Professional Documents
Culture Documents
in Aqueous Solution
COMMISSIONS ON ELECTROCHEMISTRY
AND ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Memberships of the Commissions during the period (1979-83) this monograph was pre-
pared were as follows:
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Chairman:1979-81 R. Parsons (France); 1981-83 K. E. Heusler (FRG); Vice-Chairman: 1979-81 A. J.
Bard (USA); 198 1-83 S. Trasatti (Italy); Secretary: 1979-83 J. C . Justice (France); Titular and Associ-
ate Members: J. N. Agar (UK; Associate 1979-83); A. J. Bard (USA: Titular 1981-83; E. Budevski
(Bulgaria; Associate 1979-83); G. Gritzner (Austria; Associate 1979-83); K. E. Heusler (FRG; Titular
1979-81); H. Holtan (Norway; Associate 1979-83); N. Ibl* (Switzerland; Associate 1979-81); M.
Keddam (France; Associate 1979-83); J. Kuta+ (Czechoslovakia; Titular 1979-81); R. Memming
(FRG; Associatc 1979-83); B. hliller (USA; Associate 1979-83); K. Niki (Japan; Titular 1979-83);
R. Parsons (France; Associate 1981-83); J. A. Plambeck (Canada; Associate 1979-83); Y. Sato (Japan;
Associate 1981-83); R. Tamamushi (Japan; Associate 1979-81); S. Trasatti (Italy; Titular 1979-81);
~VationalRepresentatives: A. J . ~ r v i a(Argentina; 1979-83); B. B. Conway (Canada; 1979-83); G.
Iloranyi (Hungary; 1979-83); S. K. Rangarajan (India; 1981-83); J. W. Tomlinson (New Zealand;
1979-83); S. MinZ (Poland; 1979-83); 1:. Mattsson (Sweden; 1981-83); A. K. Covington (UK; 1979-
83); M. Karsulin (Yugoslavia; 1979-81); D. Dra2id (Yugoslavia; 1981-83).
ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Chairman: 1979-81 J . F. Coctzee (USA); 1981-83 J. Jordan (USA); Secretary: 1979-81 J. Jordan
(USA); 1981-83 K. Izutsu (Japan); Titular and Associate Metnbers: J. I:. Coetzee (USA; Associate
1981-83); A. K. Covington (UK; Titular 1979-83); W. Davison (UK; Associate 1981-83); R. A. Durst
(USA; Associate 1979-83); bl. Gross (France; Associate 1979-83); K. Izutsu (Japan; Titular 1979-
83); J. Juillard (17rancc; Titular 1979-83); K. M. Kadish (USA; Associate 1979-83); R. Kalvoda
(Czechoslovakia; Associate 1979-83); ti. Kao (China; Associate 1981-83); R. C. Kapoor (India;
Titular 1979-83); Y. Marcus (Israel; Associatc 1979-83); L. Mcites (USA; Associate 1979-81); T.
Mussini (Italy; Associate 1979-83); 11. W. Niirnberg t (FRG;Associate 1979-83); P. Papoff (Italy;
Associate 1979-81); E. Pungor (Ilungary; Titular 1979-83); M. Senda (Japan; Associate 1979-83);
D. L. Smith+ (USA; Associate 1979-83): N. Tanaka (Japan; Associatc 1979-83); National Represen-
tatives: 1). D. Perrin (Australia; 1979-83); B. Gilbert (Belgiu~n;1981-83); W. C. Purdy (Canada, 1979-
83); R. Necb (FRG; 1979-83); K. T6th (Hungary; 1979-83); H. V. K. Udupa (India; 1979-81); S. K.
Rangarajan (India: 1981-83): W. F. Sniyth (Ireland: 1981-83); Ii. Grushka (Israel; 1981-83); Z. Galus
(Poland; 1979-83): G. Johansson (Sweden; 1981-83); J. Buffle (Switzcrland; 1981-83); B. Birch (UK;
1979-83); J. Osteryoung (USA; 1981-83); M. Branica (Yugoslavia; 1979-83).
Allen J.Bard
University of Texas
Austin, Texas
Roger Parsons
Laboratoire d7lectrochimie lnterfaciale du CNRS
Meudon, France
and
The University
Southampton, England
JosephJordan
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, Pennsylvania
IUPAC
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE A N D APPLIED CHEMISTRY
Physical and Analytical Chemistry Divisions
Commissions on Electrochemistry and Electroanalytical Chemistry
Marcel Dekker, Inc., 270 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016
1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Preface
The book i s organized in the following way. The first two chapters deal
with units, conventions, methods of determination, and the concept of the
single electrode potential. These are followed by standard potentials and ther-
modynamic data for the elements grouped according to their positions in the
periodic table.
The editors gratefully acknowledge the assistance and support of the
members of the IUPAC Commissions I . 3 and V . 5 , and sincerely thank all those
involved (authors and reviewers) , who contributed to this effort without finan-
cial remuneration to ensure that the book could be produced at a price afford-
able to students and the rest of the scientific community.
