Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introductions
2. Course Overview
1. Objectives and Learning Outcomes
2. Course Material
3. Grading
3. Introduction to the Field
Your Teacher
Jaspreet (Jessie) Pandher, pandher@cec.sc.edu,
1000 Catawba St Suite 120, Columbia, SC
Dash X
Class Introduction
Learning Outcomes
1.Understanding of the main developments in technology throughout aviation history, with a focus on
structural developments
2.Understanding of the structure development process in industry
3.Understanding of the role of airworthiness requirements in aircraft structural development
4.Ability to do a functional analysis
5.Ability to create and present a conceptual design
6.Ability to select applicable airworthiness requirements for a typical design problem
7. Ability to do an initial sizing (e.g. undisturbed structure + one typical cut-out + one typical joint)
8. Ability to describe the main structural analysis methods for aerospace structures (including buckling)
and apply those to simple problems
9.Ability to select means of compliance finding and draft the analysis/test approach
10.Understand the safety philosophy and practice in the aerospace supply chain
Overview of the Lectures Always Check Blackboard for latest
version of Syllabus and Schedule
Midterm (15%)
There will be one in-class test before spring break. The test will begin promptly at the start of the class period and ends at the
end of the class period. Late arrival will take away time from test time. A missed test results in a zero grade for that test. Make-
up exams will be accepted only in extreme cases. If you know ahead of time that you will miss a test, the teacher may allow
you to take the exam before the in-class test. No test grade will be dropped.
Final (25%)
The final exam is Thursday, April 28th at 9:00 am take-home and will cover all topics from the semester. The exam is 25% of
the overall grade.
More information on Blackboard in the Syllabus and the Case Study documents
Case study (1/5)
You decided from x2 options for the case study based on what you are interested
in or want to learn more about. May be related to your research field or other
interested areas
Option 1: The design variant of the Option 2: The analysis variant of the
case study consists of seven case will be defined individually and
assignments that follow the could look like:
contents of the course:
Step 3: When submitting your case study via email to the instructor by the
specified due date in the syllabus, make sure your email contains the
following information:
Step 4: each case study consists of a set of assignments. Students must hand
in individual assignments for feedback and homework grading. All students
are expected to hand in the total set of assignments as the case study for final
grading.
Aircraft
Airframe Systems
Structure + mechanical Hydraulic, pneumatic, electrical,
systems (part of the control electronic part of the AC including
systems, the landing gear, flight control system, fuel system,
doors etc) of the AC ECS, weather hazard protection
Aircraft
Airframe design
Airframe Systems
Requirements
Structural Design
Form
Materials
Production
Introduction into Technical Aviation
Regulations (Airworthiness)
Requirements
On the product:
- Minimum structural design speeds
- Minimum and maximum design weights
- Minimum loads
- Material design values
- Minimum safety factors
- Etc.
Introduction into Technical Aviation
Regulations (Airworthiness)
Requirements
On the processes:
- Design Compliance finding and
- Production verification on design,
production, operation,
- Operation maintenance, end of life
- Maintenance (full functional flow for
- End of Life an aircraft)
Introduction into Technical Aviation
Regulations (Airworthiness)
Airworthiness
Weight
Reliability
Endurance
Recyclability
Strength
Stiffness
Requirements for aerospace
structures
More than half of the safety related structural
requirements are related to the loads on aircraft.
Factor of Safety (FOS): is how much Design Safety Factor: is how much
load the structure is actually able to load the structure is designed to
withstand. withstand (note, this one example
for a design factor used for design
Calculation checked from testing of with a given applied/design load
structure to validated design factor when sizing a structure).
used for design:
Commonly provided per application
F from requirements (e.g. FAA/EASA)
FOS = and is not a calculation.
f
Margin of Safety/Reserve Factor
F = Allowable/Failure load (stress, force, moment, torque, etc)
f = Applied/Design load (stress, force, moment, torque, etc)
FOS = Factor of Safety
𝐃𝐅𝐱 = Design Factor (e.g. Design Safety Factor, Fitting factor, casting factor, bearing factor, etc.)
x : critical condition for application
Option 2: MS as a measure of requirement
Option 1: MS as a measure of verification (reality/design)
structural capability (textbook) F
MSx = −1≥0 MSx = RFx − 1 ≥ 0
F f × ∑DFx
MSx = − 1 ≥ 0 MSx = FOS − 1 ≥ 0 F
f RFx = ≥ 1 (Reserve Factor)
f×∑DFx
Option 1 𝑴𝑺𝒙 Definition: Measure of excess Option 2 𝑴𝑺𝒙 Definition: Measure of requirement verification, checking if the
capability, what additional load beyond the design structure complies with the design requirements for application in service.
load a structure can actually withstand before Considers the design/applied loads with the design factors (e.g. design safety
failure. factor).
If 𝑀𝑆𝑥 If 𝑀𝑆𝑥
= 0 structure will not take any additional load = 0 structure is exactly at the required strength designed for (e.g. MS = 0 and
before it fails design safety factor = 1.5, the structure would have an actual factor of safety
< 0 (negative) structure will fail before of 1.5, supporting one load equal to the design safety factor, meaning the
reaching its design load in service structure can support 1.5 times the applied/design load before failure).
