Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SLR Style Guide 2021
SLR Style Guide 2021
Table of Contents
The guidelines and rules contained in this style guide apply to the text of judgments, as well as
to headings, catchwords and headnotes, unless otherwise indicated.
SLR Style Guide 2021 …6
Where editing the soft copy of a draft judgment, check that there are already the in-built
styles for each of the various components of a judgment. The correct style must be
applied to each component of the judgment.
In general, no more than three levels of emphasis should be used to emphasise original
or quoted text:
• First-level emphasis: add italics to text
• Second-level emphasis: add bold italics to text
• Third-level emphasis: add bold underlined italics to text
1–2.2 Headings
Headings used in judgments should begin with an uppercase letter, but the remainder
of the heading text should be in lowercase letters except for proper nouns, eg,
“Principle of consistency in sentencing”, not “Principle of Consistency in
Sentencing”. No full stop is required at the end of a heading. Abbreviations – other
than those defined by the judge specifically in the judgment – should not be used.
1–2.3 Footnotes
Footnotes are used in a judgment only to refer to court documents and exhibits; all
citations to cases, legislation, articles, books or other authorities should be contained in
the judgment text. When editing a judgment selected for reporting, delete the footnotes,
and transfer any citations to the appropriate locations in the judgment text.
The numbering level (1), (2), (3), etc, is not used for paragraphs or lists; it
is used only for the Fourth Level Judgment Heading.
An example: “In this appeal, we had to decide: (a) whether the appellant
owed a duty of care; and (b) if so, what the content of that duty of care was.”
1–2.6 Quotations
marks for multiple levels of quotations within quotations set out in para 1–
2.6.1 above also applies here.
Where two levels of added emphasis are desired, use bold italics for those
portions of quoted text on which greater emphasis is to be placed, and plain
italics for the other portions of quoted text that are to be emphasised. Insert
“[emphasis added in italics and bold italics]” at the end of the quote.
Where emphasis that is in the original text of the material quoted is omitted,
the phrase “[emphasis in original omitted]” should be added to the end of
the quotation. Where original emphasis is omitted and new emphasis is
added to the quotation, the phrase “[emphasis in original omitted; emphasis
added in italics]” should be added to the end of the quotation.
(“[ ]”). Omissions should be indicated with the use of an ellipsis. Do not
type a full stop after an ellipsis that ends a sentence.
Each quotation block represents one paragraph – ensure that ellipses are
placed between paragraphs to denote paragraph breaks where appropriate.
Appendix 1A.
Ensure that all quotations and page numbers cited in relation to a specific
case are taken from the same law report. For example, if the main citation is
changed from an All ER citation to an ICLR citation, make sure that the
pinpoint references, quotations, etc, are all taken from the ICLR version of
the case in question.
If an order has been made against, or no authorisation has been granted for, the
disclosure of the name or address of a witness in a matter or proceeding, or evidence or
other information likely to lead to the identification of the witness, such information
must not be disclosed in a judgment, and should instead be replaced with a suitable
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 10
anonymised term in square brackets. For instance, a company may be denoted as “[B
Ltd]”; a person, as “[C]”; a bank account number (or other numeric information), as
“[XXX]”; and a property, as “[the Property]”.
Part 1: General Rules … 11
1–3.1 Spelling
British spelling conventions are to be applied, as set out in the current edition of the
Oxford English Dictionary, but variant spellings in quotations (eg, from cases, letters
or notes of evidence) should not be altered.
1–3.2 Abbreviations
Abbreviations are useful as they can improve the readability of a judgment. It should
be borne in mind that abbreviations and acronyms that are readily understood by
Singaporeans may not be clear to persons from other countries. Therefore, unless a
name or phrase is internationally known, always state it in full when it first appears in
a judgment and indicate its abbreviation after it in parentheses, thus: ‘Housing and
Development Board (“HDB”)’.
The words and phrases that are set out in the tables in paragraph 1–3.2.2 of
Appendix 1A and other familiar internationally-recognised abbreviations listed in the
Oxford English Dictionary (eg, “UK” for the United Kingdom, “UNCITRAL” for the
United Nations Convention on International Trade Law and “US” for the United States
of America) may be abbreviated in reports of judgments using the indicated short forms
without first defining them in full.
Do not place full stops after the letters in an abbreviation. When removing full stops
from abbreviations, if there is no space between the full-stop and the next letter, do not
insert spaces when removing the full-stops; where there are spaces, use non-breaking
spaces after removing the full-stops.
A citation word abbreviation (eg, s, cl, O, para, rule, etc) should not be used if it is the
first word in a sentence – in such cases, the word or phrase must be spelt in full (ie,
Section, Clause, Order, Paragraph, Rule, etc).
A citation word abbreviation (eg, s, cl, O, etc) should not be used where there is no
specific reference to either a name or a number, eg, “There was a contravention of paras
12 and 15” and “He breached the rules of the club” are correct, but “various cll of the
agreement had been deleted” is wrong.
Part 1: General Rules … 13
1–3.2.1 Words and Phrases That May be Abbreviated After the First
Occurrence
Subject to the general rules in paragraph 1–3.2, the words and phrases
in this section must be spelt in full the first time they occur in the judgment;
but thereafter, they may be abbreviated as shown. Ranks and honorifics
remain abbreviated, even if they appear at the beginning of a sentence.
