HOW TO DEAL WITH PO-PO:

If a police officer approaches and engages you for not wearing a mask or anything else…

Remember: A Peace Officer must identify as one if asked, so you ask!

YOU: “(Sir or Mam), are you a Peace Officer; yes or no?” [If they try to dodge the question, keep asking]

COP: “Yes I am”

YOU: “Are you acting under oath of office as Peace Officer?” [If they try to dodge the question, keep

asking]

COP: “Yes I am”

YOU: “Have you witnessed me breaching the peace?” [If they try to dodge the question, keep asking]

COP: “No, I haven’t.” [because they’re trying to enforce a POLICY or STATUTE]

YOU: “Then, I hereby exercise my Common Law right to refuse intercourse with a Peace Officer who has

not witnessed me breaching the peace. Have a good day, Officer.”

ANY FURTHER COMMUNICATION WITH YOU PAST THAT POINT CONSTITUTES HARASSMENT.

__________________

UPDATE: Definition of “Peace Officer” in Criminal Code:

peace officer includes

• (a) a mayor, warden, reeve, sheriff, deputy sheriff, sheriff’s officer and justice of the peace,

• (b) a member of the Correctional Service of Canada who is designated as a peace officer

pursuant to Part I of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, and a warden, deputy

warden, instructor, keeper, jailer, guard and any other officer or permanent employee of a

prison other than a penitentiary as defined in Part I of the Corrections and Conditional

Release Act,

• (c) a police officer, police constable, bailiff, constable, or other person employed for the

preservation and maintenance of the public peace or for the service or execution of civil

process,
 • (c.1) a designated officer as defined in section 2 of the Integrated Cross-border Law

Enforcement Operations Act, when

o (i) participating in an integrated cross-border operation, as defined in section 2 of

that Act, or

o (ii) engaging in an activity incidental to such an operation, including travel for the

purpose of participating in the operation and appearances in court arising from

the operation,

• (d) an officer within the meaning of the Customs Act, the Excise Act or the Excise Act, 2001,

or a person having the powers of such an officer, when performing any duty in the

administration of any of those Acts,

• (d.1) an officer authorized under subsection 138(1) of the Immigration and Refugee

Protection Act,

• (e) a person designated as a fishery guardian under the Fisheries Act when performing any

duties or functions under that Act and a person designated as a fishery officer under

the Fisheries Act when performing any duties or functions under that Act or the Coastal

Fisheries Protection Act,

• (f) the pilot in command of an aircraft

o (i) registered in Canada under regulations made under the Aeronautics Act, or

o (ii) leased without crew and operated by a person who is qualified under

regulations made under the Aeronautics Act to be registered as owner of an

aircraft registered in Canada under those regulations,

while the aircraft is in flight, and

• (g) officers and non-commissioned members of the Canadian Forces who are

o (i) appointed for the purposes of section 156 of the National Defence Act, or

o (ii) employed on duties that the Governor in Council, in regulations made under
 the National Defence Act for the purposes of this paragraph, has prescribed to be

of such a kind as to necessitate that the officers and non-commissioned

members performing them have the powers of peace officers; (agent de la paix)Additional response to a
non forthcoming peace officer.

If, after attempting to get the officer to identify as a peace officer and not getting the desired response
then ask him/her/them if s/he/they are acting as policy enforcers enforcing corporate policies and
statutes? If s/he/they say that they are then ask them what evidence do they have that their corporate
policies and statutes apply to anyone not employed by their ultra vires legal fiction Service Corpsoration
that they re-present and proceed to the 4 questions

If the wo/man accosting one refuses to answer any of one's questions or gives answers other than what
he/she should,demand that he/she call for a supervisor (Because he/she/they is/are either ignorant of
his or her own oath of office ( see "definition of a peace officer in the criminal code of Canada)) or
he/she/they are acting Ultra Vires and unlawfully.

