFAA BAe] Ae] A + 7] WTe]c (Zou and Cavusgil 2002; Johanss on 2006). J #22 7199 WAAaA Ba AY VES BU ASA F ac. auaqces vag AY SAS Ad Ete BAIy Bsa ZEHS = SAE Bd, AA] Gao Fao] Be ASA Hore az Yel] 4 date AHS FRE BES Bele BH7} We} (Mendall, Punnett, Ricks 1 995). JE ERAHE BIER, APAVBAG, uAAMwA9 Ye Benge HEEANE BP] BIG, 74, FF UIs wa Zende Anqgqoe BARTS BY] WSS AAsD WF (Quelch and Hoff 1986; Douglas, Craig, and Nijssen 2001; Arnold and Schroiff 2004). ASAU FEH-AIH YEE MAGYA 29 FASS FEY HAD 22 S9A (Cavusgil and Zou 1994, Shoham 2002). Fae FAG HA AFA Bate ORGIES (y), OUBA Hz B Aa (y2), za OaAUAa tA Ae (y3) S94] Bad qe sey seo]ly AEs S¥ad2 da 7) 2) ABA] R22 SR HALAe]= Sage ASAAlAY] FBSUOU, A137} BaAoe yo} BANAIE AYNSIUS. GY, ADAAyJAs aM! ef Beare BWI7} Se ROS yeh} Wey SMO BES-sAs ABQ Be ws ay 209 SA SAAIZA OA (yd), OVAZAA FS (y5), @F AMAIA (ys), OA") Ad S¥EUAY BA (yD MENA. Sa Ase 4 Bho) Wa 7a AAS FEL FS FEP)s WE SHDZ FVIAc. HA Le AFeE LES AE? SE, FS AFe Us AE See AMAT. (ag 1a 2 22u ga eee SOS Be _—— ta] x5 Bal-aa| Aste) ae] G6] Ss _——_ Cae) + #8 NEY Lx6_] s ~~ SE 8 81-21718 {35 A eco —>s, “gaa AES a SS ZS sae MIA ASA UF SAIS dos AF 7a ASS AA #2). BF Nunnally (1978)7} AnHe 7s HAA 4 BSS] UAdaAY) gee AVG we Feel Roz BGA. of} SrAo Amoss Sal PIAA Y7tHc (Fornell and Larker 1981). < 1>4 Beso) FAS VA VE FAl7} 06S HAA] AAA o| fxg RO Bea. Aa Sa Peo] 29 AGS Baya, Amos 23} BHAI 4B UF 2 MGc1O, x19 THAW (x15)7F OSS HHA tal Yetskalet, Hel] wre waa Se FAS Mola Me AOR Mid. Asses Fale RR 05 yor vet, 49a Beso] oh A= Hud 2os gddd. au a Jaq AL FLUAAB] BHAY Ho] ASASse] Ha SA yest. Stace Braye, 4949 asae was gud Ace wad. SA aU 139 HRARS AMT YSIS BE Ace B7ad) S9S8 484 AMAA USS Bt we # aaaqae | asada ASA BVA AAA KL) 833 gen [EAA Gea AEC) 828 via [aisl al f Ga AA de FH AGS) | 725 aa [PSA $AAGA) oat BaEMa lal $34 BECH) 550) ARE SABE) 779 geu [xa aes) ai) 630 A® 44 [aa AB BAGS) 778 ag U2 71S BAGO) 656, HE Ue 24/2489] F000 AT2 gey [27RE ae Wa dlaoD ATI Ala a Bo ASS] GAY BE(x12) 556 2a FAA AVE AT APASOA) 612 2eaS 4 AEGID 842 Aaa FAG] 2A= FGI S61 HES Way daa AMA gy Aae?) 928 AS AVA HAR AeHy3) 718 Aya) ATS ea Wag sazaa AwGD ‘61 45 [2a WAG) 814 APA FEV AAD 858 Fa = 2Eu- ae, p = WIAs", AVE = WEA 3) S2wAVS] BAHIgo] 10s} xs Aloisi eb WAKE TAF AE wok, BARS 935) BANS Wt MMS. B AE dos xs ase 372] SAAlwrhe 71S BUd FATE 242\(Dess and Beard 1984; Duncan 7219} Ess SAlei] als|-go] se 57H) FAA 28S Bat she Blo] Ue dietoletar acted. 242 Bee! 2. 71d AS - FA BY Aw toa AVe Hs} Be] 37] AVRAM} FEH-AAs} AEs9] aapyay Q 7H] Ha AMOS 408 Sal HAASE FANG. Fz BY as a = RES AE CA -012 -019) | 078 | -154 7H ng dea > mee as Cle) 07 (102) | 069 | 816 | 71 Aa Sa > RES AE (aq) =046 (-.075) | 072 | -635 V4 2) a aa > Bem aE Cle) ~o17 031) | 064 | 265 | 717 vAGA > REA AS (CAD 168 (215 | 082 | 2.046 74 3) wawad > Bem AE Cle) zai (328 | x2 | 2779 | 44 By | x7-215.8, HFE=169, p=01 ATA | al , CFI=.961, AGF: FC de EMME, * FIFE 576 SEWONT FES-Us BBQ BS as AP 249 V. az 2 ATANE GF 719) FLUNG BVI] REH-VAF AES A APE ANS ASAoe Asay BA. He] ¥ ATANE BS-84aa 3 gauge feu add wes-aasy asaade Am ugh. Aad oz $4 FRASER Gad SAA S4S a Fes BHA & go] 2ANAd. FAV! SEUNG BHAG aloe ABASAH ANA ayo uy 2 BS ASHAG. Bate Beagead Bae +e} at gaey vada Fea valgaHto] SeMeAQ PSS- UAH asa A) =e EFS tees aac. BA ash, 1 See odate FeUrAss HES-8H AES BARE dol $9 BFS TAS Aoe yes Veo, S2aIs 24 29 2 9eo] ME ALE gepta. | ase, 71a] geuragzeia +a go) EES-AAa ASS AAG A, SVWIFA FERN S245 ae Je Bg ade DAs] SS Aa Fa ad. wed Fee hale aA Bet AVSS SLY REIS FH UH AS AACS Aa lAsqe Ato] NSS AS Ash7t BAFB eth. 2 az ashe igo] As Va Ray AI Ge age seadce 7 € PYG2q BAM w= Astolc (Solberg 2002; Theodosiou and Katsilea s 2001; Xu et al. 2006). 