The Yellow party would benefit most from fair district boundaries that allow for just voting, while the likely outcome of the gerrymandered map is a win for the Green party, who unethically manipulated boundaries to increase voters in their favor. The Yellow party chair could argue that the Green party improperly increased voters in their region.
The Yellow party would benefit most from fair district boundaries that allow for just voting, while the likely outcome of the gerrymandered map is a win for the Green party, who unethically manipulated boundaries to increase voters in their favor. The Yellow party chair could argue that the Green party improperly increased voters in their region.
The Yellow party would benefit most from fair district boundaries that allow for just voting, while the likely outcome of the gerrymandered map is a win for the Green party, who unethically manipulated boundaries to increase voters in their favor. The Yellow party chair could argue that the Green party improperly increased voters in their region.
The party that carries a benefit, would be the yellow party because it
contains an equivalent break of districts which allows the voting process to take place justly.
2). The most likely outcome of the gerrymandered map would be the
winning of the Green party and the probable cause behind this is that the green party has manipulated its boundaries unethically which increases the number of voters in its favour.
3). The argument that the chairperson of the Yellow party can make
regarding the Green party is that it is inaptly increasing the number of voters in its region.