Allen J . Bard
Joseph Jordan
Roger Parsons
Contents
Preface iii
Contributors is
3 H y d r o g e n , Philip N. R o s s
5 T h e Halogens
I. F l u o r i n e , Anselm T . K u h n and Colin L . Rice
11. C h l o r i n e , T o r q u a t o Mussini and Paolo Longhi
111. B r o m i n e , T o r q u a t o Mussini and Paolo Longhi
IV. I o d i n e a n d A s t a t i n e , Pier Giorgio Desideri, Luciano
L e p r i , and Daniela Heimler
7 N i t r o g e n , Phosphorus, A r s e n i c , A n t i m o n y , a n d B i s m u t h
I. N i t r o g e n , J o s e p h T . Maloy
11. Phosphorus, K . S . V. Santhanam
111. A r s e n i c , K . S . V. Santhanam and N . S . S u n d a r e s a n
IV. A n t i m o n y , Vello Past
V. B i s m u t h , B . L o v r e E e k , I . Mekjavik, and
M . MetikoS-Hukovik
N i c k e l , Palladium, a n d P l a t i n u m
I . N i c k e l , Alejandro J . A r v i a and Dionisio Posadas
11. Palladium and Platinum, Francisco Colom
Cobalt, Rhodium, a n d l r i d i u m
I . C o b a l t , Nobufumi Maki and N o b u y u k i Tanaka
11. Rhodium and Iridium, Francisco Colom
I r o n , R u t h e n i u m , a n d Osmium
I . I r o n , Konrad E . Heusler and W . J . Lorenz
11. Ruthenium and Osmium, Francisco Colom
Manganese, T e c h n e t i u m , a n d R h e n i u m
I . Manganese, James C . Hunter and A k i y a Kozawa
11. T e c h n e t i u m and R h e n i u m , Robert J . Magee and Harry
Blutstein
Chromium, Molybdenum, a n d T u n g s t e n
I. Chromium, Katsumi Niki
11. Molybdenum, Nicholas Stolica
111. T u n g s t e n , Alexander T. Vas'ko
Vanadium, Niobium, a n d T a n t a l u m
I . V a n a d i u m , Y e c h e s k e l Israel and Louis Meites
11. Niobium and T a n t a l u m , H . V . K . U d u p a , V . K.
V e n k a t e s a n , and M . Krishnan
B o r o n , Aluminum, a n d Scandium
I . B o r o n , Su-Moon Park
11. Aluminum, Georges G. Perrault
111. Scandium, Su-Moon Park
20 Yttrium, L a n t h a n u m , a n d t h e L a n t h a n i d e Elements,
L e s t e r R . Morss
Contents
24 I n e r t C a s e s , Bruno Jaselskis
Alejandro J .
A r v i a Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquimicas Teoricas y
Aplicadas , Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
Current affiliation
*Water Branch, Environment Protection Authority of Victoria, Melbourne,
Victoria, Australia
'~moco Research Center, Naperville , Illinois
x Contributors
Current affiliation
*Faculty of Science and Technology, Harrow College of Higher Education,
Harrow, England
Contributors xi
Current affiliation
"Department of Chemistry, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
%aterials Science Research Division, Bell Communications Research, Inc.
*
Murray Hill, New Jersey
~ e ~ a r t m e of
n t Chemistry, The University, Southampton, England
xii Contributors
.
N S . Sundaresan* Chemical Physics Group, Tata Institute of Fundamental
Research, Bombay, India
. .
H V . K Udupa $ Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi,
Tamil Nadu, India
Current affiliation
"Department of Chemistry, Sophia College, Bombay, India
tDepartment of Fuel Chemistry, Akita University, Akita, Japan
Titanium Equipment and Anode Manufacturing Company, Ltd . , Vandalur ,
Madras, India
§Retired
Standard Electrode Potentials: Units,
Conventions, and Methods of Determination*
I. SYMBOLS
2+
EO(Zn (aq) + 2e- + Zn) (1.2)
T Thermodynamic temperature
G Molar Gibbs energy
S Molar entropy
Cp Molar heat capacity
H Molar enthalpy
XA Mole fraction of species A
The units of energy and potential employed are those adopted by the Con-
f6rence ~ 6 n 6 r a l edes Poids et Mesures and known a s SI (syst;me Inter-
national) units. The primary energy unit is the joule, defined in terms of
the SI base units, the kilogram, meter, and second:
2 -2
1 joule =- 1 J E 1 k g m s (1.4)
Many data in the literature are quoted in calories. They have been
converted into joules using the conversion factor 4.1840 J cal-l. Also, 1 e V =
1.6021892 x 10-19 J . The unit of electrical potential difference i s the volt,
defined in terms of these SI base units together with the ampere:
- 2
1 atmosphere : 101325 N m (Pa)
t = T -T where T = 273.15 K
0 0
Standard Electrode Potentials
RTIF = 0.0256926 V
(RTIF) In 10 = 0.0591594 V
II I. CONVENTIONS
The galvanic cell i s represented by a diagram. For example, the chemical
cell consisting of an aqueous solution of hydrogen chloride of concentration
1 mol L - I , a platinum-hydrogen electrode with hydrogen at a partial pressure
of 1 atm, and a silver-silver chloride electrode i s represented by t h e diagram
-1
p = 1 atm c = 1 mol L (1.6)
in which the C u ( s ) at either end of the cell represent the terminals of the
cell, which must be of the same material (although not necessarily copper).
