Harjot is the promisor and david is the promisee

It”s a valid consideration because harjot contracted to pay

david 1000 pounds and david began to build conservatory.

Harjot unless if she not paid 2000 pounds he would not be able
to make she would have to take another one to do - work is
something which is usually paid[ re casey”s patents case]

Harjot refusing to pay extra 2000 - performing a pre existing

legal obligation owed to the promisor - harris v sheffled

David nephew leon helping david is domestic agreement- not

binding