Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Allergic Disease - Latex-Fruit Syndrome Practice Guidance Toolkit
Allergic Disease - Latex-Fruit Syndrome Practice Guidance Toolkit
Allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction that is frequently seen in
health care workers and workers in the rubber industry (1). Individuals affected can develop symptoms
from direct contact with latex products; such as gloves, tubing or other rubber products; or by inhalation of
airborne NRL allergens in powder form, for example from latex gloves.
Latex-fruit syndrome is an allergic condition linked to NRL allergy (1). Affected individuals experience
allergic reactions on the ingestion of one or more plant foods that cross-react to NRL. Latex allergy is
normally a precursor; however, some individuals with latex-fruit syndrome are merely latex sensitized and
do not show clinical evidence of latex allergy. These reactions are due to the structural similarity
(homology) between certain NRL proteins and those found in plant foods. Since the foods involved are
primarily fruits, these cross-reactions between NRL and foods are termed latex-fruit syndrome, although
a large number of other plant foods have also been reported to provoke reactions.
Nutrition Assessment
The nutrition assessment of an individual with latex-fruit syndrome may include the following parameters in
the table below using NCP terminology.
Anthropometric Measurements
Waist As above
Circumference
Food/Nutrition-related History
Energy Needs
» Estimated energy needs
Macronutrient Needs
» Estimated fat needs
» Estimated protein needs
» Estimated carbohydrate needs
» Estimated fibre needs
Estimated Fluid Needs
Micronutrient Needs
» Estimated vitamin needs
» Estimated mineral needs
See International Dietary Reference Values Collection.
Client History
Personal History
» Personal data
Age
» Patient/Client/Family Medical/Health History
Patient/client or family nutrition-oriented medical/health history (atopy, changes
in frequency of allergic reactions; history of latex allergy; pollen allergy)
Nutrition Diagnosis
Sample PES Statements (problem, etiology, signs and symptoms using some NCP terminology)
This statement is provided as an example only, and will not apply to all individuals:
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit regarding which foods to avoid for latex-food allergy, as
evidenced by having three allergic reactions caused by eating avocado in the last month.
Nutrition Intervention
Goals
Goals for an individual with latex-fruit allergy should be determined in conjunction with the client and
should be specific to the individual. Goals that are set should be time-sensitive, easily measured and
achievable by the nutrition intervention. Both short-term and long-term goals may be set. Examples of
short- and long-term goals include:
to avoid foods that have caused allergic reactions in the past, as soon as possible, and by the
next scheduled appointment (in one month)
to eat a healthy balanced diet by avoiding only the foods that have caused allergic reactions in the
past.
This Summary of Recommendations and Evidence synthesizes the Key Practice Point(s) for each
Practice Question (PQ) in this Knowledge Pathway. It is organized by the Nutrition Care Process and
contains statements or recommendations that have been graded using either the PEN or GRADE
approaches to critical appraisal. For additional information on the evidence and references, see the PQs in
this Knowledge Pathway.
Content
INTERVENTION
1. Latex (Natural Rubber (NRL) and Fruit- (LFS)) Allergy
Natural Rubber Latex and Latex-Fruit Syndrome Allergies
Foods Associated with LFS/NRL
Diagnosis of Latex Allergy
When taking an allergy-focused diet and nutrition history, if latex allergy is suspected it is important to
ask whether allergic reactions to foods have occurred or are suspected. Similarly, since reactions to
specific plant foods may precede a latex allergy, inquiries should be made about previous exposure to
latex and relevant allergy tests/interpretations should be obtained.
{grade_c}
Remarks
Allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) is an IgE antibody-mediated hypersensitivity reaction that is
frequently seen in health care workers and workers in the rubber industry. Allergic symptoms when eating
plant foods is frequently reported by up to 70% of individuals with a latex allergy, referred to as latex-fruit
syndrome (LFS). Up to 50% of individuals with LFS experience anaphylaxis reactions.
Most individuals develop symptoms to latex before the manifestation of food allergy; however, some
individuals with LFS are sensitized to latex (have a positive test to latex but no clinical signs) and will
demonstrate food allergy without clinical symptoms of latex allergy.
Food avoidance should be individualized, as not all individuals with latex-fruit syndrome will react to all
cross-reacting foods.