2 999) AZ Bra + Art. Aa 719 age AG) AM wy Be} SA] Ja agate Adiwed wast BS A3}o] 4 (Baalbaki and Malhotra 1995; Han and Kim 2003; Johansson 2006). + as 79 FEMAGATS FAUHE Fo] AY Vad Ge aayude A A AFY VIE AVIS Pos ofS Ao ol Mapa a se Axe] Se AAAS Aol. old] AS ASHE, 71M] APBS Ae Se] Sears BHIse aa aso} Paap Sls] 7] MEI BAT FE VS Ald. ae] Ge Vp gad de PAs RAMS Bee Ao Pass, 4 aad MATE Salsp) dae FE ach. gal adel Beate UE FLU PAPAS ws of FE AF Fae BAALS Fah HAT + YE Bae] Wa F MA. BE V9 24g DAHA Sz 71d BF AS HOS Fe TeUcbAs Ag FGo] Arty Aste AA ye Ge BAC. le E ATA a #2) SE daly, SF F741 ary Bad Fale. Baz) dagoze Fa gee a8 adee vasa] Qate age 244 Bee! FAG. ZZWLAY ESS Ate] agqadozy ABBAAY Leo] opy He doe B8NFse EU 7o FAG Vo] US += gle Ald. = A 72] S2Y Agata Ba sto as, ae yw uae 19) GF 29 & 2H474 Batt 799 Qa, a aa, AZAR Ss} BUA vpy SB ato Be WES] me apo} wWasjojor g wolch WA) o2, dey MAE AAR ESA a] B_ AYE7} -Yapoy WAS SYS RAs] dere. apy ay MA ESS AEM Ado] me Aso] ge asane Yt4so] Ad we ANAL, JABAL aes] Sw ql we ae gow OS Fa) 5} BASF ae] Soh Aso Hao Be ge yopo gy SAS Beep BSVOMES BSNS SAQoG Be AS AP 245 Haga AMA. 196. Sa] ASA Ya: Agee 2 gaol] Be AT IIPa ts , 25a AlL®, pp 27-49. wh 2. 2009. "Amos 170 F2YBA BAY: Ue} aay, VPSMA} ESE. 196 HS AW FeAF Aes] UHeY BA, Ay, eA ade Fyoe, TASHA, AQSU ABS, pp 111-143. oH. 1904. URAG AS FS HA Ata AW. “FABIaAT, ASA aS, pp 1-22, o] 4.1992 "FS vag BA FEM] Bal Be ATA UAL BAta Hy A224 ALLE, pp 243-265. PSU. 1900 SF AS UH 1A AT YS Aa AT. BVIHATs AWA ABE, pp 637-657. Achrol, R. S, and Stern, L, W. 1988. "Environmental Determinants of Decisional Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels.” Journal of Marketing Research 25(February), pp 36-50. Arnold, D. and Schroiff, H. W. 2004. Strategies for Managing Brand and Product in International Markets, in Quelch, J. & Deshpande, R. eds The Global Market, Jossey-Bass. Baalbaki, Imad B. and Malhotra, N. K. 1995. "Standardization versus Customization in International Marketing: An Investigation Using Bridging Conjoint Analysis. " Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(3), pp 182-194. Backhaus, K., Mublfeld, K., and Van Doorn, J. 2001.”Consumer Perspectives on Standardization in International Advertising: A Student Sample.” Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), pp 53-61. Barney, J. B. 1991. "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management, 17(March), pp 99-120. ___, and Arikan, A. M. 2001. "The Resource-based View: Origins and Implications." In Hitt, M. A, Freeman, R. E, and Harrison, J. S.(Bds.), Handbook of Strategic Manaement, pp 124-188. Oxford: Blackwell. Buvzell, R. D. 1968. "Can you Standardize Multinational Marketing?” Harvard Business Review, 32, pp 102-113. Cavusgil, S. T., and S. Zou. 1994. "Marketing Strategy-Performance Relationship: An Investigation for the Empirical Link in Export in Export Market Ventures.” Journal of Marketing, 58(January), pp 1-21. 246 Sol Cai, A. S, Griffith, D. A, and Cavusgil, S. T. 2005. "The Influence of Competitive Intensity and Market Dynamism on Knowledge Management Capabilities of Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries.” Journal of International Marketing, 13(3), pp 32-53. Daft, R. L. 2004. Organizational Theory and Design, 8th ed, Mason, Ohio: Thomson Southwestern. Day, George. 