For abbreviations of ranks of personnel in the police force and armed forces,
see the table Ranks of personnel in the Singapore Police Force and the
Singapore Armed Forces in Appendix 1A. For any rank abbreviation
not set out in the examples, if unsure what the rank stands for, just leave it
abbreviated.
For units of measurement or currency, the general rule is to use the numeric
form with the appropriate abbreviation for the currency or unit of
measurement; and, unless otherwise specified, do not type a space between
the numeral and the abbreviation (eg, “3m”, “16.5mg”, “€25,400.50”,
“RM105,000”). To indicate multiple or a range of measurements it is
acceptable to aggregate the units of measure thus: “3 to 4ft” or “3 or 4cm”.
1–3.3.1 Dates
Dates should appear in the day-month-year format, with the month spelt in
full and the year in a four-digit format (thus: “24 September 1999”), with a
non-breaking space between the day and month.
If days of the week are referred to, they should be spelt out in full. Do not
use the abbreviations “Sun”, “Mon”, “Tue” and so on. If the day of the week
is incorporated into a date, it should be set out just before the date, with a
comma after the day (eg, “Thursday, 26 September 2002”).
1–3.3.2 Time
Times of day should be represented using the 12-hour and not the 24-hour
clock. Time indications from 12.01 after midnight to 11.59 before noon
should have the letters “am” after them, while those from 12.01 after noon
to 11.59 before midnight should have the letters “pm” after them.
A full stop should separate the hours from minutes, and there should not be
any space between the minutes and “am” or “pm”. Do not use any full stops
in the abbreviations “am” and “pm”, eg, “10.00am”, “3.15pm”.
1–3.4 Numbers
Do not use superscript type when setting out ordinal numbers, eg, “1st”, not
“1st”.
1–3.4.3 Fractions
Fractions should be indicated using the proper symbols, eg, ½, ¾, etc. Non-
standard fractions should be indicated using normal text, eg, 1/12, 5/200.
1–3.5 Punctuation
A colon may also be used after a word, phrase or sentence in the middle of
a text which introduces a list or series.
Do not use an apostrophe in setting out plural forms of decades, eg, “This
research was carried out in the 1970s”, not “This research was carried out
in the 1970’s”.
same rule applies when citing ranges of dates or years. Eg, “pp
110–112” is correct, and not “pp 110–12” or “pp 110–2”;
likewise for dates, “1995–1996” is correct, and not “1995–96”.
1–3.5.7.2 Brackets
The main use of brackets (“[ ]”), also known as square brackets,
is to enclose interpolations, corrections, explanations,
translations or editorial comments within quotations (
paragraph 1–2.6.4).
1–3.5.8 Italics
Italics should be used for the following purposes:
(b) To cite the names of cases, eg, “Ong Ah Chuan v PP”, “Brown v
Board of Education”. References to Anton Piller orders and Mareva
injunctions should not be italicised; italicise “Anton Piller” and “Mareva”
only when referring to the actual cases, eg, “in the Anton Piller case, the
court decided that …”.
(d) To cite the names of ships. Do not italicise the definite article The
unless it forms part of a ship’s name, eg, “The Ivanovo collided into El
Neputuno.” Do not use the abbreviation “mv” (for motor vessel) unless it
forms part of the ship’s name, in which case it should be italicised, eg, “the
mv Dong Hing”.
(e) To cite foreign words and phrases that have not been assimilated into
the English language: see paragraph 1–3.6.
italicised, eg, “applying Ong Ah Chuan’s case”, “the RSS Morning Star’s
bow was damaged”.
Where a passage of text is already italicised and the passage contains a word
or phrase that would normally require italics, that word or phrase should be
set out in ordinary roman type, eg, “The famous case of Brown v Board of
Education was a landmark in American legal history.” Avoid doing this if
the words are to appear in second- or third-level headings (see paragraph
1–2.1).
(a) The first word of a sentence – this rule applies even if the first word
is not normally capitalised, eg, ‘“Worldofsport.com” was registered by a
cybersquatter.’ If this is not desired, rephrase the sentence so that the word
that is not normally capitalised is not the first word.
(b) The first word, and each significant word, of a title of a case, piece
of legislation, treaty, book, journal, newspaper, television programme, film,
musical composition, etc. Small words like and, in, of, the and with need not
be capitalised unless it is the first word, eg, “Rylands v Fletcher”, “Sale of
Goods Act” (names of statutes and subsidiary legislation are not italicised),
“Singapore Civil Practice”, “Singapore Academy of Law Journal”, “The
Straits Times”, “Twelve Angry Men”.
(c) The first word of a direct quotation repeating someone else’s exact
words, if the quotation is a complete sentence, eg, “Thomas Edison
famously observed, ‘Genius is one per cent inspiration and ninety-nine per
cent perspiration.’”. No capital letter is used if the quotation is not a
complete sentence, eg, “The Minister described the latest unemployment
figures as ‘disappointing’.”
(f) Proper names, that is, names or titles that refer to an individual
person, place, institution or event, eg, “President S R Nathan”, “Sundaresh
Menon CJ”, “Professor Robert Miller”, “Raffles Square”, “the Supreme
Court”, “Singapore”, “the Internet”, “the World Wide Web”,
“Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting 2003”.
