Various letters set N#1

Disclaimer:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K5pR03B1l1h49sxNcSWd9Q_5Q57ew5SkyiRAX6-FDyk/
edit?usp=drivesdk

The authors, including myself, :Luc-Quang:Vo, present the information only as educational
material and do not claim that this information is the basis of legal advice, nor should the reader.

All content posted on this website including the content of this post are works of fiction.

Any resemblance to actual persons or events is purely coincidental.

It is hoped that the information presented will spark many conversations around the kitchen
table, with the National Constitution in one hand and the BIBLE (the basis of our law) in the
other.

It is recommended, before taking any legal action, that you consult a person qualified to advise
you (and your lawyer) in matters of national and international law, admiralty and maritime
process.

The authors accept no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from the use of the
material and information presented.

I recommend that you visit "youarelaw.org" at the following link to learn even more about the
topics cited in this document.

https://www.youarelaw.org

Autograph:

:Luc-Quang: Vo.

On this blessed day of Sunday, December 25, circumstances made it possible to give a gift to
humanity in this document offered to all individuals aspiring to sovereignty and respect for these
rights and freedoms.

In order to use the letters quoted in this document, translate them into your language and
modify the references of the legal texts mentioned in correspondence with those formulated in
the legal texts of your territory of residence.
You are asked to follow the instructions in each letter and to make sure to add to your letter:

-A color photocopy of your live-life-claim.

-A color photocopy of your see-Pass.

-A color photocopy of your Affidavit of Status or notice of understanding, intent and claim of
rights.

-A copy of your dictionary.

To further protect the terms of your documents, write in C-S-S-C-P-S-G when circumstances
permit.

Also add the other elements bringing the Jurisdiction of the UPU to your letter and giving you
complete authority over the execution of the terms of the document and sign your autograph
with the mention "without prejudice".

Thanks to :David-wynn:Miller:, :Mark-kishon:Christopher:, the youarelaw.org team and all other

contributors who participated in the work of emancipation of the world by the creator of the
universe.

What can you do when you know the law?

This is a non-exhaustive list of your possibilities:

-Defend yourself in a court of law with increased means.

-Eliminate financial burdens such as debts and mortgages that prevent you from flourishing and
are based on easily demonstrable bad practices.

-Eliminate requests for payment of imposed financial contributions which are in fact
racketeering by dishonest authorities.

-Eliminate payment requests for services that are already paid for in advance.

-Eliminate requests for Licenses to do what God authorizes you to do.

-Eliminate acts of intimidation and oppression by uninformed agents who supposedly serve
you.

-Eliminate links and contracts based on fraud.

-And many other things.

Because the law is with you!

Visit the following youtube channels and websites to learn the C-S-S-C-P-S-G language:

https://www.dwmlc.net/

https://m.youtube.com/@JasonmatthewGlass
https://m.youtube.com/@RaiseWisdom

Reasonable use rule adhered to by the non-commercial quote in a legal context of unclearly
defined word limits and other irregularities of the law.

Table of content :

1-Claim Response - Cover Letter-Follow Ups.

A series of 2 letters to answer any form of offer to contract.

The first letter "claim response" answers using error correction, inquiry and conditional
acceptance to the offer.
The second letter is a follow up letter, "Notice of Final Default and Estoppel", it voids the offer
because of lack of answer from them.

2-Question to ask Govt or Corp Offers.

A bill of the lading letter, a letter of conditional acceptance to a claim, giving them 10 days to
answer to your inquiries or else some defined conditions are taking force of law.

3-Letter - shut down accounts-no data selling.

A letter to the banks, courts, and other agencies asking them simply to stop selling your data
giving them 10 days to reply.

4-NOTICE of Fictitious Conveyance of Language.

A letter sent to court to claim the use of fictitious conveyance of language by the other parties.

5-Glossary Page to Submit - Nothing is Defined.

A letter sent in court asking them the definition of particular words and giving them your own
definition of those words. If they don't reply with their definitions as you inquired you are free to
apply yours during the case.

6-Capital Letter Name Initials Matter - Motion.

A letter sent to the court to outline why proper name calling is important point by point. It asks
for the dismissal of the case because of wrong use of name and gives them 14 days to reply or
the defined conditions in the letters take force of law.

7- Motion Definitive Statement Court Motion.

A letter motion for définitive statement that you send in court in order to ask the judge to provide
a order to correct the language of the other parties and to use CSSCPSG based on the
language defects you outlined in their documents.

8- Follow conditional-accept instructions.

A series of 2 letters sent after performing error correction of the other party document.
The first is "Notice of Terms [in plain language form]" making inquiries and performing
conditional acceptance, if they don't reply within the delay the defined conditions apply.
The second follow up letter is "Final Conditional Acceptance to Notice of Terms", it is a reminder
of the first letter.

9-3 Step Admin Process-Bank-Credit Collection Letters.

A series of three letters following the correct 3 step administrative process in order to enforce
the voidance of a debt to a financial institution.
The first letter is a list of inquiries and conditional acceptance of their claim of debt, giving them
10 days to reply.
The second letter is a reminder, you give them another chance lasting 10 days to reply to your
inquiry and conditional acceptance.
The third letter is the voidance of the debt and enforcement of the defined terms of your letter.

Beginning of Quote:

"
 Claim Response - Cover Letter-Follow Ups
[COMMENT - This is for initial contract reply with syntaxes docs attached in return. Be sure to include an index of
definitions, addendum A, all SEALED together; not stapled or paper clipped. DO NOT USE THIS IF MIXING WITH
OTHER PROCESSES. Be VERY carefyul to only use terms in this counter offer they used in their offer. Be very
customized in this action. This is NOT a general template. There is no such thing.
:Void of the legal-advice.

Plain-simple-English & Plain-Simple-Counting-Systems

(Many versions) The Living Man John-Henry: Doe

JOHN HENRY DOE and all derivatives thereof,
c/o address [ZIP non-corporate]

Roberts rules of order apply [In plain language to aid your understanding]
CEO and or Persons with significant control
(this process is how minutes and trusts are formed – we are forming a NEW expressed trust)

J8n Chr1ster Johnson

I3n McConnell
Jul1an M1chael W1nfield
US Bank,
1 L2mited and all other Parent and subsidiary companies.
123 Anywhere street,
Cleveland, Ohio, USA 90076

Perpetual-Claim-number and date: ________________ 19-February 2021 (*the 1st RM#)

Greeting: I hope this correspondence finds Youse in sound health and good stead. (always be the friendly
amicus curie – You may send a similar copy of this as the friendly 2nd follow up letter, with slightly different
wording - as a friendly reminder)

We are happy and willing to discharge any liabilities on the following terms:

Examination statement: We will keep a detailed case file. In our Private and Public duties, we have
notice that there is no wet ink Signature, name or Autograph on Youse letter / billing of the lading
making it Author-less. We are sympathetic if this was an error on youse part and can be easily be
remedied with simple letter of apology from Youse, until than we have retained the Envelope &
Letters/bills of the lading has part of our evidence gathering, if not:

We have examined Youse Letter & Envelope/Bills of the Lading and found errors: please stop and correct to
avoid possible Mail fraud, possible false advertising, fictitious use of language, pertaining to 18 U.S. Code
§ 1341 - Frauds and swindles. The use of closed brackets and vectors violating the four corners rules:
Black law Dictionary 5th Ed, P591.

See Evidence pages attached. (include their docs syntaxed correctly and all pages sealed together)

Statement: Consent is withdrawn for Youse and all companies and Parent companies, to hold any data
on any of the variant spelling names and titles attached to My full Address post code in lower case.

For Us to safeguard Youse from Jeopardy please answer these following Questions:

Non-negotiable

1. Which dictionary or styles manual you are writing from? Please give your answer here
_____________________________________________________.
 2. Is a P.O Box a lawful contracting-venue? Yes or No

3. Do Youse have a copy-right release from the post-master-general to copy her 2 nd class-postage
stamps (if applicable, such as metered stamps)? Attach copy-right release evidence to this
contract.

4. Youse guarantee in a sworn affidavit with a Justice of the Peace under penalty of perjury
that the names, language and monies are not involving Us and Youse, in Counterfeiting, Mail-
fraud, Money-Laundering and False Advertising? Attach evidence to this contract.

5. Youse qualifications? Attach evidence to this contract.

6. Evidence and proof of Youse mandate and Bond? Attach evidence to this contract.

7. What specie will Yous accept or lawfully require as payment? Please consider 18 USC § 8 and
then 31 USC § 3124 and EXHIBIT A. I do not want to break the law in paying you if your claim is
valid. It seems I might be forced to break the law if you demand federal reserve notes.

8. Be advised that 18 U.S. Code § 1341 - Frauds and swindles, may be something for
consideration if continuing to collect this matter without authorization.

I want to get this tax bill (or whatever it is) taken care of as soon as possible. I will grant 10 days for your
response or I will assume you agree that nothing further is owed.

Validity of the of any debt with the original persons and or listed Companies?
Attach evidence to this contract.

We reserve the right to compensation from Youse in Youse private capacity should any of your past or future
actions compromise our credibility in any way whatsoever.

Failure by Yourselves in Youse private capacity to respond within ten days from receipt of this
correspondence shall constitute legal accord and satisfaction of all claims.

_____________________________ ___________ 2021

:Your-full: Name - Sovereign Live-Life Claimant:
copyright/Copy-claim all rights reserved.

[No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Rights Reserved.]
[WITHOUT PREJUDICE – NON-ASSUMPSIT - Calls maybe recorded.]

(NOTES - we create a simple contract here; they will never really acknowledge this claim against their
flawed fiction language. This can shut down any corporation/ govt. etc – non-contract offers they send you.
We effectively remove the office of surety / trustee by presumption on their documents)
 EXHIBIT A

18 U.S. Code § 8 - Obligation or other security of the United States defined

The term “obligation or other security of the United States” includes all bonds, certificates of
indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve bank notes,
coupons, United States notes, Treasury notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes,
certificates of deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized officers of the
United States, stamps and other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued under
any Act of Congress, and cancelled United States stamps. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 685.)

31 U.S. Code § 3124 - Exemption from taxation

(a) Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are exempt from taxation by a State
or political subdivision of a State. The exemption applies to each form of taxation that would
require the obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be considered in computing a tax,
except—

(1) a nondiscriminatory franchise tax or another non-property tax instead of a franchise tax,
imposed on a corporation; and
(2) an estate or inheritance tax.
(b) The tax status of interest on obligations and dividends, earnings, or other income from
evidences of ownership issued by the Government or an agency and the tax treatment of gain and
loss from the disposition of those obligations and evidences of ownership is decided under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

An obligation that the Federal Housing Administration had agreed, under a contract made before
March 1, 1941, to issue at a future date, has the tax exemption privileges provided by the
authorizing law at the time of the contract. This subsection does not apply to obligations and
evidences of ownership issued by the District of Columbia, a territory or possession of the United
States, or a department, agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision of the District, territory, or
possession. (Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 945; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100
Stat. 2095.)

