CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA DESIGN OF A THREE-STORY FRAMED STEEL STRUCTURE SIECHNS ky & a 3938 SOHEIL POURYAGHOOB! ANZABI JOSEPH HARIWANTO MICHELLE LYNCH Tayo OGeYEM! eres MaRGH 16, 2017 DR. YASSER SALEMTable of Contents Design Objectives. Design Assumptions........ Dead and Live Loads... & Framing Layout. 6 Lateral Resisting System.........2..e:ccscesessesseestesessesstsseesesnesseseees 6 3D model .. 1 RAMSTEEL Output g Connections. Hand Calculations. a) Cost Estimate... Conelusion. Appendix. AL Appendix A: Hand Caleulations......-...00. 42 Appendix B: Structural Drawings..... 5DDesign Objectives This report presents the structural analysis and design of a three-story office building, The design ‘was based on given architectural floor plans, elevations, and building sections. Structural framing plans and structural details are included in this report. It is our objective to design the structure using RAMSTEEL software and verify with some hand calculations. Design Assumptions General: © Dead and live load for both roof and floor were determined based off architectural floor plans © Symmetrical moment frames % Hand Calculations: ‘© System braced © Full composite action for the beam © Initial assumption of the neutral axis of the beam to be 0.4 the thickness of concrete ‘© 60 psf of construction loads © 3.5 inches concrete cover RAMSTEEL ‘© Run based on the IBC building codes > Lateral Loads Seismic design criteria @ Risk category III (ASCE Table 1.5-1) © Scismic important factor = 1.25 (ASCE Table 1.5-2) Class D (ASCE 11.4.2) (ASCE Table 12.2-1) © Site Class © R-Value © Design category :C © 0.33 000 = 000000 00000000 0mm aman Design ot 00 7380 © 000000 007 = aad 240000 © 0m oom Design o 0.00 2040 000000000 © 0a 3820000 © 0.00 0g0 ko Design 03 0.00 2040 000000 000 © oa 13820 000» 0.0 ono 80 Design bs 00 2040 © 000000 000 = 0001382000 om ammo 0 Design 05 000 2040 000000000 ©= aad 13920000 © 0.00 ogo Design 06 000 2040 000000000 ©=— ago 13820 000 © 000 ogo KO Design or 000 2040 000 000000 © aad 13020 000 © 0m mom Design oe 000 1530 000000000 00010440 000-000 (2810 Design 09 000 1530 000-000-000 ©= 0010440. 000-000 0000002610 Design PagetInterface between Gusset - Bottom right brace Connection: Directly welded DEMANDS Pu Description Load type we 7900 DL Design 000 LL Design 000 st Design 000 WL Design 4060 01 Design 3480 02 Design 3480 D3 Design 3490 DM Design 3490 05, Design 3400 06 Design 3480 07 Design 2510 08 Design 2610 09 Design DESIGN CHECK Vertcstion Unit___Capacty Demand _ClEG Ratio. References Brace Direc welded Connection Tela weld design strength (wo) 20046 000 59.2, e4.uz0 Masenum weld force that brace can develop (eo) 543 000 Ease Susset Masmum wal force that gusset can devel ol 31320 000 0 Equi Ratio 000 REQUIRED RESISTANCE OF BRACED CONNECTIONS Requirement Value (o] Required tense strength 535.70 Required compressive strength 47655, [GEOMETRIC CONSIDERATIONS. Checks for gusset and brace Dimensions. Unit Value Min. value Max.value Sta, References ‘Senders 53.89 = 20000 ¥ —AISC 347-10 See. F250, Local bucking 9.90 0.00 1325 Seismic Manual Table 8-1, ‘Seismic Manual Table D1.1 ‘Gusset