A single vertical b a r represents a phase boundary; a dashed vertical bar ( i )
represents a junction between miscible liquids, and double dashed vertical
b a r s (i i ) represent a liquid junction in which t h e liquid junction potential
has been eliminated b y some more or less accurate extrapolation or other
procedure.
The electric potential difference E of a cell written in this way is always
taken a s the potential of the right-hand terminal with respect to that of t h e
left-hand terminal. Thus if the cell i s written down in the opposite direction,
the sign of E must be reversed.
The reaction occurring in the cell is written down in the direction that
corresponds to the flow of electrons in the external circuit from the left-hand
terminal to the right-hand terminal. Thus for the cell ( 1 . 6 ) , the reaction i s
Again, if the cell i s written in the opposite direction, the reaction must also
be reversed.
The potential difference measured becomes of thermodynamic significance
when the current through the external circuit becomes zero, all local charge
transfer equilibria across phase boundaries represented in the cell diagram
(except at electrolyte-electrolyte junctions) and local chemical equilibria
being established. The resulting value of E i s termed the electromotive force
(emf) of the cell, a name that no longer represents the reality of the concept
but which i s so well established that it seems impossible to replace ( t h e same
i s true for the equivalent terms in other languages).
When all species in the cell reaction a r e in their standard states ( p u r e
solids, unit standard concentrations, etc. ) , the measured emf of the cell i s ,
to a good approximation, equal to the standard potential of the reaction in the
cell E O , which i s also given by
4 Chapter 1
where A G O i s the standard Gibbs energy change in the cell reaction and K i s
the thermodynamic equilibrium constant of this reaction. n , the charge num-
b e r of the reaction, i s the number of electrons passing around the external
circuit when one unit of the cell reaction occurs as written [ e . g . , for ( 1.7),
n = 21.
The standard electrode potential of an electrode reaction ~ ~ ( z n ~ + l z n )
i s the standard potential of a reaction in a cell whose left-hand electrode i s
a hydrogen electrode. [Note that this i s the point at which the present
(IUPAC) convention differs from that used in Latimer's book, where the hy-
drogen electrode is on the right of t h e cell in i t s standard format. Clearly,
the standard electrode potentials consequently have the opposite sign . ] For
example, in the IUPAC convention
IV. S T A N D A R D S T A T E S I N SOLUTION
For many phases in galvanic cells the standard state i s the pure element or
pure compound at unit pressure and at the temperature of the experiment,
frequently 25OC. For mixtures that are miscible in all proportions these
standard states may be retained by expressing t h e composition of the mixture
in terms of mole fraction ( = pure component). This means, of course, that
all components in a mixture miscible in all proportions cannot be simultaneous-
ly in their standard states.
The chemical potential of a species A is then written
In this standard state the Gibbs energy of the solvent in aqueous solutions i s
not very different from that in the pure state. Hence the solvent may be re-
garded as being approximately in its standard state, too (if that i s taken as
the pure substance). However, the approximation may in fact be rather poor,
and this difficulty i s avoided by omitting the solvent from the cell reaction in
most of the examples given in this book.
V. S T A N D A R D S T A T E IN T H E GAS PHASE
Up to the present time the generally used standard state pressure ( p O )has
been 1 standard atmosphere ( 101 325 P a ) . During the time that this book was
prepared, a recommendation for a change in this standard state was proposed
[ 2 ] . The new recommendation for the standard state pressure made by IUPAC
is l o 5 Pa ( 1 b a r ) . In view of the fact that all the data collected in this book
a r e referred to the standard pressure of 1 atm, it has been decided to retain
this a s the standard state pressure, at which the standard electrode potential
is specified.
At the same time, it should be noted that the change to the standard
state of 105 Pa would affect very few of the data presented here. The major
effect for most standard potentials would be that the standard hydrogen elec-
trode potential shifts 0.169 mV in the positive direction, that i s , 0.169 mV
would have to be subtracted from the quoted standard electrode potentials
on this account. For cell reactions, that otherwise involve only condensed
6 Chapter 1
phases, this i s the only significant correction. For cell reactions in which a
gas other than hydrogen takes p a r t , there would be a further change that
would be of the same order of magnitude. Since the large majority of the
standard potentials quoted in this book have an uncertainty of 1 mV or greater,
this correction can be neglected.
If a correction to 1 b a r is necessary, it may be calculated from the
Nernst equation [see ( 1.22)] that the change in E0 i s
where A v i s the increase in the number of gaseous molecules as the unit reac-
tion proceeds as written [ e . g . , A v = - 1 for reaction ( 1.7) 1 .
In view of the relation between E0 and the change in Gibbs energy given by
equation ( 1 . 8 ) , it i s evident that the former, like the latter, i s a function of
state and therefore an additive property. This i s the basis of the utility of a
table of standard electrode potentials. If there are n possible electrodes, the
total number of cells that can be made from pairs of them i s clearly :n(n - 1).
The standard emfs of all of these may be readily calculated from a tabulation
of the values for n - 1 cells in which n - 1 electrodes are in t u r n combined
with one particular electrode. The latter i s termed the standard reference
electrode and in aqueous solution (and in other protic solvents) this i s taken
to be the hydrogen electrode.
For example, from the standard electrode potential of the cell
Cu ( A g / ~ ~j j Zn
2+
I Zn / cu EO=-1.562V (1.18)
where it should be noted that in subtracting the cells the cell being subtracted
i s reversed and added, the common hydrogen electrode being canceled out.