Article 1 Section 10 United States Constitution

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and
Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in
Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of
Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay
any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for
executing it’s [sic] inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State
on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws
shall be subject to the Revision and Control of the Congress. No State shall, without the Consent of
Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any
Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless
actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
 [:Syntax analysis guide to attached documents- for [co]rrection:]
:First-Middle: Last.
PLENIPOTENTITARY-JUDGE, : AMBASSADOR, :POSTMASTER

FLAG OF THE
CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATIONS-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR
WITH THE CONTRACTING-PERSONS OF A CONTRACTUAL-POSTAL-COPORATION

~YOURCITY~YOURSTATE~zip#
:PHONE~123-456-7777. :CELL~123-456-8888.
:EMAIL: you@GMAIL.COM

:For the voidance of perjury, use Correct Sentence Structure Communications, Parse, Syntax,
Grammar.

~0 conjunction
~1 adverb
~2 verb (by modification)
~3 adjective
~4 pronoun
~5 (pre)position
~6 article
~7 noun
~8 past time
~9 future time
:For the claim of use quantum languages and violations by re-spondent:
:law violations are with this claim:

:Symbol use with the correction.

~ = a negative prefix (underlined section of a word) = NO = no contract.
~ ND = non-defined terms = non defined symbol = no contract.
~ NDG = a Nom De Guerre - fiction name, not correct full name, dead fiction.
~ // = B = Boxing = removed from page section = no contract.
VC = void continuum = double space/blank space area = No contract

:Law
:Title~42: USCS~1986 Knowledge and Stop-Correct-Wrongs.
~FRCP-26-E :Closure
~FRCP-9-B: Fraud by confession
~Title~18: USCS~1001 & 1002: false-statements
~Title~15: USCS~1692E Fraud & Misleading Statements
~Title~15: USCS~78 ~ ff: Penalty: $25,000,000
~Title~42: USCS~1985-1: Conspiracy-Civil,
~Title~42: USCS~1985-2: Obstruction-evidence & Witness,
~Title~42: USCS~1985-3: Depriving Evidence & Witness,
~Title~18: USCS~1961: RICO
~Title~18: USCS~242: Coloring of the Laws = Ailing
~Title~18: USCS~241: Criminal-Conspiracy = tort
~Title~18: USCS~3: Criminal-Participation-Knowledge
~Title~42: USCS~1983: Personal Damages
~Title~18: USCS~1512: Obstruction of the Law
~Title~18: USCS~1341: Frauds and swindles
~Title~18: USCS~1342: Fictitious name or address
~Title~18: USCS~241: Conspiracy
~Title~18: USCS~242: Criminal Deprivation of Rights
~Title~28: USC~1359: Loss of Jurisdiction by Collusion

:AIDING: CORRUPTION AT THE START/BEGINNING

~JUSTICE~ JU=no, S=Speak, TI=Title, CE=Judge
 FOLLOW UP LETTERS to complete the contract closure.
A Separate follow up strategy may also apply – see member downloads for updates.

Once you have sent your initial syntax response document with postage and seal, back to them
using Registered mail. Then each follow up letter must reference the original RM#, but mailed by
RM to them separately. After the 3rd notice and DEFAULT by them, you then need to establish the
final contract ESTOPPEL (effectively a new claim/contract). With each mailing, seal copies of
previous mailing and proof of mailing photos pages (Make a document with photos and envelopes
sent). Always bond documents together, using a blue ribbon (through a holes you punch 3 hole
punch works and 3 blue ribbons), or Gold binding rings, or glue (the last option). Never staple or
just use paper clips. This need to be one BOUND document with your copy-right/copy-claim to it.
STAMP & SEAL & Date etc

Notice of Final Default and Estoppel

:First-Middle: Last.
[: ℅ ABC Road (a physical address only):]
[: Anywhere, State, Zip :]

Their Individual Name (must be a man or woman)

Person with significant control of matters for
ABC Company/ ABC Court etc
Physical street address (PO Boxes are non-contract venues, so don’t use them)
Anywhere, USA Zip

The living man or woman responsible for using PO box _________ Address etc (the PO box they
may have sent from).

Claim number and date: ____ May, 2019 RE 123 456 789 US (this orig. RM# from first mailing).
Date ________________2021

Dear sir or madam,

(this is the 3RD or so, final default establishing your claim (or whatever letter # you are on).
1- 2 previous reminder letters usually precede this final default to given them an opportunity.
Attach COPIES of previous letters and docs each time – modify each as it makes sense to your
understanding).

1. For you are given the estoppel for your failure to answer back to us of your claims.
2. You are in tacit agreement
3. Our lawful Council says we should give you the opportunity to remove the unsubstantiated
filing under the rule of voluntary removal of frivolous paperwork.
4. Curing yourself under the rule of Jeopardy, stopping and correcting yourself from the fraud
act 2006 (***look up the American version yourself and reference that).

Contents of the previous letters in this matter are attached.

We refer to your unclaimed mail items, that have been returned to you using registered
mail-in the United States, the United States of America, the US, and/or from its territories. I remind
you that per postal-law, use of P.O. Boxes is a non-contract-venue. and we trust that you will find
these documents in good order. None of your unclaimed articles bear our proper name, proper
address, or any other details that indicate that we are in any way responsible for claiming your
articles (see 18 USC 1342).

Would sir or Madam in his or private capacity kindly know that we have clearly recorded
the unclaimed postal articles as unclaimed, and return them to you, the sender. Would you and your
private capacity kindly confirm whom the unclaimed postal articles were in fact intended for, as
continuing to have articles delivered for our care that are not clearly and correctly marked a
constitute harassment, fraud, or false advertising under the 2006 fraud Act (***look up American
version before sending).

Should you in your private capacity send any further or future or similar postal items, notes,
correspondence, or articles that we may not lawfully claim, as doing so may constitute false claims
of your postal notes or Postal articles, or your correspondence not meant for us.
We therefore conditionally accept your post articles under the following conditions:

1. You clearly and legibly state the name or names of your intended recipients, so that it can be
clearly read in normal English, stating the specific English Styles manual you used for
constructing the names of your intended recipients, what specific proof of references.
2. You correctly place the lawful names of your intended recipients in writing or print, as per
our very reasonable requirement upon the physical postal article itself, without exposing us
to fraudulent crime, should we mistakenly claimed any of our correspondence that has
nothing to do with us.
3. Is a PO Box a Contracting Avenue?
4. What does the prefix MR mean? (or whatever discrepancies you see)
5. Why is the first intended recipient name written in all uppercase alphabet then on the
second mailing it is written in upper and lowercase? (be specific to your facts)
6. That you guarantee in a sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury, that the names you're using
for your intended recipients are not held in trust, whereby the registrar-general of births,
deaths and marriages is trustee and thus liable for those names.

We reserve the right to compensation from you in your private capacity, should any of your past or
future actions compromise our credibility, in any way whatsoever.

BILL - INVOICE

Your failure to respond and correct in your private capacity, within 10 days from receipt of this
correspondence, shall constitute legal accord and satisfaction of all claims. Further, any further
pursuance of unverified claims shall entitle me to damages in the amount of 3 times your claim of
$__________ plus a rate of $1000 per day since inception of this matter back beginning _________
2019. And for the possession of seized property I charge rent of $___________ per day from date of
taking use of my property (if applicable)
Your sincerely,

By: :First-Middle: Last.

:copy-right/copy-claim:
Authorized Agent and Representative for :First
No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions excepted. All Right Reserved.
WITHOUT RECOURSE - NON-ASSUMPSIT
CALLS MAY BE RECORDED
 :Bills of the Lading.
NON-NEGOTIABLE
Fit for Purpose-performance
Question to ask Govt or Corp Offers.
Zero Tolerance
:[Your first name/s] of the clan :[Your clan-name]
[Your Full Address ]
[Date]
Verses
[This is an example:]
The person that you are writing to
Their full name
The name of the company that they are in charge of
The full address of the registered company
And full postcode / zip code]

Date and Claim Number [Your 1st Registered post sticker]: __________________________

Account Number: 000000000000000

Accordial welcome, I hope this Bills of the Lading finds you in good health and good spirits.

Dear [Always write to them by their name]

I would be happy to perform any obligation I might lawfully have, as soon as I have received the following
answers and documentation from you:

Answer the following question by circling the answer or by giving a brief description on this contract:

1. Is a PO BOX a valid postal-contract-venue? Answer YES or NO ________________.

2. Has any other accounts been opened at the above address that resembles or may resemble my
name, however variant the spellings may be, without my consent and or knowledge? Answer YES
or NO ________________.
3. Has any account or accounts been securitised? Answer YES or NO ________________ .
If yes what is the Cusip-number?____________________________
4. What is your definition of the word performance?
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________.
5. Validation of the performance, the actual accounting:
6. Verification of your claim with a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice.
7. A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties.
8. Please also provide me with a true and certified copy, Not photocopy of the Original Note
under penalty of perjury with unlimited liability and confirm that this Note has never been
sold. Please also confirm the name of the individual/s __________________
_________________________________________________who is the duly authorised
representative from your company, who has carried out due diligence under [The Money
Laundering Regulations 2007 - other countries will have different laws] and what
actions s/he has taken in relation to your letter.
9. Do you know of the Fraud Act 2006/2001? Answer YES or NO ________________.
10. Do you know what the law of your land is? Answer YES or NO ________________.
If,YES, provide me with a copy of those laws. Without these laws I am disabled under
the Disability Act.
11. Who was the author of your contracts and letters?______________________________
_________________________________________________. As you know the person
writing the first contract is duty bound to provide me with the necessary definitions of words.
12. Does the author of your contracts belong to the Writer's Guild? Answer YES or NO.
13. Have you been tested for suitability to hold a fiduciary position? Answer YES or NO.
14. Show me your indemnity insurance/bond.
15. What language is your letter written in?
 16. Can you define for me what the word Securitised and Cusip-number are? Answer YES or NO
________________. If,YES__________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________.
17. Are you versed with the laws of my land? Answer YES or NO. If YES, provide me with the copy
of those laws.
18. Are you versed with the Robert Rules of the Corporation?
19. Have you been fully counselled by a lawful Maritime Counsel on Maritime Law? Answer YES or
NO.
20. What is the significance of your surname appearing in all capital letters which is in the front of
your first and middle name? (Check with your own countries Company House whether its true
or false. Meaning is Capitis Deminutio Maxima Media
Minor.)__________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
___________.

I hereby give you ten days to reply to this notice from the above date with a note sent using recorded
post and signed under full commercial liability and penalties of perjury, assuring and promising me that all
of the replies and details given to the above request are true and without deception, fraud and mischief.
Your said failure to provide the aforementioned documentation within ten (10) days from the above
date, will constitute your agreement to the following terms:

1. That the performance did not exist in the first place; or

2. that you are held culpable for any damages suffered;
3. That any negative remarks made to a credit reference agency is removed;
4. That you are no longer pursuing this matter any further;
5. You agree to pay all fee schedules.