1994. "The Capebilities of Market-Driven Organizations.” Journal of Marketing, 58, 4, pp 37-52. DeSarbo, W. S., Benedetto, A. C., Song, M., and Sinha, I. 2004, “Revisitiong the Miles and ‘Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships Between Strategic ‘Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Filmbiliformance.” Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), pp 47-74. Dess, G. G, and Beard, D. W. 1984. "Dimension of Organizational Task Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), pp 52-73. Douglas, Susan P. C. Samuel Craig, and E. J. Nijssen. 2001. "Integrating Branding Strategy ‘Across Markets: Building International Brand Architecture.” Journal of International Marketing, 9(2), pp 97-114 Duncan, R. 1972. "Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp 313-327. Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., and Rajiv, S. 1999. "Success in High~Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical 2" Marketing Science, 18(4), pp 547-568. Fahy, J, Hooley, G., Cox, A., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K, Snoj, B. 2000. “The Development and Impact of Marketing Capabilities in Central Europe.” Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 1, pp 63-81. Freel, M. S. 2001, "Perceived Environmental Uncertainty and Innovation in Small Firms.” Small Business Economics, 25, pp 49-64. Goll, L, and Rasheed, A. M. A. 1997. "Rational Decision-Making and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment.” Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp 583-591. Han, C. Min and Jung Min Kim, 2003. "Korean Marketing in China: An Exploratory Analysis of Strategy-Performance Relationships.” Journal of International Marketing, 11, 2, pp 79-100. Hooley, G., Fahy, J., Cox, A., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K., Snoj, B., 2000. “Marketing Capabilities and Firm Performance: A Hierarchical Model.” Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4, 3, pp 259-278. Homburg, C., H. Krohmer and J. P. Workman. 1999. "Strategic Consensus and Performance: ‘The Role of Strategy Type and Market Related Dynamism." Strategic Management Journal, 20: pp 339-357, S2VOATA HES-HAs ABQ BH aS AP 247 Jain, S. C. 1989. "Standardization of International Marketing Strategy: Some Research Hypotheses.” Journal of Marketing, 53(January), pp 70-79. Johansson, Johny K. 2006. Global Marketing: Foreign Entry, Local Marketing & Global Marketing, 4th ed, McGraw-Hill. Karimi, J., Somers, T. M,, and Gupta, Y. P. 2004. "Impact of Environmental Uncertainty and Task Characteristics on User Satisfaction with Data." Information Systems Research, 15(2), pp 175-193. Keller, K. 1993. "Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity.” Journal of Marketing, 57, pp 1-22. Lages, L. F. 2000 “A Conceptual Framework of the Determinants of Export Performance: Reorganizing Key Variables and Shifting Contingencies in Export Marketing.” Journal of Global Marketing, 13(3), pp 29-51. Levitt, Theodore. 1983, "The Globalization of Markets." Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp 92-102. Lockett, Andy, Steve Thompson, and Uta Morgenstern. 2009. "The Development ‘of the Resource-based view of the firm: a Critical Appraisal.” International Journal of Management Reviews 11(1), pp.9-28. Mendall, Mark E., B. J. Punnett, and D. A. Ricks. 