plate plastic hinge length 21) io 200 2.0 400 ¥ Wad size en} 3 2 3 ¥ table, ‘Sec, 1226 Ratio 0.09 DESIGN CHECK Verification Unit Capacity Brace Yking strength due to aa load ie} 43830 WARNINGS ‘Ampitiod sosic load combination ae rquired Page2Lower right gusset interface - beam Directly welded DEMANDS Beam Description Ru Py Mu Po Muz2—~— MUS. Loadtype: (We) Ke] KN] KT] pen 000 000 0000.00 Design 0.00 0.00 0000.00. Design 000 000 © 0.00» 0.00. Design 009 090 © 0000.00. Design ot 627 989 000000 © 0000.00 Design bz 537 8220.00 0000.90 0.00 Design 03 837 822 0.00 000 © 0000.00 eskn 08 5837 822 0.00 0.00 © 000-000 Design bs S37 822 0.00000 «0000.00. Design 06 537 822 000 000 © 0000.00 Design o7 a7 822 000 000 © 0000.00 Design 08 403° 617 000 0000.00 be 403 617 000 000.00 DESIGN CHECK Vertficatlon ‘Gusset ‘Shear yeling 1) 15062 0.00 0. 200 cass {Gusset edge tonion tess ‘oa) 4868600 00, 0.00 DL 200 sat Gusset edge shear stress (uotta) —sttoo0.00 0.00 OL 00D sa Weld copacty Kel 11849 0.00 OL 0.00 © Tables 64.617 Beam Weld block shear (Ko) 0.000 Ee.J45 Ratio 0.00 Lower right gusset interface - column Directly welded DEMANDS Bem _____atumn__ Description Pu wu Pu -Mu22 «Mu Lond type Ki} KR) Ke] KBR) ou 685 0001760000000 Ww 000 = 00000000 st 900 000 0000 we 000 0000000000 on nS er er) oz 822 00013920 ©0000 os 322 090 9920 © 000000 bs 822 0.90 19820» 0000.0 95 82 © 00013020» 0000.00 D8 82 000 13020» 0000.00 o7 822 0.00 13920 «= 000.00 28 8:7 0001044000000 28 8x7 00010840 =a DESIGN CHECK Verlfcation Unit Capacity _Dumand Ct allo _Referonces ‘Gusset ‘Shear yeding Kip) 783.03 0.00 00 O £4.33 Gustet ecje tension stress [vere 4855600.00 0.00 0.00 Q Jeet Gusset edge shear stress ub} 3110400.00 0.00 OL 0.00 Jat Weld capacty (Wal $00.13 2.00 OL Tebles 04 0-11 PagesRight beam interface - column Angles Load type OL 2385 448 Design w 0.00 0.00 Design SL 000 0.00 Design Unit Value Min. value Max value Sta, References Leth fo 600 496 os ¥ p18 ‘Angle (Beem sie) Wald 328 Wn} 3 3 Tv tables, ‘Sec. 122 ‘Vertical edge distance fi 180 125 Y Tables 13.4, 135 Horizontal edge distance in 144 125 ~ v Tebleo 34, 135 Vertical centertocente spacing (pitch) fe 3.00 267 700 v Sec.333, ‘S00. 35 ‘coh Horizontal edge distance li 144 125 ~ Y Tebhes 13.4, 135 WARNINGS (Connector does nt ft on support DESIGN CHECK Verification Unit Capacity Demand CtrEQ —_—_—Ratlo_References ‘Angle (Beam side) Weld capacty (9) 23.41 0.00 OL 0.00) Tables 84.811 ‘Shear yielding Ko} 129.60 0.00 OL 0.000 Fass ‘angle (Golumn side) ‘Boll shear ro 198.08 0.00 OL 0.00 Tables (7.1.14) Bolt bearing under shear laad Ke} 151.71 0.00 OL 0000 p.7-18, See. 43.10 ‘Shear yesing Ke 129.60 0.00 ou 000 cq Js ‘Shear rupture Kip) 9788 0.00 OL 00 O Eq ie Block shear Kip] 11085, 0.00 BL. 0 O Eq Ms Resuting tension capacity de prying actin (Kp) 3584 000 OL 0000 p.910 Beam ‘Welds rupture Kip 173.16 0.00 DL 00 O pos ‘Shear yielding Kip) 195.42 0.00 DL. 0.0 O Eq. M3 PagedBk bearing under shsar lad (ip) 2o4ee 0.00 OL 0.00 Eq e6 Global critical strength ratio. 