Please Note: I wish to deal with this matter in writing and I do not give your organisation permission to
contract me by telephone. Should you do so, I must caution you that the calls could constitute
‘harassment’ and I make take action under [Section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act
1997 – Each country has its own laws] and under the [Administration of Justice Act 1970 Article
40], which makes it a Criminal Offence for a creditor or a creditor’s agent to make demands (for
money), which are aimed at causing ‘alarm, distress or humiliation’, because of their frequency or
manner.

By: Sovereign : [Your FirstName] of the clan :[Your clan-name]

Authorised Agent and Representative.

No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Rights Reserved.

WITHOUT RECOURSE – NON – ASSUMPSIT – ONE WORD ONE MEANING IS BY THIS AUTHOR.

Calls may be recorded

Time: ___________________Date:____________________

Author-Autograph-copyright/copyclaim:_______________________________________________

Respondent Autograph:___________________________________________________________

Notary Public Autograph and Seal

 COMMENT - Letter to stop banks, courts, and other agencies from selling data. It can stop what
they are doing to you as well.

:Your-First-middle: Last
Letter - shut down accounts-no data selling. C/O is optional, Address
Address
Postcode / Zip code in lower case, optional to put it in Brackets
GPS latitude and longitude coordinates is optional
Optional Mobile
Date

Manager by name
Name of Organization
Address
Address
Post code in all upper case

Date and Perpetual claim-number:______________ (it is the first RM#)

Dear [Name of Manager]

Regarding The Sharing Of My Data

I [Insert your full name in upper and lower case i.e.:Jim-jones :Smith] a natural Man / Woman am
informing you that I am withholding my express permission to share any of my personal data with
any third (3rd) party(ies). This includes those authorized by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA
– find you USA equivalent) or other regulated companies.

[No information / data / monies is to be shared at any time between my natural man's account and
vice versa without my explicit consent.] Furtherance: Consent in the past, present or in the future is
not given by me [name]. If you are / have shared any of my personal data with any third (3rd) party
I hereby inform you that I [name] wish this to be removed / withdrawn / called back/ no publicly
disclosed, as it also violates my private copy-right/copy-claim.

I am giving you 10 working days to acknowledge this letter in compliance with my instructions and
for the 10 days correspond-back-rule via postal letter.

I [Your full name as it appears when you first opened your account[s] am the author of this letter /
document / contract, which is in plain and simple English.

Yours sincerely The Living Man / Woman / Natural Person

(Your Autograph + finger print + your copy-right/copy-claim.)

No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Rights Reserved.
WITHOUT RECOURSE – NON-ASSUMPSIT

Calls maybe recorded

Enclosed: Live Life Claim

 NOTICE of Fictitious Conveyance of Language
Point 010 A. Affiant has no record or evidence that Libellee(s) have not used "Fictitious
Conveyance of Language" against Affiant, leading to various and many connected interlocking
directives founded, propegated, brought forward, and executed in the fraud to Affiant's pain and
injury.

ADMIT - Libellee(s) admit to the truth and guilt of utilizing, as a device, against Affiant, "Fictitious
Conveyance of Language" to Libellee(s) (potential) unjust gain and to Affiants pain and injury.

EXHIBIT 010 A - NOTICE of Fictitious Conveyance of

Language
NOTE: This NOTICE, with its several points is written in "event continuum" format to bring
clarity to the various Points in dispute, displaying the fact that one point leads to another and the
end issue is connected to the beginning issue. Points shall be "set off" in brackets "[ ]".

INTRODUCTION:

If an organization, corporation, or other entity, uses false conveyance of language, we call it

"Deceptive Trade Practices"; acts and actions of such are often harmful to the intended victim and
bring "ill-gotten gain" to the treasuries of such corporations.

Bear in mind that all governments are corporations and all legislative court systems are for profit
"Also Trades As" corporations with very few safeguards in place to protect the private man. The
corporate beasts' prime directive is to instill fear in the minds of the less fortunate persons of
involuntary servitude; and the most common device in use by such fear-mongers is false
conveyance of language.

All organizations within the government are required by 26: C.F.R.: 601.72(a)-1 to publish how the
organizations are organized, and the nature of the organization. In most cases, there is plenty of
evidence pointing to the fact that there is a lack of public disclosure concerning the true nature of
the organization that is demanding monies, fees, fines, penalties, licensing, or prosecuting us. We
have further evidence that the court’s organization is just as fraudulent, since they all are organized
as legislative foreign fictions, using subjective interpretation, legal fictions, and the like.

We also know, according to court records, that the judicial system has been manipulating job titles
to confuse and dominate the proceedings. What are the consequences if we accept and act
according to these fraudulent definitions? We find that we do not know to whom we are speaking,
and what authority he is exercising at any moment, whether the person we are talking to is acting in
his capacity as a clerk, judge, legislator, or whatever. In the court, are we talking to a judge,
legislator, bailiff, banker, or a clerk when we are talking to the guy on the bench in the black robe?

BEGINNING OF POINTS:

Lack of full disclosure combined with the use of verb language (versus truth language, noun
language) allows Libellee(s) to be charged with breaching Title 18, section 1001, for their [Point
010 A - a] false statements and Title 18, section 1002, for their [Point 010 A - b] false papers
against us. The organizational structure of the system, the false statements and false papers are
designed to place us at a legal disability. So we claim our handicapped status of Title: 29: U. S.
A. Codes: 706(8)(a), and charge them with breaching Title: 29: U. S. A. Codes: 701(C)(2): the
Policy for the [Point 010 A - c] rights of the handicapped, since the government is obligated in
Title: 42: ch: 126: 12182(2)(A)(iv) to make efforts to eliminate communication barriers that hinder
the handicapped.

If the opposing party uses all uppercase styling of our names, they are intentionally addressing their
pleadings to the fictional “strawman,” and are using Title: 18: U. S. A. CODES: §: 1342: [Point
010 A - d] Fiction names against us to Title: 18: U. S. A. CODES: §: 1341 [Point 010 A - e]
cause a Fraud and Swindle. By not using upper and lowercase lettering, with punctuation, they are
in breach of F.R.C. P. RULE:10(a): [Point 010 A - f] proper name of the Party, and in breach of
F.R.C. P. RULE: 17, [Point 010 A - g] since only the real party of interest can be sued in the
admiralty.

For what purpose would a person knowingly (title 42 § 1986) do such a thing? For whatever
reason, to hold their beloved system together, they are committing: Title: 42: 1985(3) [Point 010 A
- h] Deprivation of our Rights. Therefore, they are engaging in a Title: 18: 1961 [Point 010 A - i]
Racketeering-activity, for their Title: 42: 1985(2) [Point 010 A - j] Obstruction of the Justice,
causing a Title: 42: CH. 21: 1983 [Point 010 A - k] Personal Injury, and a Title: 42: 1983: NOTE:
39 [Point 010 A - l] civil Deprivation of the Rights, by their Title: 42: 1983: NOTE: 319 and
NOTE: 337 [Point 010 A - m] Custom & Policy of their Title: 18: 241 [Point 010 A - n]
Conspiracy, under the Color of Law, causing the Title: 18: 242 [Point 010 A - o] criminal
Deprivation of the Rights, Title: 18: 872 [Point 010 A - p] Collusion/ Coercion, for the Title: 18:
Ch.73:§: 1512 [Point 010 A - q] criminal Obstruction of the Justice, ending with a Title: 28: §:
1359 [Point 010 A - r] Loss of the Jurisdiction by their Collusion, all under the Title: 4: §: 3 [Point
010 A - s] Desecrated flag.

https://www.google.co.uk/url?
sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0ahUKEwiZsM7esLbMAhVGGR4KHbocDDoQFgg0M
AQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Famericansrepublicparty.org%2Fattachments%2FFile%2Faatemplates
%2FEXHIBIT_010_A_-
_Fictitious_Conveyance_of_Language.rtf&usg=AFQjCNEFW9PL7DbH2CqKGPnhsWs6hqlNjg&sig2=vIv
oAvVDHgXxMjyJcOoSCA&bvm=bv.121070826,d.d24
 Glossary Page to Submit - Nothing is Defined.

EXAMPLE - File ahead of time into a court case, and copy to plaintiff, demanding one
meaning DEFINITIONS in order to proceed. Add other words as you think apply. They will
likely deny this, which opens the door for you to answer any questions as someone who doesn't
know any definitions of word they use. Answer using other alternative definitions.
NOT legal advice.

Case Number CV0901598

AMERICAN EXPRESS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

§
vs. § Liberty COUNTY, TEXAS
§
First Name Last Name (SS # XXXX) § 75th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Individuality and dba EQUIPMENT §
FLUID POWER
GLOSSARY PAGE
TO JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES, hereafter called Defendant, a living man without the benefit of Counsel.
Defendant is not Pro-Se but is In Propria Persona and without aid of Counsel; to submit this, so
the Defendant can ensure that Defendant understands the intent of the PLAINTIFF and the
PLAINTIFF cannot use words that have several definition, uses, and meaning. If PLAINTIFF
uses any of these words, they will have the same meaning unless Defendant is notified of its
unambiguous meaning. If PLAINTIFF is using a different meaning, then PLAINTIFF must tell
Defendant what the word is and its meaning and where he got the definition to that word. This is
required in order to proceed with this matter so the Defendant can ensure that Defendant
understands the intent of the PLAINTIFF.

Bill - A formal declaration, complaint, or statement of particular things in writing. As a legal

term, this word has many meanings and applications, the more important of which are
enumerated below. 1. A formal written statement of complaint to a court of justice. In the ancient
practice of the court of king’s bench, the usual and orderly method of beginning an action was by
a bill, or original bill, or plaint. This was a written statement of the plaintiff’s cause of action,
like a declaration or complaint, and always alleged a trespass as the ground of it, in order to give
the court jurisdiction. 3 Bl. Comm. 43. In Scotch law, every summary application in writing, by
way of petition to the Court of Session, is called a “bill.” Cent. Diet. https://thelawdictionary.org
Essentially Blacks Law

Money - In usual and ordinary acceptation it means coins and paper currency used as circulating
medium of exchange, and it does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of debt, or other personal
or real estate. Lane v. Railey, 280 Ky. 319, 133 S.W.2d 74, 79, 81. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th
edition)

No State shall . . . make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts . . .
(United States Constitution Article 1 Section 10)

Fiat money - Paper currency not backed by gold or silver. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition)

Federal reserve notes - Form of currency issued by Federal Reserve Banks in the likeness of
non interest bearing promissory note payable to bearer on demand. The Federal Reserve note
(e.g. one, five, ten, etc. dollar bill) is the most widely used paper currency. Such have replaced
silver and gold certificates which were backed by silver and gold. Such reserve notes are direct
obligations of the United States. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition)

Straw man or party - A "front"; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a
transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose
of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal
may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity
of real purchaser, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. (Blacks Law Dictionary
6th edition)

Specie - Coin of the precious metals, of a certain weight and fineness, and bearing the stamp of
the government, denoting its value as currency. Metallic money; e.g. gold or silver coins. When
spoken of a contract, the expression "performance in specie" means strictly, or according to the
exact terms. As applied to things, it signifies individuality or identity. Thus, on a bequest of a
specific picture, the legatee would be said to be entitled to the delivery of the picture in specie;
i.e., of the very thing. Whether a thing is due in genere or in specie depends, in each case, on
the will of the transacting parties. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition)

Loan- A lending. Delivery by one party to and receipt by another party of sum of money upon
agreement, express or implied, to repay it with or without interest. Boerner v. Colwell Co., 21
Cal.3d 37, 145 Cal.Rptr. 380, 384, 577 P.2d 200. Anything furnished for temporary use to a
person at his request, on condition that it shall be returned, or its equivalent in kind, with or
without compensation for its use. Liberty Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Travelers Indem. Co., 58
Misc.2d 443, 295 N.Y.S.2d 983, 986. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition)

Contract- An agreement between two or more persons, which creates an obligation to do or not
to do a particular thing. As defined in Restatement, Second, Contracts § 3: "A contract is a
promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance
of which the law in some way recognizes as a duty." A legal relationship consisting of the rights
and duties of the contracting parties; a promise or set of promises constituting an agreement
between the parties that gives each a legal duty to the other and also the right to seek a remedy
for the breach of those duties. Its essentials are competent parties, subject matter, a legal
consideration, mutuality of agreement, and mutuality of obligation. Lamoureux v. Burrillville
Racing Ass'n, 91 R.I. 94, 161 A.2d 213, 215.