Part 1: General Rules … 23
(g) Manufacturer’s brand names and products (if they have not become
generic labels for classes of objects), and trade marks, eg, “Microsoft
Windows XP”, “Sony Discman”, “Coca-Cola”.
Member of Parliament
National Service
Example 1:
Example 2:
While the point was not raised by the plaintiff in the pleadings,
it was alluded to in her written submissions.
Part 1: General Rules … 25
Example 3:
(a) To cite English words or short phrases that are being talked about,
eg, ‘The phrase “wrongful gain” is defined in s 23 of the Penal Code
(Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) as meaning “gain by unlawful means of property
to which the person gaining it is not legally entitled”.’
(b) To cite the names of trade marks, eg, ‘the plaintiff’s trade mark
“Breez” ’.
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 26
The specific foreign words and phrases in the table Foreign Words and Phrases in
Appendix 1A should be italicised. Accents and diacritics should not be omitted, eg,
“fiancée”, “raison d’être”, “vis-à-vis”.
If a foreign word or phrase is not listed in the table in Appendix 1A, the drafter or editor
should ensure consistency in the way the foreign word or phrase appears throughout
that judgment (ie, either italicised or unitalicised throughout).
Case name [year] or (year) volume number(issue number) law report first
page number at [paragraph number] or page number [(court,
jurisdiction)]
Case name volume number law report first page number at page number
(court, year)
Refer to the table in Appendix 1B for specific guidance on the citation style, years,
and volume numbers of some common law reports.
Ensure that the correct case title, year, volume number and starting page number are
cited. If unsure as to how a particular law report series should be cited, refer to the first
few pages of the hardcopy law report (the citation convention for that series, if
available, can usually be found within those pages).
This rule applies to all case authorities cited, ie, including cases reported in
the Singapore Law Reports or Singapore Law Reports (Reissue) as well as
foreign case authorities.
Use the main case title in full, even if it is very long compared to the title in
the running head, or is different from the title in the running head. Refer to
the table in Appendix 1B for guidance.
Part 2: Citation Rules … 29
The only exception to citing the main case title in full concerns foreign
judgments whose main case titles consist of multiple case names. For such
foreign judgments, it is sufficient to cite in full only the first case name
which appears at the beginning of the report (as opposed to citing all the
case names). Refer to the table in Appendix 1B for guidance.
2–1.1.2 Year
The year of the case should either be in parentheses (“( )”) or brackets (“[ ]”)
depending on the practice used by the law report.
In general:
• Parentheses are used when the law reports series is published by
volume number, in which case the year identifies when the case was
decided (eg, (1992) 175 CLR 1).
• Brackets are used when the series of reports is organised by year of
publication – in such cases, the year is a component of the citation
needed to locate the case (eg, [2010] 1 SLR 1).
• For Indian and Scottish cases, the year is not enclosed in parentheses or
brackets.
If a case is reported well after the year in which it was decided, the latter can
be placed in parentheses before the case citation (eg, “Thompson v Cremin
(1941) [1956] 1 WLR 103”).
Some law reports (eg SLR, All ER, MLJ) use brackets but have a volume
number as well. The volume number indicates which volume of a particular
year’s law reports should be consulted. As the year is required to find the
case, it should be placed in brackets.
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 30
Although cases reported in the Malayan Law Journal from 1932 to 1965
were formerly cited by a year in parentheses and a volume number, cite
these using brackets only, thus: “Re Ong Yew Teck [1960] MLJ 67”, not “Re
Ong Yew Teck (1960) 26 MLJ 67”.
For cases by the courts of Singapore, the United Kingdom and other
countries, place the year of the case before the volume number, law report
and first page number. For United States cases, follow the established
convention of placing the year after these citation elements.
Semi-Official Reports
Alberta Reports (AR)
New Brunswick Reports
(NBR (2d))
Newfoundland & Prince
Edward Island Reports
(Nfld & PEIR)
Nova Scotia Reports (NSR
(2d))
Ontario Reports (OR (3d))
Recueils de jurisprudence du
Québec (RJQ)
Northwest Territories Reports
(NWTR)
England and The Law Reports All England Law
Wales Queen’s and King’s Bench: Reports (All ER)
LR QB, QBD, KB, QB Fleet Street Reports
Common Pleas: LR CP, CPD (FSR)
Exchequer: LR Ex, Ex D Lloyd’s Law Reports
Chancery: Ch D, Ch (Lloyd’s Rep)
Equity: LR Eq Reports of Patent Cases
Family: Fam (RPC)
Appeal Cases: AC
Privy Council: LR PC
Probate: LR P&D, PD, P
Admiralty and Ecclesiastical
Cases: LR Adm & Eccl
The title of a law report should be abbreviated as indicated in the report or,
if no indication is given, as it is commonly abbreviated. Dictionaries of legal
abbreviations should be consulted. Refer to the table in Appendix 2 for
guidance on the abbreviations of some common law reports. A list of
abbreviations of law reports and other works containing Singapore and
Malaysian cases appears in Appendix 3.
If a stipulated abbreviation is not well known, give the full name of the law
reports in italics in brackets after the abbreviation, thus: “David v Smith &
Partners (2002) 24 PC [Professional Conveyancer] 196”. If there is no
stipulated abbreviation for an uncommon law report, set out the name of the
report in full in italics.
Where parallel citations are provided, they should be separated from each
other by semicolons.
