Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article 1156-1162
Article 1156-1162
(2) An active subject (called creditor or obligee) or the - If any of these elements is absent, the complaint becomes
person who is entitled to demand the fulfillment of the vulnerable to a motion to dismiss on the ground of failure
obligation; he who has a right; to state a cause of action.
(3) Object or prestation (subject matter of the obligation) or - A cause of action only arises when the last element
the con- duct required to be observed by the debtor occurs, i.e., at the moment a right has been transgressed.
-It may consist in giving, doing, or not doing. Without the An obligation on the part of a person cannot exist without a
prestation, there is nothing to perform. In bilateral corresponding right existing in favor of another, and vice-
obligations (see Art. 1191.), the parties are reciprocally versa, for every right enjoyed by a person, there is a
debtors and creditors; and corresponding obligation on the part of another to respect
such right.
Cause of action based upon a written contract. There are thus two kinds of personal obligation:
-be brought within 10 years from the time the right of 1. Positive personal obligation or obligation to do
action accrues or to render service (see Art. 1167.); and
-period of prescription commences from the occurrence of 2. Negative personal obligation or obligation not
the breach. to do (which naturally includes obligations “not to
give”). (see Art. 1168.)
Injury, damage, and damages distinguished.
ART. 1157. Obligations arise from:
Injury Damage Damages
Illegal invasion Wrongful act or denote the sum (1) Law;
of a right omission which of money
causes loss or recoverable as (2) Contracts;
harm to another amends for the
which results wrongful act or (3) Quasi-contracts;
from injury omission;
(4) Acts or omissions punished by law; and
(1) Binding force. — Obligations arising from contracts -not properly a contract at all
are governed primarily by the agreement of the contracting
parties. Once perfected, valid contracts have the force of -no consent
law between the parties who are bound to comply therewith
in good faith, and neither one may without the consent of Ex.
the other, renege therefrom.
When a party benefited at the expense of another not liable
(2) Requirements of a valid contract. — As a source of to the latter.
obligation, a contract must be valid and enforceable. A
contract is valid if it is not contrary to law, morals, good Facts: By virtue of an agreement between X and Y, X
customs, public order, and public policy. It is invalid or assisted Y in improving a large tract of land which was
void if it is contrary to law, morals, good customs, public later declared by the court as belonging to C.
order, or public policy.
Issue: Has X the right to be reimbursed by Z for X’s
(3) Where contract requires approval by the services and expenses on the ground that the improvements
government. — Where a contract is required to be verified are being used and enjoyed by Z?
and approved by the government before it can take effect
such contract becomes the law between the contracting Held: No. From the language of Article 2142, it is obvious
parties only when approved, and where there is nothing in that a presumed quasi-contract cannot emerge as against
it which is contrary to law, etc., its validity must be one party when the subject matter thereof is already
sustained. covered by an existing contract with another party. X’s
cause of action should be against Y who, in turn, may seek
(4) Compliance in good faith. — It means compliance or relief against Z. (Cruz vs. J.M. Tuazon Co., Inc., supra.)
performance in accordance with the stipulations or terms of
the contract or agreement.9 Good faith and fair dealing Kinds of Quasi Contracts
must be observed to prevent one party from taking unfair
advantage over the other (1) Negotiorum gestio is the voluntary management of the
property or affairs of another without the knowledge or
(5) Liability for breach of contract. — Although the consent of the latter.
contract imposes no penalty for its violation, a party cannot
breach it with impunity. Our law on contracts recognizes (2) Solutio indebiti is the juridical relation which is created
the principle that actionable injury inheres in every when something is received when there is no right to
contractual breach. Interest may, in the discretion of the demand it and it was unduly delivered through mistake.
court, on equitable grounds, be allowed upon damages
awarded for breach of contract. Applicable when:
(a) payment is made when there exists no binding relation ART. 1162. Obligations derived from quasi-delicts shall
between the payor, who has no duty to pay, and the person be governed by the provisions of Chapter 2, Title XVII
who received the payment; and of this Book, and by special laws. (1093a)
(b) the payment is made through mistake11 and not through Requisites of quasi-delict.
liberality or some other cause.
(1) There must be an act or omission by the defendant;
ART. 1161. Civil obligations arising from criminal
offenses shall be governed by the penal laws,14 subject (2) There must be fault or negligence of the defendant;
to the provisions of Article 2177,15 and of the pertinent
provisions of Chapter 2, Preliminary Title on Human (3) There must be damage caused to the plaintiff;
Relations,16 and of Title XVIII of this Book, regulating
(4) There must be a direct relation or connection of cause
damages. (1092a)
and effect between the act or omission and the damage; and
Concept: deals with civil liability arising from crimes or
(5) There is no pre-existing contractual relation between the
delicts.
parties.22
(1) The commission of an offense has a two-pronged effect:
one, on the public as it breaches the social order and the Crime Quasi Delict
other, upon the private victim as it causes personal Malicious intent Negligence
sufferings or injury, each of which is addressed, Public interest Private interest
respectively, by the imposition of heavier punishment on Criminal and civil liability Civil liability ONLY
the accused and by an award of additional damages to the Punishment Indemnification
victim. (People vs. Catubig, 363 SCRA 621 [2001].) CANNOT be CAN be compromised
compromised or settled
(2) Oftentimes, the commission of a crime causes not only guilt of the accused must need only be proved by
moral evil but also material damage. From this principle, be proved beyond preponderance of evidence
the rule has been established that every person criminally reasonable doubt
liable for a felony17 is also civilly liable. Liability is subsidiary Liability is direct and
primary
No material damage (ex. contempt, insult to authority,
gambling, traffic violations etc.)= no civil liability Recovery of damages twice for the same act or omission
prohibited.
Reservation of Right to Recover Civil Liability
The same negligent act or omission causing damage may
only the civil liability arising from the offense charged is produce civil liability arising from a crime under Article
deemed instituted with the criminal action unless the 100 of the Revised Penal Code (supra.) or create an action
offended party waives the civil action, reserves his right to for quasi-delict under Article 2176 punishes not only
institute it separately, or institutes the civil action prior to reckless but also simple negligence.
the criminal action. There is no more need for a reservation
of the right to file the independent civil actions under Under Article 1157, quasi-delict and an act or omission
Articles 32, 33, 34 and 2176 of the Civil Code. punish- able by law are two different sources of
obligations. Inasmuch as civil liability co-exists with
The reservation and waiver referred to refer only to the criminal responsibility in negligence cases, the offended
civil action for the recovery of the civil liability arising party has the option between an action for enforcement of
from the offense charged. civil liability based on culpa criminal under Article 100 of
the Revised Penal Code and an action for recovery of
Scope of Civil Liability (RPC) damages based on culpa aquiliana under Article 2177.25
(see Art. 1161.)
This civil liability includes:
(1) Restitution; These two causes of action (ex delicto or ex quasi delicto)
(2) Reparation for the damage caused; and may be availed of subject to the caveat that the offended
party cannot recover damages twice for the same act or
(3) Indemnification for consequential damages. (Art. 104, omission or under both causes. Since these two (2) civil
Revised Penal Code.) liabilities are distinct and independent of each other, the
failure to recover in one will not necessarily preclude
recovery in the other.