Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*
CS GARMENT, INC.,** pe i ioner, s. COMMISSIONER OF
INTERNAL REVENUE, responden .
* FIRST DI ISION.
** T C .A
, A I CS G ,I .
CS G , I ., C T
A . See P R 1, . . 1 ( 23 M 2008), R ll , . 10.
615
SERENO, CJ.:
Before he Co r is a R le 45 pe i ion for re ie on ce i a i,
assailing he respec i e Decision 1 and Resol ion 2 of he Co r of
Ta Appeals (CTA) e ba c in EB Case No. 287. These j dgmen s
in rn af rmed he Decision 3 and he Resol ion 4 of he CTA
Second Di ision, hich ordered he cancel-
_______________
1 CS Ga e , I c. . C e f I e a Re e e, EB Case No. 287
(CTA e ba c, 14 Januar 2008), slip op., R , at pp. 40-62 (hereinafter CTA e
ba c Decision).
2 CS Ga e , I c. . C e f I e a Re e e, EB Case No. 287
(CTA e ba c, 2 April 2008), slip op., R , at pp. 37-39 (hereinafter CTA e ba c
Resolution). Both the Decision and the Resolution of the CTA e ba c were penned
b CTA Associate Justice Caesar A. Casanova and concurred in b Justices Ernesto
D. Acosta, Juanito C. Casta eda, Jr., Lovell R. Bautista, Erlinda P. U , and Olga
Palanca-Enrique .
3 CS Ga e , I c. . C e f I e a Re e e, CTA Case No. 6520
(CTA 2nd Div., 4 Januar 2007), slip op., R , at pp. 63-94 (hereinafter CTA 2nd Div.
Decision).
4 CS Ga e , I c. . C e f I e a Re e e, CTA Case No. 6520
(CTA 2nd Div., 25 Ma 2007), slip op., R , at pp. 95-97 (hereinafter CTA Sec. 2nd
Div. Resolution). Both the Decision and
616
Facts
We reprod ce he narra ion of fac s c lled b he CTA e ba c 5
as follo s:
Pe i ioner [CS Garmen ] is a domes ic corpora ion d l organi ed and
e is ing nder and b ir e of he la s of he Philippines i h principal
of ce a Road A, Ca i e Eco one, Rosario, Ca i e. On he o her hand,
responden is he d l appoin ed Commissioner of In ernal Re en e of he
Philippines a hori ed nder la o perform he d ies of said of ce,
incl ding, in e alia, he po er o assess a pa ers for [alleged] de cienc
in ernal re en e a liabili ies and o ac pon adminis ra i e pro es s or
req es s for reconsidera ion/rein es iga ion of s ch assessmen s.
R CTA S D CTA A J J C.
C ,J. J E P. U O P -E .
5 CTA e ba c D , a 1, . 2-5, R ll , . 41-44.
617
618
On No ember 20, 2001, or i hin he 30-da period prescribed nder
Sec ion 228 of he Ta Code, as amended, pe i ioner led a formal ri en
pro es i h he responden assailing he abo e assessmen s.
On Jan ar 11, 2002, or i hin he si -da period af er he ling of he
pro es , pe i ioner s bmi ed o he Assessmen Di ision of Re en e Region
No. 9, San Pablo Ci , addi ional doc men s in s ppor of i s pro es .
Responden failed o ac i h nali on he pro es led b pe i ioner
i hin he period of one h ndred eigh (180) da s from Jan ar 11, 2002
or n il J l 10, 2002. Hence, pe i ioner appealed before [ he CTA] ia a
Pe i ion for Re ie led on A g s 6, 2002 or i hin hir (30) da s from
he las da of he aforesaid 180-da period.
The case as raf ed o he Second Di i ion of [ he CTA] for decision.