It i s , in fact, more precise to note that standard electrode potentials
represent the Gibbs energy change in the cell reaction and to write this com-
bination in the form
2Ag(s) + Zn
2+ + E0 = -1.562 V
(aq) -t 2Ag ( a q ) + Zn(s)
Standard Electrode Potentials 7
However, in adding the reactions it must be noted that they must be written
in such a format that the H g and H+ have the same stoichiometric coefficients
in the two reactions being subtracted. This i s equivalent to saying that the
charge number n i s the same for both reactions. In the example given, n = 2 .
The Gibbs energy changes calculated from these values of E0 with n = 2 ,
using (1.8) are consequently the values associated with a mole of the reaction
a s written.
for an electrolyte A
vfB v
-.
The standard value E0 may be determined from experimental values of
E at various values of m , the molality of HC1 in the cell, by noting that equa-
tion (1.23) may be written
8 Chapter 1
It i s evident that the limit of the quantity EO' (calculable from experiment) as
m -+ 0 is E 0 because y+ -t 1. The extrapolation depends on a judicious plot
of EO' against and appropriate function of m . In favorable cases such a s the
cell ( 1.6), very precise values of E 0 may be obtained.
The quantity EO' i s called the conditional o r formal potential. It may be
regarded as a standard potential for a particular medium in which the activity
coefficients are independent (or approximately so) of the reactant concentra-
tions. If activity coefficients from another source are available, E 0 can be
calculated directly from the Nernst equation in a form like (1.23).
One or other of these procedures may be adapted for different types of
cell without liquid junction. Clearly, it is not essential to use the hydrogen
electrode as one electrode of the experimental cell provided that one of t h e
electrodes being used has a standard electrode potential which is already
known.
Many measurements have also been made in cells which have an explicit
liquid junction ; for example :
The Nernst equation for such a cell may be written in the form
Note that this type of procedure i s best worked out in the procedure for
measurement of pH where assumptions equivalent to ( 1.28) are used.
Finally, it may be remarked that with some electrodes the experimental
difficulties in obtaining reproducible results may lead to errors which are
greater than those resulting from the uncertainties in liquid junction poten-
tials or activity coefficients. Hence the use of cells with liquid junction po-
tentials is often quite acceptable.
Standard Electrode Potentials 9
and the entropy change can be obtained either by measuring the enthalpy of
precipitation [ i . e . , the reverse of reaction ( 1.30) I in a calorimeter or by
measuring K S at several temperatures.
Entropy changes in reactions involving ions may also be obtained from meas-
urements of the temperature coefficient of the standard emf of a galvanic cell.
This follows directly from equations ( 1.8) and ( 1.32) :
where the prime indicates the llabsolute" entropy of these hydrated ions and
aS0(298) i s the standard entropy change in reaction (1.34).
Thus the general definition of the standard entropy of species B i s
All the thermodynamic properties of ions thus are the difference between the
property of a given cation and that of z+ hydrogen ions or the sum of the
property of a given anion and that of z _ hydrogen ions. Owing to the con-
ventional definition of the standard enthalpy and energy of elements, these
quantities are also the change in enthalpy (eriergy) accompanying a real
process like (1.34) or (1.35). However, in the case of the entropy a different
reference state for the element is used and the entropy change in these real
processes must be calculated from
REFERENCES
Hydrogen
*
1 R. D. McCarty , in Hydrogen: Its Technology and Implications, K. E. Cox and K. D. Williamson , eds., Vol. 3, CRC Press, Cleveland,
Ohio, 1975.
2 D. D. Wagman , W. H. Evans , V. B. Parker , R. H. Schumm , I. Halow , S. M. Bailey , K. L. Churney , and R. L. Nuttall , NBS Tables
of Chemical Thermodynamic Properties, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 11, Supplement 2 (1982).
3 V. Goldschmidt , Trans. Faraday Soc., 25, 253 (1929).
4 B. E. Conway , Ionic Hydration in Chemistry and Biophysics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981; (a) pp. 395–404; (b) pp. 551–568; (c) B. E.
Conway , in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, J. O’M. Bockris and B. E. Conway , eds., Vol. 3, Butterworth, London, 1964, Chap.
2.
5 Comptes Rendux , 17th Conf. Union Int. Chim. Pure Appl. (1958); see also Chapter 1 for conventions.
6 J. Giner , J. Electrochem. Soc., 111, 376 (1964).
7 M. Fleischmann and J. N. Hiddlestone , J. Sei. Instrum. Ser. 2, 1, 667 (1968).
8 J. V. Dobson , J. Electroanal. Chem., 35, 129 (1972).
9 M. Chemla , in Encyclopedia of the Electrochemistry of the Elements, A. J. Bard , ed., Vol. 9A, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp.
383–413.
10 R. G. Bates , The Principles of pH: Theory and Practice, Wiley, New York, 1973.
11 H. Kita , in Encyclopedia of the Electrochemistry of the Elements, A. J. Bard , ed., Vol. 9A, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp.
413–478.
12 D. R. Stull and H. Prophet , JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Second Edition, Nat. Bur. Stand. Publ. NBS-37, U.S. Government
Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1970.
