std AT onjue inertthceitialy etl Government of india Ender Nia, 2aRarrossontoadi SALAD SARK AE aT wae! Your No 7738 5304 6920 ART FTG, FT Tees & ies BEE Government oni BOLAPSARKA 7738 5304 6820 A ae, FRY oe re ar ey aitaroaga cea aT EAT AE | poo! Of danny) soLor aueaiship © ealeblsh identity, authenticate oniine ais ae | | often at arene atte steer dart a mt gent A at gh | (s valle throughout the country [Unique iGeniiaation authanty of hte 738 $304 6920nen tes set seme thats by BErrastAoey share DISTRICT: NORTH 24-PARGANAS In the Court of Adiitonal District Judge Fast Track Court-I, Bonsaon, North 24-Parganas easy | Sri Tapas Kame Mita, Adkitianal Discs Judge, ast Track Court-I, Bongaoa, ‘Nouh 24 Perganoe Mat Suit Np. 451 of 2015 (Gm, Golapi Sarkar -V5- Sei Pabitra Sarkor) La Lawyer for the Petitio nar’ + Sri Pradip Chaterlee ‘Application wis. 13., Hindu Marriage Act. 1955 Today is fxed for auigment cf this Suit on the basis oF the Petition dated 15+ 05-2025, wg 19 ofthe Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 fled by the Petitioner Set. Golap! Sarkar, wile of Set Pablra Sarkar, daughuer of Sti Goblnds Malumiler of Village ~ Ponilia, PO Hingnara, under BS, Chakui, m the Distlet of Nacie againat Sri ablita Sarkar; S’o Sri Parimal Sarkar of village — Tengra Colony, PO ~ Teagre Colony, under BS; Bonqaan, inthe District ~orh 24 Pagans. ‘The Petitioner's case: in brief i thy the Petitioner go mrrige Hid the Respondent on 23-01-2000 as pe? Hin Rie» ane Customs at her patemnal hovse Village — Purulia, BO,- Hingnara, under PS. Ghalidali in the Disirict of Nadia, _Afver the sad martiage the Potloner ett tote? matrimonial home at-vlage —rangra Colony, RO —Tengea Colony, under )S. Bonguon, in the District North 24 Parganas’ and resite there as husband and wie with We Respondent and their ge was duly consunninated, Cut of the att wedlock two children were Barn (o us namely Pranab Sarkar ged about 14 years and Piyali Sarkar, age “bout 12 Years. The seid soa is wesiding with bis fatherand the daughter is residing with her ‘After some days of thel: marriage, tl Peitioniet nosiced thar she responcear is’a habitual deunker and being in intoxicated condition, the respondent was recurning home and used Alithy languages. to the jase and assaulted the Petitioner deimanding more dowry from her pavenis, The respondent aa facity members cominued to create prencure upon the Peitiort t6 bring more and more money trom