SCHOOL PROFILE

1. Enrollment

350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
SY 2013-14 SY2014-15 SY 2015-16
FEMALE MALE

The bar graph shows the decrease of enrolment due to the

opening of a national high school in the nearby barangay.

2. Number of Learners by Health-status

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
SEVERLY WASTEDWASTED NORMAL OVERWEIGHT OBESE

MALE FEMALE

The graph shows that majority of the students are normal but the school is not
free from malnutrition.
3. Status of Learning Modules per Subject by Grade Level for SY 2015-2016

Subject Excess Shortage

Grade 7
*English
L *Filipino

E *Math
*Science
A *AralingPanlipunan
*MAPEH
R *EsP
Grade 8
N *English

I *Filipino
Math **
N Science **
AralingPanlipunan **
G MAPEH **
EsP **
Grade 9
M English **
**
O Filipino
Math **

D Science **
AralingPanlipunan **
U MAPEH **
EsP **
L Grade 10

English 1:1
E Filipino 1:1
Math 1:1
S Science 1:1
AralingPanlipunan 1:1
MAPEH 1:1
EsP 1:1

The table shows that unavailability of learning modules for all learning areas for grade 7 and English
and Filipino for grade 8 was due to non-delivery of these materials.
Learning modules for other subject areas decreased due to improper usage, non retrieval by the
students and some were destroyed by termites.

Numbers

library Books
Tables
Chairs
Computers
Science equipment
 4. Trainings Attended by Teachers
SY 2015-2016

12

10

0
1 2 NG NG IC
T
SE
T RS
K- INI INI IN THE
A A O
Y TR TR
T Y
ILI CI
T
P AB P A
CA CA

The graph shows that all the teachers have attended In-service Trainings
and the needed mass training on the K-12 curriculum as the basic requirement for
those who will handle the subject.
It also implies that teachers need trainings and seminars in the field of
Information and Communication Technology since they are required to submit report
online.
5. Funding Sources

MOOE GAA LGU CANTEEN DONATIONS

20%

9%

2%

69%

The biggest sour ce of school funding come fr om the MOOE. Other sour ces ar e canteen
fund, LGUs, Subsidy for Special Programs and donations.

6. School awards and Recognition

Category of
Title of Awards Awarding Body Level Awardees
!st Runner Up (HenyongPalaweño) Provinvial Gov’t of Students &
Palawan Provincial Teacher
2nd Place (Science Quiz & Fair G-8 Students &
Level DepedPlawan Division Teacher
1st Runner Up (Pop Quiz) Deped Palawan Division Students &
Teacher
Performance Indicators: Access
7. Number and rate of dropouts by cause

100% 0 0

90% 1
2
80% 0
1 0
70% 1
0
60% 2
1
50%
1
40%

30% 1
1
20% 2
2
10%

0% 0
GRADE 7 GRADE 8 GRADE 9 GRADE 19

SICKNESS FAMILY PROBLEM FINANCIAL DISTANCE

CHILD LABOR HEALTH & NUTRITION AFFECTED BY CONFLICT OTHER REASONS

5
5.24
4
3.88
3

2 2.34

0 0
2013-14
2014-15
2015-2016

Financial matter and health and nutrition were the primary cause of the increased of drop-
out rate during the current school year.
Performance Indicators :Quality
8. Percentage of learners who completed the School Year
(Promotion Rate)

PERCENTAGE OF PROMOTION
120.00%

100.00%
100.00%
97.10%
94.25% 94.87%
88.88% 88.04% 87.72%
85.36% 86.78%
80.00% 84.94%
78.94%
73.11% 71.43% 71.25%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
GRADE 7 GRADE 8 GRADE 9 GRADE 10 0.00%TOTAL

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

COMPARATIVE GRAPH OF PROMOTIONS BY GRADE LEVEL FOR 3 CONSECUTIVE YEARS

Performance Indicators: Quality
9. Three year NAT comparative result

NAT MPS

70
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
63.58 63.11 63.85 64.45
57.35 59.18
60 57.16 56.79
49.52
50 47.37
42.95 44.42
40
33.01 31.9430.21
30

