Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A
attending doctor in Prosthetic Dentistry.
surgical approach to the healthy mucosa around implant fix-
Kai-Feng Hung, DDS, is a resident in Oral
and Maxillofacial Surgery. host bone and osseous re- tures, an adequate attached zone of ke-
I-Chiang Chou, DDS, is a resident in Oral
construction for installation ratinized gingivae around the fixture,
and Maxillofacial Surgery. of titanium endosteal im- no intervening frenum or high muscle
Chen-Hsian Wu, DDS, is a resident in Oral plants have been proposed attachment close to the fixture, and an
and Maxillofacial Surgery. over the last decade.1–6 It is generally appropriate probing depth of peri-im-
Richard Che-Shoa Chang, DDS, MS, is agreed that soft tissue management is plant gingivae sulcus. However, these
professor and dean of Oral and Maxillofacial as important as bone condition for im- results might not be easily obtained
Surgery. plant installation. The signs of success- because of the compromised ridge con-
FIGURE 1. A 57-year-old female patient with a class II atrophic ridge with implant-supported overdenture rehabilitation. (A) Compromised
soft tissue conditions at the anterior atrophic ridge of the mandible with bone resorption and high mentalis muscle attachment. (B) After
fully uncovering and trimming down the sharp, thin, and narrow crestal bone, the bone table was wide enough to provide implantation
of fixtures. (C) An improved contour of the vestibule 2 weeks after surgery. (D) A casting bar-type connector on 2 standard abutments
for supporting the overdenture.
fixture, the gingivae should be split phic ridges behind the mental fora- The retention, stability, function, and
off labiolingually by a horizontal men due to high attachment of the cosmetic appearance of the dentures
crestal incision at the second-stage buccinator muscle and a shallow buc- were excellent.
operation for the exposure of implant cal vestibule. Postoperatively, there
DISCUSSION
fixtures. If keratinized attached gin- was exposure of 3 fixtures due to mu-
givae are not exactly located on the cosal flap dehiscence. At the second- A severely atrophic ridge in aged pa-
top of implant fixtures, an apically stage surgery, there were 5 implants tients has long been an obstacle for
positioned flap can be made to relo- with minimal fenestration or bone an ideal dental rehabilitation by a
cate the keratinized gingivae around loss within 2 mm at the superficial conventional complete denture.7 To
the healing abutment of the implant crestal bone around the fixtures. All cope with this, a variety of methods
fixture. Afterward, prosthodontic cases had improved labial contour of for increasing retention, stability, or
treatment was completed with a clip the vestibule at the surgical sites. A even supporting ability for the pros-
and bar overdenture supported by a prosthesis of a clip and bar overden- thesis have been considered.1–4 Unfor-
casting connector between 2 standard ture supported by fixture abutments tunately, bone augmentation with or
abutments (Figure 1d). These patients and their casting connector was de- without grafting vestibuloplasty for
were regularly followed for clinical signed. After delivery of their pros- the class II and class III atrophic ridg-
observation and for radiographic ex- theses, all patients needed 2–3 fol- es still often cannot meet the basic
amination at 6-month intervals. low-up visits within the initial 3 needs for making a conventional
months for denture adjustment. Two prosthesis with good retention, sta-
RESULTS
patients with class III severely atro- bility, and support. It is generally
All 17 patients received a lipswitch phic ridges having a superficially lo- agreed that supporting the prosthesis
vestibuloplasty for the first-stage im- cated mental foramen felt mild dis- with endosteal implants can dramat-
plant surgery at the anterior atrophic comfort and required denture adjust- ically improve the results.
ridge of the mandible. The sizes of ments for an additional 6 months. Another question is how many im-
the implant fixtures varied from 4 ⫻ With an average of 6 years’ follow-up, plants are needed for the patients with
13 mm to 4 ⫻ 18 mm (see Table 1). all the fixture abutments were firm such severely atrophic ridges. Usually,
Seven patients (5 class III and 2 class and stable, with a mean probing the class II and class III atrophic eden-
II) had similar management by lip- depth of peri-implant gingivae sulcus tulous ridges behind the mental fora-
switch vestibuloplasty at their atro- less than 2.5 ⫾ 0.6 mm (see Table 1). men are not suitable for regular fixture
FIGURE 2. Radiographs of the same patient as in FIGURE 1. (A) A vertical bone height of approximately 2.2 cm at the symphysis area. (B)
Excellent integration between host bone and two 18-mm implant fixtures 5 months after surgery.