1995 “Global management.” Wiley~Black well. Miller, D., and Friesen, P, H. 1983. "Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link," Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), pp 221-235. Milliken, F. J. 1987. "Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment State, Effect and Response Uncertainty.” Academy of Management Review 12(1), pp 133-143. Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. Second Edition. New York. Onkvist, S. and Shaw, J. J. 1987. “Standardized International Advertising: A Review and Critical Evaluation of the theoritical and Empirical Evidence." Columbia Journal of World Business, 22, pp 9-14. Ozsomer, A., and Prussia, G. E. 2000. "Competing Perspectives in International Marketing Strategy: Contingency and Process Models.” Journal of International Marketing 81, pp 27-50. Pearce, R. J. 1997. "Toward Understanding Joint Venture Performance and Survival A Bargaining and Influence Approach to Transaction Cost Theory.” Academy of Management Review, 22, pp 203-225. Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. 1978. “The External Control of Organizations: A Resourc: Dependence Perspective.” New York: Harper & Row. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press. 248 B1Bo1 Quelch and Hoff. 1986. "Customizing Global Marketing.” Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp 59-68. Samiee, S., and Kendall Roth. 1992. "The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance.” Journal of Marketing, 58. pp 70-79. Sharfman, M. P., and Dean, J. W. 1991. "Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimentional Approach.” Journal of management, 17, pp. 681-700. Shoham, Aviv. 1996. "Marketing-Mix Standardization: Determinants of Export Perfomance.” Journal of Global Marketing, 10(2), pp 53-73. Solberg, C. A. 2000 "Educator Insights: Standardization or Adaptation of the International Marketing Mix: the Role of the Local Subsidiary /Representative.” Journal of International Marketing, 8(1), pp 78-98. ‘Theodosiou, M., and Katsikeas, C. S. 2001 "Factors Influencing the Degree of International Pricing Strategy of Multinational Corporations.” Journal of International Marketing, 9(3), pp 1-18. Waheeduzzaman, A. N. M. and Dube, Leon F. 2004. "Trends and Development in Standardization Adaptation Research.” Journal of Global Marketing, 17(4), pp 23-52. Wiersema, M. F., and Bantel, K. A. 1992. "Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change.” Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp 91-121. Workman, John P., Jr, C. Homburg, and K. Gruner. 1998. "Marketing Organization: An Integrative Framework of Dimensions and Determinants." Journal of Marketing, 62 (July), pp 21-41. Xu, S., Cavusgil, S. T., and White, J. C. 2006. "The Impact of Strategic Fit Among Strategy, Structure, and Process on Multinational Corporation Performance: A Multimethod Assessment." Journal of International Marketing, 14(2), pp.1-31. Zahra, S., and Das, S. 1993. "Building Competitive Advantage on Manufacturing Resources.” Long Range Planning, 26, 2, pp 90-100. Zou, Shaoming, and Cavusgil, S. T. 2002. “The GMS: A Broad Conceptualization of Global Marketing Strategy and Its Effect on Firm Performance.” Journal of Marketing, 66(4), pp 40-56. EET +: 2010. 05. 10 EETA + 2010. 06. 04 AAA + 2010. 06. 10

You might also like