13 D. R. Rosseinsky , Chem. Rev., 65, 467 (1965).
14 F. G. Basolo and R. G. Pearson , Mechanisms of Inorganic Reactions, Wiley, New York, 1958, pp. 48–65.
15 I. Kolthoff , Recl. Trav. Chim., 49, 401 (1930); E. Abel , E. Bratu , and O. Redlich , Z. Phys. Chem., A 170, 153 (1934); A 173, 353
(1935); G. N. Lewis and F. G. Doody , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 55, 3504 (1933); E. Lange , Z. Elektrochem , 44, 43 (1938).
16 B. E. Conway , Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A 247, 400 (1958).
17 B. E. Conway , J. Solut. Chem., 7, 721 (1978).
Oxygen
*
1 F. A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson , Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972, p. 409.
2 A. G. Streng , Chern. Rev., 63, 607 (1963).
3 D. D. Wagman et al., Natl. Bur. Stand. Tech. Note 270–273, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1968.
4 B. E. Conway , Electrochemical Data, Elsevier, New York, 1952, p. 196.
5 A. J. de Béthune and N. A. Swendeman Loud, Standard Aqueous Electrode Potentials and Temperature Coefficients at 25°C,
Hampel, Skokie, III., 1964.
6 J. P. Hoare , The Electrochemistry of Oxygen, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1968, p. 81.
7 J. P. Hoare , in Encyclopedia of the Electrochemistry of the Elements, A. J. Bard , ed., Vol. 2, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1974, p.
191.
8 J. P. Hoare , J. Phys. Chem., 79, 2175 (1975).
9 D. M. H. Kern , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76, 4208 (1954).
10 V. I. Tikhomirova , V. I. Luk’yanycheva , and V. S. Bagotskii , Elektrokhimiya, 1, 645 (1965).
11 E. Yeager , E. P. Krause , and K. V. Rao , Electrochim. Acta, 9, 1057 (1964).
12 V. S. Bagotskii and D. L. Motov , Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 71, 501 (1950).
13 I. E. Yablokova and V. S. Bagotskii , Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 85, 599 (1952).
14 R. J. Bowen , H. B. Urbach , and J. H. Harrison , Nature, 213, 592 (1967).
15 C. Fabyan, Monatsh . Chem., 106, 513 (1975).
16 S. Gordon et al., Discuss. Faraday Soc., 36, 193 (1963).
17 B. L. Gall and L. M. Dorfman , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 2199 (1969).
18 E. Haydon and J. J. McGavey , J. Phys. Chem., 71, 1472 (1967).
19 V. R. Landi and L. J. Heidt , J. Phys. Chem., 73, 2361 (1969).
20 D. Behar , G. Czapski , J. Rabani , L. M. Dorfman , and H. A. Schwarz , J. Phys. Chem., 74, 3209 (1970).
21 B. H. J. Bielski and A. O. Allen , J. Phys. Chem., 81, 1048 (1977).
21a B. H. J. Bielski , Photochem. Photobiol., 28, 645 (1978).
21b J. A. Fee , Metal Ions Biol. Syst., 2, 209 (1980).
22 J. A. Fee and J. S. Valentine , in Superoxide and Superoxide Dismutases, A. M. Michelson , J. M. McCord , and I. Ridovich , eds.,
Academic Press, New York, 1977, p. 19.
23 J. Divisek and B. Kastening , J. Electroanal. Chem., 65, 603 (1975).
24 J. Chevalet , F. Rouelle , L. Gierst , and J. P. Lambert , J. Electroanal. Chem., 39, 201 (1972).
25 Y. A. Ilan , G. Czapski , and D. Meisel , Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 430, 209 (1976); Israel J. Chem., 12, 891 (1974).
26 G. Czapski , Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 22, 171 (1971).
27 R. J. Gillespie and J. Passmore , Acc. Chem. Res., 4, 413 (1971).
28 A. Hickling and S. Hill , Trans. Faraday Soc., 46, 557 (1950).
29 G. Stein , J. Chem. Phys., 42, 2986 (1965).
30 K. H. Heckner and R. Lansberg , Z. Phys. Chem., 230, 63 (1965).
31 V. M. Berdnikov and N. M. Bazhin , Zh. Fiz. Khim., 44, 712 (1970).
32 C. S. Foote , Acc. Chem. Res., 1, 104 (1968).
33 S. N. Foner and R. L. Hudson , J. Chem. Phys., 25, 601 (1956).
34 A. U. Khan and M. Kasha , J. Chem. Phys., 39, 2105 (1963).
35 E. J. Corey and W. C. Taylor , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 3881 (1964).
36 D. Pierre , Adv. Radiat. Res. Phys. Chem., 1, 217 (1973).
The Halogens
1 W. M. Latimer , J. Am. Chem . Soc., 48, 2868 (1926).
2 G. Milazzo and S. Cavoli , Tables of Standard Electrode Potentials, Wiley, New York, 1978.
3 A. J. de Bethune and N. A. Swendeman Loud , “Table of Standard Aqueous Electrodes Potentials and Temperature Coefficients at
25°C,” in Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry, C. A. Hampel , ed., Reinhold, New York, 1964.
4 M. Pourbaix , ed., Atlas d'équilibres électrochimiques à 25°C, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1963.