Where a report is divided into columns, such as Lloyd’s Law Reports or the
Malayan Law Journal, the abbreviations “LHC” (‘left-hand column’) and
“RHC” (‘right-hand column’) may be used to indicate which column the
cited text appears in, eg, “[1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 85 at 90 LHC”, “[1971] 2
MLJ 43 at 49 RHC”.
If required, indicate the court and/or jurisdiction where the case was heard,
using the abbreviations in the tables in Appendix 1B.
• State Courts – indicate the state and court of the decision, but do
not name the court if it is the highest court in the state. Do not include the
state if it is obvious from the law report.
Do not insert “(unreported)”. Unreported cases should be cited in accordance with the
rules below.
Singapore cases:
Case name suit or application indicator and number (where available) (date
of judgment) [(court, jurisdiction)] at [paragraph number] or page
number
Foreign cases:
• The case number on the cover page and first page of the judgment
should however be spelt out in full.
A citation to a case published in electronic form should only be given if the case has
not been published in print version, or if the print version of the case cannot be
conveniently accessed locally.
If the URL of a webpage is excessively long, set out the URL of a parent
webpage or the home page.
After the first reference, a case may be cited by a short title. If it is desired to refer to a
case by one party, the non-government-related party’s name should generally be used.
Subsequent references to cases cited in earlier paragraphs should be set out in the
following format: ([paragraph number] supra) at pinpoint.
The word “supra” is to be used for cross-references to citations of cases only. For other
cross-references to judgment text, the word “above” should be used.
A supra reference to the case need only be included once in a single paragraph. Thus,
if the case is referred to multiple times in a single subsequent paragraph which appears
more than six paragraphs after the first citation of that case or the previous supra
reference to that case, the supra reference should be used once, at the first mention of
the case in that subsequent paragraph.
Example
…
Part 2: Citation Rules … 37
2–2.1.1 Constitution
Cite the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore as follows:
As at the date of this version of the Style Guide, the current reprint of the
Constitution of the Republic of Singapore is the 1999 Reprint of the 1985
Revised Edition.
2–2.1.2 Statutes
2–2.1.2.1 Unrevised Statutes
Statutes applicable to Singapore that are not part of a revised
edition of statutes should be cited according to the following
formats:
Period Status of Citation Format
Singapore
22 November Part of Straits Title of Act (Indian Act
1834 – Settlements under
1 April 1867 Indian No number of year)
administration pinpoint
[Indicate the Act number
in Arabic, not Roman,
numerals.]
1 April 1867 – Part of Straits Short Title of
15 February 1942 Settlements under
British Act/Ordinance year
administration (SS Ord No number of
year) pinpoint
[Statutes were
erroneously termed ‘Acts’
in 1867 only.]
1
See, generally, Interpretation Act (Cap 1, 2002 Rev Ed) ss 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) (as amended by Act 4 of 2021
wef 1 March 2021).
Part 2: Citation Rules … 39
2
Tentatively on 31 December 2021.
Part 2: Citation Rules … 41
2–2.1.4 Bills
Bills should be cited as follows:
Other material should be cited in the following format, modified to suit the
nature of the material:
Title of Material ([SS] GN Gazette indicator No number/year)
Where material lacks a descriptive title, provide one in brackets. For the
Gazette indicator, use the following abbreviations:
Government Gazette Indicator Abbreviation
Collective Agreement (in the CA
Industrial Relations Supplement)
Gazette Notification Number GN No
Gazette Notification Supplement Number GN Supp No
Government Gazette Govt Gazette
Industrial Relations Supplement IR
Straits Settlements SS
Treaties Supplement T
When citing sub-provisions that use lowercase letters, italicise the letters to
conform with how they are set out in legislation and to distinguish them
from Roman numerals, as follows: “s 5(1)(a)”, “regs 14(3)(l) to 14(3)(n)”.
When citing a range of provisions, set out the beginning and ending
provisions in the range and separate them by an en-dash. If the parts of
legislation are numbers, set out the ending provision in full; do not merely
retain the last one or two digits of the number, eg, “ss 510–513”, not
“ss 510–13” or “ss 510–3”.
In the absence of any clear indication of how the legislation of a particular foreign
jurisdiction should be cited, adapt the citation method used for Singapore legislation
(see paragraph 2–2.1).
2–2.2.2.2 Jurisdiction
Jurisdictions should be abbreviated as shown in paragraph
2–2.2.2.2 of Appendix 1B.
2–2.2.4.1 Year
Regnal years, traditionally cited for all UK legislation enacted
before 1 January 1963, may be omitted.
2–2.2.5.1 Statutes
Cite statutes to the official federal code, the United States Code
(USC), in preference to codes by private publishers, reporters of
session laws and looseleaf services. Once a statute has been
codified, it is not usually referred to by its original title unless it
is commonly known by that name. For citation of sources other
than the USC, refer to The Bluebook: A Uniform System of
Citation.
citation of the legislation, eg, “Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed)
(“MDA”)”.
Do not use the terms ibid, id, op cit, see above or supra in subsequent references to
legislation as the full citations of legislation may be ascertained from the list of
legislation referred to.
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 48
Parliamentary debates published from 2002 onwards are available from the Parliament
reports database on the Parliament of Singapore website at
https://www.parliament.gov.sg/parliamentary-business-official-reports-(parl-
debates). Optionally, when writing for a foreign audience that may not have convenient
access to the print version of the Parliamentary Debates, Official Report, a citation to
this website may be included.