The writing which contains the agreement of parties, with the terms and conditions, and which
serves as a proof of the obligation. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition)

Corporation - An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of
a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the
corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued. The corporation is distinct from the
individuals who comprise it (shareholders). The corporation survives the death of its investors,
as the shares can usually be transferred. Such entity subsists as a body politic under a special
denomination, which is regarded in law as having a personality and existence distinct from that
of its several members, and which is, by the same authority, vested with the capacity of
continuous succession, irrespective of changes in its membership, either in perpetuity or for a
limited term of years, and of acting as a unit or single individual in matters relating to the
common purpose of the association, within the scope of the powers and authorities conferred
upon such bodies by law. Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 518, 636, 657, 4
L.Ed. 629; U. S. v. Trinidad Coal Co., 137 U.S. 160, 11 S.Ct. 57, 34 L.Ed. 640. (Blacks Law
Dictionary 6th edition)

Person - In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may
include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives,
trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. See e.g. National Labor Relations Act, § 2(1), 29
U.S.C.A. § 152; Uniform Partnership Act,§ 2. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6 th edition)

Artificial persons - Persons created and devised by human laws for the purposes of society and
government, as distinguished from natural persons. Corporations are examples of artificial
persons. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition)

Pro se - A Latin phrase meaning "for himself" or "in one's own behalf." This term denotes a
person who represents herself/himself in court. It is used in some states in place of "in pro per"
and has the same meaning.

In Propria Persona - In one's own person, especially without representation by an attorney. Lat.
'In one’s own proper person.' To represent oneself in court without assistance of an attorney, at
least 'on the record.' Often shortened to 'in pro per.'

The U.S. Supreme Court observed in its unanimous decision in Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, that
a lawmaking body may instead prefer to discourage attorneys from electing to appear in propria
persona because such self-representation may often conflict with the general public and
legislative policy favoring the effective and successful prosecution of meritorious claims. The
high court observed that 'Even a skilled lawyer who represents himself is at a disadvantage in
contested litigation. Ethical considerations may make it inappropriate for him to appear as a
witness. He is deprived of the judgment of an independent third party in framing the theory of
the case, evaluating alternative methods of presenting the evidence, cross-examining hostile
witnesses, formulating legal arguments, and in making sure that reason, rather than emotion,
dictates the proper tactical response to unforeseen developments in the courtroom. The adage
that 'a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client' is the product of years of experience
by seasoned litigators.. Id. at 437-438

An appearance may be in propria persona, and need not be by attorney.

Debt, contracts. A sum of money due by certain and express agreement. 3 Bl. Com. 154. In a
less technical sense, as in the "act to regulate arbitrations and proceedings in courts of justice" of
Pennsylvania, passed the 21st of March 1806, s. 5, it means and claim for money. In a still more
enlarged sense, it denotes any kind of a just demand; as, the debts of a bankrupt. 4 S. & R. 506.
(Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition).

Goods, property. For some purposes this term includes money, valuable securities, and other
mere personal effects. The term. goods and chattels, includes not only personal property in
possession, but also choses in action. 12 Co. 1; 1 Atk. 182. The term chattels is more
comprehensive than that of goods, and will include all animate as well as inanimate property, and
also a chattel real, as a lease for years of house or land. Co. Litt. 118; 1 Russ. Rep. 376. The
word goods simply and without qualification, will pass the whole personal estate when used in a
will, including even stocks in the funds. But in general it will be limited by the context of the
will. Vide 2 Supp. to Ves. jr. 289; 1 Chit. Pr. 89, 90; 1. Ves. jr. 63; Hamm. on Parties, 182; 3 Ves.
212; 1 Yeates, 101; 2 Dall. 142; Ayl. Pand. 296; Wesk. Ins. 260; 1 Rop. on Leg. 189; 1 Bro. C. C.
128; Sugd. Vend. 493, 497; and the articles Biens; Chattels; Furniture. 2. Goods are said to be of
different kinds, as adventitious, such as are given or arise otherwise than by succession; total
goods, or those which accrue from a dowry, or marriage portion; vacant goods, those which are
abandoned or left at large. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition)

Merchandise. By this term is understood all those things which merchants sell either wholesale
or retail, as dry goods, hardware, groceries, drugs, &c. It is usually applied to personal chattels
only, and to those which are not required for food or immediate support, but such as remain after
having been used or which are used only by a slow consumption. Vide Pardess. n. 8; Dig. 13, 3,
1; Id. 19, 4, 1; Id. 50, 16, 66. 8 Pet. 277; 2 Story, R. 16, 53, 54; 6 Wend. 335. (Bouvier’s Law
Dictionary 1856 edition)

Service, contracts. The being employed to serve another. 2. In cases of seduction, the gist of the
action is not injury which the seducer has inflicted on the parent by destroying his peace of mind,
and the reputation of his child, but for the consequent inability to perform those services for
which she was accountable to her master or her parent who assumes this character for the
purpose Vide Seduction, and 2 Mees. & W. 539; 7 Car. & P. 528. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary
1856 edition)

Service, feudal law. That duty which the tenant owes to his lord, by reason of his fee or estate.
2. The services, in respect of their quality, were either free or base, and in respect of their
quantity and the time of exacting them, were either certain or uncertain. 2 Bl. Com. 62.
3. In the civil law by service is sometimes understood servitude. (q. v.) (Bouvier’s Law
Dictionary 1856 edition)

Service, practice. To execute a writ or process; as, to serve a writ of capias signifies to arrest a
defendant under the process; Kirby, 48; 2 Aik. R. 338; 11 Mass. 181; to serve a summons, is to
deliver a copy of it at the house of the party, or to deliver it to him personally, or to read it to him;
notices and other papers are served by delivering the same at the house of the party, or to him in
person. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition)
2. When the service of a writ is prevented by the act of the party on whom it is to be served, it
will, in general, be sufficient if the officer do everything in his power to serve it. 39 Eng. C. L. R.
431 1 M. & G. 238. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition)

Dated April 17, 2019

Respectfully submitted,

______________________________
First Last, In Pro Persona
101 FM 1950
Houston, Texas 77002
If they refuse your glossary, then answer any question with these words by your own
interpretation. Since they won’t define them for you, can you really understand and answer?

Example: I bet you $5 my dog can jump higher than your house

Look up:

frivolous
in-come
tax
re-turn
in-ternal
re-venue
statement (6012)
Motor vehicle (commercial)
vehicle
near
form
im-posed
State
United States
The United States of America (a non fact)
in-dictment
com-plaint
FBI
PHD
driving
motor vehicle
vehicle
drinking
al cahol
“Answer yes or no” so you answer how?

etc STOP assuming...it is a trap to gain jurisdiction!

Words we need to request of the judge to proceed (hint they have many meanings)

No authority - liens and levy payback happening. Offer and compromise.

Federal income ? but what is income?
MTD lack of standing, SMJ, disclosure. Impact of exhibit A
Do a MJD - of some of these items
Definition of return (many definitions)
What is a FORM - many meanings.
Return - many meanings.
Ad Valorem vs Property Tax (value added), states cannot do a andveloum but do anyway.
What does voluntary mean?
PHD - piled high and deep? Public high school diploma?
26A and E - See 26 USC 7608 0000-6999 is A but they have no authority.
However above the is title 27 “E”. So ask for pocket commission and how they enforce Title 26
A matters?
EXEMPT? See 31 USC 3124 and 18 USC 8 definitions - exempt from taxation can pay tax with
FRN’s.
31 USC 321 Definition of Income = gift
Tips, salary, etc? I earn etc...1000,000 etc
In come
“Earn etc”
Line 8 income of instructions income not defined.
What is Where wear etc
Re turn
Statement
Frivolous - I agree with you - it’s all frivolous. A return is frivolous.
1040 instructions deficient
Signed 23C to do a lien
6331 A why missing? Law on omissions = fraud
Taxpayer Bill of Rights
Form
6212 6213 meanings
Tax court finding
31 sec 321 d2 Federal Income
House
May
March
April
Res idence
Income
Expense
12277 form
27 CFR 72.11
Understand
False
Fictitious
Loan
Ac count
6011and 6012 - read statement or Return -
Am-endment vs false/fictitious
Tax Payer (gas property, slavery, etc)
Taxpayer
What is a fact if not properly placed and not defined?

Time 3:35:00

Three-thirty-five 3305

Three:thirty:five

Three Thirty Five = 38 = 3+30+5 or 3305

Language IS Math

First Middle Last = anything in separate parts = no contract = fiction

First-middle: Last = three linked facts = living man = now time fact.

United States vs The United States of America

 Capital Letter Name Initials Matter - Motion.
Why names and punctuation really matter, and how challenge it!

QUESTION: Must a person be required to show up to court if the summons spells the name wrong?

ANSWER: I would say legally no. But as a practical consideration if you don’t show up to show how this is

not legally you they will have merely assumed it’s you, and you will wind up with a default judgment to get out

from under. Have all your law and arguments together – don’t just spout it out. We have rebutted this many

times. One of the things YOU have to establish is the legal way your name should be written. Then attached

this memorandum of competent authorities on English grammar is the foundation for that.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF xxxxxxxx COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

[name] )
PLAINTIFF )
) NO. xxxxxxxxxxx
vs. )
)
BRENDA A. SMITH ) Memorandum and Requiring Definitions,
DEFENDANT ) Rules, and Grammar Styles Being Used.

