Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shear d o m a i n of fibre-reinforced
high-strength concrete beams
M. Imam,* L. Vandewalle, F. Mortelmans and D. Van Gemert
Department of Civil Engineering, Catholic University of Leuven, de Croylaan 2, 3001
Heverlee, Belgium
(Received November 1994; revised version accepted June 1995)
738
Shear domain o f fibre-reinforced concrete beams: M. Imam et al. 739
designed to resist shear forces due to earthquake and wind b = width of the beam in mm
loading. Secondly, fibres increase the concrete's resistance d = effective depth of the beam in mm
to crack formation and propagation. Thirdly, the increased d,, = maximum aggregate size in mm
resistance of the concrete cover to spalling and cracking a/d = shear span to depth ratio
helps to protect steel from corrosion in adverse environ-
ments and, hence, improve structural durability. Fourthly, Equation (1) is in fact a modification of the ACI approach
since conventional stirrups require relatively high labour (ACI Committee 544, 1988) 6 for predicting the flexural
input to bend and fix in place, fibres may significantly capacity of normal strength fibre concrete composites to be
reduce construction time and costs, especially in an area of valid and applicable for concrete with higher strength. The
high labour costs and possibly even labour shortages. modification is mainly in the tensile stress intensity (05)
Fifthly, fibre concrete can also be easily placed in thin or and the neutral axis depth (c) as shown in Figure 1. The
irregularly shaped sections such as architectural panels, proposed equation [Eq. (1)] was derived on the basis of
where it may be very difficult to place stirrups. However, the assumptions and the equilibrium of forces as shown in
the main purpose of this paper is not to compare between Figure 1. It is worth noting that in case of non-fibrous con-
steel fibres and stirrups as shear reinforcement. It is to crete (F = 0.0), Eq. (1) can be written as
investigate the influence of fibres on both the shear strength
and failure mode of longitudinally reinforced HSC beams
without stirrups and to provide answers for the following Ms, = o y S (1 (3)
questions: l.u,.
(1) How much is the improvement of shear strength as The above formula, Eq. (3), is typically the original equ-
well as flexural strength of HSC beams due to the ation of the ACI Building Code for non-fibrous reinforced
addition of steel fibres? concrete beams (ACI 318RM-83, [10.3.117. Therefore the
(2) How to ensure shear safety of reinforced HSC beams proposed Eq. (1) is, in fact, an extension of the ACI equ-
without shear reinforcement regardless of shear span ation to predict the full flexural capacity of both HSC and
to depth ratio (a/d)? SF-HSC beams with rectangular cross-section.
(3) What is the optimum percentage of steel fbres (Vf_op,) Equation (2) for predicting the ultimate shear strength
at which a beam without stirrups reaches its full flex- of fibrous high-strength concrete beams without stirrups,
ural capacity? was proposed on the basis of the following aspects:
Axis
T,
...,11.-
- - ~ s OMWO) T=Tt *T,
000 "~ID~Ts
- - ~ ~-- ~ S m ~ )
--~ ~- cr~
P
Strain diagram SlmpIifled s t g e u dis|rim
Figure 1 Rectangular reinforced fibre concrete beam at ultimate m o m e n t
,o ~0o7
• 0.6
/ Shear Failure F;lexural Failure
,,F
0.5 J
4 i i i i
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0,4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.4
0.00 0.15 0.$0 0.45 0.60 0.75 0.90
Fibre Factor ( F ) Fibre Factor ( F )
Figure 2 Fibre effect on both ultimate and n o m i n a l flexural Figure 3 Fibre factor (F) versus relative flexural capacity
moments (M./M~/)
Shear d o m a i n o f f i b r e - r e i n f o r c e d concrete beams: M. I m a m e t al. 741
major types. The first type concerns the inclined cracks types of shear failure may be distinguished at the two dif-
which occur in the web of a beam before any other flexural ferent values of a/d.
