Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0956-5663(18)30009-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.01.001
Reference: BIOS10194
To appear in: Biosensors and Bioelectronic
Received date: 8 November 2017
Revised date: 30 December 2017
Accepted date: 3 January 2018
Cite this article as: Sitian Tang, Huawei Shen, Yixiong Hao, Zhenglan Huang,
Yiyi Tao, Yang Peng, Yongcan Guo, Guoming Xie and Wenli Feng, A novel
cytosensor based on Pt@Ag nanoflowers and AuNPs/Acetylene black for
ultrasensitive and highly specific detection of Circulating Tumor Cells,
Biosensors and Bioelectronic, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.01.001
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for
publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of
the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form.
Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which
could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
A novel cytosensor based on Pt@Ag nanoflowers and
Sitian Tanga, Huawei Shenb, Yixiong Haoa, Zhenglan Huanga, Yiyi Taoa,
400021, P R China
c
Clinical Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated
*
Correspondence authors: Key Laboratory of Medical Diagnostics of
1
Key Laboratory of Medical Diagnostics of Ministry of Education,
68485239
China fengwlcqmu@sina.com Tel.: +86 23 68485938, fax.: +86 23
68485239
Abstract:
are cancer cells that break away from a primary tumor and circulate in the
material to increase the specific surface area and enhance the conductivity
high specific surface area and good biocompatibility were not only as the
the range from 20 to 1×106 cells mL-1 and the detection limit is as low as
3 cells mL-1 on condition of acceptable stability and reproducibility.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
including that of the primary tumor and the site of fatal metastases
(Chaffer and Weinberg 2011; Goldkorn et al. 2014; Rack et al. 2014;
Shen et al. 2017). So, it is conceivable that detecting and analyzing CTCs
ultrasound (Brindle 2008; Fass 2008; Zhang et al. 2002). However, there
attractive tool for cancer metastasis monitoring due to its fast response,
manufacturing cost (Giaever and Keese 1993; Hong et al. 2011; Liu et al.
nanowires was utilized for detection of MCF-7 cells and HCT-116 cells
satisfy the desired sensitivity for the early clinical diagnosis. So, it is an
et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2016b; Zhang et al. 2015). Carbon nanomaterials
namely, acetylene black (AB), has been intensively studied for their
et al. 2011; Wei et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2016). AuNPs with good
biocompatibility are mostly recommended owing to the fact that they can
good conductive ability and provide binding sites for subsequent protein
al. 2010; Zuo et al. 2015). In view of their excellent performance, our
AgNFs for the novel Pt@AgNFs to further improve the ability for the
reduction of H2O2.
Moreover, it could increase the electrode surface area and thus lead more
AuNPs modified onto the surface, which possessed the ability to anchor
more protein G to amplify the signals. In view of the above two kinds of
distribution of Ab1 was more uniform and expose more effective binding
sites. At the same time, we use the in-situ synthesis method to adhere
PtNPs onto the surface of AgNFs to form the novel Pt@AgNFs, which
was used as the label of secondary antibodies (Ab2) for the reduction of
2. Experimental
MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines were obtained from the Key Laboratory
albumin (BSA), ascorbic acid (AA), chitosan (CS) and Sodium citrate
was purchased from Yi Huan Carbon Co. (Fuzhou, China). Silver nitrate
MΩ cm) was employed in all runs. All other chemicals were of reagent
morphological analysis.
citrate was quickly added to above solution. Then, the mixture solution
was continued to stir another 15 min still the color changed from pale
yellow to wine red. Finally, after cooled to room temperature (RT), the
mg mL-1, 20 mL) and AgNO3 (10 mM, 10 mL) aqueous solutions were
mixed in a 100 mL beaker and the mixture was stirred at RT for 10 min,
AA (50 mg mL-1, 1 mL) was then added dropwise to the solution. The
color of the solution became light grey which indicated AgNFs was
with the formed AgNFs solution. The mixture was stirred at RT for
another 10 min until the color became dark grey. It suggested that the
collected and washed three times with water and ethanol, respectively.
use.
were re-suspended with PBS, then 40 µL Ab2 (1 mg mL-1) was added into
with 0.3 and 0.05 μm alumina slurry. Then, a mirrorlike surface was
obtained. Followed by successive sonication with double distilled water
and ethanol, and then dried at RT. After the cleaning procedure, 10 μL of
solution was dropped on it and dried slowly in air. Protein G (40 µg mL-1)
was allowed to attach directly onto the gold surface by Au–NH2 chemical
0.3% BSA solution was used to block the modified electrode overnight at
4 °C. The cytosensor was achieved after another round of washing with
all medium was removed and cells were washed with 0.01 M PBS.