placement due to the lack of adequate these atrophic ridges raises another im- after surgery. Therefore, we proposed
bone height above the inferior alveolar portant consideration. The severely the method of lipswitch vestibuloplas-
canal. Therefore, denture designs with atrophic edentulous ridge at the man- ty in combination with implant sur-
2–5 fixtures between the bilateral men- dible often presents with a sharp and gery to provide access sufficient to im-
tal foramen can provide different thin contour with a high attachment of prove the aforementioned problems in
tracks of treatment from fixed to re- the mentalis and buccinator muscle in a single procedure. This method pro-
movable prostheses. In these 17 pa- need of vestibuloplasty.8 In such con- vides several advantages as follows: (1)
tients, a clip and bar overdenture sup- ditions, conventional methods of rais- it eliminates the need for another sur-
ported by 2 implant fixtures gave good ing a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap gery for soft tissue management; (2) a
results. with midcrestal, labial, and lingual ap- secure mucosal flap for covering the
Besides the type and mechanical proaches cannot improve the underly- fixture is created; (3) the morphology
design of the implant prosthesis, the ing problems and may even leave a of the labial vestibule is improved; and
compromised soft tissue condition at more severely compromised vestibule (4) the keratinized attached gingivae is
FIGURE 3. Sagittal sections of the lip, mandible, and tongue demonstrating the procedure and management of the transpositioned mucosal
flap and periosteum flap prior to implant surgery. (A) A compromised vestibule with a shallow and thin atrophic edentulous ridge and
high mentalis muscle attachment. (B) The mucosal flap being raised to the lingual cortex to fully uncover the ridge crest. (C) The ridge
crest is trimmed down to accommodate the fixture. (D) The transpositioned mucosal flap and periosteum flap provides secure coverage
of implant fixtures without dehiscence and a great improvement in vestibular morphology.
preserved for use as peri-implant tis- planned to provide adequate access for one time, and the preservation of the
sue at the second-stage operation. In proper implant fixture installation as keratinized gingivae. The design of a
some cases, such as when the attach- well as tension-free soft tissue closure. clip and bar overdenture supported by
ment of the buccinator muscle in the The lipswitch method with the tran- 2-fixture abutments and connectors
class III atrophic ridge is high, the lip- spositioned mucosal flap and perioste- had a satisfactory result.
switch vestibuloplasty can also be per- um flap can provide the advantage of
REFERENCES
formed at the region behind the mental primary closure. However, it is critical
foramen to improve the morphology of to avoid creating tension on the flaps, 1. Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D,
the vestibule. This certainly improves because tension causes ischemia and the et al. A technique for osseous restora-
the retention and stability of the final primary closure can be lost, such as in tion of deficient edentulous maxillary
prosthesis. 1 case with wound dehiscence in this ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43:
Although there is some controversy group of patients. 87–91.
about the need for complete primary 2. Astrand P, Nord PG, Branemark
SUMMARY
closure over the implant, and various PI. Titanium implants and onlay bone
flap design modifications have been de- This article addressed a method of us- graft to the atrophic edentulous max-
veloped to help obtain such closure, it ing lipswitch vestibuloplasty combined illa: a 3-year longitudinal study. J Oral
is agreed that a good flap design can with implant surgery in patients with Maxillofac Surg. 1996:25:25–29.
ensure adequate tissue mobility to at- severely atrophic class II and class III 3. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S. Au-
tain primary closure of the wound. This edentulous ridges. This method pro- togenous mandibular bone grafts and
greatly facilitates postoperative care, vides the advantages of access to the osseointegrated implants for recon-
minimizes complications, and maximiz- host bone for easier implant fixture in- struction of the severely atrophied
es the predictability of the procedure. In stallation, improved morphology of the maxilla: a preliminary report. J Oral
the severely atrophic ridge with shallow vestibule, convenience of performing Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:1277–1287.
vestibule, flap design must be carefully vestibuloplasty and implant surgery at 4. Verhoeven JW, Cune MS, Terlou
M, Zoon MAOW, de Putter C. The H-P, Berthold H. Localized ridge aug- nous cancellous bone. J Oral Maxillofac
combined use of endosteal implants mentation using guided bone regener- Surg. 1938;41:629–642.
and iliac crest onlay grafts in the se- ation. II. Surgical procedure in the 9. Kethley JL. The lipswitch: a
verely atrophic mandible: a longitudi- mandible. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. modification of Kazanjian’s labial ves-
nal study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 1995;15:10–29. tibuloplasty. J Oral Surg. 1978;36:701–
26:351–357. 7. Jennings DE. Treatment of the 705.
5. Becker W, Becker B. Guided mandibular compromised ridge: a lit- 10. Wessberg GA. Transpositional
bone regeneration for implants placed erature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61: flap technique for mandibular vestib-
into extraction socket and for implant 575–579. uloplasty. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;98:
dehiscences: surgical techniques and 8. Kent JN, Quinn JH, Zide MF, 929–933.
case reports. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. Guerra LR, Boyne PJ. Alveolar ridge 11. Moon AC. Transpositional flap
1990;10:376–391. augmentation using nonresorbable hy- vestibuloplasty of the maxilla. J Oral
6. Buser D, Dula K, Belser UC, Hirt droxylapatite with or without autoge- Maxillofac Surg. 1983;41:272–273.