20

10

Based from the data, the increased in NAT MPS from 45.39% (2014-2015) to
52.77% (2015-2016)

Performance Indicators: Governance

 10. School-Based Management Assessment Level

11. Child-Friendly School Survey result

12. Stakeholders’ participation

Stakeholders' Attendance to Number of volunteer hours

School Activities SY 2015-16
110 30
100 100 20
100 10
90
88 0
ST T GS RS
TE DA EE
80
N I GA M N IN THE
C AI
CO BR TI O
LE TR
H
AT

Stakeholders Contribution (InPesos),

SY 2015-16 Cash/Inkind
12,000.00
8,000.00
4,000.00
5,000.00 10,000.00 7,500.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
0.00
T A T S S
ES AD EE ING HER
NT IG
IC
M IN OT
CO BR ET RA
HL T
AT

The graph shows that stakeholders share their contributions for the success
of school activities.

13.
Learner-Teacher ratio-SY 2015-16
 LEARNER-STUDENT RATIO 35:1 STANDARD RATIO

14.
50
45
Lea
1
40
35
1
1
1
rn Except for grade 10 all levels er-
have a general class size bigger
30 TEACHER
25 STUDENT-CLASSROOM RATIO
LEARNER than the recommended
2050 42 41 student-teacher ratio.
39
35 Classrooms in Isaub NHS are
1545 sub-standard this means that
1040 1 1
1 the learners are overcrowded.
535 1
030 CLASSROOM
GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE
25 7 8 9 10 LEARNER
20 42
15
39 41
35 Classroom ratio: SY 2015-16
10
5
0
GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE
7 8 9 10

15. Toilets-learner Ratio: SY 2015-16

STUDENT-TOILET RATIO
50
40 1 1
1
1
30THERE ARE ENOUGH TOILETS TOILET
LEARNER
20TO ACCOMMODATE
42 39 41 THE
35
10STUDENTS. 1 CLASS ROOM 1
0TOILET.
16. GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE
7 8 9 10
17.
18. PROJECTS
Continues construction of pathways and repair of fence, classrooms building construction
19. Other activities and accomplishments
DEPED VISION, MISSION AND CORE
VALUES
V. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Monitoring and Evaluation is important to determine the realization

of any projects and programs. Members of the School Planning Team are
responsible for the monitoring and evaluation and will undertake the task
at the middle and end of the implementation period.

The School Planning Team will guide and help the Project Team in
resolving problems especially during the early stage of the project
implementation. To help inform the SPT of the status of the projects, the
Project Team will submit a progress reports using the suggested template.
Both the SPT and the Project Team will discuss the
recommendations/action points based on the result of the monitoring done
by the SPT. The progress report shall be consolidated to serve as inputs to
the SRC which shall be presented to the stakeholders during the midyear
and yearend. The Progress Monitoring Report will be submitted to the
SDO to help them in monitoring the progress of the projects in school.
Based on the recommendations/Action points, the SPT and Project Teams
can adjust, modify and write the AIP for the following year. In starting the
next SIP, the Project Team assigned may begin by collecting, organizing
and analyzing the required school data for the PIAs to be tackled in the
AIP. After year three, the SPT will prepare the SIP for the next cycle. The
SDO will also conduct a visit to school to do a summative evaluation of the
SIP.
 Prepared by the School-Community Planning Team composed of the following,
during the SIP workshop held on February 20, 2016 at Isaub National High School,
Aborlan, Palawan.

SPT Members Designation Signature

Cielo F. Temple Team leader

Jhan Mark M. Norte Student Representative

Edgardo L. Evina, Sr. Teacher Representative

Jocelyn M. Yadao Parent Representative

Mario C. Corla Barangay Representative

Joselito G. Temple BDRRMC Representative

Nelly M. Angala Member of School Child

Protection Committee

Elizabeth T. Lacson Member of School

Governing Council