Followed, the cells were digested with 0.25% trypsin/EDTA solution for
2–3 min. Then, the flesh medium was added to inhibit the activity of
trypsin. After centrifugation 500 rpm for 5 min, the cells were collected in
rpm for 5 min and then washed twice with 0.01 M PBS. Followed, the
uniformly, which indicated that AB could also provide the basis for the
subsequent stable signal. In Fig. 1B (the magnification of Fig. 1A), it
results.
exclusively observed with high intensity (Fig. 3A). O and C peak was
Pt@AgNFs.
shown in Fig. 3C, it became attached to dish well. Fig. 3D revealed that
M KCl at a scan rate of 100 mV s-1. As shown in Fig. 4A, there was a
AB and AuNPs (curve b) when compared with bare gold electrode (curve
kept falling after the employment of the protein G (curve c), Ab 1 (curve
d), and BSA (curve e) blocking solution. This showed that the protein G,
Ab1, and BSA were successfully immobilized onto the electrode surface.
The current further decreased (curve f) when MCF-7 cells was captured
by its antibody, which was consistent with the fact that the hydrophobic
and the resistance sharply decreased after the electrode was deposited
with AuNPs/AB (curve b). After the protein G was modified on the
electrode, the resistance increased due to their negative charge that block
the electron transfer (curved c). And increased further with the
modification of Ab1 (curve d), BSA (curve e), and MCF-7 cells (curve f),
situations were shown in Fig. S1. As was evident from curve b, the
containing 20 mM H2O2.
when 40 µg mL-1 of the concentration was used (Fig. S2A). Thus, the
decreased very slightly when the Ab1 concentration was over 100 µg mL-1
(Fig. S2B). These results demonstrated that the maximum peak current
The incubation time of MCF-7 cells and antibody also played a great
influence and it was studied in the range from 10 to 60 min. As shown in
Fig. S2C, the current response increased rapidly with the incubation time
significantly change the signal. Hence, 40 min was chosen as the optimal
performance for the reduction of H2O2. As seen in Fig. S2D, the current
100:1 to 25:1, and then the current change decreased when the proportion
ranged from 25:1 to 10:1. The current variations declared that the
successfully specific binding between MCF-7 cells and antibody but also
there is a good linear relationship between the current response and the
5.671, with a linear correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.997, where Y was the
signal-to-noise ratio of 3.
change was observed toward 1×106 cell mL-1 of HeLa cells. While the
(1×106 cell mL-1 of MCF-7 and HeLa cells) was almost the same with
1×106 cell mL-1 of MCF-7 cell. These DPV responses indicated that the
MCF-7 cells.
of its initial current response was retained compared with the freshly
concentration (104 cells mL-1 and 105 cells mL-1) of MCF-7 cells. All five
1000, and 10,000 cells mL-1 were tested using the proposed cytosensors.
The recovery results agreed with the spiked amounts of MCF-7 cells and
the corresponding results are given in Table S2. The slight difference
between the measured and actual values could be due to the effect of the
clinical application.
4. Conclusions
signal label, which significantly amplify the current signal. On the basis
and the relatively low detection limit of 3 cells mL-1 (S/N=3) was
obtained, which was more sensitive compared with other methods.
Acknowledgments
of Sichuan(NO. 16ZA0181).
References:
Cao, H., Yang, D.P., Ye, D., Zhang, X., Fang, X., Zhang, S., Liu, B.,
Deng, P., Fei, J., Feng, Y., 2011. Analyst 136(24), 5211-5217.
Goldkorn, A., Ely, B., Quinn, D.I., Tangen, C.M., Fink, L.M., Xu, T.,
Twardowski, P., Van Veldhuizen, P.J., Agarwal, N., Carducci, M.A., 2014.
