Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The framework is a:
1) Base
2) Foundation
3) Principle (not rules)
4) Constitution
5) Map
Benefits
IASB creates coherent & consistent IFRS
Framework give knowledge to accountants top solve problems in absence of regulation
Reduces creative accounting (like American rules approach)
Stakeholders can have a better understanding the role and limitations of financial
statements by implementing the framework
Why revised?
Old one had gaps, new one has chapters on: measurement (cost and value) & presentation
(PL & OCI)
To make it up to date. Updated and clarified areas on recognition etc
STATKEHOLDERS
FAITHFUL = Honest/Facts
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
1. Faithful re can be mixed with some level of uncertainty which will reduce its usefulness
2. Less relevant with more measurement certainty preferred
Cost vs benefit analysis = justify cost and use of the above info
Q. Tech co decided to include staff wages = 12 pages long. Want to show equality etc
A. Will it make a difference to investors? TMI. Cant justify cost of getting and showing this info.
Although faithful, not relevant.
CONSOL = P + Subs
UNCONSOL = P
1. Asset = A present economic resource with a potential economic benefit. Can sell &/or use.
e.g. (staff vs chair). Staff can’t be thrown away and worked 24/7. Chair can. Hence staff not
included in FS as a figure/asset. Exception is sports, Ronaldo is an asset.
2. Liability = a present obligation to transfer ownership for past events.
e.g. Land value 100m cost 55m sold at 60m. Sold contract says can buy back 12month later
for 66m. Sold and marked 5m profit on P&L and land disposed on FAR OR the 60m received
is a liability and the 6m is interest. Seems more like a loan than a sale as I will have all future
economic increase and benefit e.g. the land value goes up to 150m in 12months.
3. Equity = Residual interest in asset after deducting liability
Asset – Liability = Equity
4. Income = increase in asset or decrease in liability = Equity goes up
5. Expense = decrease in asset or increase in liability = Equity goes down
RECOGNISATION CRITERIA
Relevance =
Faithful =
DERECOGNITION
Criteria for this is = removal of an asset or liability from FS ( when you lose control over it = you’ve no
obligation or ownership over it)
Liability = when you no longer have an obligation over it = paid off or settled
New Guidance
Cost & Value is on a case-by-case basis
Mixed measurement system
o Cost is liked as objective and reliable simple and can see it. Transaction based
o Others dislike as historic and out of date. But depreciation does this to things and reduces
cost
o Some people love value, it looked as forward thinking and relevant but its also subjective.
o Value is not relevant if no intention of selling the asset. E.g a machine which makes your
core product you wont ever sell it.
Cost =
1. Transaction based
2. Reduced if impaired
3. Amortised costs in intangible
Value =
1. Fair value
2. Market value
3. Value in use (impairment) IAS36. Reflects present value future cash flow for asset and how
much to settle liability
4. Current cost, cost to replace it and buy and another or how much I can sell it?
Relevance
A. If measured at cost, then neutral and faithful to the true cost, but ignores the current FV
A. Cost as wrong as you made them (bred them). Value every time for something like this.
OCI – In exceptional circumstances, BoD may exclude from P&L and in P&L.
RECYCLING
What WE think is the most relevant and most faithful thing to do is, means we take from OCI and
into P&L
Q. Asset cost 50yo £100m. Every year gain of 1m value and this goes to OCI every year. Selling the
asset for £151m. What gain to we show in P&L.
A1. If we do recycle the answer is 51m as we take gain in equity and recycling it and pushing it
through the P&L. recognised as gain on revaluation and now on disposal. Answer1 51m (e.g. group
exchange differences IAS21)
A2. Only 1m is we take the proceeds to the carrying value. The gain of 50m is not recycled. This is an
exception per the framework. Revalued as PPE IAS 16.
PRO - Recycling means that profit is transaction based. Recycling means that profit is reported in the
year of the sale (when its realised – when you’ve sold it). Recycling will ensure substance of cash
flow hedging will be faithfully represented
CON – The gain has already been included in OCI over the years. This means gain is recognised twice.
Once on revaluation once on realisation (double counting? Reporting profits twice?). Also against
accruals over 50 years?