Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Settlement
Settlement
Settlement
Lecture 6: Settlement of
Foundations
1
Settlement
Settlement
S = Se + Sc + Ss
Where 3
,
Vertical Stress: Concentrated load
0.5
0.4
0.3
Influence Factor for
IB General solution of vertical stress
0.2
P
0.1 z 2 IB
0.0
z
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
r z 4
Vertical Stress: Uniformly Distributed
Circular Load
5
Vertical Stress: Uniformly Distributed Circular Load
6
Vertical Stress: Rectangular Area
7
Vertical Stress: Rectangular Area
8
Pressure Bulb
Square Footing Strip Footing
9
Pressure
Bulb for
Square
Foundation
10
Pressure
Bulb for
Circular
Foundation
11
Newmark’s Chart
Influence Value
Depth = z2
13
Westergaard’s Method
• Provided solution for layered soils
• Point Loads
• Assumption:
Elastic soil mass is laterally reinforced by numerous, closely
spaced, horizontal sheets of negligible thickness but infinite
rigidity, that allow only vertical movement , preventing the
mass as a whole from undergoing any lateral strain.
P 2 1 2
z 2
1
C
2 z C r z
2 2 2 1
15
Fröhlich Chart with
concentration factor m‘ = 4
z n 0.005 .q
16
Simplified Methods (Poulos and Davis, 1974)
Circular Foundation:
2 1.5
B
z 1 1 (q zD
)
2 z
Square Foundation:
2
1.76
B (q )
z 1 1
2z zD
f
17
Simplified Methods (Poulos and Davis, 1974)
Strip Foundation:
2
2.60
B (q )
z 1 1
2z zD
f
Rectangular Foundation:
2.60 0.84 B / L
1.38 0.62 B / L
B (q )
z 1 1
2 z f
zD
18
Approximate
Methods
B.L
Rectangular Foundation: z q
B z . L z
B2
Square/Circular Foundation: z q
B z
2
B
Strip Foundation: z q
B z 19
Contact Pressure and Settlement Distribution
s x s y dz
1
Se z dz z
0
Es 0
Es Modulus of elasticity
H Thickness of soil layer
s Poisson’s ratio of soil
Elastic settlement for Flexible Foundation:
Se
qB
Es
1 s2 I f
If = influence factor: depends on the rigidity and shape of the foundation
Es = Avg elasticity modulus of the soil for (4B) depth below foundn level
21
Elastic Settlement of Foundation
E in kPa
22
Elastic Settlement of Foundations
23
Elastic Settlement of Foundations
Soil Strata with
Semi-infinite depth
24
Steinbrenner’s Influence Factors for Settlement of the Corners of
loaded Area LxB on Compressible Stratus of = 0.5, and Thickness Ht
25
Strain Influence Factor Method for Sandy Soil:
Schmertmann and Hartman (1978)
z2 C1 Correction factor for foundation depth
Se C1C2 q D f z
Iz
1 0.5 D f q D f
0 Es
C2 Correction factor for creep effects
1 0.2log time in years 0.1
Es 2.5qc
For rectangular
foundations
Es 3.5qc
Correlation with SPT data:
Es 800 N in kPa
27
Burland and Burbidge’s Method for Sandy Soils
Depth of Stress Influence (z'):
If N60 is constant or increasing with depth, then z 1.04 B
0.75
,where B is in meters
If N60 is decreasing with depth, use smaller of
z 2 B and z z Thickness of soft layer below foundation
28
Settlement due to Primary Consolidation
av
For NC clay c o o av Sc
Cc H c
log o
1 eo
o
For OC clay o av c Cs H c o av
Sc log
1 eo o
C H av
For OC clay o c o av CH
Sc s c log c c c log o
1 eo
o 1 eo
c
o Average effective vertical stress before construction
Average increase in effective vertical stress
av
c Effective pre-consolidation pressure
eo Initial void ratio of the clay layer t
Cc
m
Compression Index
Cs Swelling Index
Hc Thickness of the clay layer
1
av t 4 m b b
6 29
Settlement Correction for Effect of 3-D Consolidation
Sc 3D Sc 1D
30
Fox’s Depth Correction Factor
for Rectangular Footings of
L x B at Depth D
Sc Embedded
Depth factor
Sc Surface
Rigidity Factor
Total settlement of
rigid foundation
Total settlement at the center
of flexible foundation
Void Ratio, e
t1
32
Total Settlement
from SPT Data for
Cohesionless soils
3 qc
C
2 o
34
Plate Load Test
35
Plate Load Test
Bearing Plate:
• Rough mild steel bearing plate in circular or square shape
• Dimension: 30 cm, 45 cm, 60 cm, or 75 cm.