For United Kingdom command papers, use the following abbreviations for the
reference number:
Series Year Command Paper Abbreviation
Numbers
1st series 1833–1869 1–4222 c
2d series 1870–1899 1–9550 C
3d series 1900–1918 1–9239 Cd
4th series 1919–1956 1–9889 Cmd
5th series 1957– 1– Cmnd
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 50
In judgments, cite the title, author/editor, publisher, edition, year of publication and
pinpoint. If it is not possible or feasible to ascertain all of this information, cite the
information available.
2–4.1.3 Edition
For the first edition of a book, do NOT indicate “1st Ed”.
2–4.1.4 Pinpoint
Paragraph numbers should not be enclosed in brackets and should instead
be preceded by “para” or “paras” respectively depending on whether a single
paragraph or multiple paragraphs are referenced. Page numbers should
likewise not be enclosed in brackets and should instead be preceded by “p”
or “pp” respectively depending on whether a single page or multiple pages
are referenced.
A looseleaf book should be cited in the same way as a bound work, except that the date
of release of the particular pages or parts referred to should be indicated after the year
of publication of the entire work. This information usually appears printed on the
relevant pages or parts.
After the first reference, a book may be cited by its author’s surname, a combination of
the author’s surname and a short version of the book’s title, or a short version of the
title. In judgments, do not use the terms ibid, id, op cit, see above or supra in subsequent
references to books or articles.
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 52
A citation to an article published in electronic form should only be given if the article
has not been published in a print version, or if the print version cannot be conveniently
accessed locally.
If the URL of a webpage is excessively long, set out the URL of a parent webpage
or the home page.
After the first reference, an article may be cited by its author’s surname, or a
combination of the author’s surname and a short version of the article’s title. In
judgments, do not use the terms ibid, id, op cit, see above or supra in subsequent
references to books or articles.
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 54
2–6.1.1 Manuscripts
Cite manuscripts that are unpublished or not formally published, and which
are not scheduled for publication, as follows:
2–6.1.4 Interviews
An unpublished in-person, telephone or e-mail interview should be cited by
indicating the title and institutional affiliation, if any, of the interviewee and,
for an in-person interview, the location of the interview, as follows:
When the author has not personally conducted the interview, the name of
the interviewer should be indicated:
If the URL of a webpage is excessively long, set out the URL of a parent
webpage or the home page.
Working papers and reports issued by law reform commissions should be cited as
follows:
Omit the jurisdiction and country for papers from Singapore, and if the information is
clear from the name of the institution.
Part 2: Citation Rules … 57
Treaty’s Name (date), [parties], treaty series, pinpoint (entered into force
date [, accession by Singapore date]) [, database identifier
<universal resource locator>] (“Short Title”)
2–7.1.2 Date
If parties can accede to the treaty, cite the full date the treaty was opened for
signature, thus: “opened for signature date”.
In other cases, cite the date the treaty was signed. When an agreement or
exchange of notes between two parties has more than one date of signing,
give the first and last dates, thus: “(12 August – 23 September 2002)”. If a
treaty between three or more parties is not signed on a single date, use the
date on which the treaty is opened for signature, done, approved or adopted,
and indicate the significance of the date, eg, “(adopted on 6 May 1999)”.
2–7.1.3 Parties
If the parties to a bilateral treaty are not specified in the name of the treaty,
list them after the date separated by an en-dash. Shorten the names to reflect
common usage but do not abbreviate them, ie, “United Kingdom”, not
“United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland” or “UK”; “United
States”, not “United States of America” or “US”.
Singapore does not have an official treaty series. Only a limited number of
treaties to which Singapore is a party are published in the Government
Gazette Treaties Supplement. The Singapore Treaties Database managed by
the Attorney-General’s Chambers which is available on the Legal
Prospector section of LawNet at https://www.lawnet.sg contains
information on treaties to which Singapore is a party, as well as the full text
of selected treaties or hyperlinks to such full text available elsewhere on the
Internet. Selected free trade agreements to which Singapore is a party are
available on the Ministry of Trade and Industry’s website at
https://www.enterprisesg.gov.sg/non-financial-assistance/for-singapore-
companies/free-trade-agreements/ftas/singapore-ftas.
published in the Report of Cases Before the Court of Justice and the General
Court (“ECR”). The Court of Justice of the European Union has since
adopted the European Case-Law Identifier (ECLI) system and assigned an
ECLI to all decisions delivered by the Courts of the European Union since
1954 and to the Opinions and Views of the Advocates General.
For cases that were reported in the ECR, cite to the ECR in the following
format. Note that beginning with 1990 Part I, page numbers in the ECR
begin with a “I” or “II” before the number.
For cases not reported in the ECR, cite the case using the ECLI system. Note
that the abbreviation “ECLI” is omitted when citing decisions of the Court
of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal.
2–7.2.2.3 Jurisdiction
Where a case is before the Court of First Instance, indicate “Ct
First Instance” at the end of the citation.
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 62
Cases that were before the European Commission of Human Rights should
be cited as follows:
2–7.3.2.4 Sub-divisions
Within a single volume of UN official records there may be su-
divisions that are separately paginated. These sub-divisions
should be indicated thus:
2–7.4.1 Legislation
Cite directives, regulations and decisions of the European Parliament,
Council and Commission as follows:
• If the items in the list are complete sentences or consist of more than one
sentence, each item should begin with an uppercase letter and end with
a full stop or a question mark, as the case may be.