If the "Officer" states that he/she is not acting under their oath of office of a peace officer [demand
he/she call his/her supervisor to the scene and state that one's fee schedule is in effect and ask
him/her/it the exact time as one's fee schedule is costed by the minute(be sure they note the exact time
in their little notebook and ask for a file # for one's records, if he/she/they refuse to do so demand to see
his/her supervisor and [and or start screaming blue murder and attract as much attention to the
situation and ask witnesses to start videoing the event] ask the 4 questions that will remove one from
there assumed/presumed jurisdiction.

1. Am i Property of YOU or the ultra vires(*1), legal fiction(*2), service corpse-oration (*3), that YOU (*4)[
Accusative plural in legalese ]re-present (*5)? (Slavery has been outlawed worldwide(In theory anyway)
so he/she/they have no authority based on Master/Slave contract so that Jurisdiction goes out the
window.)

2. Can any man administer (*6) property(*7) without right? (One's body and whatever is proper to one's
body is one's property, one's physical body, spiritual "body", personal possessions, real property,
intellectual property, whatever one claims is one's property that goes uncontested)

3. Do i have a wet ink signature contract with YOU or the Ultra Vires, Legal Fiction, Service Corpsoration
that YOU re-present that gives YOU or the Ultra Vires, Legal Fiction, Service Corpsoration that YOU re-
present the authority to do what YOU are doing right now? (Without a wet ink signature Contract giving
them authority by One's self that jurisdiction goes right out the window.)

4. Do YOU have a verified claim that i have caused injury, loss or harm to another Wo/Man or damaged
their property? (Without a verified claim by another Wo/Man that one has caused injury, loss or harm to
another Wo/Man or damaged their property then that jurisdiction goes out the window)

*1- (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ultra%20vires#h1)
Definition of ultra vires

: beyond the scope or in excess of legal power or authority

Examples of ultra vires in a Sentence

Recent Examples on the Web

Moreover, the Executive Order exceeds the President’s authority and is therefore ultra vires and void ab
initio. — Eriq Gardner, Billboard, 4 Sep. 2020

That strikes me as ultra vires; liberals can’t stir more poison into the pot. — The Economist, 4 Dec. 2019

*2.- legal fiction noun

legal fic·tion

Legal Definition of legal fiction

: something assumed in law to be fact irrespective of the truth or accuracy of that assumption the legal
fiction that a day has no fractions — Fields v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 818 P.2d 658 (1991)

*3.- Corporation: Corpse = Dead + Oration = Speaking

From Merriam Webster's Dictionary:

corporation noun

Synonyms of corporation

an enlarged or bulging abdomen

a substantial corporation that showed that he was a sucker for all-you-can-eat buffets

Synonyms for corporation

bay window, beer belly, belly, gut, paunch, pot, potbelly

Words Related to corporation

breadbasket [slang], stomach, tummy

chubbiness, corpulence, fat, fatness, fleshiness, obesity, overweight, paunchiness, plumpness,

portliness, pudginess

chunkiness, heaviness, stoutness.

*4.- YOU: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/you

you pronoun
\ ˈyü

, yə also yē \

Definition of you

1 : the one or ones being addressed —used as the pronoun of the second person singular or plural in any
grammatical relation except that of a possessive you may sit in that chair —used formerly only as a plural
pronoun of the second person in the dative or accusative case as direct or indirect object of a verb or as
object of a preposition — compare thee, thou, ye, your, yours

2 : one sense 2a after a while, it grows on you

How did you become singular?

The history of the pronoun you provides a good example of the effect social forces can have on the
language. Originally, the pair ye and you was used along with thee and thou to refer to people in the
second person, ye and you for plural and thee and thou for singular. You began as the grammatical
object, used in the following ways:

I see you sitting there together.

I gave you six apples, three for each.

These uses are known respectively as the accusative and dative cases. The singular for this use would be
thee:

For thee there are three apples.

Of thee I sing.

When the second person plural was used as a grammatical subject, ye was used.

Seek and ye shall find.

This use is called the nominative case. The singular for this use would be thou:

How great thou art.