Thickness > 25 mm
• Smaller size for stiff or dense soil. Larger size for soft or loose soil
• Bottom of the plate is grooved for increased roughness.
• Concrete blocks may be used to replace bearing plates.
36
Plate Load Test
Test Pit:
• Usually to the depth of foundation level.
• Width equal to five times the test plate
• Carefully leveled and cleaned bottom.
• Protected against disturbance or change in natural formation
Plan
Section
37
Plate Load Test
Procedure:
• Selection of Location
– Based on the exploratory boring.
– Test is carried out at the level of proposed foundation. If water table is
below the foundation level but the depth is less than width of plate then
the test is carried out at the level of water table. If the water table is above
the foundation level then the water level is reduced to proposed foundation
level by pumping out the water during the test; however, in case of high
permeability material perform the test at the level of water table.
– In case the soil is expected to have significant capillary action and the water
table is within 1 m below the foundation, it becomes necessary to perform
the test at the level of water table in order to avoid the effect of higher
effective stresses due to capillary action resulting in lower values of
interpreted settlements.
• Reaction supports should be at least (3.5 x width of plate) away from the test
plate location, and loading arrangement should provide sufficient working
space.
• Test plate should be placed over a 5 mm thick sand layer and it should be
centered with the loading arrangement.
38
Plate Load Test
Procedure: (Contd.)
• A seating pressure of 7 kPa is applied and then released after some time before
the test.
• Loads are applied in the increments of approximately 1/5th of the estimated
ultimate safe load. (Or, one may choose to increase the load at an increment of
0.5 kN.)
• At each load settlement is recorded at time intervals of 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 16, 25 min
and thereafter at intervals of one hour.
• For clayey soil, the load is increased when time settlement curve shows that the
settlement has exceeded 70-80% of the probable ultimate settlement or a
duration of 24 Hrs.
• For the other soils, the load is increased when the settlement rate drops below
0.02 mm/min.
• The minimum duration for any load should, however, be at least 60 min.
• Dial gauges used for testing should have at least 25 mm travel and 0.01 mm
accuracy.
• The load settlement curve can then be platted from settlement data.
39
Plate Load Test – Load-Settlement Curve
Zero Correction:
40
Plate Load Test – Load-Settlement Curve
Terzaghi and Peck (1948):
Sf Settlement of a foundation of
B f Bp 30
2
Sf width Bf (cm)
S p Bp B f 30 Sp Settlement of the test plate of
width Bp (cm) at the same load
intensity as on the foundation
Bond (1961):
Soil Index - n
43
Plate Load Test: Bearing Capacity
• A more precise determination of
bearing capacity load is possible if
the load-settlement curve is plotted
in log-log scale and the relationship
is assumed to be bilinear. The
intersection point is taken as the
yield point or the bearing capacity
load.
quf Bf
For cohesioless soil
qup Bp
45
Differential Settlement
Terzaghi’s recommendation:
Differential settlement should not exceed 50% of the total settlement calculated for the foundation.
Considering the sizes of different footing, the following criteria is suggested for buildings:
Differential settlement of footing 75% of max calculated settlement of footing
For raft foundation the requirements shall be more stringent and they may be designed for the
following criteria
Differential settlement of raft footing 37% of max calculated settlement of raft footing
d
= maximum settlement
d= differential settlement
d/ = angular distortion
Allowable maximum and differential settlements are given on the next slide
46
47
Rotation of Footings Subjected to
Moment
• Footings subjected to moment will have the tendency to rotate and the
amount of rotation can be estimated by assuming that the footing is
supported on a bed of springs and using the modulus of sub-grade
reaction theory.
LB3k
L k . .dx
B2
M 2
0 12
48
Rotation of Footings Subjected to
Moment
Influence factor
to compute
rotation of
12M
3
12M 1 2 1 2
M
I
footing
2
LB k LB 2 Es Es LB
I values
49
Allowable Bearing Pressure
50
Allowable Bearing
Pressure
Terzaghi and Peck (1967):
B 0.3
2
Dw D f
Rw 0.5 1
Rw 1
Df
B 0.3
2
B 0.3
2
qn 0.48 N RD 2 Sa kN m2 for B 1.2 m
B
N-value corrected for overburden using bazaraa’s equation, but
54
the N-value must not exceed field value
Allowable Bearing Pressure
Recommendation: Use total settlement correlations with SPT
data to determine safe bearing pressure.
55