PRE-HEARING MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES REGARDING ENGLISH

GRAMMAR AND PROPER NAMES – REQUEST FOR DEFINITIONS AND GRAMMAR RULES -

JURDICTION CHALLENGED UNTIL CLEARLY DEFINED

(Bold and italics added throughout as emphasis only) In American jurisprudence, it is essential

to identify parties to court actions properly. If not properly identified, all corresponding judgments are

void, as outlined in Volume 46, American Jurisprudence 2d (Am. Jur 2d) at Judgments; §100 Parties it is

stated that, Law revolves around how words are preciously defined and used. A Man should be defined by law

as he is supposed to be defined and recognized. An ancient maxim of law states: "In order rightly to

comprehend a thing, inquire first into the names, for a right knowledge of things depends upon their names."
In general, it is necessary to properly identify parties to actions or judgments are void, as treated in Volume

46, American Jurisprudence 2d, "Judgments": §§ 100 Parties [46 Am Jur 2d JUDGMENTS]. A judgment

should identify the parties for and against whom it is rendered, with such certainty that it may be readily

enforced, and a judgment which does not do so may be regarded as void for uncertainty. Such identification

may be achieved by naming the persons for and against whom the judgment is rendered. Technical

deficiencies in the naming of the persons for and against whom judgment is rendered can be corrected

if the parties s are not prejudiced. A reference in a judgment to a party plainly liable, followed by an

omission of that party's name from the language of the decree, at least gives rise to an ambiguity and calling

for an inquiry into the court's real intention as reflected in the entire record and surrounding circumstances.

[Footnote numbers omitted; cites not reproduced]

57 Am. Jur. 2d © 200l West Group beginning on page 613 and continuing through page 675, deals

with the subject NAME.

§ 1 Defines a name in relevant part as "the word or combination of words by which a person is

distinguished from other individuals..." Petition of Dengler, 246 N.W. 2d 758 (N.D. 1976).

§ 2 relates the common law authority to adopt any name a man or woman wishes, providing it is not

done for fraudulent purposes. In re: Adoption /Guardianship No. 3155 Circuit Court for Harford County, 103

Md. App. 300, 653 A. 2d 521, 525 (1995); Rappley v. Rappley, 183 Mich. App. 396, 454 N.W. 2d 231 (1990).

The sections following discuss many other particulars with respect to a name. The rules of English

grammar authorize a capitalized letter only for a very limited number of well-defined uses. One such use is

the initial letter of a proper name. A capital letter is defined as, "of the large size used at the beginning of a

sentence or as the first letter of a proper name." No lexical authority exists for use of all-capital letters in

writing the proper name of a man or woman. An all-capital letters written version of one's name is not

one's name, but strictly an artificial construct, existing by color of law only. No authority of English

grammar recognizes such a contrivance. The legal term, in propia persona, means "in one's own proper

person." How can one do anything outside of "one's own proper person" unless there exists some other
"person" by who/which one could act? Using the juristic artifice known as "legal fiction" parties lawfully

identified by their proper noun names have been legally ascribed with and corrupted by all-capital letter

names. Using counsel does not change this issue as a fact.

I. WHY LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR MATTER

An exhaustive study of various English language textbooks, including but not limited to: the Harbrace College

Handbook, The McGraw-Hill College Handbook, the Reference Handbook of Grammar and Usage, the

Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar, the McGraw-Hill Style Manual, and the Gregg Reference Manual,

(all books dealing with the rules of grammar to our common language) shows no reference that gives an all

upper case lettered proper noun support. It is also stated by these “grammar books” that something that is all

uppercase letters is merely "initials" which are “representations” of something else. Thus, the rules of English

grammar fail to give us discussion or authority regarding the proper use of an all-capital letter name.

The Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, beginning on page 1539, gives us a

definitive look at capitalization. This book shows authority to use a capital letter only as the first letter of

proper nouns (names), titles, brand names, places, vehicles, awards, governmental and judicial bodies,

historical periods and events, organizations, scientific terms, certain religious terms, seasons, months, days,

titles of printed material, works or art, and trademarks, but it shows no authority for the use of an ALL

CAPITAL letter or incomplete proper name.

From the Steck-Vaughn Complete GED Preparation book we find a discussion of the use of capital

letters, but again there is neither discussion nor authority to use an all-capita1 letter proper name.

The Manual on Usage & Style, Eighth Edition, ISBN I-878674-5l-X, published by the Texas Law

Review in 1995 (Section, D-Capitalization, paragraph D:1:1) states: "Always capitalize proper nouns...

[Proper nouns], independent of the context in which they are used, refer to specific persons, places, or things."

Another well-recognized reference book is the Elements of Style, Fourth Edition, ISBN

0-205-30902-X, written by William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White, published by Allyn & Bacon in 1999. There is

found one reference to capitalization in this book on page 94, where it states: "The name of a particular
person, place, or thing" should be capitalized. Proper nouns are capitalized. There's an obvious and legally

evident difference between capitalizing the first letter of a proper as compared to capitalizing every letter used

to portray the name.

Oxford University Press publishes the New Oxford Dictionary of English. Considered the foremost

authority on the British English language, this dictionary shows in the 1998 edition: "Proper noun (also proper

name). Noun. A name used for an individual person, place, or organization, spelled with a capital letter, e.g.

Jane, London, and Oxfam. A word or set of words by which a person, animal, place, or thing is known,

addressed, or referred to...my name is Parsons...bearing or using the name of a specified person or

organization...a driving license in the name of William Sanders."

In The Real Life Dictionary of the Law, Oran's Dictionary of the Law, and Miriam-Webster’s

Dictionary of Law, the term legal fiction is used and described. The synopsis of these shows that a legal

fiction is an assumption that something that is, or may be, false or nonexistent is true or

real...Something assumed in law to be fact irrespective of the truth or accuracy of that assumption.

There is one area which does use all capital letters for proper names – Corporate Law. Names of

artificial entities (artificial persons) are written in legalese (artificial English), i.e., ALL CAPITAL

LETTERS. Artificial persons exist by grant of privilege from the state. They have no constitutional rights.

Their “owners”, officers and shareholders are accorded limited legal and financial liability. A limited liability

entity (one with an all-capital letter name) is also accorded limited freedom/power to speak and act on its own

behalf.

From all the books and resources cited in this paper, there has been no authority found whatsoever to

use an all-capita1 letter name. Therefore, a name appearing in all-capita1 letters falls outside the rules of

English grammar.

Absolutely no example can be found in any recognized reference book that specifies or allows the use

of all capitalized letter names, proper or common. There is no doubt that a proper name, to be
grammatically correct, must be written with only the first letter capitalized, with the remainder of the

word in a name spelled with lower case letters.

There are no official or unofficial English grammar style manuals or reference publications that

recognize the use of all caps letters when writing a proper name. To do so is only by juristic license or

arbitrary presumption irrespective of the facts.

II. DEFINITION AND STYLE MATTER

Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a comprehensive definition as follows …

Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) – In Roman law.

A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal

attributes and qualifications.

Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g.

JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) – The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a

man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away

with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John

DOE) – A lessor or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but

without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.

Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g.

John Doe) - The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family

relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own

master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had
been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See

Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.

Capite. - Lat. By the head

Diminutio. – Lat. In civil law. Diminution; a taking away; loss or depravation.

As Black’s Law Dictionary explains, the full capitalization of the letters of one’s natural name, results in a

diminishing or complete loss of legal or citizenship status, wherein one actually becomes a slave or an item of

inventory. The method by which the State causes a natural person to "volunteer" himself into slavery, is

through forming legal joinder, implied or stated, with the entity or legal fiction (name all CAPS).

III. INITIALS USE

INITIALISM. In order for a group of initials to make any sense, it must be known what each upper

case letter represents. The proliferation of the computer has resulted in an unofficial language, which is

"Initialism." Now the question, "Does the Government now practice the language of initialism?" If any

agency of the Government is unable to correct such an error, then that Government may be using the

all-caps method for the purposes of dealing with artificial persons. Initialism also deals with acronyms.

IV. ACRONYM

ACRONYM. 1. "Strictly, a word formed from (a) the initial letters of other words, or from (b) a

mixture of initials and syllables." (1) NATO = NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION; (2)

NIMBY=Not in my back yard; (3) radar=radio detection and ranging; yuppie=young urban profession+

diminutive ending. 2. More loose1y, an abbreviation pronounced as a string of letters, especially letters that

stand for the name of an organization or institution; e.g., BBC, USA. The Oxford Dictionary of English

Grammar, S. Wa1ker & E. Weiner (1994).

V. “PERSON” USAGE MATTERS

 Person. A definition of a “person” appears in Webster's 1828 Dictionary as "person...[ L. persona; said

to be compounded of per... through or by, and sonas, sound; a Latin word signifying a mask used by actors on

the stage.]...8. In 1aw, an artificial person is a corporation of body politic.

Let's look to the law dictionaries to find meaning in the term "person." In Bouvier's Law Dictionary,

8th ed., pg. 252, we find "artificial person...a subject of duties and rights, which is represented by one or more

natural persons (generally, not necessarily, by more than one) but does not coincide with them. It has a

continuous 1egal existence not necessarily depending on a natural life; the lega1 continuity answers to some

real continuity of public functions or of special purpose recognized as having public utility or of some 1awful

common interest of the natural persons concerned.

In Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 8th Ed., pg. 2574, we find "person... a man considered according to the

rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duty which it

imposes. It may include artificial beings, as corporations... territorial corporations... foreign corporations...

relating to taxation and revenue laws... XIV Amendment “persons”…a slave… estate of a decedent… a judge

holding court… an infant [ward of the court]… officers, partnerships, and women… participants in the

forbidden acts [“defendants & plaintiffs”]… agents, officer, and members of the board of directors or trustees,

or their controlling bodies of corporations… the legal subject [subject-matter] or subs

It is therefore factual to say that "person" throughout the history of our common language has meant a

number of things including a government created fiction (artificial) subject to the public laws, public utility, or

public function. Current attacks by the Prosecutors of the public law, public servants are commenced in the

name of fictions (persona/person/whoever/etc.). And by supreme and binding declaration in the UNITED

STATES SUPREME COURT, at Dred Scott, we have learned that absolute immunity is dictated where a

procedurally proper and lawful contract is lacking even in the case of a state created fiction. As C.J.S. are the

widely recognized initials of Corpus Juris Secundum (according to the body of law), this is the embodiment of

the public law. It is from this that we can be identified. It is now factual to say, pursuant to the UNITED

STATES SUPREME COURT, the body of public law, our common language, etc., that a sovereign is not a
person; a person has a name; and, therefore, a sovereign has not an all capital/acronymical/abbreviation

NAME,(Public).

Section 64 of 57 Am Jur 2d, identifies the fact that fictitious names are in use. The next several

sections of 57 Am Jur 2d deal with the use of an assumed or fictitious name and how the law deals with a

man, woman, or person using a fictitious name. These sections §§ 64-79, set forth that, generally, a fictitious

name identifies an artificial entity.