Example
1–2.6 Quotations
Section 2(m) of the Schedule includes “any lecture, talk, address, debate
or discussion” as an activity that would be a public entertainment.
In addition, s 2 also states that these activities must be done “in any place
to which the public or any class of the public has access whether
gratuitously or otherwise”. [Full stop after the closing quotation mark as
the quotation is not a complete sentence.]
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 72
When asked what was in the bag, the defendant told the narcotics officer,
“I am carrying Chinese medicine.” [Full stop within the quotation marks
as a complete sentence is quoted; no additional full stop required after the
closing quotation mark.]
OR
(a) …
(b) Failing such amicable settlement, any and all
disputes, controversies and conflicts arising out of or in
connection with this Agreement or its performance
(including the validity of this Agreement) shall be
settled by arbitration by a three (3) member arbitration
board which will hold its sessions in Singapore in
English under the SIAC (Singapore International
Arbitration Centre) Rules. The tribunal of three (3)
arbitrators shall be appointed by each party with the
third member appointed by the Chairman of the SIAC.
[emphasis added]
Example
Example
Example:
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 76
This is a view that has supporters. As part of their review of the ETA,
on 25 June 2004, the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore
and the Attorney-General’s Chambers released a public consultation
paper dealing with the exclusions under s 4 of the ETA. Paragraphs
2.1.3 and 2.1.5 of the consultation paper state:
2.1.3 The effect of section 4 is that, in such excluded
transactions, one cannot rely on the provisions in the
ETA that enable electronic records and signatures to
satisfy legal requirements for writing and signature.
For example, sections 6 and 7 of the Civil Law Act
impose legal requirements for writing and signature
in the case of certain land transactions and for trusts
respectively.
…
2.1.5 Even where legal form requirements apply,
exclusion under section 4 of the ETA may not
necessarily prevent such transactions from being done
electronically. Electronic records or signatures could
still possibly satisfy the legal requirements without
reliance on the provisions of the ETA. It would be a
matter for legal interpretation whether an electronic
form satisfies a particular legal requirement for writing
or signature. Some legislative provisions, by reason of
their detailed specifications, would clearly exclude the
use of electronic means even if the ETA were
applicable. ...
[emphasis in original omitted; emphasis added in
italics]
Example:
The contract specified that “property in the goods shall not pass to the
Buyer [ie, the plaintiff] until payment in full has been received by the
Vendor [ie, the defendant]”.
The witness explained that: “The point about the influence, which [Tan]
had exercised over me at the time being undue, is that I had no say in
the running of the company and never had.”
The Judge made the following observation: “The manner of the attack was
vicious and very destructive. … [T]here can have been no excuse.”
He cannot have had [sic] been unaware of the presence of the clause.
The trial judge took the view that the case was governed by the principle
in Rylance [sic] v Fletcher.
The trial judge took the view that the case was governed by the principle
in [Rylands] v Fletcher.
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 78
1–3.2 Abbreviations
Example
“Airedale N.H.S. Trust v Bland; Buona Maritima S.A. v Karl Schuhfabrik G.m.b.H.”
should be edited as “Airedale NHS Trust v Bland; Buona Maritima SA v Karl
Schuhfabrik GmbH”
But
1–3.2.1 Words and Phrases That May be Abbreviated After the First
Occurrence
Honorifics and forms of address commonly used in relation to judicial
proceedings
Ranks of personnel in the Singapore Police Force and the Singapore Armed
Forces
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 80
Examples
The notice to quit was given on Thursday, 26 September 2002. [Note the comma
between the day of the week and the day of the month.]
On Tuesday, 11 November 2003, the lessor exercised his right of re-entry into the
premises. [Note the second comma after the year of the date which is often
incorrectly omitted.]
1–3.5 Punctuation
Millions of dollars were pumped into the project, yet there was
apparently nothing to show for this colossal expenditure.
Because of problems with the test, all the people who were told
that they were HIV-negative had to be recalled. [No
bracketing commas used around the clause “who were
told that they were HIV-negative”, as without this clause
it would not be evident which people were being referred
to.]
Although her testimony was not always clear, she was sure of one thing:
she did not intend to enter into a contract with him. [Identifies the one
thing she was sure of.]
There were several potential candidates for the position: Tan Lay Geok,
Ravinder Singh and Peter Wong. [Identifies the potential candidates.]
The rule may be stated thus: An appellate court will be slow to overturn
findings of fact of the trial judge, especially when an assessment of
credibility and veracity of witnesses is made.
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 90
The question was: Why did the plaintiff not report the matter to the
authorities?
A colon may also be used after a word, phrase or sentence in the middle of
a text which introduces a list or series.
Example
It was believed that the existence of the will was known only to the
deceased’s widow; however, it is now evident that this is not the case.
The people present were the surgeon, Dr Sunita Prakash; the attending
nurse, Mr Tan Khaw Bee; and the defendant. [If only commas were
used, it would not be clear how many people were present.]
Appendix 1A: Examples for General Rules … 91
Exception (a)
the appellants’ costs
the two Malaysians’ passports
two months’ imprisonment
Exception (b)
Reuters’ journalists.