cracks appear in their vicinity. This type is termed 'web- At the higher value of a/d, a flexural-shear crack
shear cracks' and is usually observed in thin-webbed, I- initiates near the tip of an existing flexural crack in the
shaped beams with large flanges like those used in pre- shear span. With increasing applied load, the inclined crack
stressed concrete construction. The second type is generally propagates simultaneously in two directions: towards the
identified as a ' f l e x u r a l - s h e a r crack'. In this type, an load point and towards the support along the tensile
inclined crack starts at the top of an existing flexural crack reinforcement. The crack continues to propagate until the
and a short distance above the longitudinal reinforcement. beam becomes unable to sustain further load. The failure
Although the flexural-shear crack is the most common type is sudden and may cause separation of a large part of the
in reinforced concrete beams, the mechanism by which it shear span from the beam. This mode of failure is identified
forms is not entirely understood. The appearance of the as diagonal-tension (DT). Whereas, at the lower value of
flexural-shear crack is mainly a function of the flexural a/d, the arch action is dominant and provides more load
stress fir) and the shear stress (v). These stresses can be capacity for the beam in comparison with the higher a/d
calculated as value. The failure of this beam mainly occurs as a result
of either concrete crushing above the upper end of a
M flexural-shear crack or splitting of concrete around the
fr = Cl bd 2 (7) inclined crack itself. This failure mode is usually termed
as shear-compression (SC). In both DT and SC failure
V modes, which have been frequently observed, the beam
v=c, (8)
- bd fails before its full flexural capacity is developed.
At the minimum value of the relative moment
where c~ and c 2 are constants, and V and M are the applied (M,,/M~t)m,,, there is only one value of a/d and hence, one
shear and moment at a section. However, the effect of these particular failure mode is expected. At this point, it
stresses can be expressed by the ratio a/d since, becomes difficult to distinguish DT from SC failures. Fen-
wick et al. ~-~have pointed out the existence of a critical a/d
f. cj M a ratio which separates beams that sustain further loading
C3 ) (9)
v ca Vd (d after diagonal cracking from those that fail at diagonal
cracking. The value of (a/d)c, for normal strength concrete
where c 3 is another constant and a is the shear span. This beams, has been empirically reported in the range 2.0 to
shows that the failure mode of a beam without stirrups is 3.0 ~3. However, on the basis of the proposed equation for
significantly affected by the ratio a/d. The relation between M,,/Mj¢, it becomes possible to obtain an analytical
M,/M~ and a/d (Figure 6) shows two different values of expression for predicting the value of (a/d)c by setting the
a/d for the same value of M,,/M~. Since the nominal flexural derivative of Eq. (6) with respect to a/d equal to zero.
strength (MI~) is constant for a given beam regardless of
the value of a/d, thus, at the same value of M,, there are
also two different values of a/d. It is known that M,, of a O(M. /M=j,)0.0
O(a/d)
(in)
given beam is proportional to the applied load multiplied
by a/d. Therefore, the existence of two different values of
a/d at the same value of M,/M/~ means that at the lower Hence, Eq. (10) provides the following expression for
value of a/d the beam can sustain higher loads than in the (a/d)c which draws the borderline between the DT and SC
case of the higher a/d value. Accordingly, two different failure modes:
1.o ga. / Equation (11) indicates that the value of (a/d)c depends
only on p, F, and f . It can easily be noted that (a/d)c is
!
in direct proportion to both p, and F but is inversely pro-
portional to f . For the usual values of p, and F, Eq. (11 )
gives (a/d)c values falling in the observed range.for normal
~= 0 . 8 strength concrete. For example, for HSC beams without
fibres ( f = 110 MPa) and p = 0.0187, the predicted value
of (a/d)c is 2.19. When steel fibres with F = 0.5625 are
incorporated into the latter concrete, the value of (a/d)c
increases to 2.78. The relationship between (a/d)c and F
~. o.6
for different values of p and f . = 110 MPa, is shown in
( I Mfl ) rain Figure 7. It can be observed that for a given p the value
0.5 of F is limited by F,,p,(M, = M~) as will be explained below.