IDEM SONANS. As we pursue this line of logic, we need to address IDEM SONANS. Its definition

can be found in 14 C.J.S., Names, pg. 36. (a) in general... "If names sound alike, they are usually regarded as

the same, although spelled differently, and the variance in their spelling is considered immaterial." With

respect to names, the phrase "idem sonans" means “of the same sound." "The general rule is that the law

(Public) does not regard the spelling of names as much as it does their sound." "Great latitude is allowed in

the pronunciation and spelling of proper names, since proper names are often spelled differently, although

pronounced the same (Terry-Terri)." "If they sound alike, or even if common usage (widely known) has made

their pronunciation identical, they are regarded as the same and a variance in their spelling is immaterial,

unless it is such as misleads a person to his prejudice, or the misspelling transforms the name into a wholly

distinct appellation." Same sounding names discussed above are like Terry and Terri, not Terry and TERRY,

as the latter is not a proper name, but an abbreviation/acronym/initialism. So what is “JOHN”! It could be a

corporation, a vessel, a computer term, etc. It is not widely recognized or known, and therefore, according to

the Government Printing Office publication on style, an improper abbreviation. This is nothing other than an

appearance of legitimacy (legal). The exception clause of the "idem sonans" test must be invoked, i.e.,

“…unless it is such as misleads a person to his prejudice, or the misspelling transforms the name into a

wholly distinct appellation.” This is truly a wholly distinct appellation, as official sources of reference and

information, do not identify, describe, or define JOHN.  the "Manual on Usage & Style," Eighth Edition,

ISBN I-878674-51-X, published by the Texas Law Review in 1995. Section D, CAPITALIZATION, paragraph

D: 1:1 states:
"Always capitalize proper nouns... [Proper nouns], independent of the context in which they are used,

refer to specific persons, places, or things (e.g., Dan, Austin, Rolls Royce)."

Paragraph D: 3:2 of Section D states:

  "Capitalize People, State, and any other terms used to refer to the government as a litigant (e.g., the

People's case, the State's argument), but do not capitalize other words used to refer to litigants (e.g., the

plaintiff, defendant Manson)."

"The New Oxford Dictionary of English" is published by the Oxford University Press. Besides being

considered the foremost authority on the British English language, this dictionary is also designed to reflect

the way language is used today through example sentences and phrases. We submit the following definitions

from the 1998 edition: Proper noun (also proper name). Noun. A name used for an individual person, place,

or organization, spelled with an initial capital letter, e.g. Jane, London, and Oxfam.

Name. Noun 1: A word or set of words by which a person, animal, place, or thing is known,

addressed, or referred to: my name is Parsons, John Parsons. Kalkwasser is the German name for limewater.

Verb 2: Identify by name; give the correct name for: the dead man has been named as John Mackintosh.

Phrases 3: In the name of. Bearing or using the name of a specified person or organization: a driving license in

the name of William Sanders.

 From the "Newbury House Dictionary of American English," published by Monroe Allen Publishers, Inc.,

(1999): name n. I [C] a word by which a person, place, or thing is known: Her name is Diane Daniel.

 We can find absolutely no example in any recognized reference book that specifies or allows the use of all

capitalized names, or middle initial names or misspelled name is proper or common. There is no doubt that

a proper name, to be grammatically correct, must be written with only the first letter capitalized, with
the remainder of the word in a name spelled with lower case letters, with no additional initials or other

alternations.

VI. US Government Style Manual

Is the spelling and usage of a proper name defined officially by US Government? Yes. The United

States Government Printing Office in their "Style Manual," March 1984 edition (the most recent edition

published as of March 2000), provides comprehensive grammar, style and usage for all government

publications, including court and legal writing.

Chapter 3, "Capitalization," at § 3.2, prescribes rules for proper names:

"Proper names are capitalized. [Examples given are] Rome, Brussels, John Macadam, Macadam

family, Italy, Anglo-Saxon." At Chapter 17, "Courtwork, the rules of capitalization," as mentioned in

Chapter 3, are further reiterated: "17.1. Courtwork differs in style from other work only as set forth in this

section; otherwise the style prescribed in the preceding sections will be followed." After reading §17 in

entirety, I found no other references that would change the grammatical rules and styles specified in Chapter 3

pertaining to capitalization. At § 17.9, this same official US Government manual states:

"In the titles of cases the first letter of all principal words are capitalized, but not such terms as

defendant and appellee." This wholly agrees with Texas Law Review's Manual on "Usage & Style"

as referenced above.

Examples shown in § 17.12 are also consistent with the aforementioned §17.9 specification: that

is, all proper names are to be spelled with capital first letters; the balance of each spelled with lower

case letters.

VII. Grammar, Punctuation, and Capitalization

 "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration" (NASA) has publish one   of   the most

concise US Government resources on capitalization. NASA publication SP-7084, "Grammar, Punctuation,

and Capitalization." A Handbook for Technical Writers and Editors, was compiled and written by the NASA

Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. At Chapter 4, "Capitalization," they state

in 4.1 "Introduction:”

"First we should define terms used when discussing capitalization:

● All caps means that every letter in an expression is capital, LIKE THIS.

● Caps & lc means that the principal words of an expression are capitalized, Like This.

● Caps and small caps refer to a particular font of type containing small capital letters instead of

lowercase letters.

Elements in a document such as headings, titles, and captions may be capitalized in either sentence

style or headline style:

• Sentence style calls for capitalization of the first letter, and proper nouns of course.

• Headline style calls for capitalization of all principal words (also called caps & lc).

Modern publishers tend toward a down style of capitalization, that is, toward use of fewer capitals, rather than

an up style."

Here we see that in headlines, titles, captions, and in sentences, there is no authorized usage of all

caps. At 4.4.1. "Capitalization With Acronyms," we find the first authoritative use for all caps:

"Acronyms are always formed with capital letters. Acronyms are often coined for a particular program

or study and therefore require definition. The letters of the acronym are not capitalized in the definition

unless the acronym stands for a proper name:

Wrong - The best electronic publishing systems combine What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG)

features...
 Correct - The best electronic publishing systems combine what you see is what you get (WYSIWYG)

features... But Langley is involved with the National Aero-Space Plane (NASP) Program.” This cites, by

example, that using all caps is allowable in an acronym. "Acronyms" are words formed from the initial letters

of successive parts of a term. They never contain periods and are often not standard, so that definition is

required. Could this apply to lawful proper Christian names? If that were true, then JOHN SMITH would have

to follow a definition of some sort, which it does not. For example, only if JOHN SMITH were defined as

'John Orley Holistic Nutrition of the Smith Medical Institute To Holistics (JOHN SMITH)' would this apply.

The most significant section appears at 4.5., "Administrative Names":  

"Official designations of political divisions and of other organized bodies are capitalized:

• Names of political divisions;

• Canada, New York State;

• United States Northwest Territories;

• Virgin Islands, Ontario Province;

• Names of governmental units, US Government Executive Department, US Congress, US Army;  

• US Navy.”

According to this official US Government publication, the States are never to be spelled in all caps such

as “NEW YORK STATE.” The proper English grammar, and legal style is “New York State.” This

agrees once again with Ohio.

VIII. The Use of a Legal Fiction

  The authors of "The Real Life Dictionary of the Law," Gerald and Kathleen Hill, are accomplished

scholars and writers. Gerald Hill is an experienced attorney, judge, and law instructor. Here is how the term

legal fiction is described:

"Legal fiction. n. A presumption of fact assumed by a court for convenience, consistency or to

achieve justice. There is an old adage: ‘Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions.'
 Oran's Dictionary of the Law: published by the West Group 1999, within the definition of "Fiction"

is found: "A legal fiction is an assumption that something that is (or may be) false or nonexistent is true or

real. Legal fictions are assumed or invented to help do justice. For example, bringing a lawsuit to throw a

nonexistent ‘John Doe’ off your property used to be the only way to establish a clear right to the property

when legal title was uncertain."

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996: "legal fiction: something assumed in law to be fact

irrespective of the truth or accuracy of that assumption. Example: the legal fiction that a day has no fractions

— Fields V. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 818 P.2d 658 (1991)."

The main key to a legal fiction is assumption as noted in each definition above.  Assumption of a

Legal Fiction. An important issue concerning this entire matter is whether or not a proper name, perverted

into an all caps assemblage of letters, can be substituted for a lawful Christian name or any proper name, such

as the State of Florida. Is the assertion of all-capital-letter names "legal?" If so, from where does this practice

originate and what enforces it?

A legal fiction may be employed when the name of a “person” is not known, and therefore using the

fictitious name “John Doe” as a tentative, or interim artifice to surmount the absence of true knowledge until

the true name is known. Upon discovering the identity of the fictitious name, the true name replaces it.

In all cases, a legal fiction is an assumption of purported fact without having shown the fact to be true

or valid. It is an acceptance with no proof.

An established maxim of law states the importance of the name:

Ad recte docendum oportet, primum inquirere nomina, quia rerum cognitio a nominibusrerum dependet. In

order rightly to comprehend a thing, inquire first into the names, for a right knowledge of things depends upon

their names. Co. Litt. 68.

CONCLUSION

Commercial law deals with people engaged in commerce and fictitious entities (persons, artificial persons),

the documents creating them, such as Articles of Incorporation and By Laws, such as Trust Indentures,
documents of ownership or control, Certificates of title, Birth Certificates, etc., and contracts involving same.

Such persons are identified with names in all-capital letters and in such legal terms as: "citizen," "driver,"

"officer of a corporation," etc. These persons cannot be seen, touched, or heard.

Law is extremely precise. Every letter, capitalization, punctuation mark, etc., in a legal document is utilized

for a specific reason and has legal (i.e. deadly force) consequences. If, for instance, one attempts to file

articles of incorporation in the office of a Secretary of State of a State, if the exact title of the corporation —

down to every jot and tittle, is not exactly the same each and every time the corporation is referenced in the

documents to be filed, the Secretary of State will refuse to file the papers. This is because each time the name

of the corporation is referenced it must be set forth identically in order to express the same legal entity. The

tiniest difference in the name of the corporation changes its legal identity.

Why is "The State of Texas" or "John Doe" not used in the courts or on Driver's Licenses? What stops them

from doing this? Obviously, there is a reason for using the all-caps names since they are very capable of

writing proper names just as their own official style manual states. The reason behind "legal fictions" is found

within the definitions as cited above.

Title III, "Pleadings and Motions," Rule 9(a) "Capacity," Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, states,

in pertinent part: "When an issue is raised as to the legal existence of a named party, or the party's capacity to

be sued, or the authority of a party to be sued, the party desiring to raise the issue shall do so by specific

negative averment, which shall include supporting particulars."

All Parties in This Matter Take Judicial Notice

At this juncture, it is clear that the existence of a name written with all caps is a necessity-created legal

fiction. This is surely an issue to be raised and the supporting particulars are outlined within this

memorandum. Use of the proper name must be insisted upon as a matter of abatement, correction, for all
parties of an action of purported "law." However, the current "courts" cannot correct this since they are all

based on presumed/assumed fictional law and must use artificial, juristic names. Instead, they expect parties

to accept the all-caps name and agree by silence to accept the fictional entity. They must go to unlimited

lengths to deceive and coerce this compliance.

Automated computer systems, with daisy-wheel and pin printers used prevalently in the early

1980's, emulated the IBM electric typewriter Courier or Helvetica fonts in both upper and lower case letters.