Af er rial on he meri s, he Second Di i ion rendered he Assailed Decision
on Jan ar 4, 2007 pon hich he Second Di ision cancelled responden s
assessmen agains CS Garmen s for de cienc e panded i hholding a es
for CY 1998 amo n ing o P47,880.00, and par iall cancelled he
de cienc DST assessmen amo n ing o P1,963.00. Ho e er, he Second
Di i ion pheld he alidi of he de cienc income a assessmen s b
s bjec ing he disallo ed e penses in he amo n of P14,851,478.83 and a
por ion of he ndeclared local sales P1,541,936.60 (amo n ing o
P1,500,000.00) o income a a he special ra e of 5%. The remainder of
ndeclared local sales of P1,541,936.06 (amo n ing o P41,936.60) as
s bjec ed o income a a he ra e of 34%. The Second Di i ion fo nd ha
o al a
619
620
621
_______________
6 Annexes A to E of CS Garment s Manifestation and Motion dated 25
September 2008, R , at pp. 171-175.
7 Comment (on Petitioner s Manifestation and Motion dated September 25,
2008) of the OSG ( led on 26 Januar 2009), R , at pp. 212-220.
622
_______________
Order dated 8 Februar 2010, R , at pp. 229-230.
Order dated 17 Jul 2013, R , at pp. 321-323.
10 To clarif , an order to move in the premises, which is a term of art
emplo ed in this Court, simpl means that the parties are obliged to inform the Court
of pertinent developments that ma help in the immediate disposition of the case. See
O ea .L e , G.R. No. L-29727, 14 December 1988, 168 SCRA 431.
623
Issue
Discussion
_______________
11 R , at pp. 324-352.
12 Id., at pp. 366-374.
13 Compliance ( led on 29 November 2013) at p. 2, R , at p. 367.
14 Me a Ba a dT C . .C e f I e a Re e e, G.R.
No. 178797, 4 August 2009, 595 SCRA 234; and P e Ba g C a
(N : G ba B e Ba , I c.) . C e f I e a Re e e, G.R. No.
170574, 30 Januar 2009, 577 SCRA 366.
15 Id.
624
_______________
16 R.A. 9480, Sec. 1.
17 BIR Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 19-2008, 22 Februar 2008.
625
626
627
628
men Form (Accep ance of Pa men Form or BIR Form No. 0617).
1
The a pa ers m s hen comp e he amnes a d e in
accordance i h he ra es pro ided in Sec ion 5 of he la , 1 sing
as a base heir ne or h as of 31 December 2005 as declared in
heir SALNs. A heir op ion, he re en e dis ric of ce (RDO) of
he BIR ma assis hem in accomplishing he forms and comp ing
he a able base and he amnes a d e. 20 The RDO, ho e er, is
disallo ed from looking in o, q es ioning or e amining he eraci
of he en ries con ained in he Ta Amnes Re rn, SALN, and
o her doc men s he ha e s bmi ed. 21 Using he Ta Amnes
Pa men Form, he a pa ers m s make a comple e pa men of he
comp ed amo n o an a hori ed agen bank, a collec ion agen , or
a d l a hori ed reas rer of he ci or m nicipali . 22
Thereaf er, he a pa ers m s le i h he RDO or an a hori ed
agen bank he (1) No ice of A ailmen of Ta Amnes Form; (2)
Ta Amnes Re rn Form (BIR Form No.
_______________
1 See R.A. 9480, Sec. 2; Department of Finance Department Order No. (DOF
D.O.) 29-07, Rule II, Sec. 6(1) (Implementing Rules and Regulations of R.A. 9480);
BIR RMC No. 19-2008, 22 Februar 2008; and BIR RMC No. 69-2007, 5 November
2007.
1 R.A. 9480, Sec. 5 provides: G a f Ta A e . Except for the persons or
cases covered in Section 8 hereof, an person, whether natural or juridical, ma avail
himself of the bene ts of ta amnest under this Act, and pa the amnest ta
due thereon, based on his networth as of December 31, 2005 as declared in the
SALN as of said period, in accordance with the following schedule of amnest ta
rates and minimum amnest ta pa ments required: x x x x
20 DOF D.O. 29-07, Rule II, Sec. 6(2)(c); BIR RMC No. 19-2008, 22 Februar
2008.
