Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Constitutional Commissions
The Constitutional Commissions
Article IX.
SECTION 1. The Constitutional Commissions, which shall be independent, are the: CIVIL
SERVICE COMMISSION, THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, AND THE COMMISSION
ON AUDIT.
Why Independent?
1. Are constitutionally created (sec. 1)
2. Have independent powers of appointment (sec. 4)
3. Each commission may promulgate its own procedural rules (sec. 6)
4. The commission shall enjoy fiscal autonomy (sec. 5)
5. Salaries may not be diminished during their tenure (sec. 3)
6. Commissioners have a fixed term
SECTION 2. DISQUALIFICATIONS
1. Hold any other office or employment;
2. Engage in the practice of any profession;
3. Engage in the active management or control of any business, which, in any way, may be
affected by the functions of their office; and
4. Be financially interested, direct or indirect, in any contract, franchise, privilege granted
by the government, any of its subdivisions, agencies, instrumentalities, including
GOCC’S and their subsidiaries.
Qualifications:
They are all required to be natural-born citizens, at least 35 years of age and must not have been
candidates in the election immediately preceding their appointment.
All the members of the commissions are deemed to start on the same date, their terms of
office expire on different dates. Thus, for the first appointees under the 1987 constitution,
the chairmen had a term of office of seven years, the other members for a term of five
years, and the last ones for a term of three years.
CLASSIFICATION
Career Service
Characterized by entrance based on:
merit and fitness to be determined, as far as practicable, by competitive examinations
-RA.6656- (AN ACT TO PROTECT THE SECURITY OF TENURE OF CIVIL SERVICE OFFICERS
AND EMPLOYEES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION)
Section 2. No officer or employee in the career service shall be removed except for a valid cause and
after due notice and hearing. A valid cause for removal exists when, pursuant to a bona fide
reorganization, a position has been abolished or rendered redundant or there is a need to merge, divide, or
consolidate positions in order to meet the exigencies of the service, or other lawful causes allowed by the
Civil Service Law. The existence of any or some of the following circumstances may be considered as
evidence of bad faith in the removals made as a result of reorganization, giving rise to a claim for
reinstatement or reappointment by an aggrieved party:
(a) Where there is a significant increase in the number of positions in the new staffing pattern of the
department or agency concerned;
(b) Where an office is abolished and other performing substantially the same functions is created;
(c) Where incumbents are replaced by those less qualified in terms of status of appointment, performance
and merit;
(d) Where there is a reclassification of offices in the department or agency concerned and the reclassified
offices perform substantially the same function as the original offices;
(e) Where the removal violates the order of separation provided in Section 3 hereof.
Section 3. In the separation of personnel pursuant to reorganization, the following order of removal shall
be followed:
(a) Casual employees with less than five (5) years of government service;
(b) Casual employees with five (5) years or more of government service;
(c) Employees holding temporary appointments; and
(d) Employees holding permanent appointments: provided, that those in the same category as enumerated
above, who are least qualified in terms of performance and merit shall be laid first, length of service
notwithstanding.
b) Except as herein otherwise provided, entrance to the first two levels shall be through competitive
examinations, which shall be open to those inside and outside the service who meet the minimum
Section 4 – All public officers and employees shall take an oath or affirmation to uphold and defend
this constitution
- members of the AFP included
Disqualifications
Section 7
“No elective official shall be eligible for appointment or designation in any capacity to any public
office or position during his tenure.
Unless otherwise allowed by law or by the primary functions of his position, no appointive official shall
hold any other office or employment in the government or any subdivision, agency or instrumentality
thereof, including government-owned or controlled corporations or their subsidiaries.”
- Not applicable to officials covered by Article VII, Section 13 of the 1987 Constitution.
(Secretary, Usec, Asec)
- Allows concurrent holding of positions only when the second post is required by the primary
functions of the first appointment is exercised in an ex-officio capacity
- Public Interest Center, Inc. v. Elma
Section 6 “No candidate who has lost in any election shall, within one year after such election, be
appointed to any office in the government or any Government-owned or controlled corporations or
in any of their subsidiaries.”
Section 94 (b) of the Local Government Code exempts from this prohibition the losing candidates
in Barangay elections.
Section 1. COMPOSITION/QUALIFICATIONS/TERM
Composition: (7)
1) Chairman and
2) Commissioners (6)
Qualifications:
1) Natural-born citizens of the Philippines;
2) At least 35 years old at the time of appointment
3) Holders of college degrees; and
4) Not candidates for any elective position in the immediately preceding elections.
5) Majority of the Commission, including the Chairman must be:
a). Members of the Philippines Bar
b). Engaged in the practice of law for at least 10 years: “any activity in or out of court, which requires the
application of law, legal procedure, knowledge, training and experience.”
