Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20mid0116 VL2020210105834 Ast05

    Uploaded by

    Mrunalini Reddy
    5 views3 pages
    This document summarizes an experiment to determine the concentration of iron (Fe) in a metal sample using conventional colorimetric and smartphone digital imaging methods. The data collected includes concentration measurements from a colorimeter and smartphone device. The results show the Fe concentration in the sample was 1.6 ppm using colorimetry and 1.62 ppm using digital imaging, indicating good correlation between the two methods. Graphs of concentration versus absorbance and concentration versus R-value further demonstrate correlation.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    20MID0116_VL2020210105834_AST05

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes an experiment to determine the concentration of iron (Fe) in a metal sample using conventional colorimetric and smartphone digital imaging methods. The data collected includes concentration measurements from a colorimeter and smartphone device. The results show the Fe concentration in the sample was 1.6 ppm using colorimetry and 1.62 ppm using digital imaging, indicating good correlation between the two methods. Graphs of concentration versus absorbance and concentration versus R-value further demonstrate correlation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views3 pages

    20mid0116 VL2020210105834 Ast05

    Uploaded by

    Mrunalini Reddy
    This document summarizes an experiment to determine the concentration of iron (Fe) in a metal sample using conventional colorimetric and smartphone digital imaging methods. The data collected includes concentration measurements from a colorimeter and smartphone device. The results show the Fe concentration in the sample was 1.6 ppm using colorimetry and 1.62 ppm using digital imaging, indicating good correlation between the two methods. Graphs of concentration versus absorbance and concentration versus R-value further demonstrate correlation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    REGt-NO 20MEOOI16

    KUHTurolim1 Redduy
    Suanti totiv calcrimabric detRymination af Fet2 mekal ion
    utng
    using conventional and smart phone digital-tmogmg mebhods

    a6le Experimental daba

    Oata collecked -fro Oato cotladted fvom Sma1kphone device


    SNO
    Calorimalvic devce
    Conc
    Ppmx-ani9 (Y-Kt6) Gl Reb
    33 t -214 L.66
    0-086
    t6 6 2-09 2-8 26.8B3

    0 2.21 28
    3 35 ly-41
    o332 u82 168 6
    4a . 4 1662.95
    0-131

    Result
    ct) concerkialion af Fe im sbecl gomple (using calovinety)

    1.6 PPo
    cii) Concenbation of Fe n tael sample Custmg digital imaqmoa)
    1.62 Ppm
    Page No.
    Corcen ahior Vs Absotmna
    cOntonboltn

    dencenLra tien

    SVE
    Page No
    Connlation vs -Rln-
    teanaaten

    encertraon

    SVE

    You might also like