Shortly thereafter, the introduction of laser and ink-jet printers with multiple fonts became the standard. For

the past fifteen years, there is no excuse that the government computers will not accommodate the use of

lower case letters and correct name syntax, unless the older data is still stored in its original form, i.e. all caps,

and has not been translated due to the costs of re-entry. But this does not excuse the entry of new data, only

"legacy" data. In fact, on many government forms today, proper names are in all caps while other areas of the

same computer produced document are in both upper and lower case. One can only conclude that now,

more than ever, the use of all caps in substitution the writing a proper name is no mistake.

There are no official or unofficial English grammar style manuals or reference publications that

recognize the use of all caps and no use of middle initials when writing a proper name. To do so is by fiat,

within and out of an undisclosed jurisdiction by unknown people for unrevealed reasons, by juristic license of

arbitrary presumption not based on fact. The authors of the process unilaterally create legal fictions for their

own reasons.

The US and State Governments are deliberately using a legal fiction to "address" the lawful,

real, flesh-and-blood man or woman or their own selves. It is clear this is deliberate because their own

official publications state that proper names are not to be written in all caps. They are deliberately not

following their own recognized authorities.

 In the same respect, by identifying their own government entity in all caps, they are legally stating

that it is also intended to be a legal fiction. As stated in the beginning of this memorandum, the use of all

caps for writing a proper name is an "internal style" for what is apparently a pre-determined usage and, at this

point, unknown jurisdiction.

Therefore, judication is now challenged and is unrebutted until proven otherwise on the

record. This case is moved to be dismissed unless these points can be rebutted, point by point, on the

record within 14 days if filing. The omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant in a

legal process prevents the court from acquiring jurisdiction, …" Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 8thed., pg.

2287

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

Brenda Smith (use exact proper grammar – :First-middle: Last: or First Last (only)

In Propria Persona
 Motion Definitive Statement Court Motion

An idea to bring forensic-syntaxed documents into a court matter as answer.

FOR THE LEARNING CLAIM IS WITH THE LACK OF THE LEGAL-ADVICE BY THE

[PRE]SENTER [plain English used for clarity of the reader]

:For the void of legal-advice.

www.Youarelaw.org/join

With this concept, you are answering by accepting their claim and not defending their facts.

We are adding conditions that they use proper grammar, syntax definitions, explanation of

“boxings”, etc… or they are using language fraud (legalese). This may result you having a

postal claim or suit for using those (legalese) tricks and traps.

It is ONLY about their documents, language and grammar.

Do you REALLY understand them or assume you do?

The strategy is Focus Only on their indictment, complaint, ticket, etc and ask them,

politely and firmly, correct defects in language and grammar. Keep your argument within the 4

corners of their document and you new book you file; reveal multiple defects.

:Defect = No Contract.

How can you possibly “understand” or agree to their document IF words,

styles, and symbols are not is defined within the document? Are you going to

proceed on THEIR presumptions, and therefore volunteer and concede?

If you start arguing their presumed “facts” you will likely lose. They WILL try to

draw you in to that game. So, make it only about their document (fly paper you are

stuck to). As the answer to their complaint, we can ACCEPT their offer with conditions

and stay on point.

… submit your Live Life Claim, your definitions and styles sheet, document evidence with

syntax analysis complete (stamp, thumbprint, autograph, copy-copy-claim, page numbers, etc).

All glued together (no paper clips or staples).

Learn more in our Word Power Course, as a Premium Member of Youarelaw.org

 FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT
MIAMI COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL DIVISION (look up cases in your court for heading format or style)
DANNY PLAINTIFF, ) Case# 12345
        Plaintiff, )
v. ) Motion for More Definitive Statement
JOHN HENRY DOE )
        Defendants. )
_________________________________ )

MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITIVE STATEMENT

I :John-henry: Doe. for Named defendant, JOHN HENRY DOE moves this Honorable

Court to enter an Order requiring a more definitive statement regarding legal definitions and

grammar being used in the plaintiff’s documents, and proceedings. The rule of plain language

may be considered; however, defendant may still understand only certain grammar styles and

definitions of words which defendant commonly uses. This may in be opposition to the

presumption of definitions being used by the plaintiff and court. (do your own short points and

examples)

1. Start making your points - Short bullet sentences, one verb one noun, limited

adjectives and adverbs. ONE SUBJECT.

2. For the void of perjury, defendant requires the use or Correct Sentence Structure Parse

Syntax Grammar Communication in all documents and proceedings.

3. For the void of perjury, defendant requires the use of correct name style and spelling,

and not a nom de guerre fiction trust name.

4. Defendant requires the use of definitions and styles as submitted in Exbibit A.

 5. Exhibit B; documents analyzed in relation to case# ________________________ with

the XYZ court, points to the grammar issues, and styles requiring correction, before

proceeding.

6. Exhibit B may provide evidence of fictitious conveyance of language if not corrected

fully.

WHEREFORE defendant moves the Court to enter an Order preventing plaintiff from

using mere assumption of definitions and grammar styles being used in their case

#___________. Plaintiff shall provide evidence that such definitions were previously known

and agreed to by defendant previously when the alleged contract/crime took place. This

evidence and cooperation shall be admitted as evidence so that the plaintiff is not committing

fictitious conveyance of language in their papers or charges, which would prejudice or deprive

defendant of their contractual and constitutional rights to truly understand the nature and cause

of the matter.

DATED this ____ day of May 2019. Respectfully submitted,

by: _____________________________

:John-henry: Doe. for Named Defendant JOHN HENRY DOE in that case#___________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, I CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was provided

to clerk of the court and to opposing counsel. (AND ?????????)

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH

I CERTIFY that a good faith effort was made to communicate with opposing counsel with a
view toward resolving the issues raised by the foregoing motion, however the parties are at an

impasse.

Learn more in our Word Power Course, as a Premium Member of Youarelaw.org

 Follow conditional-accept instructions

THIS IS NOT A TEMPLATE – SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATION IS REQUIRED

This instruction could be a syntax approach matter. It can be for the use of a first step claim or a
follow up (Conditional Acceptance), after you have performed forensic syntax of documents, then
send them to the opposing party, for establishing your new contract terms. Stylize it and make it
work for whatever situation you are in. Be very specific. THIS IS NOT A “TEMPLATE”.
The goal is NEVER to accuse but in-quire peacefully, with conditional acceptance of their offers,
so their law breaking is exposed without arguing as a debtor. **Of course DELETE COMMENTS.
This example generally applies to a loan scenario. This is virtually the same approach you might
have if asking about this in a court appearance as well. Same attitude with no arguing. Stay in the
asking mode. You may replace “company” with “agency” if a government organization.

Notice of Terms [in plain language form]

STAMP /autograph HERE
This is a notice of procedural findings and requests for sequence in terms. This is a private
communication between parties. Notice to the agent is notice to the principal. Notice to principal is
notice to the agent.

LIST all the primary and secondary names, and addresses here of the agency/firm/court that you are
dealing with. Claim# _____ (the Registered mail# used to mail to yourself first – get this in
advance) Delivered via RM# _____( a separate RM# used to send to the one primary party – send
regular mail to others)
To whom it may concern, after seeking much counsel, it has come to my attention that
certain elements of the paper agreement which I signed seem to carry language that may be
questionable and/or misleading. I would like these issues corrected before proceeding.
I am requesting that (so-and-so Educational Loan Service, Inc – whoever), hereinafter
respondent, provide me, John Doe, hereinafter “principal”, with the terms for the paper agreement,
in order to show that respondent and the account in question is indeed valid. My intent in this
procedural request, hereinafter “Notice of Request”, is to make sure that the company, hereinbefore
“respondent”, is the legitimate creditor, hereinafter lender for all capital name, John Doe, account
number (or case#12345), and that a valid loan amount was in fact assets disbursed to John Doe.

03/18/19 Page 1 of 8
(**use the documents associated with the contract you are dealing with)
Let’s talk about the findings and concern:
In line section 15 of the Federal Stafford Loan Master Promissory Note, hereinafter “the
note”, under promise to pay (See attachment A), the line reads as follows. “I promise to pay to the
order of the lender all amounts disbursed under the terms of this note”. And that's the problem
there. It's saying that “an amount was disbursed”.

(**But they have no procedural substantive protocol that was disclosed or what trust it was
disbursed from, nor does they define “disbursed” to mean something else? That's pretty serious
there. Where are those funds coming from? Did they even take a loss? Or is this just a made-up
loan? What happened here? They need to be specific. And there's even more than that with the
grammar that we're going to get into. However, you will find out that YOU loaned THEM the
money/value; it came out of your trust account. It's held in escrow. That's why you see a positive
balance on the statement, by the way. Therefore, there is NO contract. If there was a contract, they'd
have to accept gold and silver according to Article 1, Section 10.1 of the United States Constitution.
Again, it’s big rabbit trail there. But let's keep going. So now we have a request for a definite
statement and documentation.)
I am requesting that respondent please provide me with written confirmation that amounts
were in fact disbursed from your actual asset accounts, as states in the above section hereinbefore
line 15 of the note. Upon said confirmation, I'm requesting that respondent provide me with
certified documentation showing that there is a valid fund, i.e. “Trust fund escrow” from which the
loan amounts were in fact disbursed. Provide to me clear terms for disbursement under company
terms and definition meanings, for the disbursed amount as stated in line Section 15 of the note.

Other findings and concerns.

Other findings include double-spacing along with blank spaces throughout the agreement,
hereinbefore paper agreement. (**double-spacing is procedural, this is why a lot of counties and
courts will have you do double-spacing. It voids the continuum of evidence) It is a concern of this
claimant, hereinbefore “principal”, that said arrangement may be interpreted to mean void
continuum or void continuum of evidence.

03/18/19 Page 2 of 8
 Please provide for me the following: (A) the styles manual that your company uses. (B) the
syntax structure sequence that your company uses. (C) the rules for spacing, boxing, quotations, and
what would and would not constitute as void continuum of evidence within the paper agreements.

03/18/19 Page 3 of 8
Please provide adequate answers to the questions below:
1. Do blank spaces in the agreement void the continuum of the evidence, or void any
agreement stated in the paper agreement?
2. What are the company rules for double-spacing?
3. Does your company use a styles manual?
4. What are my rights in the signed agreements, hereinafter contract?
5. Does your company have a four-corner rule, meaning anything in brackets, parentheses, or
italics is a separate matter from the page?
(***Regarding the rule for use of brackets, parentheses, italics, and all other boxings
rendering a statement legally inapplicable and insubstantial to the body of text within the
surrounding contract.)
6. Do the words in the contract have one meaning per word?
(**That's very important. That's why in Oppositional Syntax is so powerful – such as the
formatting of For the, With the, By the, Of the, etc). We can only have one verb per sentence,
one meaning per word so they can't twist our words. If you want done for you syntax help
see our syntax service options http://youarelaw.org/syntax - you must be an active Premium
Member to make such requests.)
7. Or do the words have contranyms and/or other variables for interpretation, which may be
misleading?
(**Okay, again contranyms and/or other variables are completely misleading. Also, if there
is NO “consideration” between both contracting parties, it is then merely an “implied
trust” or an “implied contract”, and subject to other variables for interpretation. The rabbit
hole of deception gets deeper.)
8. If the latter is true, who is the party that would be responsible for interpretation of said
contract?
9. Will this be left up to a court or a third party for “judicial interpretation”?
10. Or is it based on common opinion?
11. Does this contract, paper agreement, comply with federal law?
12. What are your accounting policies?
13. Are they stated in the paper agreement?