6) Appointments subject to CA approval
Term:
1) Chairman -7 yrs; 3 Members - 7 yrs; 2 Members - 5 yrs; 1 Member - 3 yrs.
2) LIMITATION: Single term only: no reappointment allowed
3) Appointment to a vacancy: only for unexpired portion of predecessor’s term
4) No temporary appointments, or appointments in acting capacity
2) Exercise:
A. Exclusive original jurisdiction over all contests relating to the elections, returns, and qualifications of
elective
1. Regional,
2. Provincial, and
3. City officials
1. COMELEC can exercise this power only in relation to its adjudicatory or quasi-judicial
functions. It CANNOT exercise this in connection with its purely executive or ministerial
functions.
2. If it is a pre-proclamation controversy, the COMELEC exercises quasi-judicial/administrative
powers.
3. Its jurisdiction over ‘contests’ (after proclamation), is in exercise of its judicial functions.
E. The COMELEC may issue writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus in exercise of its appellate
jurisdiction. This is not an inherent power.
3) Decide, except those involving the right to vote, all questions affecting elections, including determination of the
number and location of polling places, appointment of election officials and inspectors, and registration of voters.
4) Deputize, with the concurrence of the President, law enforcement agencies and instrumentalities of the
Government, including the Armed Forces of the Philippines, for the exclusive purpose of ensuring free, orderly,
honest, peaceful, and credible elections.
a). This power is NOT limited to the election period.
b). Applies to both criminal and administrative cases.
a). The political parties etc. must present their platform or program of government.
b). There should be sufficient publication
c). Groups, which cannot be registered:
i. Religious denominations/sects
ii. Groups which seek to achieve their goals through violence or unlawful means
iii. Groups which refuse to uphold and adhere to the Constitution
iv. Groups, which are supported by any foreign government.
d). BUT: Political parties with religious affiliation or which derive their principles from religious beliefs
are registerable.
1) File, upon a verified complaint, or on its own initiative, petitions in court for inclusion of exclusion of voters;
investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute cases of violations of election laws, including acts or omissions
constituting elections frauds, offenses and malpractices.
A. COMELEC has exclusive jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute cases for violations of election laws.
B. COMELEC can deputize prosecutors for this purpose. The actions of the prosecutors are the actions of
the COMELEC
C. Preliminary investigation conducted by COMELEC is valid.
2) Recommend to the Congress effective measures to minimize election spending, including limitation of places
where propaganda materials shall be posted, and to prevent and penalize all forms of election frauds, offenses,
malpractices, and nuisance candidacies.
3) Recommend to the President the removal of any officer or employee it has deputized, or the imposition of any
other disciplinary action, for violation or disregard or, or disobedience to its directive, order, or decision.
4) Submit to the President and the congress a comprehensive report on the conduct of each election, plebiscite,
initiative, referendum, or recall.
Rules of Procedure
Decision-Making
Regulation of franchises
1). The enjoyment or utilization of all franchises or permits for the operation of transportation and other
public utilities, media of communication or information.
2). Grants, special privileges or concessions granted by the Government or any subdivision, agency or
instrumentality thereof, including any GOCC or its subsidiary
a). Under Article XI, Section 9, the election period commences 90 days before the day of the election and ends 30
days thereafter.
b). In special cases, COMELEC can fix a period.
2). Applies not just to elections but also to plebiscites and referenda.
3). Plebiscite: Submission of constitutional amendments or important legislative measures to the people ratification
4). Referendum: power of the electorate to approve or reject legislation through an election called for that purpose.
1). COMELEC cannot compel print media to donate free space to the COMELEC. It may, however, compel it
to provide space after paying just compensation.
2). Power of COMELEC is over franchises and permits, NOT individuals. For example, COMELEC may not
regulate media practitioners, for this would violate the freedom of expression.
Section 5. No pardon, amnesty, parole, or suspension of sentence for violation of election laws, rules, and
regulations shall be granted by the President without the favorable recommendation of the Commission.
Section 6
Definition of Political Party
organized group of persons pursuing the same political ideals in a government and includes its
branches, and divisions
Prohibition on block-voting
Political parties, organizations, or coalitions registered under the party-list system shall NOT be
represented in the following:
Poll Watchers
Political parties, etc. are entitled to appoint poll watchers in accordance with law.
discrimination.
1) Funds certified by the COMELEC as necessary to defray the expenses for holding regular and special
elections, plebiscites, initiative, referenda and recalls, shall provided in the regular or special appropriations.
2) Funds should be certified by the COMELEC as necessary.
Release of funds
Once approved, funds should be released automatically upon certification by the Chairman of
COMELEC.
Section 2.
IMPEACHABLE OFFICIALS STEP 4. Verified complaint becomes the Articles of
Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall
The President forthwith proceed.
