ee ee ee ee eee ee ee
[ONE
The Concept of
Resistance
OBS CONFLICT MANIFEST ITSELF
CLINICALLY?
very day after work, very depressed young man sits inthe dark in
his ving room hour ater hou, delay nothing, his mind Blank. By
his sde is his stereo and magnificent collection of his favorite
‘lsseal musi. The fick of «switch and he would fee beter —and
etn after night, overwhelmed with despair, he just ss, never
‘nce touching that switch,
vould like to suggest that we think ofthis man as being in
state of internal conte (although he may not, at this point, be
ftware of such confi), He could turn on his stereo, but he does no.
[He could do something that would make him fel better, but he does
rothing. Within this tan is tension between what he “should” let
‘imelt do and what he finds himself doing Instead.4 ADRIMER ON WORKING WITH RESISTANCE,
1m general, patients both do and don’ want to got beter. They
both do and doatt ant to maintain things as they are. They both do
hd dont want to get on wih thelr ives. They both ste and are’t
invested in their suffering, They aze truly confieted about al the
‘holees that confront them.
“The patient may proest that he desperately wants to change. He
does and be doesn’. He may insist that he would do anything in
‘order to fel beter, Well, yes and no, On some level, everybody
‘wants things to Be better, but few are willing to change:
HOW DOES CLASSICAL PSYCHOANALYSIS
CONCEPTUALIZE CONFLICT?
Drive theory conscives of confit as involving intemal tension
‘between impulse insisting “yes” and ego defense protesting “no”
{withthe superego coming down usually on the side of the ego). In
Ralph Greenson's (1967) words: “A neurotic confit is an uncon-
{sous conflict between an i@ impulse seeking discharge and an exo
Aefense warding off the impulee's deect discharge or acces £0
‘onseioumnes” (p. 17)
‘Although drives are considered part of the id, affects (ive
tesivatives) are thought fo reside the ego In Fact, the ego isa 0
be the seat ofall affects, When Freud writes of psychic confit
beeween the id andthe ego, sis understood that sometimes he is
feferring to conflict between an id drive and an ego defense and
Sometimes he i refering to conflict between an anxity-provoking
fet (inthe ego but deriving from the id) end an ego defense.
WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF SUCH
CONFLICTS?
“The patent is sad but doesnot let himself ry.
“The patient is angry bur is determined (o remain in contol
“The patient is upset but tres not co ett show.
‘The patient is frightened but pretends he isnot.
“The patient i disppointed but claims that alls wel
{THE CONCEPT OF RESISTANCE :
Way AND NOW DOES THE eee ore |
ae
In cach of the above sttlons, the patient ts experiencing some
tn cach fst cx hm fal aous or comfortable Bate doce
attest tt haat way and so defends inset agains te otog by
aoe ensucnce by protesting tht he doesnot feel tat way, oF
deovng Olathe feclssomething she fogebes In may of
PO ays the patient defends himsel nuit the aoe
Jrowoking or pail at
eee, the paint expricncing an affect thatthe
cao a oable. In oder to defend el gaia he aly
eet the aff, the ebo Mobis 4 detese Yo oppore the
test
“tne net real confit, variously described as neurotic
fnurapayeie, oF siesta.
How MIGHT WE OPERATIONALIZE THE
CONCEPT OF CONFLICT?
et us think, more generally, of piyehic conftice as spetking 10
[Shieh Thin the pation between those healthy forces that press
Sex" and those eubealthy counterforces that insist "No."
"For example thefes always tension within the patient becween
his recognition that i sup fo him to take responsiblity for is fe
(ehh apenks to his healthy wish to get ete) and his convition
{hav stout nos have to be his responsibilty (whi speaks 10 his
Unmealtny eed t0 preserve things as they are). There is lays
Uhcalt nthe patient between his heathy investment in changing
‘Sid unbeahyFelctasceo Tet 20 of his old ways of doing thine
WHAT ARE SOME MORE EXAMPLES OF
CONFLICT?
“The paint woul ke todo wel on hs examination, and yet Ne
‘Tas fan eo t0 make himself sed.
ne,eee
‘The patent knows that he should tlk about how angry he's wth
his father, bathe doesnot yet fel ready todo that
‘The patient knows that he should try to come on time 10 his
session, but he nds hac consi snng 3 10 miner
into te nou.
“The patient want to remember his dreams, bi he is uniling to
sete then down.
Tas pt knows he ha ad step pre fr having ad
Such an emotionally abusive mother, but he not yet prepared to
det wit ta
(On some level the patient knows tha eventually he must deal with
Just how diappoite he en his therapt, ut he hopes ti
inet be abl to gt Batter without having to do that.