21 DOF D.O. 29-07, Rule II, Sec. 6(2)(c). See R.A. 9480, Sec. 6.
22 DOF D.O. 29-07, Rule II, Sec. 6(3); R.A. 9480, Secs. 2 & 7; and BIR RMC
No. 69-2007, 5 November 2007.
62
_______________
23 See R.A. 9480, Sec. 2; DOF D.O. 29-07, Rule II, Sec. 6(1); BIR RMC No. 19-
2008, 22 Februar 2008; and BIR RMC No. 69-2007, 5 November 2007.
24 DOF D.O. 29-07, Rule II, Sec. 6(3).
25 DOF D.O. 29-07, Rule II, Sec. 6(3); P e Ba g C a .
C e f I e a Re e e, a note 14. See R.A. 9480, Sec. 2 in relation to
Sec. 6.
26 Compliance (filed on 29 November 2013) at p. 2, R , at p. 367.
630
_______________
27 Compliance (filed on 29 November 2013) at p. 2, R , at p. 367.
631
EXCEPT:
Wi hholding agen s i h respec o heir i hholding a
liabili ies
Those i h pending cases:
Under he j risdic ion of he PCGG
In ol ing iola ions of he An i-Graf and Corr p Prac ices
Ac
In ol ing iola ions of he An i-Mone La ndering La
For a e asion and o her criminal offenses nder he NIRC
and/or he RPC
Issues and cases which were ruled by any court (even
without nality) in favor of the BIR prior to amnesty
availment of the taxpayer. (e.g., Ta pa ers ho ha e failed o
obser e or follo BOI and/or PEZA r les on en i lemen o
Income Ta Holida Incen i es and o her incen i es)
632
633
_______________
2 S a note 14.
30 Me a Ba a dT C . .C e f I e a Re e e, G.R.
No. 178797, 4 August 2009, 595 SCRA 234 (citing P e Ba gC a ,
a note 14).
31 Pe e . Mace e , G.R. No. L-32166, 18 October 1977, 79 SCRA 450 (citing
Ca a a g . W a , 70 Phil. 726 [1940]; Pe e .R e a , 68 Phil. 328 [1939];
U.S. . T a M a, 29 Phil. 119 [1914]; Sa .E e , 109 Phil. 419 [1960];
Te . Me be f e B a d f Ad a , G.R. No. L-25619, 30 June 1970,
33 SCRA 585; Ma e . Ge e a A d g Of ce, G.R. No. L-28952, 29 December
1971, 42 SCRA 660; De a . Ca ee , G.R. No. L-21906, 29 August 1969, 29
SCRA 350; U e f Sa T a . B a d f Ta A ea , 93 Phil. 376 [1953];
E C ec de Re a I e a .V a , 69 Phil. 319 [1940]; W e & C . . Mee ,
78 Phil. 655 [1947]; and De Ma .P . Ve e a Ad a , G.R. No. L-27299,
27 June 1973, 51 SCRA 340); La d Ba f eP e .C f A ea , G.R.
Nos. 118712 and 118745, 05 Jul 1996, 258 SCRA 404 (citing S e P e , I c.
. Ce a Ba f eP e , 162
634
_______________
SCRA 628 [1988]; P e Pe e C a .M c a fP a, 198
SCRA 82 [1991]; and Ta g R a Ba . Ce a Ba , 146 SCRA 120 [1986]).
32 In P e Ba gC a ( a note 14), we ruled that the BIR was
misplaced in including in RMC 19-2008 as one of the exceptions those issues and
cases which were ruled b an court (even without nalit ) in favor of the BIR prior
to amnest availment of the taxpa er. Since in that case the bank availed itself of the
tax amnest program before the judgment against it had become nal and
executor , we resolved to set aside the CTA Decision; see also Me a Ba
a dT C . .C e f I e a Re e e, G.R. No. 178797, 4 August 2009,
595 SCRA 234.
635
Pe i i g a ed, j dg e a d e i e a ide.
_______________