1 T. Mussini and P. Longhi , J. Electrochem . Soc, 114, 340 (1967); J. Chem. Eng. Data, 13, 458 (1968); J. Electroanal . Chem., 20,
411 (1969); A. J. Bard , ed., Encyclopedia of the Electrochemistry of the Elements, Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1973, p. 2.
2 T. Naito , Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi , 65, 749 (1962).
3 N. V. Troitskaya , K. P. Mishchenko , and I. E. Flis , Zh. Fiz. Khim., 33, 1614 (1959).
4 A. J. Bard , ed., Encyclopedia of the Electrochemistry of the Elements, Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1973, p. 50.
1 E. H. Appelman , J. Am . Chem. Soc., 90, 1900 (1968); Inorg. Chem., 8, 223 (1969).
2 G. Jones and S. Baeckstrom , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 56, 1517, 1524 (1934).
3 T. Mussini and G. Faita , Ric. Sci., 36, 175 (1966).
4 T. Mussini and G. Faita , in Encyclopedia of the Electrochemistry of the Elements, A. J. Bard , ed., Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York,
1973, pp. 65-68.
5 H. A. Liebhafsky , J. Am . Chem. Soc, 56, 1500 (1934).
1 W. M. Latimer , Oxidation Potentials, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, New York, 1952.
2 P. G. Desideri , L. Lepri , and D. Heimler , in Encyclopedia of the Electrochemistry of the Elements, A. J. Bard , ed., Vol. 1, Marcel
Dekker, New York, 1973.
3 A. F. VorobTev , A. F. Broier , and S. M. Skuratov , Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 173, 385 (1967).
4 A. I. Popov , in Halogen Chemistry, V. Gutman , ed., Vol. I, Academic Press, New York, 1967.
5 G. Horiguchi and H. Hagesawa , Bull. Inst. Phys. Chem. Res. (Tokyo), 22, 661 (1943).
6 R. P. Bell and F. Gelles , J. Chem . Soc, 2734 (1951).
7 T. L. Allen and R. M. Keefer , J. Am . Chem. Soc, 77, 2957 (1955).
8 J. C. McCoubrey , Trans. Faraday Soc, 51, 743 (1955).
9 J. H. Faull , J. Am . Chem. Soc, 56, 522 (1934).
10 D. L. Cason and H. N. Neumann , J. Am . Chem. Soc, 83, 1822 (1961).
11 L. G. Cole and G. W. Eiverum , J. Chem . Phys., 20, 1543 (1952).
12 R. H. Lamoreaux and W. F. Giauque , J. Phys . Chem., 73, 755 (1969).
13 V. K. LaMer and M. H. Lewinsohn , J. Phys . Chem., 38, 171 (1934).
14 D. M. Yost and W. E. Stone , J. Am . Chem. Soc, 55, 1889 (1933).
15 L. Kovach , Z. Phys . Chem., 80, 107 (1912).
16 D. F. Bowersox , E. A. Butler , and E. H. Swift , Anal. Chem., 28, 221 (1956).
17 C. A. Kraus and H. C. Parker , J. Am . Chem. Soc., 44, 2429 (1922).
18 W. O. Lundberg , C. S. Vestling , and J. E. Ahlberg , J. Am . Chem. Soc, 59, 264 (1937).
19 R. D. Spitz and H. A. Liefbafsky , J. Electrochem . Soc., 122, 363 (1975).
20 C. E. Crouthamel , A. M. Hayes , and D. S. Martin , J. Am . Chem. Soc, 73, 82 (1951).
21 G. J. Buist , W. C. P. Hipperson , and J. D. Lewis , J. Chem . Soc. A, 307 (1969).
22 M. G. Brown , Potential-pH diagrams for iodine compounds, Compt. Rend. 7th Meet, du CITCE (Lindau, 1955), Butterworth,
London, 1957, pp. 244-256.
23 E. E. Mercer and T. Farrar , Can. J. Chem., 46, 2679 (1968).
1 G. L. Johnson , R. F. Leiniger , and E. Segrè , J. Chem . Phys., 17, 1 (1949).
2 E. Kroo , I. Dudova , and V. A. Khalkin , Magy, Kèm. Foly., 82, 1 (1976).
3 I. Dreyer , R. Dreyer , Yu. V. Norseev , and V. A. Chalkin , Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett., 33, 291 (1978).
4 W. M. Latimer , Oxidation Potentials, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, New York, 1952.
5 E. H. Appelmann , J. Am . Chem. Soc., 83, 805 (1961).
6 E. H. Appelmann , J. Phys . Chem., 65, 325 (1961).
7 L. Stein , in Halogen Chemistry, V. Gutman , ed., Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, 1967, p. 191.
Inert Cases*
1 B. Weinstock , E. E. Weaver , and C. P. Knop , Inorg. Chem., 5, 2189 (1966).
2 G. Stein and P. Plurien , in Noble Gas Compounds, H. H. Heyman , ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1963, p. 147.
3 S. R. Gunn and S. M. Williamson , Science, 140, 177 (1963).
4 P. A. G. O’Hare , G. K. Johnson , and E. H. Appleman , Inorg. Chem., 9, 332 (1970).
4a G. K. Johnson , J. Chem. Thermodyn., 9, 835 (1977).
5 V. I. Pepekin , Yu. A. Lebedev , and A. Ya . Apin, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 43, 1564 (1969).