The paint was to seed, bt hee ot entirely sure that he
diserves to make
“The patent knows tha hs therapist docs relly have all the
answers, bute wishes his theapit di
Inhis heat of heats the patient knows that hs mothe wll never
realy love him a he wants to be loved, ad yet he finds hist
Continuing to hope that maybe sted she il
‘he pant knows that be mus be sd shout the death of his
father, Bat be cant Sam of his ely fea
IN THE FINAL ANALYSIS, CONFLICT
INVOLVES TENSION BETWEEN WHAT.
KINDS OF FORCES?
Ultimately, the force defended against isthe helthy (but anxety-
provoking) force within each of es that empowers uso change. the
force that empowers us to relinquish ur tie to the past in onder to
‘gon withthe present, the force that empowers us to move forwarl
In our lives. The counterforee is the ushealthy (but antes).
‘ssuaging) force within each of ws that rests change, the force that
gine tencouty tothe past the force thet neds Our proses
“THE CONCEPT OF RESISTANCE 7
Inthe final analysis, conflict involves tension between the
patient's healthy wish fo change and his unhealthy resistance (0
hanee.
ARE WE ADDRESSING CONVERGENT OR
DIVERGENT CONFLICT:
‘Because we are here discussing the patient's resistance, our interests
in convergent conflict (Kris 1977), confit between two opposing
Fores, one force originating asa defense against the other, fo fact
Sepending upon the other fr lis very existence. Convergent conflict
farses In the context of tension between one force that presses "Yes"
fad another force tht opposes with a “No.” The coaice beeen
Toree and countrforce fs known as conflict of defense or conver-
sent conc.
For exazaple, consider an agressive impulse tht is opposed by
the fore of repression, The presence ofthe id aggression arouses
lanvety inthe obo, which promps the ego to mobilize a defense. The
fepresive fore is deat rea f the presence ofthe agereson.
‘This isan stance, sherefore, of convergent confi.
Whan drive theorists speak of prychic conflict, they are usually
teferrng to “itersyatemic™ confit between i impulse (derivative
fffect) and ep0 defense—that i, convergent confit between forces
‘within separate psychic stuctres (or systems)
By comparison, there afe “lntrasytemic™ conflicts between
forces within the same payee structure, bet the Id, the ego, oF the
superego. There i confit, for exampic, between Tove and hate,
fetive and passive, love of one’s country and love of one's family,
fear of fallure and fear of success, 1 name a few. These are
divergent contits.
‘Divergent confit arses from conflict between tv forces that
are mutually exclusive, Nofonger are we talking about two forces In
sate of dynamie equllviumy now we ar talking abou two frees
Sing for exclusivity. Either the one or the other will ram.
In what fol, we wll be addressing ourselves primarily to the
‘convergent conflict tat exists between two forces in direct oppose
tion t9 each other, the one a defense agaist the other. More5 A PRIMER ON WORKING WITH RESISTANCE
specifiy, we wil be concerned with the patient's experience of the
{casion within him between the two forces in opposition, i wills
{his interna tension that wil eventually provide the Ipetes fee
‘overcoming the paticnt's resistance
HOW IS CONVERGENT CONFLICT
EXPERIENCED BY THE PATIENT?
On the on band the rae has some antes of wha he
“shouldbe esing/ doings he has some knowldas Of what te
or “healthy.” On the otter hand, he finds himself Teahogaeey
Something other than hat: On some lee the patent ease fone
the tah om another evel he Pde Rl efonding sete
sshaowlgment oft
"Xpretied Somewhat diferent tems, there eve tension
‘hi the patient between what Knows fhe seal so whe
‘princes as real~in ater word, tension Between he te
of reality and his experience of it. ine]
HOW DO KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE
OF REALITY RELATE TO ACCURACY oF
PERCEPTION?
‘Tae patients knowledge of rest has todo with accurate percep
{i he ay to pers gs a hey Teall are ae
Innate bythe need for them to be here
The patents experience of realty, however, often has more to
wit acurate pereepion devng from eulyon eas
‘withthe prental ober
WHAT IS MEANT BY ILLUSION AND
DISTORTION
‘The patient's misperceptions of reality are lther unrealistically
Dositive, which I will refer to as ilsions, or uneeaiaically nesetve
hich wil refer to as ditotions, "
{ue CONCEPT OF RESISTANCE .
Even though on some level the patient knows better, hes
nonethslss always misinterpreting the present, making assumptions
hou the preset based on te past, Because of parental negest and
{tbe eel on, the patient now Tooks to his contemporary objects to
‘ete good paren he never had iusion) and/or expects them to be
the bad parent he did have (distortion).
‘Whether illusion or distortion, the patent clings to is misper-