03/18/19 Page 4 of 8
 14. Who insures your company?
15. Who ensures your accounting protocols?
16. Could I have a copy of the policies and terms for your accounting protocols?
17. Who ensures this contract?
18. Does this contract have international application?
19. Could I have a copy of all insurance policies for this contract?
20. Does this contract have present applicability, hereinafter now-time standing as a contract, or
is this contract, hereinbefore “paper agreement”, structured as an evidentiary bill, hereinafter
“evidence of a past liability”?

Please provide an adequate answer within 14 days of this notice of request. In the event that
the contract is void, please send me a statement showing any and all obligations have been
vacated and release the funds to me upon said vacation showing a zero balance. You have 14
days from receipt of this notice to respond by a point-by-point basis via affidavit under your
full commercial liability, signing under the penalty of perjury that the facts contained therein
are true, correct, complete, and not misleading. Mere declarations are an insufficient response. If
an extension of time is needed to properly answer, please request in writing.
Failure to respond will be deemed as an agreement that the facts contained herein by an
inability to prove your claim, thereby indicating your agreements to the facts.
Thank you for your time in this matter.
By: ___________________________ ___________, 2021
John Doe
Address, Phone# email

(** he did not use a postal stamp for this one. There is a time and place to use a postal stamp for
matters like this. It can’t hurt to do if in doubt. If you have already previously formed your
judgment on that contract with a forensic syntax response, you may want to make that into the
binding contract using this default process. The stamp, autograph, thumb print method makes it into
your court as a real contract. In that event first mail it to yourself with “Registered Mail#” to
register as a Claim (not certified mail), then forward to the parties with this established Registered

03/18/19 Page 5 of 8
Mail# on the claim as you do your process.

03/18/19 Page 6 of 8
 Final Conditional Acceptance to Notice of Terms

This is a private communication between the parties. Notice to the agent is notice to the principal.
Notice to the principal is notice to the agent.
(**use same header, account info, reference to previous documents sent through, the parties, claim#
as before. We have the principal laid out; the respondent laid out. And we have re-payment. We
have the account number, etc. BE CLEAR. Remember this, especially with court scenarios or
anything similar, they can tell if it's coming from you, and you need to be very careful with that, or
they will walk all over you if they can sense you don't know what you're doing. DO NOT just copy
this and insert a name. One of the big reasons why we don't like templates, because HAVE make it
your own.

My timely response to whom it may concern.

I, John Doe, here and after principal am in receipt of an offer. Hereinafter, “offer to vacate”,
and/or “pay pending balance”. Under the account number 1234 or whatever, hereinafter “account”.

After investigation and consideration has been decided that principal will accept the
aforementioned offer, upon certain information provided by way of proof of claim to meet
satisfactory requirements for: the avoidance of criminal investigation, fictitious conveyance of
language, and/or fraudulent postal application.

Please provide proof of claim that:

1. The aforementioned account is negative, and that payment complies with law concerning
procedural tender of said payment. Ref: Article One, Section 10.1 of the United States
Constitution.
2. The contracts are without misleading statements and/or with use of the correct judicial
syntax for the avoidance of perjury, for use of fictitious conveyance of language by an
individual or person authorized to contract with this claimant, hereinbefore “principal”.
3. The principal does not have greater or equal value in escrow to satisfy and indem for any
and all obligations for this account through the respondent.

03/18/19 Page 7 of 8
 4. Respondents hold the original promissory note for the account.
5. The respondents did not sell said note, here and before original promissory note for value
received.
6. The amount or balance of the aforementioned note has not been satisfied by procedural sale
and transfer of said note.
7. The respondents are the valid creditor for this account.

You have 10 days from receipt of this notice of conditional acceptance to respond by point by
point basis.

Be advised this matter is now being billed at a rate of $10,000 per count /per violation or as
indicated by the Universal Postal union in their matrix of violations, whichever is greater, if not
settled by the deadlines stated above.

Thank you for your time in this matter.

By: ___________________________ ___________, 2021
John Doe
Address, Phone# email

03/18/19 Page 8 of 8
 3 Step Admin process

COMMENT - This utilizes the basic concept of a 3-part administrative process

NON-NEGOTIABLE

[FIRSTNAME LOWERCASE] of the family [SURNAME LOWERCASE]

c/o [YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[CEO FULL NAME]

[THEIR ADDRESS]
[THEIR ADDRESS]
[THEIR ADDRESS]
[THEIR POSTCODE]

CC: [COLLECTION CONTACT] Collections Department

[THE DATE]

Re: Account Number: [ACCOUNT NUMBER]

Dear [CEO TITLE SURNAME]

I would be happy to settle any financial obligation I might lawfully owe, as soon as I
have received the following documentation from you:

1. Validation of the debt (the actual accounting);

2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice in
accordance with The Uniform Commercial Code );
3. A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties.
4. Please also provide me with a true and certified copy (NOT photocopy) of the
Original Note (Credit Agreement), under penalty of perjury and with unlimited
liability and confirm that this Note, has never been sold. Please also confirm the name
of the individual who is the duly authorized representative from your company, who
has carried out due diligence under the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 and
what actions s/he has taken in relation to this account.

I hereby give you ten (10) days to reply to this notice from the above date with a notice sent
using recorded post and signed under full commercial liability and penalties of perjury,
assuring and promising me that all of the replies and details given to the above requests are
true and without deception, fraud or mischief. Your said failure to provide the aforementioned
documentation within ten (10) days, from the above date, to validate the debt, will constitute
your agreement to the following terms:

1. That the debt did not exist in the first place; OR

2. It has already been paid in full; AND
3. That any damages suffer, you will be held culpable;
4. That any negative remarks made to a credit reference agency will be removed;
5. You will no longer pursue this matter any further.
1
 6. You agree to pay all fee schedules.

Please Note: I wish to deal with this matter in writing and I do not give your organization
permission to contact me by telephone. Should you do so, I must warn you that the calls
could constitute ‘harassment' and I may take action under The Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act.

Yours sincerely,
By: _____________________, _____________2021
First-Middle Last, without prejudice
Authorized Agent for [FULLNAME UPPERCASE]

No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Rights Reserved.
Calls maybe recorded

2
 2nd letter

NON-NEGOTIABLE

[FIRSTNAME LOWERCASE] of the family [SURNAME LOWERCASE]

c/o [YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[CEO FULL NAME]

[THEIR ADDRESS]
[THEIR ADDRESS]
[THEIR POSTCODE]
CC: [COLLECTION CONTACT] Collections Department

[THE DATE]

Re: Account Number: [ACCOUNT NUMBER]

Dear [CEO TITLE SURNAME]

I previously wrote to you on ________________ 2016 requesting the following

documentation, so that I may settle any financial obligation I might lawfully owe:

1. Validation of the debt (the actual accounting);

2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice in
accordance with The Uniform Commercial Code );
3. A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties.
4. Please also provide me with a true and certified copy (NOT photocopy) of the
Original Note (Credit Agreement), under penalty of perjury and with unlimited
liability and confirm that this Note, has never been sold. Please also confirm the name
of the individual who is the duly authorized representative from your company, who
has carried out due diligence under the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 and
what actions s/he has taken in relation to this account.

As you have failed to provide the aforementioned documentation to validate your claim,
I hereby give you ten (10) days to reply to this notice from the above date with a notice sent
using recorded post and signed under full commercial liability and penalties of perjury,
assuring and promising me that all of the replies and details given to the above requests are
true and without deception, fraud or mischief. Your said failure to provide the aforementioned
documentation within ten (10) days, from the above date, to validate the debt, will constitute
your agreement to the following terms:

1. That the debt did not exist in the first place; OR

2. It has already been paid in full; AND
3. That any damages suffer, you will be held culpable;
4. That any negative remarks made to a credit reference agency will be removed;
5. You will no longer pursue this matter any further.
6. You agree to pay all fee schedules.

3
 Yours sincerely,
By: _____________________, _____________2019
First-Middle Last, without prejudice
Authorized Agent for [FULLNAME UPPERCASE]

No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Rights Reserved.
Calls maybe recorded

4
 #3 Letter

NON-NEGOTIABLE

[FIRSTNAME LOWERCASE] of the family [SURNAME LOWERCASE]

c/o [YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[CEO FULL NAME]

[THEIR ADDRESS]
[THEIR ADDRESS]
[THEIR POSTCODE]

CC: [COLLECTION CONTACT] Collections Department

[THE DATE]

Re: Account Number: [ACCOUNT NUMBER]

Dear [CEO TITLE SURNAME]

I previously wrote to you on ________________ 2019 and on ______________ 2019

requesting the following documentation, so that I may settle any financial obligation I might
lawfully owe:

1. Validation of the debt (the actual accounting);

2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice in
accordance with The Uniform Commercial Code);
3. A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties.
4. Please also provide me with a true and certified copy (NOT photocopy) of the
Original Note (Credit Agreement), under penalty of perjury and with unlimited
liability and confirm that this Note, has never been sold. Please also confirm the name
of the individual who is the duly authorized representative from your company, who
has carried out due diligence under the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 and
what actions s/he has taken in relation to this account.

As you have failed to provide the aforementioned documentation to validate your claim, I
hereby give you ten (10) days to reply to this notice from the above date with a notice sent
using recorded post and signed under full commercial liability and penalties of perjury,
assuring and promising me that all of the replies and details given to the above requests are
true and without deception, fraud or mischief. Your said failure to provide the aforementioned
documentation within ten (10) days, from the above date, to validate the debt, has now
constituted your agreement to the following terms and agreement to my BILL:

1. That the debt did not exist in the first place; OR

2. It has already been paid in full; AND
3. That any damages I suffer, you will be held culpable;
4. That any negative remarks made to a credit reference agency will be removed;

5
5. You will no longer pursue this matter any further. You have not proven any debt, if
you sell the alleged liability, and/or appoint an agent to act on its/your behalf on this
matter you will have broken our agreement and you agree to pay the following fee
schedule $ (3X what they are claiming) for dishonoring our agreement, 1000 per hour
or part of it of Authorized Representatives time nunc pro tunc, $1000 per recorded
delivery or any other form of response nunc pro tunc also any further contact is now
not necessary, if however you deem a need to contact me by phone or letter the fee is
$100 per item payable in advance, place the check in the envelope, if no payment is
made in advance the fee will rise to $1000 per item and you will also be held culpable
for any cost incurred while recovering the debt you owe.

Yours sincerely,
By: _____________________, _____________2019
First-Middle Last, without prejudice
Authorized Agent for [FULLNAME UPPERCASE]

No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Rights Reserved.
Calls maybe recorded

6
"

End of Quote.