6 L. Stein , Yale Sci. Mag., 44(8), 2 (1970).
7 H. J. Svec and G. D. Flesch , Science, 142, 954 (1963).
8 J. Berkowitz , W. A. Chupka , P. M. Guyoi , J. H. Holloway , and R. Spohr , J. Phys. Chem., 75, 1461 (1971).
9 J. F. Liebman , in Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry:Herbert H. Hyman Memorial Volume, J. J. Katz and I. Shift , eds., Pergamon
Press, Oxford, 1976, p. 155.
10 A. V. Grosse , A. D. Kirshenbaum , A. G. Streng , and L. V. Streng , Science, 139, 1047 (1963).
11 F. Schemer , J. G. Malm , and J. C. Hindeman , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 25 (1965).
12 V. N. Prusakoc and V. B. Sokolov , Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 45, 1673 (1971).
13 B. Frlec and J. H. Holloway , J. Chem. Soc. Commun., 11, 370 (1973).
14 R. J. Gillespie and R. J. Schrobilgen , Inorg. Chem., 15, 22 (1976).
15 J. H. Holloway , G. J. Schrobilgen , S. Bukshpan , W. Hilbrants , and H. DeWaard , J. Chem. Phys., 66, 2627 (1977).
16 S. R. Gunn , J. Phys. Chem., 71, 2934 (1967).
17 S. R. Gunn , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 5924 (1966).
18 P. A. Sessa and H. A. McGee Jr , J. Phys. Chem., 73, 2078 (1969).
19 H. H. Claassen , G. L. Goodman , J. G. Malm , and F. Schreiner , J. Chem. Phys., 42, 1229 (1965).
20 N. Bartlett , Proc. Chem. Soc., 218(1962).
21 H. H. Hyman , ed., Noble Gas Compounds, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1963, pp. 47, 106.
22 H. H. Claassen , H. Selig , and J. G. Malm , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 3593 (1962).
23 S. Maricic and Z. Weksli , Croat. Chem. Acta, 34, 189, 191 (1962).
24 J. G. Malm and C. L. Chernick , Inorg. Synth., 8, 254 (1967).
25 L. V. Streng and A. G. Streng , Inorg. Chem., 4, 1370 (1965).
26 J. H. Holloway , Chem. Commun., 22 (1966).
27 S. M. Williamson , Inorg. Syn., 11, 147 (1968).
28 A. V. Nikolaev , A. S. Nazarov , A. A. Opalovskii , and A. F. Trippel , Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 186, 1331 (1969).
29 H. Meinert and S. Ruediger , Z. Chem., 9, 239 (1967).
30 P. Allamagny , M. Langignard , and P. Dognin , C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. C., 266, 711 (1968).
31 S. Siegl and E. Gebert , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85, 240 (1963).
32 F. Sladky , Angew. Chem., 81, 330 (1969).
33 N. Bartlett , M. Wechsberg , F. O. Sladky , P. A. Vulliner , G. R. Jones , and R. D. Burbank , Chem. Commun., 703 (1969).
34 N. Bartlett and F. O. Sladky , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 5316 (1968).
35 N. Bartlett , B. Zemva , and L. Graham , J. Fluorine Chem., 7, 301 (1976).
36 H. H. Hyman and L. A. Quarterman , Noble Gas Compounds, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1963, p. 275.
37 A. Iskraut , R. Taubenest , and E. Schumacher , Chimia, 18, 188 (1964).
38 H. Meinert , G. Kauschka , and S. Ruediger , Z. Chem., 7, 111 (1967).
39 I. Sheft , T. M. Spittler , and F. H. Martin , Science, 145, 701 (1967).
40 H. Selig , Science, 144, 537 (1964).
41 K. E. Pullen and G. H. Cady , Inorg. Chem., 6, 2267 (1967).
42 G. J. Moody and H. Selig , J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 28, 2429 (1966).
43 G. J. Moody and H. Selig , Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett., 2, 319 (1966).
44 J. G. Malm , F. Schreiner , and D. W. Osborne , Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett., 1, 97 (1965).
45 D. F. Smith , Science, 140, 899 (1963).
46 H. Selig , Inorg. Chem., 5, 183 (1966).
47 F. Schreiner , G. N. McDonald , and C. L. Chernick , J. Phys. Chem., 72, 1162 (1968).
48 J. F. Huston , J. Phys. Chem., 45, 3334 (1967).
49 J. F. Huston , Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett., 4, 29 (1968).
50 J. Jortner , E. G. Wilson , and S. A. Rice , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85, 814 (1963).
51 F. Schreiner , D. W. Osborne , J. G. Malm , and G. McDonald , J. Chem. Phys., 51, 4838 (1969).
52 S. Siegel and E. Gebert , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85, 240 (1963).
53 P. A. Agron , C. K. Johnson , and H. A. Levy , Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett., 1, 145 (1965).
