Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FRIA Methodology
FRIA Methodology
by
FRANCIS N. FRIA
Chapter 3
Methodology
This chapter deals with the research design, population, corresponding sample
that were used as respondents for this study, the research instrument procedures for
gathering the data, and the statistical treatment of the data collected.
Research Design
Science teachers of STI College Pasay-EDSA Senior High School department and the
used in this study. Descriptive-correlation research design is the most appropriate research
design for this study because it seeks to determine the degree of linear relationship between
the two variables; the instructional competencies and the students’ academic performance.
The respondents of this study were the Senior High School students of STI
College Pasay-EDSA from Grade 11 and Grade 12 students in their first semester
In order to come up with the sample population of the study coming from each
N
n=
1 + Ne2
30
Where:
n = number of samples;
The current population of the Senior High School students of STI College Pasay-
EDSA and its estimated sample (based on 5% margin of error) is given in the table below:
Table 1
Distribution of the Population with Percentages per Year Level and Estimated Sample with Percentages per
Year Level
Estimated
Year Level Population % %
Sample
Grade 11 152 53 % 45 54 %
Grade 12 135 47 % 40 46 %
Total 287 100 85 100.0
The stratified random sampling was used to ensure that the different groups in the
population are adequately represented in the sample. For the, study the year level served as
the stratum. Table 1 presents the distribution of the population by year level. The total
population of the Grade 11 is 152, that is 53% of the total population; the Grade 12 have
135, that is 47 % of the total population. By using the formula to get the sample, the
researchers came up with the figure of the total sample size. In orderto distribute this
sample size evenly by year levels, the population size of the year level was divided by the
total population and multiplied by the total sample size. Thus, the process gave the
following figures of sample for each year level: 45 students from Grade 11 , 40 students
from Grade 12. After obtaining the concrete sample size from
31
the different year levels, researchers randomly selected at least two sections for each year
level where the number of students approximate the estimated samples needed. This
process was done for the convenience in conducting the survey. In order to come up with
the estimated number of sample, the researchers randomly and evenly eliminated the
Instrumentation
The main instrument used in this study is the questionnaire which was prepared to
find out the instructional competencies of the faculty members involved in the study as
The survey questionnaire was validated by teachers who are currently in anacademe
and pursued graduate studies in the field of education. The alterations that were looked into
competency that is being evaluated. The phrasingsof some of the items were changed into
more understandable and acceptable ones considering the accuracy of the behaviours.
As for the reliability of the instruments for the questionnaire used for the Senior
high school students in evaluating the teachers’ competencies, pilot testing and reliability
As for the academic performance of the students concerned in the study, the first
and second quarter grades Introduction to the Philosophy of Human Person and Personal
the students, this study made use of the rating scale that is applied in STI College Pasay-
EDSA’s Senior High School Department. The scale below indicates the rating and
description of the grade equivalent as presented in the 2018 edition of the STI’s Student
Handbook.
33
Table 4
Scale for Student’s Grade
Percentage Equivalent
95 and above Excellent
90-94 Outstanding
85-89 Above Average
80-84 Average
75-79 Below Average
74 and below Failed
The researchers sought permission from the Assistant Principal of the Senior High
School Department to conduct a study on the students of high school department. Upon
The first and second quarter grades Introduction to the Philosophy of Human
Person and Personal Development subjects which served as the measure to academic
Department for the school year 2022-2023, was collected from the Office of the Assistant
Principal for Academic Affairs of the Senior High School Department with a notice to all
Treatment of Data
The collected data were analyzed, interpreted, and the implications were
To facilitate the tabulation and tallying of the data gathered, the researchers made
use of the Microsoft Excel 2010® and subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS
was used to measure the number of responses and its magnitude with the sample. Also, the
study made use of the mean, standard deviation, and ranking to describe the perception of
∑X
̅X=
n
Where:
̅X = mean
2 𝑛 ∑ 𝑋2−(∑ 𝑋)2
∑ 𝑋2−(∑ X)
s =√ 𝑛
or s = √
𝑛−1 𝑛(𝑛−1)
Where:
s = standard deviation
X = each score
̅X = mean
Personal Development subjects first and second quarter grades of the senior high school
students from Grade 11 and Grade 12 in the school year 2022-2023, with the proper
permission from the Senior High School Principal. In order to measure the academic
performance of the students over the two quarters, an average of the grades in two quarters
variables X and Y, giving a value between +1 and −1 inclusive which is widely used in
the sciences as a measure of the strength of linear dependence between two variables
Where:
academic performance of the students, this study made use of the correlation scale
that indicated the interpretation on the correlation based on the value of r obtained.
Table 5
Correla
tion
Scale
Value of r Interpretations
Between ± .80 to ± .99 High correlation
Between ± .60 to ± .79 Moderately high correlation
Between ± .40 to ± .59 Moderate correlation
Between ± .20 to ± .39 Low correlation
Between ± .01 to ± .19 Negligible correlation
test statistic at least as extreme as the one that was actually observed, assuming
that the null hypothesisis true. A p-value that is less than or equal to 0.01 indicates
that the correlation made is highly significant because the p-value would suggest
that there is only 1% probabilitythat the null hypothesis is not being true, and
thus accepted. On the other hand, a p-value that is greater than or equal to 0.05
indicates that the correlation made is not significant because it exceeds .95 which
used to mean something is good enough to be believed. Thus any value in between
the two values is considered significant at 0.05 level which gives 5% of margin of
errors which means that the null hypothesis has a 95% chance of being true (The
References:
Dahms, M., Geonnottie, K., Passalacqua, D., Schilk, J. N., Wetzel, A., &Zulkowsky,
M.M. (2007).The educational theory of Lev Vygotsky: An analysis. NewFoundations.
Jarvis, P. (2006). The theory and practice of teaching. Second Edition. London
and NewYork: Routledge