Vice-President
Members of the Supreme Court STEP 5. In cases where the President is being
Members of the Constitutional Commissions impeached, the chief justice (SC) shall preside but
Ombudsman cannot vote.
STEP 6. Conviction: 2/3 of all senate members
The office of the Ombudsman shall have the following power, function and
duties:
(1) Investigate on its own
(2) Direct, upon complaint or at its own
(3) Direct the officer concerned to take appropriate action
SECTION 14
The office of the Ombudsman shall enjoy fiscal autonomy.
Note: The ombudsman shall give priority to complaints filed against high ranking government
officials and/or those occupying supervisory positions, complaints involving grave offenses as
well as complaints involving large sums of money and/or properties.
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
SECTION 1
Composition:
QUALIFICATIONS OF MEMBERS.
(1) They must be natural-born citizen of the Philippines
(2) They must be at least thirty five(35) years of age at the time of their appointment;
TERM OF OFFICE
The Chairman and the Commissioners shall be appointed by the President with the consent of the
Commission on Appointments for a term of seven years without reappointment
Commissioners first appointed for a term of less than seven years are likewise ineligible for
reappointment
Constitution provides for the rotation of the appointments regular and fixed intervals of two(2)
years
o Of those first appointed
Chairman shall hold office for seven years
One commissioner for five years
And the other Commissioner for three years without reappointment
Member-Appointed to any vacancy shall be only for the unexpired portion of the term of the
predecessor.
In no case shall any Member be appointed or designated in a temporary or acting capacity is
similarly prohibited
constitutional bodies, commissions and offices that have been granted fiscal autonomy under this
Constitution;
SECTION 2
The commission shall have exclusive authority, subject to the limitations in this Article, to
define the scope of its audit and examination, establish the techniques and methods
required therefore and promulgate accounting and auditing rules and regulations including
those for the prevention and disallowance of irregular,unnecessary,excessive,extravagant,
or unconscionable expenditures or uses of government funds and properties
SECTION 3
No law shall be passed exempting any entity of the Government or its subsidiary in any
guise whatever or any investment of public funds from the jurisdiction of the Commission
on Audit
SECTION 4
The Commission on Audit shall submit to the President and the Congress within the time
fixed by law an annual report covering the financial condition and operation of the
Government, its subdivisions, agencies an instrumentalities, including government-owned
or controlled corporation and non-government entities subject to its audit and recommend
measures necessary to improve their effectiveness and efficiency. It shall submit other
reports as maybe required by law
SECTION XVII
AMENDMENTS OR REVISIONS
SECTION. 1:
SECTION 2:
Amendments to this Constitution may likewise be directly proposed by the people through initiative upon a
petition of at least 12% of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district shall be
represented by at least 3% of the registered voters therein. No amendment under this section shall be authorized
within 5 years following the ratification of this Constitution nor oftener than once every five years thereafter.
The Congress shall provide for the implementation of the exercise of this right.
SECTION. 3:
The Congress may, by a vote of 2/3 of all its Members, call a constitutional convention, or by a majority vote of all
its members, submit to the electorate the question of calling such a convention.
SECTION. 4:
WRITTEN OR UNWRITTEN
Written. A written constitution is one whose precepts are embodied in the document or set of
documents.
1) Constitution of Liberty
Constitution of liberty sets forth the fundamental civil and political rights of the citizens and
imposing limitations on the powers of government as a means of securing the enjoyment of
those rights.
2) Constitution of Government
Constitution of government outlines the organization of the government, enumerating its
powers, laying down certain rules relative to its administration and defining the electorate.
3) Constitution of Sovereignty
Constitution of sovereignty points out the mode or procedures in accordance with which
formal change in the fundamental law may be brought about.
Unwritten. An unwritten constitution is one which consists of rules which have not been integrated into
a single, concrete form, but are scattered in various sources, such as statutes of a fundamental
character, judicial decisions, commentaries of publicists, customs and traditions, and certain common
law principles.
Evolved (Cumulative). A cumulative constitution, by contrast is the result of a political evolution, not
inaugurated at any specific time but changing by accretion rather than by any systematic method.
FLEXIBLE OR RIGID
Rigid. A rigid constitution is one that can be amended by a formal and usually difficult process.
The permanence of the 1987 Constitution is highlighted on it being a rigid type of constitution.
The disadvantage of a permanent constitution is its inability to adjust to the need for change justified by
new conditions and circumstances. Since a permanent constitution involves a usually difficult process of
amendment or revision, people may have to resort to violation of the provisions and, if they cannot
make a new constitution, they will have to make a revolution.
The constitution, however, must change with the changing times lest it impedes the progress of the
people with antiquated rules grown ineffective in a modern age.
Amendment of the Constitution is an isolated or piecemeal change only. It involves alteration of one or a
few specific and separable provisions.
