Assignment No#04

Bu Ali Mehtab. Sir Zafar Iqbal

FA19-BCS-021 Lecturer

Computer Science Computer Science

COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus

Problem 26:
 Consider the following network. With the indicated link costs, use
Dijkstra’s shortest-path algorithm to compute the shortest path from x to
all network nodes. Show how the algorithm works by computing a table
similar to Table 4.3.

Ans:

The IP router at the end of the tunnel will use the protocol number in the
‘Upper Layer Protocol” field of the IP packet to determine which upper layer
protocol to pass the IP packet. Thus, IP doesn't really know that the IP packet
contains a multicast datagram. This is only discovered when the upper layer
protocol (which will perform the multicast copy and routing) “opens” the IP
datagram it is handed by the IP layer.

Problem 27:
Consider the network shown in Problem P26. Using Dijkstra’s algorithm
and showing your work using a table similar to Table 4.3, do the following:
a. Compute the shortest path from t to all network nodes. b. Compute the
shortest path from u to all network nodes. c. Compute the shortest path
from v to all network nodes. d. Compute the shortest path from w to all
network nodes. e. Compute the shortest path from y to all network nodes. f.
Compute the shortest path from z to all network nodes.

Ans:

a) Recall that in distance vector routing, information about a change in

destination passes only between neighboring nodes, when the neighboring
nodes exchange routing updates/information. (The contrasts with link state
routing, where all changes in routing are broadcast to all routers, and thus all
routers learn about changes in the network after just one link state broadcast).
Thus, all routers will not be able to route to the mobile node immediately, under
the assumption of distance vector routing.
b) Under distance vector routing, different routers may indeed have a different
view of the visited network for the mobile node. A router will not know about
the changed visited network until that information propagates to it via the pair-
wise exchanges of routing information between routers on the path to the
mobile node.

c) The timescale is roughly on the order of the diameter of the network (i.e., the
length of the longest source-destination path). This is because routing
information propagates only via pair-wise exchange between neighboring
routers on the path. Thus, the time it would take to propagate information from
any point in the network to any other point is, in worst case, on the order of the
diameter of the network

Problem 28:

Consider the network shown below and assume that each node initially
knows the costs to each of its neighbors. Consider the distance-vector
algorithm and show the distance table entries at node z

Ans:

If the correspondent is mobile, then any datagrams destined to the

correspondent would have to pass through the correspondent’s home agent. The
foreign agent in the network being visited would also need to be involved, since
it is this foreign agent that notifies the correspondent’s home agent of the
location of the correspondent. Datagrams received by the correspondent’s home
agent would need to be encapsulated/tunneled between the correspondent’s
home agent and foreign agent

Problem 29:
Consider a general topology (that is, not the specific network shown above)
and a synchronous version of the distance-vector algorithm. Suppose that
at each iteration, a node exchanges its distance vectors with its neighbors
and receives their distance vectors. If the algorithm begins with each node
knowing only the costs to its immediate neighbors, what is the maximum
number of iterations required before the distributed algorithm converges?
Justify your answer

Ans:

Because datagrams must be first forward to the home agent, and from there to
the mobile, the delays will generally be longer than via direct routing. Note that
it is possible, however, that the direct delay from the correspondent to the
mobile (i.e., if the datagram is not routed through the home agent) could be
smaller than the sum of the delay from the correspondent to the home agent and
from there to the mobile. It would depend on the delays on these various path
segments. Note that indirect routing also adds a home agent processing (e.g.,
encapsulation) delay.

Problem 30:

Consider the network fragment shown below. x has only two attached
neighbors, w and y. w has a minimum-cost path to destination u (not
shown) of 5, and y has a minimum-cost path to u of 6. The complete paths
from w and y to u (and between w and y) are not shown. All link costs in
the network have strictly positive integer values.

a. Give x’s distance vector for destinations w, y, and u.

b. Give a link-cost change for either c(x,w) or c(x,y) such that x will inform
its neighbors of a new minimum-cost path to u as a result of executing the
distance-vector algorithm.
c. Give a link-cost change for either c(x,w) or c(x,y) such that x will not
inform its neighbors of a new minimum-cost path to u as a result of
executing the distance-vector a

Ans:

First, we note that chaining was discussed at the end of section 4.9.2. In the case
of chaining using indirect routing through a home agent, the following events
would happen:

 The mobile node arrives at A, A notifies the home agent that the mobile
is now visiting A and that datagrams to the mobile should now be
forwarded to the specified care-of-address (COA) in A.
 The mobile node moves to B. The foreign agent at B must notify the
foreign agent at A that the mobile is no longer resident in A but in fact is
resident in B and has the specified COA in B. From then on, the foreign
agent in A will forward datagrams it receives that are addressed to the
mobile’s COA in A to the mobile’s COA in B.
 The mobile node moves to C. The foreign agent at C must notify the
foreign agent at B that the mobile is no longer resident in B but in fact is
resident in C and has the specified COA in C. From then on, the foreign
agent in B will forward datagrams it receives (from the foreign agent in
A) that are addressed to the mobile’s COA in B to the mobile’s COA in
C.

Note that when the mobile goes offline (i.e., has no address) or returns to its
home network, the datagram-forwarding state maintained by the foreign
agents in A, B and C must be removed. This teardown must also be done
through signaling messages. Note that the home agent is not aware of the
mobile’s mobility beyond A, and that the correspondent is not at all aware of
the mobile’s mobility.
In the case that chaining is not used, the following events would happen:

 The mobile node arrives at A, A notifies the home agent that the
mobile is now visiting A and that datagrams to the mobile should now
be forwarded to the specified care-of-address (COA) in A.
 The mobile node moves to B. The foreign agent at B must notify the
foreign agent at A and the home agent that the mobile is no longer
resident in A but in fact is resident in B and has the specified COA in
B. The foreign agent in A can remove its state about the mobile, since
it is no longer in A. From then on, the home agent will forward
datagrams it receives that are addressed to the mobile’s COA in B.
 The mobile node moves to C. The foreign agent at C must notify the
foreign agent at B and the home agent that the mobile is no longer
resident in B but in fact is resident in C and has the specified COA in
C. The foreign agent in B can remove its state about the mobile, since
it is no longer in B. From then on, the home agent will forward
datagrams it receives that are addressed to the mobile’s COA in C.
 When the mobile goes offline or returns to its home network, the
datagram-forwarding state maintained by the foreign agent in C must
be removed. This teardown must also be done through signaling
messages. Note that the home agent is always aware of the mobile’s
current foreign network. However, the correspondent is still blissfully
unaware of the mobile’s mobility.