≥ 0 structure can withstand additional < 0 (negative) structure may not fail but the design requirements have not been
load beyond the design load (e.g. if MS = 1 met to reaching its design load(s) in service (failed compliance with
can handle one additional of equal force to requirements).
the maximum load it was designed to ≥ 0 (positive) structure must have additional remaining strength requested in the
support (x2 the design load)) requirements (e.g. if requirements specified MS = 1 and design safety factor =
1.5, the structure would have an actual factor of safety of 3 capable of
supporting two loads each equal to the design safety factor of 1.5, meaning
the structure can support 3 times the applied/design load before failure).
Margin of Safety/Reserve Factor
F = Allowable load (stress, force, moment, torque, etc)
f = Applied load (stress, force, moment, torque, etc)
𝐃𝐅𝐱 = Design Factor (e.g. Design Safety Factor, etc.)
x : shows critical condition
Possible critical conditions:
- Basic material strength
- Tension
Airworthiness criteria: - Compression
- Shear
- Positive MS / RF larger than 1
- Joint strength
- Bearing
F - Bearing/bypass (for multi row fastened joints only)
MSx = −1≥0 - Fastener strength / pull out
f × ∑DFx - Bond strength
- Stability
F - Buckling
RFx = ≥1 - Damage tolerance (residual strength)
f × ∑DFx - Compression after impact
- Crack arrestment
- Creep
- etc
Loads as product requirements
for the airframe
Number of load cases is very large due to
What do you
notice?
Structural design
Functional analysis
Concept generation
Analysis
Evaluation
Trade-off
Verification
Verification: prove that allowable loads are
higher than applied loads
Finding objective evidence that the
Functional analysis structure is airworthy
Methods:
Concept generation - calculation (analysis)
- laboratory testing
Analysis - flight tests
- ground tests
- reviews
Evaluation - inspections
- statements
Trade-off - safety assessment
- simulation
- equipment qualifications
Verification
FAA/EASA: control the verification process
Airworthiness Product
requirements specification
Design
System monitorin
Type Analysis
investigation & test
Type investigation
Organisation
program
System
Show
Design
Compliance
Verification of
compliance
Declaration of
compliance
Type
certification
Design
Manufacturing Materials
Triple-trinity airframe design:
the foundational trinity
Metal
Polymer Composite
Materials
Ceramic
Extrusion
Manufacturing
Lamination
Design
Sintering
Externally bead
stiffened medium
thickness cylinder
Function
Technology/
Customer
Design
Triple-trinity airframe design:
the engineering trinity
Design
Analysis Testing
Engineering Trinity:
Simplified design and analysis cycle for aircraft primary structure
Understanding structures:
Basis for design and analysis
Primary function is take up loads, carry through and pass over to other
elements or items
What do we mean by
• Material
• Structure
• Safety factor
• Loads
• …..
Importance of language:
The airframe and its components
• Fuselage
• Wings
• Empennage
• vertical tailplane
• horizontal tailplane
• Engines
• Landing gear
• Control surfaces
• Doors
• Windows
The fuselage
• Skins • Butt joints
• Frames • Single lap joints
• Stringers • Keel, side, crown
• Stiffeners • Bulkheads
• Keel beam • Doublers
• Cut-outs • Crack stoppers
• Clips • Seats
• Cleats
• Floor beam
• Seat rails
• Castellations
• Stringer couplings
Importance of language:
Wings
The airframe and its components
• Skins,
• Spars
• Shear webs
• Ribs
• Access holes
• Stiffeners
• Filler caps
• Fuel tanks
• Slosh ribs
• Shims
• Hinges
• Brackets
Importance
Control systems
of language:
The airframe and its components
• Rods
• Cables
• Pulleys
• Rod ends
• Tensioners
• Turnbuckles
• Brackets
• Bell cranks
• Gearing ratio
• Actuator
Importance
Detail elements
of language:
The airframe and its components
• Rivets
• Bolts
• Nuts
• Anchor nuts
• Safety pins
• Washers
• Brackets
• Fittings
• Clips
Importance of ‘language’
Be precise in using:
- Strength (static, fatigue, buckling, residual ….)
- Stiffness: extensional, bending, torsion, material stiffness
- Material <> structure
- Material properties (A-, B-values, etc)
- Stress concentration
- Stress intensities
- ……..
Summary of the key ideas
• Successful product development is guided by the Triple Trinity
• Requirements: functional, performance constraints
• Main functions structure: take-up loads and transfer loads
• Understanding and designing load paths is a key part of structural design
• Free body diagrams and FE are the key tools for understanding and quantifying
applied loads on individual parts
• Understanding failure modes, structural analysis and testing are the key tools for
understanding allowable loads
• Design verification is the analysis of Applied loads versus Allowable loads
• Airworthiness MS>0, RF>1
• Design is synthesis of partial solutions
• Foundational trinity asks for best combination of shape, material and manufacture
• Many new developments ask for new combinations in all three trinities
• Understanding and being able to express yourself in the language of structural design
and analysis is an important enabling skill
Thank You!