Socrates’ philosophy
the United States’ next move
The husband and wife were married two and a half years ago
and they have a four-year-old son.
The witness conceded that the plan was bold and unusual –
bold and unusual in the sense that it would require more
money than he had. [Only first dash required as the strong
interruption occurs at the end of the sentence.]
(A) Ng Eng Ghee and others v Mamata Kapildev Dave and others
(Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, intervener) and another appeal [2009] 3
SLR(R) 109
(B) Ng Swee Lang and another v Sassoon Samuel Bernard and others
[2008] 2 SLR(R) 597
(C) Associated Newspapers Group Plc v Insert Media Limited and Others
[1991] FSR 380 (and not Associated Newspapers v Insert Media [1991]
FSR 380)
(D) Alpine Bulk Transport Co Inc v Saudi Eagle Shipping Co Inc (The
Saudi Eagle) [1986] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 221 (and not just The Saudi Eagle
[1986] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 221)
(E) A v B (No 2) [2007] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 358 (and not just A v B [2007] 1
Lloyd’s Rep 358)
(F) Rubber and Improvement Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234
(even though this case is more commonly known by its running head title,
ie, Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234)
(B) Rubber and Improvement Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234
(“Lewis v Daily Telegraph”)
(C) Alpine Bulk Transport Co Inc v Saudi Eagle Shipping Co Inc (The
Saudi Eagle) [1986] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 221 (“The Saudi Eagle”)
The full main case title of the House of Lords case reported at [1999] 2 AC
349 appears in the hardcopy law report as follows:
For this case, its main case title should simply be cited as “Kleinwort
Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council”.
(B) Bradley v Harris Resources, Inc 275 F 3d 884 (9th Cir, 2001)
(C) Miller v Indiana Hosp 562 F Supp 1259 (WD Pa, 1983)
Appendix 1B: Examples for Citation Rules … 113
Indian cases
Example:
Scottish cases
Example:
… see, eg, the decision of this court in Ong Chay Tong & Sons
(Pte) Ltd v Ong Hoo Eng [2009] 1 SLR(R) 305 at [75]; the
Singapore High Court decision of Eng Bee Properties Pte Ltd v
Lee Foong Fatt [1993] 2 SLR(R) 778 at [26] …
(C) This extract echoed the essence of Lord Saville’s earlier more
comprehensive but no less forceful reasoning in Hayter v Nelson Home
Insurance Co [1990] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 265. It was observed at 267–269:
In some cases the suggestion seems to be made that if
it can be shown that a claim under a contract is
indisputable, i.e. a claim that simply cannot be resisted
on either the facts or the law, then there is no dispute
or difference within the meaning of the arbitration
clause in that contract. …
Australia Aust
Commonwealth of Australia Cth
Australian Capital Territory ACT
New South Wales NSW
Northern Territory NT
Queensland Qld
South Australia SA
Tasmania Tas
Victoria Vic
Western Australia WA
Canada Can
Alberta Alta
British Columbia BC
Appendix 1B: Examples for Citation Rules … 115
Jurisdiction Abbreviation
Manitoba Man
New Brunswick NB
Newfoundland and Labrador Nfld & Lab
Northwest Territories NWT
Nova Scotia NS
Nunavut Nvt
Ontario Ont
Prince Edward Island PEI
Québec Qc
Saskatchewan Sask
Yukon Y
Malaysia M’sia
New Zealand NZ
United Kingdom UK
England and Wales Eng
Northern Ireland NI
Scotland Scot
Examples
Diva XL Pte Ltd v Lalasis Trading Pte Ltd [2003] SGHC 97 at [11]
Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v Hammond [2001] EWCA Civ 778
Padilla v Rumsfeld Nos 03-2235 (L), 03-2438 (Con) (2nd Cir, 2003)
<http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1423225.html> (accessed 2
December 2019)
Examples
Examples
In the Reynolds case ([75] supra) at 423, Lord Bridge of Harwich commented…
2–2.1.1 Constitution
Example
2–2.1.2 Statutes
2–2.1.2.1 Unrevised Statutes
Examples
2–2.1.4 Bills
Examples
Examples
… : MDA s 2.