1) To improve specific pars or to add new provisions deemed necessary to meet new conditions;
and
2) To suppress specific portions that may have become obsolete or that are judged to be
dangerous.
An example of an amendment made to the Philippine Constitution is in the case of the 1935
Constitution, where the term of office of the President of the Philippines was changed from six (6) to (4)
years. The change is considered an amendment being unsubstantial, and not a revision.
The guiding original intention of revision is that, to determine how and to what extent it should be
altered, it must contemplate a re-examination of the document which have overall implication for the
entire document.
An example of a revision of the Philippine Constitution are in the case of the 1973 and 1987
Constitution, which were produced by the Constitutional Convention of 1971, where there were a
complete rewriting of the entire constitution.
The table below summarizes the key distinctions between amendments and revisions to the
Constitution:
AMENDMENT REVISION
1 Adds, reduces, or deletes without altering A change that alters the basic principle in the
the basic principle involved. Constitution, like altering the principle of
separation of powers or the system of checks and
balances.
2 Only specific provisions are being The change alters the substantial entirety and
changed, i.e., the changes are not the change affects several substantial provisions
substantial. of the constitution.
3 Generally affects only the specific Generally affects several provisions of the
provision being amended. Constitution.
Two-Part Test
1) Quantitative Test
The quantitative test asks whether the proposed changes is so extensive in its provisions as to
change directly the substantial entirety of the constitution by the deletion or alteration of
numerous existing provisions. Here, the court examines only the number of provisions affected
and does not consider the degree of the change.
2. Qualitative Test
The qualitative test inquires into the qualitative effects of the proposed change in the
constitution. The main inquiry is whether the change will accomplish such far reaching changes
in the nature of our basic governmental plan as to amount to a revision.
However, there can be no fixed rule on whether a change is an amendment or a revision. A change in a
single word of one sentence of the Constitution may be a revision and not an amendment, e.g.
substituting the word “republican” with “monarchic” or “theocratic” in Art. III, Sec. 1 of the Constitution.
Hence, each specific change will have to be examined on a case-to-case basis, depending on how it
affects:
STEP 1 STEP 2
RATIFICATI
PROPOSAL
ON
THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS
Sections 1, 2, and 3 of Art. XVII deal with the modes in which amendments or revisions may be
proposed.
Section 4 of Art. XVII of the Constitution deals with how such proposals are ratified.
A summary of the three modes of how amendments may be proposed is shown below:
** Or by a majority vote of all its members, when submitting to the electorate the question of calling such convention.
For amendments to the Constitution proposed directly by the people through initiative, the following
requisites must concur:
With respect to the constitutional requirement of an implementing legislation (see item 1 above), the
Supreme Court held in the case of Lambino vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 174153 that Republic Act No. 6375
An Act Providing for a System of Initiative and Referendum is inadequate for the purpose of
implementing the initiative clause of the Constitution.
With respect to the proposal and petition requirement (see item no. 2 and 3 above), the Supreme Court
has held that the full text of the proposed amendments may be either:
Hence, the illustrations below depict the two instances mentioned above:
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__ THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
____________
__
____________
PETITION containing the required signatures.
__
____________
__
____________
__
____________
__
____________
__
____________
__
PROPOSAL embodied in the petition containing
____________
__
____________
the full text of the proposed amendments.
__
_________
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
The manner through which proposal of amendment or revision to the constitution may be ratified
depends upon how the amendments or revisions were proposed. The table below summarizes the rules
on ratification:
Plebiscite is held not earlier than 60 days to ensure the needed careful study of the proposed
amendments or revisions. On the other hand, ratification within a reasonable time after they are made,
i.e., not later than 90 days, is intended to answer present needs or current problems sought to be
addressed by such amendment or revision.
In the case of Mabanag vs. Lopez Vito, the Supreme Court announced that the question of the validity of
the adoption of amendments to the constitution is regarded as subject to judicial review. Hence, the
Supreme Court has jurisdiction but limited only to ascertaining whether the constitutional procedures
required for valid proposal and ratification was followed.
In the case of Sanidad v COMELEC, wherein Art. X, Sec. 2(2) of the new constitution provides: “All cases
involving the constitutionality of a treaty, executive, agreement or law shall be heard and decided by the
SC En Banc, and no treaty, executive agreement, or law may be declared unconstitutional without the
occurrence of at least ten Members.
Therefore, the SC has the last word in the construction not only of treaties and statutes but also the
Constitution itself. The amending, like all other powers organized in the Constitution, is in form a
delegated and a limited power, so that SC is vested with the authority to determine whether that power
has been discharged within its limits.
In the case of Pirma vs. COMELEC, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition to compel a proposal to
amend the Constitution on the alleged initiative of six million voters.