Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2nd largest coffee producer and no.1 exporter of Robusta coffee in the world
Predicted decline in yield and quality because of aging trees and improper
field practices
– Old trees and poor management
– No or too little selective picking
– Unbalanced nutrition
– Too much N, S
– No application of Mg, Ca and Micronutrients
– Wrong form of N fertilizers (Urea, Ammonium Sulfate) further acidifying soils
Traditional practice in Vietnam is often based on
Urea and Ammonium sulfate (AS)
H+
Urea
NH4+ NO3-
AS
Ammonium Nitrate
Soil pH and nutrient availability
Soil pH in H2O
pH of many Adequate
Vietnamese for coffee
soils
Content of presentation
Yield Health
Improve farmer Disease
profit resistance
Difference
Category Traditional Balanced (Balanced vs.
Traditional)
Yield
3.27 3.63 +11%
(tons green bean/ha)
Bean weight
74.6 83.5 +12%
(g of 200 beans)
Farmer Profit
3360 3906 +16%
(USD/ha)
Carbon footprint
1845 846 -54%
(kgCO2eq/ton green bean)
Content of presentation
N fertilizer rate
0.3 t
green bean/ha
Source: Results from trials, Elzebrock & Wind, 2008; Arzolla et al., 1963; Hart, 1969; Cannel & Kimeu, 1971; Catani &
Moraes, 1958; Malavolta, 1990; v.d. Vossen, 2005; Wilson, 1985; Ramiah, 1987; Snoeck & Duceau, 1978
Balanced nutrition: Coffee needs more than
only Nitrogen
Arabica - India
83 t/ha
Calcium Nitrate (+18%)
Ammonium Nitrate
Year
REF: Trial conducted by J.A. Quaggio (IAC Campinas, SP)
Recommended improvements in coffee nutrition
in Eastern Africa