Arbitration and conciliation are alternative dispute resolution methods, but they differ in several key ways:
1. Arbitration involves a third party arbitrator who makes a binding decision based on evidence presented by both parties. Conciliation involves a third party conciliator who acts as a facilitator to encourage the parties to reach their own settlement agreement.
2. Arbitration requires a prior agreement between the parties to use arbitration, while conciliation can be used for existing disputes without prior agreement.
3. The arbitrator's decision is called an "award" while the conciliator may help draft a non-binding "settlement agreement" if the parties come to an agreement.
Arbitration and conciliation are alternative dispute resolution methods, but they differ in several key ways:
1. Arbitration involves a third party arbitrator who makes a binding decision based on evidence presented by both parties. Conciliation involves a third party conciliator who acts as a facilitator to encourage the parties to reach their own settlement agreement.
2. Arbitration requires a prior agreement between the parties to use arbitration, while conciliation can be used for existing disputes without prior agreement.
3. The arbitrator's decision is called an "award" while the conciliator may help draft a non-binding "settlement agreement" if the parties come to an agreement.
Arbitration and conciliation are alternative dispute resolution methods, but they differ in several key ways:
1. Arbitration involves a third party arbitrator who makes a binding decision based on evidence presented by both parties. Conciliation involves a third party conciliator who acts as a facilitator to encourage the parties to reach their own settlement agreement.
2. Arbitration requires a prior agreement between the parties to use arbitration, while conciliation can be used for existing disputes without prior agreement.
3. The arbitrator's decision is called an "award" while the conciliator may help draft a non-binding "settlement agreement" if the parties come to an agreement.
COMPARISON 1. Meaning Arbitration is a dispute Conciliation is an settlement process in alternative dispute which an impartial 3rd resolution method in which party is appointed to study an expert is appointed to the dispute and hear both settle the dispute by the party to arrive at a persuading/ encouraging decision binding on both parties to reach agreement. parties.
2. Prior Required Not Required
Agreement 3. Available for Existing and Future Existing Disputes Disputes
4. process Formal like Court room More like Informal process
process
5. Evidences Acceptable Technical evidences are not
acceptable
6. Third Party Acts as Judge Acts as facilitator, evaluator
and intervener
7. Opinion giving Actively give opinion on Conciliator has the power to
power of 3rd the basis of evidences give his opinion mainly on submitted only facts party 8. Powers of third More powerful Less powerful as compared party to arbitrator
9. Result is Award Settlement agreement
known as 10. Role of 3rd Arbitrators find solution Conciliator can draft party in on the basis of evidences settlement agreement as per only. the wishes of parties. providing decision 11. Fees Very Expensive Less Expensive as compared to Arbitration
12. No. of third Odd in number like 1,3,5, May be 1, 2 or 3
party 7, 9
13. Enforcement An arbitrator has the A conciliator do not have
power to enforce his the power to enforce his decision. decision.
Excerpts From The Book 'The Lawless State (The Crimes of The U.S. Intelligence Agencies) ' by Morton H. Halperin, Jerry Berman, Robert Borosage, Christine Marwick (1976)