Hong, J., Kandasamy, K., Marimuthu, M., Choi, C.S., Kim, S., 2011.
Hong, W., Lee, S., Chang, H.J., Lee, E.S., Cho, Y., 2016. Biomaterials
106, 78-86.
Huang, H., Liu, M., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Yang, D.P., Cui, L., Wang, X.,
Huang, P., Yang, D.P., Zhang, C., Lin, J., He, M., Bao, L., Cui, D., 2011.
Huo, X., Liu, P., Zhu, J., Liu, X., Ju, H., 2016. Biosens. Bioelectron. 85,
698-706.
Liang, C., Li, Z., Dai, S., 2008. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47(20),
3696-3717.
Liu, J., Zhou, H., Xu, J.J., Chen, H.Y., 2011. Chem. Commun. (Camb.)
47(15), 4388-4390.
Mytych, J., Pacyk, K., Pepek, M., Zebrowski, J., Lewinska, A., Wnuk, M.,
Park, M.H., Reategui, E., Wei, L., Tessier, S.N., Wong, K.H.K., Jensen,
A.E., Thapar, V., Ting, D., Toner, M., Stott, S.L., 2011. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
139(7).
Peng, J., Zhao, Q., Zheng, W., Li, W., Li, P., Zhu, L., Liu, X., Shao, B., Li,
H., Wang, C., Yang, Y., 2017. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(22),
18423-18428.
Rack, B., Schindlbeck, C., Juckstock, J., Andergassen, U., Hepp, P.,
Zwingers, T., Friedl, T.W., Lorenz, R., Tesch, H., Fasching, P.A., Fehm, T.,
K., Janni, W., Group, S.S., 2014. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 106(5), 2504-2511.
Seriburi, P., Mcguire, S., Shastry, A., Böhringer, K.F., Meldrum, D.R.,
Shen, H., Yang, J., Chen, Z., Chen, X., Wang, L., Hu, J., Ji, F., Xie, G.,
Shen, Z., Wu, A., Chen, X., 2017. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46(8), 2038-2056.
Song, P., Ye, D., Zuo, X., Li, J., Wang, J., Liu, H., Hwang, M.T., Chao, J.,
Su, S., Wang, L., Shi, J., Wang, L., Huang, W., Lal, R., Fan, C., 2017.
Su, L., Jia, W., Zhang, L., Beacham, C., Zhang, H., Lei, Y., 2010.
Wan, Y., Zhou, Y.G., Poudineh, M., Safaei, T.S., Mohamadi, R.M.,
Wei, X., Zhao, Q., Wu, W., Zhou, T., Jiang, S., Tong, Y., Lu, Q., 2016.
Wu, L.L., Wen, C.Y., Hu, J., Tang, M., Qi, C.B., Li, N., Liu, C., Chen, L.,
Yang, J., Shen, H., Zhang, X., Tao, Y., Xiang, H., Xie, G., 2016a. Biosens.
Yang, X., Roling, L.T., Vara, M., Elnabawy, A.O., Zhao, M., Hood, Z.D.,
Bao, S., Mavrikakis, M., Xia, Y., 2016b. Nano Lett. 16(10), 6644-6649.
Zhang, C., Shen, G., Shen, Y., Zhang, X., 2015. Anal. Biochem. 485,
66-71.
Zhang, J., Campbell, R.E., Ting, A.Y., Tsien, R.Y., 2002. Nat. Rev. Mol.
Zhou, T., Tao, Y., Jin, H., Song, B., Jing, T., Luo, D., Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y.,
Zuo, Y., Wu, L., Cai, K., Li, T., Yin, W., Li, D., Li, N., Liu, J., Han, H.,
assembly process.
Pt@AgNFs for 24 h.
Fig. 4 CVs (A) and EIS (B) spectra obtained from different electrodes: (a)
containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]- 3/-4 and 0.1 M KCl (scan rate of CV: 0.1 V
s-1).
Fig. 5 (A) DPV responses of the cytosensor incubated with MCF-7 cells
20, (c) 1×102, (d) 1×103, (e) 1×104, (f) 1×105 and (g) 1×106 cells mL-1 (B)