As far back as the 14th century, the plural forms ye and you began to be used to address one person—
usually a superior—as a mark of deference and respect. This change could have been influenced by the
first-person plural we (the royal “we”) used by sovereigns or reflected the impact of French politeness at
work in Middle English. Once this usage of the polite plural began, it gradually grew. This is where social
forces came into play: once people begin such a use, it must grow, since people would rather be polite
than risk offending others in cases of doubt. As the use of the plural increased, the singular use
decreased accordingly: by the beginning of the 17th century, thou and thee marked only an intimate or
personal relationship or a superior-to-inferior relationship. It was even sometimes used to show
deliberate disrespect. Queen Elizabeth I seems to have used only you in writing, and a user of her
prestige must have given you a boost.

By about the middle of the 16th century the contrast in function between ye and you began breaking
down, with the effect that you was more frequently used as a subject pronoun as use of ye decreased.

The loss of thee and thou—a singular pronoun for everyday use—was clearly noticed by English
speakers.

Initially, the distinction between singular you and plural you was signaled by verb agreement; you was
for the singular continued in polite if informal use well into the 18th century before it lost respectability.
Special plural forms were later contrived to hold you chiefly to singular use, such as you-all , you-uns,
yez, and youse. None of them became standard.

So the simple social drive of good manners has in a few centuries completely remade the second person
pronoun in English. No doubt the social pressures of today will work changes in the language as well. The
chances are, however, that most changes they bring about will not be rapid.

First Known Use of you

before the 12th century, in the meaning defined at sense 1

History and Etymology for you

Middle English, from Old English ēow, dat. & accusative of gē you; akin to Old High German iu, dative of
ir you, Sanskrit yūyam you

*5.- Re-present: represent verb (1)

rep·re·sent | \ ˌre-pri-ˈzent\

represented; representing; represents

Definition of represent

(Entry 1 of 2)

transitive verb

1 : to bring clearly before the mind : present a book which represents the character of early America

2 : to serve as a sign or symbol of the flag represents our country

3 : to portray or exhibit in art : depict

4 : to serve as the counterpart or image of : typify a movie hero who represents the ideals of the culture

5a : to produce on the stage

b : to act the part or role of

6a(1) : to take the place of in some respect

(2) : to act in the place of or for usually by legal right

(3) : to manage the legal and business affairs of athletes represented by top lawyers and agents

b : to serve especially in a legislative body by delegated authority usually resulting from election

7 : to describe as having a specified character or quality represents himself as a friend

8a : to give one's impression and judgment of : state in a manner intended to affect action or judgment

b : to point out in protest or remonstrance

9 : to serve as a specimen, example, or instance of

10a : to form an image or representation of in the mind

b(1) : to apprehend (an object) by means of an idea

(2) : to recall in memory

11 : to correspond to in essence : constitute

intransitive verb

1 : to make representations against something : protest

2 slang : to perform a task or duty admirably : serve as an outstanding example

re-present verb (2)

re-pre·sent | \ ˌrē-pri-ˈzent\

re-presented; re-presenting; re-presents

Definition of re-present (Entry 2 of 2)

transitive verb

: to present again or anew

*6- Administer: administer verb

ad·min·is·ter | \ əd-ˈmi-nə-stər\

administered; administering\ əd-ˈmi-nə-st(ə-)riŋ\

Definition of administer

transitive verb

1 : to manage or supervise the execution, use, or conduct of administer a trust fund

2a : to provide or apply : dispense administer justice administer punishment

b : to give officially or as part of a ritual administer a test administer the last rites

c : to give remedially administer a dose of medicine

intransitive verb

1 : to perform the office of administrator

2 : to furnish a benefit : minister administer to an ailing friend

3 : to manage affairs

*7-Property: property noun

prop·er·ty | \ ˈprä-pər-tē\

plural properties

Definition of property

1a : a quality or trait belonging and especially peculiar to an individual or thing

b : an effect that an object has on another object or on the senses

c : virtue sense 2

d : an attribute common to all members of a class

2a : something owned or possessed specifically : a piece of real estate

b : the exclusive right to possess, enjoy, and dispose of a thing : ownership

c : something to which a person or business has a legal title

d : one (such as a performer) who is under contract and whose work is especially valuable

e : a book or script purchased for publication or production

3 : an article or object used in a play or motion picture except painted scenery and costumes