Examples
Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (12 November 2012) vol 89 (Teo
Chee Hean, Deputy Prime Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security
and Minister for Home Affairs)
United Kingdom, House of Lords, Parliamentary Debates (4 July 2003), vol 650 at
col 1148, <https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2003-07-04/debates/af8287cb-22e2-
429f-9227-
6ac566bb2521/HumanFertilisationAndEmbryology(DeceasedFathers)Bill>
(accessed 2 December 2019) (Baroness Pitkeathley)
United Kingdom, House of Commons, Parliamentary Debates (4 July 1947) vol 439
at col 1678, <https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1947-07-
04/debates/3406cdb1-a47f-478a-b1cf-d077fe457e73/CrownProceedingsBillLords>
(accessed 2 December 2019) (Sir Hartley Shawcross, Attorney General)
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 126
Examples
Report of the Select Committee on the Advance Medical Directive Bill (Bill No 40/95)
(Parl 1 of 1996, 11 March 1996)
Ministry of Home Affairs, The Jemaah Islamiyah Arrests and the Threat of Terrorism
(White Paper, Cmd 2 of 2003, 7 January 2003)
Examples
Colin Tapper, Cross and Tapper on Evidence (Butterworths, 9th Ed, 1999) at p 74
Kevin Y L Tan, Yeo Tiong Min & Lee Kiat Seng, Constitutional Law in Malaysia
and Singapore (Malayan Law Journal, 1991)
Lee Poh Onn, The Water Issue Between Singapore and Malaysia: No Solution in
Sight? (Economics and Finance Working Paper No 1) (Institute of Southeast
Asian Studies, 2003)
Jaroslav Pelikan et al, The Idea of the University: A Reexamination (Yale University
Press, 1992)
Singapore Court Practice 2003 (Jeffrey Pinsler gen ed) (LexisNexis, 2003) at
para 74/2-3/1
Benjamin’s Sale of Goods (A G Guest gen ed) (Sweet & Maxwell, 6th Ed, 2002) at
para 10-039
Examples
Examples
Malaysian and Singapore Company Law and Practice (CCH Company Law eds)
(1990, 2002 release) at para 20-090
Woodfall’s Law of Landlord and Tenant (Kim Lewison gen ed) (Sweet & Maxwell,
Looseleaf Ed, 1994, October 2000 release) at para 9.001
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 128
Examples
Cane at p 45
Examples
Mei-lan E Wong, Note, ‘The Implications of School Choice for Children with
Disabilities’ (1993) 103 Yale L J 827 at 830
Examples
Ho Ka Wei & Ben Nadarajan, “Thwarting the Cyber Terrorist”, The Straits Times
(14 November 2003) at p H1
Michael Walsh, “Asia’s Different Drum”, Time (14 January 1991) at pp 17–18
Jeremy Summers, “We’re Innocent Until We’re Proved Guilty … or Until Our Assets
are Seized”, The Times (London) (29 November 2003) at p 34
Appendix 1B: Examples for Citation Rules … 129
Examples
Woon at p 231
2–6.1.1 Manuscripts
Examples
Letter from Jane Friedman, Senior Editor, American Civil Liberties Law
Review, to Martin Buerkle, Executive Editor, University of Kansas
Law Review (7 April 1996)
2–6.1.4 Interviews
Examples
Lee Boon Yang, Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts,
“Towards a Global Media City”, lunch talk at the Singapore Press Club
Lunch (12 November 2003)
Examples
Donald Rublé, “Law and Psychology” 118 Harv L Rev (forthcoming, January 2004)
Examples
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 132
United Kingdom, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, Report (Cmnd 2263, 1993)
(Chairman: Viscount Runciman of Doxford)
Examples
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (19 December 1966), 999 UNTS
171, 6 ILM 368, Arts 9–14 (entered into force 23 March 1976) (“ICCPR”)
Free Trade Agreement Between the EFTA States (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway &
Switzerland) and Singapore (26 June 2002), (entered into force 1 January 2003)
Bilateral Treaty No B348 <https://www.lawnet.sg>
SC Res 780, UN SCOR, 47th Sess, 3119th mtg, UN Doc S/Res/ 780
(1992), 31 ILM 1476
2–7.4.1 Legislation
Examples
Council of Europe, PA, 2002 Sess, 1st Pt (23 January 2002) (Mike Moore,
WTO Director-General)
Appendix 1B: Examples for Citation Rules … 137
Council of Europe, CA, 21st Sess, 3rd Pt (1970) Texts Adopted, Rec 585
at p 1
Council of Europe, PA, Iraq, 2003 Sess, 1st Pt, Res 1316 (30 January
2003)
Council of Europe, PA, 2003 Sess, 2nd Pt, The Human Rights Situation
in the Chechen Republic, Ord 586 (2 April 2003)
Council of Europe, PA, 38th Sess, 3rd Pt, Written Declaration No 150 on
the Protection of the Archaeological Site of Pompeii (1987)
Documents, vol 7, Doc 5700 at p 1
2–7.6 Citation of World Trade Organisation and General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade Materials
Singapore
Malaysia
[1995] 1, 2, 3 or 4
[1996], [1997] 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5
[1998], [2000] 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7
[1999], [2001] to [2004] 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6
Canada
United Kingdom
The Law Reports (published by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England
and Wales)
Citation Style Full Name of Report Years Volume Nos
(year) LR vol A & E Admiralty & (1865) to (1875) 1 to 4
page Ecclesiastical Cases
(year) vol App Cas Appeal Cases (1875) to (1890) 1 to 15
page
[year] AC page Appeal Cases [1891] to [1915], –
[1917] to [1920],
[1923] to [1966],
[1968], [1970] to
[1982], [1984] to
[1989], [1993],
[1996] to [1998]
[year] vol AC page Appeal Cases [1916], [1921], [1922], 1 or 2
[1967], [1969],
[1983], [1990] to
[1992], [1994],
[1995], [1999] to
present
(year) LR vol Ch App Chancery Appeals (1865) to (1875) 1 to 10
page
(year) vol Ch D page Chancery Division (1875) to (1890) 1 to 45
[year] vol Ch page Chancery Division [1891] to [1894] 1, 2, 3
[1895] to [1924], 1 or 2
[1927], [1929] to
[1932], [1969]
[year] Ch page Chancery Division [1925], [1926], [1928], –
[1933] to [1968],
[1970] to present
(year) LR vol CP page Common Pleas (1865) to (1875) 1 to 10
SLR Style Guide 2021 … 140
[paragraph 2–1.1.4]