It should be pointed out that the variation of f does not
affect the value of (a/d)c significantly. For instance, the
o., . . . . . . .
t
3.6
F
3.2
a
(~)c 2.8 " -- ( M,,= Mn )
2.4
Fibre Factor ( F )
Figure 7 Critical shear span to depth ratio (a/d)c versus f i br e
factor (F) !.2
0"9 I • T e s t Beams p-O.OlSV |[
0.|
. = +- !!?+-ml
6. Domain of shear effect .,.-:,
1.o
At M , / M , = 1.0 (Figure 6), the two limiting values of a/d O.T II
can be denoted at (a/d)R in the right side and (a/d)L in the £
left side. Between these two limiting values the failure is 0.6 0.8 ~
affected by the shear interaction and M, will be less than <
M n (M,/M~ < 1.0). It is worth returning now to Figure 5
0.5
to see that, with the variation in F, pairs of the limiting
o.~ ~
values of a/d can be obtained. In addition, the distance
.o 0.4
between the two limiting points [(a/d)R-(a/d)L] dimin-
ishes with the increase of F. This means that between the
0.3 0.4 "
two limiting values of a/d shear failure is expected, while
outside those limiting points a beam provides its full flex-
0"1
ural capacity and fails in flexure. At a certain value of F,
0,,2 ,.~
the distance between (a/d) R and (a/d)L vanishes and the
two limiting points are equal to (a/d)c. Consequently, the 0.1
two limiting values of a/d define the borderline of shear
effect in fibrous HSC beams. 0.0 0.0
0 1 2 $ 4 $ $ 7
The zone of shear effect, however, is in fact the relation-
Shear Span to Depth Ratio ( a / d )
ship between F and a/d for a given p when M,/M~ = 1.0
which can be seen in the horizontal projection of Figure 5. Figure 9 (a) Domain of shear effect f o r p = 0.0187
Likewise, the horizontal projection of Figure 4 represents
the zone of shear effect as a relationship between p and
a/d for a given F. The choice of the suitable diagram to
represent the shear domain, whether it should be a/d versus l~t 1.6
o.~ BI
= = 1.0 0.6 i
Mj, p/,(2 - 77) + 1.66F (0.75 - ~)(2.15 + r/) 0.4
(12) 0.4
I II III IV
*SC = s h e a r - c o m p r e s s i o n failure; DT = diagonal tension; FL = flexural failure; SF = combination of shear and flexural failure
fc= 110MPa, fv=550 MPa, d = 3 O O m m , da= 1 4 m m
Shear domain of fibre-reinforced concrete beams: M. Imam e t al. 745
PI2 PI2
_L _1_ a _1
-I
" ! -r
3o22 or 3~a28
A &
I.. 3250
3800
mm
mrn
=! _
I--
F. Hence, the p:F relationship can be obtained numerically returning to Figure 9. The top point of the curve in
when the equation of M,/M~= 1.0 [Eq. (12)] is solved for Figure 9(a) or (b) represents the optimum fibre factor
a given a/d. (F,p,) irrespective of the value of a/d. At this point
In order to determine and generalize the optimum fibre (a/d)R=(a/d)L=(a/d)c and F=F,,p,. Accordingly, the
content which covers all possible values of a/d, it is worth optimum fibre factor (F,p,) can be defined as the value of
746 Shear d o m a i n o f fibre-reinforced concrete beams: M. I m a m e t al.
Table 3 Failure m o d e of HSC beams as presented in Ref. 11 22.243 0o/X/'5~! .264 - of,.(2 - ~ ' )
F,,,,, = 1.66 (O.75 - ~ ' ) ( 2 . 1 5 + ~ ' ) (13)
Beam F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 FIO
[
1.2 1.6
f~ =11o ~ [ I
f~ = 5 5 0 ~=,,I 1.4 ~:~
1.0
d==14 ffrfl| q S ~
1.2 ~
" 0.8
i.o ,~..
0.6 o.s
0.6
= 0.4
0.4
©
0.2
0.2
O
0.0 0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5