Professional Documents
Culture Documents
)
© 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 0-415-40822-9
ABSTRACT: The objective of this paper is to show the modeling of filtration and stress-strain processes, during
the building of dam and accumulation in naturally loaded structure, using the finite elements method. Analyzed
region is modeled by the 3D finite elements mesh, whereas real geometry and disposition of different geological
environments are completely respected. Through modeling of filtration, the fields of potential and fluid velocity are
obtained for determined boundary conditions and for accepted material properties as well as for field of filtra-
tion forces as a measure of interaction between fluid and soil. Achieved filtration forces are used as input for stress-
strain analysis. The elasto-plastic material model with critical state is applied for stress-strain analysis. The paper
presents developed methodology which gives a very good evaluation of global safety of structure as well as a pos-
sibility of the critical zones localization concerning static and filtration stability shown in analysis of FR
Macedonian St. Petka dam.
721
The governing differential equations of incom- The incremental iterative equilibrium equation of
pressible fluid flow through a porous medium of vari- finite element, which can be derived from principle of
able permeability have the following form, Desai virtual work (9), has the following form:
(1984),
(10)
(3)
where:
where Q ⫽ volume source/sink and S ⫽ specific
storage. For the case of stationary fluid flow right side (11)
of Equation (3) is equal to zero.
The finite element equation of balance is
is the stiffness matrix and
(4)
(12)
where S is the profusion matrix
(7)
For the case of small strains, total strains are
When the procedure converge, we can calculate the
gradient of potential (2), Darcy’s velocity (3) and (14)
flow quantity in each node of the model using the
potential, where t⫹⌬tB(i⫺1) is strain-displacement matrix. The total
displacements are
(8)
(15)
Flow quantity on a contour is equal to the algebraic
sum of flows in nodes inside that contour. In the implicit numerical procedure for stress calcula-
tion we start with the assumption that the stress-strain
3 MODELING OF STRESS–STRAIN state is known at a material point and time t. The known
PROCESSES quatities are: stress t, strain t, plastic strain tp at time
t, and total strain t⫹⌬t at the end of load step. The task
Stress-strain processes are analyzed by elasto-plastic within the stress integration is to determine stress t⫹⌬t
material model with the concept of critical state, and plastic strain t⫹⌬t at the end of time steps.
Kojic & Bathe (2005). This analysis can give field of The basic steps in concept of the implicit stress
displacement, total and plastic strains, stress and integration are as follows:
other relevant internal variables for given initial and 1. Express all unknown variables in terms of one gov-
boundary conditions. erning parameter ⌬e mp (increment of the mean plastic
The principle of virtual work has the following strain).
form: 2. Solve the governing equation (yield function)
f(⌬emp ) ⫽ 0
(9) 3. Calculate the unknown variables using ⌬em p
the
solution of the governing equation.
722
4 COMPLEX MODEL OF FILTRATION AND where its filtration coefficient has been varied within
STRESS-STRAIN PROCESSES a 0.5–3 Lu range.
723
allowed gradients. It should be noted that water losses forces are increased linearly until the dead weight
and stability are not independent, because forbidden load is constant.
filtration velocities can also produce progressive In the second case, safety factor is determined with
increase of water discharge, what would result in pro- regards to all loads at the same time (dead weight,
gressive increase of water losses, thus endangering hydrostatic water pressure and filtration forces). After
dam stability. determining initial stresses (step 1) and achieving nom-
Filtration stability at critical locations is investi- inal values for pressure and filtration forces (step 2), all
gated, that is, at contacts of various mediums, within loads are increased linearly.
a zone where underground water erupt, and at down-
stream under the dam. With regards to this, filtration
stability is defined by a safety factor for maximum 7 THE RESULTS OF FILTRATION
output gradients in relation to allowed ones (Fs ⫽
Idop/Imax; where Idop ⫽ allowed output gradient, Imax ⫽ The 3D sections and views are selected to describe
maximum output gradient). filtration analysis around the dam and through sur-
Criterions for allowed gradients are formed, through rounding rock mass. They show fields of potential,
application of results of numerous and of many years
investigations of local filtration deformation appear-
ance and of porous environment filtration collapse. In
regards of previous, allowed gradients criterions are
spatial variables, because they generally increase when
permeability decreases.
724
velocity and gradients. Analyses are performed in 8 THE RESULTS OF STABILITY ANALYSIS
order to identify the influence of injection curtain
water permability. The total flow dependence of The calculation of the stress field is firstly done, where
the filtration coefficient for injection curtain is the load of the dead weigh of soil and dam is used.
determined. Safety factor of the whole structure for the first cri-
The results of analyses of filtration for curtain terion (Fig. 6) is 4. With further load increase non-
(kcurtain ⫽ 1 Lu) are shown on Figures 2–5 (field of stability occurred. Field of stress, in this case, is shown
potential, velocities and gradients). on Figure 6, and field of total displacement on Figure 7.
The flow dependence of the filtration coefficient Safety factor of the whole structure for second cri-
around dam and through the surrounding rock mass terion (Fig. 8) is 2. With further load increase non-
ranges from 33 l/s (for cases without curtain) to 7.3 l/s stability occurred. Field of stress, in this case, is shown
(for case with curtain of 1 Lu). on Figure 8 and field of displacement in x direction
(direction of river flow) on Figure 9.
Figure 5. Field of gradient (vertical section, decreased 8 Figure 7. Field of total displacement at the moment of the
times in palette). crash of structure (case 1).
725
9 CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
726