0.08 REFERENCES {) A'SC 2005, Design Examples Version 13.0, pp. 1-28 -1C-27 {8 Dowswal, &., 2003, Camecon Design For Sieel Stuctures, Stucturl Design Soldiers, LLC. Chapter 18, p. 14 Pages"RAM Connection Standalone CE Unis systems Curent Date: ©Hand Calculations Hand calculations for composite beams, girders, and columns were executed to verify the member sizes and capacities produced from RAMSTEEL. Following the hand calculations, an excel spreadsheet was made to efficiently analyze the different members of the structure. The hand calculations presented in this report do not serve as an accurate representation of the office building. Rather, the purpose of the attached hand calculations is to show the procedure taken to design the building. The spreadsheets reflect the process shown in the hand calculations, but with the capabilities of adjusting the conditions to those identical to the office building. All design caleul: ins were performed using the suggested design methods proposed in Structural Stee! Design: A Practice Oriented Approach. Assumptions made for the hand calculations can be found in the “Design Assumptions” section. These hand calculations and spreadsheets can be found in Appendix B. Cost estimation ‘The cost estimation is based on the assumption that construction duration is 110 days. Length is, based on Centerline dimensions, and weight is based on actual member areas, not nominal weights. Table 5 and 6 contain details of the estimated value of construction. 49Table 5: Frame Component Total weight (1b) | Cost per unit weight Amount (8) Columns 161837 0.95 153,745 Beams 116956 0.95 111,108 Braces 33670 0.95 31,986 Total Cost of Steel 296,839 Table 6: Human Resources Labor Component Number Total days at | Payment per day| Amount ($) work i) Estimator 1 1 600 600 Labor 8 110 3,200 352,000 Crane operator = 110 800 88,000 Total Human Source Cost 440,600 Discussion and Conclusion RAMSTEEL program is an efficient tool in the design of steel structures. Structural members can be easily designed and the final model output to DXF file to produce final detail drawings. The total estimated cost for the frame construction is $ 737,439.0 41Appendix Appendix A: Beam Calculation Example Figure X. Beam Design Excel Spreadsheet Example 42Girder Calculations Example Column Calculation Example Figure X. Column Design Excel SpreadsheetFigure X. Beam Hand Calculations Example Part ayFigure X. Beam Hand Calculations Example Part 2Figure X. Girder Hand Calculations Example Part 1 aeFigure X. Girder Hand Calculations Example Part 2 atCOLUMN 29.245 % Tey weeny YP NAE” Cable 4-1) Me fe. ths EE ~ 252" CIT = VIB") Set 9.270 £1 OS Fy Barr. Leevennts FeMay YM Okay - Figure X. Column Hand Calculations Example Part 1 4, OA Esl me) C50) C15 20+44 4.2709 (SOM) 4870-56 < ‘ OKAY Figure X. Column Hand Calculations Example Part 2 44Appendix B: Structural Drawings 56Te TT jks | t ——— Second Floor Framing, e 3 & - \ 16’-0" 32’-0 32-0 22-0 S2"~5 32’-0 -i_- ae —— ———— § 8 a g j a a q q a a q ¢ PhP: i y 4 $4 § @ § § 8 jay Pf adpaid pop a 3 i 4 3 3 ; 7, oF @ @ &8 a8 i ; ! ! Pa ii eee eee eee Se ey wrens a i viens A wiese | SRY FLOOR Floor rea5 iE & wise a0 BR wresee a nc ROOF oor Framing PLateral view Front ~\—4 > | Typical Moment FrLateral view i Front view Typical Beam-Column Connection Typic Cone Conn