Evidence Summary
Toggle content
Remarks
Latex allergens include both class 1 and class 2 allergens including profilin and lipid transfer protein (LTP)
allergens. The allergens that are most usually involved in cross-reactions in latex-sensitized individuals are
called profilins, which are present in all latex-cross-reacting foods. Other plant food allergens such as LTP
allergens can also provoke reactions to plant foods, either with or without the involvement of pollen
antibodies.
See Additional Content: Food Allergies - Oral Allergy Syndrome: Pollen-food Syndrome Knowledge
Pathway.
It is therefore important that advice given about foods to be avoided should be based primarily on the
clinical history of reported symptoms. In addition, since there are a significant number of similar common
allergic proteins in all plant foods, including latex, it is important to determine whether reported reactions
to a food are due to cross-reactivity with NRL or indicate a primary allergy to that food. Individuals who are
sensitized to latex may have positive SPT or specific IgE tests to a large number of foods but only need to
avoid those which are reported to have provoked symptoms. The same is true for other cross-reactive food
allergies such as pollen-food syndrome.
Evidence Summary
Toggle content
Remarks
See Additional Content: Food Allergies - Oral Allergy Syndrome: Pollen-food Syndrome Knowledge
Pathway.
It has been shown that it is possible to reduce latex glove usage by food handlers through the use of
education programs. This action would potentially be beneficial not only to the latex-allergic individual
buying food, but also protect the food handler from developing latex allergy. The risk of using other types of
gloves is that the food handler could still develop a delayed allergic reaction to polyvinyl chloride (PVC)
gloves, although the risk to the consumer would be negligible. As well, alternative latex-free gloves may
not provide reliable barrier protection.
Evidence Summary
Toggle content
Remarks
The main allergens on the outside of a latex glove are Hev b 1 and Hev b 3, which do not contain any Hev
b 8. Individuals who are monosensitized to Hev b 8 are unlikely to react to NRL gloves, whereas individuals
with a primary latex allergy who are sensitized to Hev b 1 and Hev b 3 are more likely to react to NRL
gloves used by food handlers.
Type here
Education materials for clients, practice guidelines and other professional tools and resources can be
found under the Related Tools & Resources tab. Use the Audience, Country and Language sort tabs to
narrow your search.
Additional Information
References
1. Wagner S, Breiteneder H. The latex-fruit syndrome. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002 Nov;30
(Pt6):935-40. Abstract available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12440950
This toolkit provides an overview of practice recommendations and other relevant information contained in
Practice Questions and Backgrounds in PEN® Knowledge Pathways. To view the key practice points and
other relevant information (including the associated references) see the Food Allergies - Latex-Food
Syndrome Knowledge Pathway.
In addition, the source of the NCPT used in this toolkit is: The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. eNCPT:
Nutrition Terminology Reference Manual. 2018. Available from: Nutrition Care Process and Terminology
Web Links.
Disclaimer: The information included on this website is based on the best available evidence at the time of writing. It
has been independently researched, written and reviewed by dietitians and other health professionals using established
protocols, to assist practitioners to make practice decisions. It should be used to complement, not replace, sound clinical
judgment. While every effort is made to ensure information contained on this website is accurate and up-to-date, errors
may occasionally occur. Neither Dietitians of Canada nor any dietetic associations contributing to or licensing the content
in PEN: Practice-based Evidence in Nutrition® assumes any responsibility or liability arising from any error in or omission
of information, or from the use of any information or advice contained within this website or provided by your health care
professional. Because PEN® content is updated regularly, printed web pages or PDF documents may become obsolete.
PEN® users should ensure that they are referring to the most recent version available. The PEN® website may contain
links to other external websites that do not fall under the pennutrition.com domain. Pennutrition.com is not responsible for
the privacy practices or the content of such external websites. Neither Dietitians of Canada nor any dietetic associations
contributing to or licensing the content in PEN® endorses the content, products or services on other websites. All PEN®
authors and reviewers are required to complete a Declaration of Affiliations and Interests Form that is kept on file with
© Dietitians of Canada 2005-21. All rights reserved. While individual copies of documents may be reproduced for the
convenience of the licensed subscriber according to the end user license, distribution to non subscribers or
reproduction of multiple copies of PEN content is strictly prohibited without prior written permission. Licensed
subscribers may download, duplicate and distribute copies of the PEN branded client handouts for educational use with
their own clients. Institutions must have sufficient numbers of site licenses in order to make multiple copies to meet client
needs. The PEN website may also contain information which is copyrighted by others; multiple copies of these
documents may not be reproduced without the prior written permission of the copyright holder.