Hon Lintay Preycamming Problem (NuPpp) An optimisation problem in Which objedive 4s a or Some /all conshuints ave non linear [Higher 3 ta, tes than one] is called NLP P, Kay, Types; i) with no conshaiins uN) with Equality Conshainks —> Cag qs voethod W With unequality Gnshainks. (Rupr Tucker conditions. ualily constoints : Laqsanges method > one conshuints working ule, eb Sean ae : ne eee s be the given = ket L=z-arh en nage ear] ctbove equations Sroulenenusty Sa Ceee oo by o 3%a, > find x1, 7 values, we gad pom XG > Now te decide see = has maxima dv minima at this point, we the cletuminant , : ah a, 2 aL . 2»y sy) the method of Eee multiplies solve the foley ne Opkimise z= Exh yp sxt Sub: to MES =F A112 7,0 QS 4 a Keb La z-ah , where z= Cather? a h = ees ; = (424) #S%2') —A(%,4+ 5%2-F) lo ae saath 12-7 =O SZ AE AND ay) ae WES) 204 ig XA My, Sv Ea = Gut$e.-%) =0 = UTS%a=F D+sn 1 a EMEC Fang a) “. Point ts mn 42) Now we hove, i2. ophmize Sub to any 4x2 =4 + Avtar > 7 ee is z-ah L= Butrade ante +6 +2%2]-AL2m + X94 m So pa TOF SUF2+6-22=0 —O at Ze Bap exh H2Xr $6 FIX au 1 =O W2Wrt+ay4¢2-~=0 —@O Ey ey Vy ax +H -@ O©-2©% 2x, 2%, +2 =o Ss ad i eo @2@ Syoubaneouly Fs a 2% ¥ ait aa = esl puiting: in'@, ‘ae aXy. +2: & A= APAED We. _,.| wo- eines RoENUPP yoith wnequality constraints uhn- Tucker Conclitlons + cone _Canstaints + (06 conditions) > ) Solve, Maximise = W% $ Ate, amt — ab Q Sub-fo. any $a < aVne QM sinecactent a\ghy 4% —S —>. Keb Ke f- 7h on Ky (10% 4 Arta anak Alans H%a-5) BE =o => 10-4%-2n=0 —O ay Baw 9 4ose nse 8 | Ah =0 9 j A(am+%27S) =O fos minimisation problem , : cn o On e ee : Lae a We | aa from @ = AHO OV 0 2% =O case dy Ket AHO. BR. O > 10-44 DU= Se ° ny @D 4.52%. 9 G=2. conditions are -satietted. heo D> M+%2. aan [A= 415 CS Thesc values Sa all 6 conditions of Kuhn TU oe Optimal sol Is 90> Ve wa aAlg \ “Kenan 10% 44% —onP—at = 10 (1%) +4(4I5)- 2 IC = a : Sv 2 Mox. z= &, es - 2) PHVA T1D. = 16% + Brg 12 HE 1 SUb- $0! 2%) FOR < 105 te wy mae Ret k= P-Ah= (and qak —i6e 42° {AB ata) = Alan, +5%2-l05) DK=9 3S 4-16 +1ax2.-2n=0 ™) BE =o > —Myta +2 ven G@ K-T condilions Cos) mH pho 3 rGursu-wes)=o" —@ héo 3 244¢5% S0 ae Hi ka 70 sade =e 70 fom @, A=0 oS an) +520 = 10 cose t 2 aa OF 4x HL = @2> Vary S ery j a3casei2- (Sqaees = WE) —@ Now een a fen © 4@ , malpyng © 20%) — GO +60%2 —loA=o 24%) +4 —28%2 ~10A=0 Oy Se A 74% -84 499%. =o Bi OF 244+ 5m =F _ 2G) > -2% FAG 42 49%. =1\4F =P paling mo ®, x= 28 2 putting into © 4 4nd a, 47 =1b +13%2_-2nzo0 180 -16 +36 “PNY & 7 A=l00 “ey Since eS satsped we have optima) scl ee yt 2H PAF : -16(45) ee +1245) wat