54 D. W. Osborne , F. Schreiner , H. E. Flatow , and J. G. Malm , J. Chem. Phys., 57, 3401 (1972).
55 D. W. Osborne , H. E. Flatow , and J. G. Malm , J. Chem. Phys., 57, 4670 (1972).
56 G. K. Johnson , J. G. Malm , and W. N. Hubbard , J. Chem. Thermodyn., 4, 879 (1972).
57 S. A. Kudchadker and A. P. Kudchadker , Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A., 73 (5), 261 (1971).
58 H. H. Claassen , The Noble Gases, Heath, Boston, 1966, p. 51.
59 E. H. Appelman and J. G. Malm , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 2297 (1964).
60 I. Feher and M. Semptey , Magy. Kern. Foly., 76, 954 (1963).
61 E. H. Appelman , Inorg. Chem., 6, 1268 (1967).
62 I. S. Kirin , V. K. Isupov , V. I. Tikhonov , N. V. Ivannikova , Yu. K. Gusev , and G. G. Selikhov , Zh. Neorg. Khim., 12, 1088 (1967).
63 E. H. Appelman , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 1900 (1968).
64 E. J. Appelman , Inorg. Chem., 6, 1305 (1967).
65 M. T. Beck and L. Dozsa , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 5713 (1967).
66 A. V. Nikolaev , A. A. Opalovskii , and A. S. Nazarov , Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 181, 361 (1968).
67 A. A. Goncharov , Yu. N. Kozlov, and A. P. Purmal , Zh. Fiz. Khim., 53, 2685 (1979).
67a A. A. Goncharov , Yu. N. Kozlov , and A. P. Purmal , Zh. Fiz. Khim., 55, 1607 (1981).
67b S. A. Lempert , D. B. Lempert , N. N. Aleinikov , and P. K. Agasyan , J. Gen. Chem. USSR, 49, 1907 (1979).
68 J. G. Malm and E. H. Appelman , Atom. Energy Rev., 7, 3 (1969).
69 V. D. Klimov , V. D. Prusakov , and V. B. Sokolov , Radiochimya, 13, 725 (1971).
70 F. B. Dudley , G. Gard , and G. H. Cady , Inorg. Chem., 2, 228 (1963).
71 D. F. Smith , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85, 816 (1963).
72 S. M. Williamson and C. W. Koch , Science, 139, 1046 (1963).
73 B. Jaselskis , T. M. Spittler , and J. L. Huston , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 2149 (1966).
74 A. D. Kirshenbaum and A. B. Grosse , Science, 142, 580 (1963).
75 E. H. Appelman and J. G. Malm , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 2141 (1964).
76 M. H. Studier and J. L. Huston , J. Phys. Chem., 71, 457 (1967).
77 B. Jaselskis and J. P. Warriner , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 210 (1969).
78 B. Jaselskis and S. Vas , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 2078 (1964).
79 H. J. Rhodes and M. I. Blake , J. Pharm. Sci., 56, 1352 (1967).
80 B. Jaselskis , T. M. Spittler , and J. L. Huston , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 2770 (1967).
81 S. R. Gunn , in Noble Gas Compounds, H. H. Hyman , ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1963, p. 149.
82 G. Narajan , Bull. Soc. Chim. Beiges, 73, 665 (1964).
83 R. E. Powell and W. M. Latimer , J. Chem. Phys., 19, 1139 (1951).
84 D. D. Wagman , W. H. Evans , V. B. Parker , I. Halow , S. M. Bailey , and R. H. Schumm , Natl. Bur. Stand. Tech. Note 270–3, U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1968.
84a CODATA , Recommended Key Values for Thermodynamics, 1975; CODATA Bulletin, 17 (1976).
85 J. G. Malm , B. D. Holt , and R. W. Bane , in Noble Gas Compounds, H. H. Hyman , ed., Univeristy of Chicago Press, Chicago,
1963, p. 167.
86 E. H. Appelman and J. G. Malm , Preparative Inorganic Reactions, Vol. 2, Interscience, New York, 1965, p. 348.
87 E. H. Appelman , Inorg. Synth., 9, 205 (1968).
88 D. M. Gruen , in Noble Gas Compounds, H. H. Hyman , ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1963, p. 174.
89 J. L. Huston , M. H. Studier , and E. N. Sloth , Science, 143, 1161 (1964).
90 J. L. Peterson , H. H. Claassen , and E. H. Appelman , Inorg. Chem., 9, 619 (1970).
91 E. H. Appelman and M. Anbar , Inorg. Chem., 4, 1066 (1965).
92 R. W. Bane , Analyst, 90, 756 (1965).
93 S. R. Gunn , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 2290 (1965).
93a R. S. McDowell and B. Asprey , J. Chem. Phys., 57, 3062 (1972).
94 P. R. Fields , L. Stein , and M. H. Zirkin , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 4164 (1962).
95 M. W. Hazeltine and H. C. Moser , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 2497 (1967).
96 K. Flohr and E. H. Appelman , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 3584 (1968).
97 L. Stein , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 5396 (1969).
98 L. Stein , in Halogen Chemistry, V. Gutmann , ed., Vol. 1, Academic Press, London, 1967, pp. 133–224.
99 P. A. G. O'Hare and W. N. Hubbard , J. Phys. Chem., 69, 4358 (1965).
100 Yu. N. Matyushin , T. S. Kon'kova , E. A. Miroshnichenko , V. K. Isupov , N. N. Aleinikov , B. L. Korsunskii , F. I. Dubovitskii , and
Yu. A. Lebedev, Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR (English), 239, 401 (1978).