Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in Popular
Culture
The sign is interesting for what it does not say. Information vital
to the identity of America's premier playwright and yet repugnant to
this small Southern town has been carefully omitted and highlighted
at the same time. Tennessee Williams was a homosexual, a fact that
he made no effort to conceal and a fact that, I am told, created quite a
scandal among Columbus' residents. Yet many years later, Columbus
does not fail to exploit its connection to Williams. One would like to
believe that this move reveals the community's growing tolerance
toward sexual diversity, but this unfortunately is not true. Columbus
is a profoundly
militant hostil
Southern Bapt
chosen to hono
it has initiated
it seems intent
Columbus has
national Memo
local cemeteries after the Civil War where the soldiers of both the North
and the South were buried alongside each other. The local ladies
indiscriminately decorated all of the graves - both northern and south-
ern - to honor the war dead, and it is out of this gesture that the
national holiday was born. The association between the community
and the nation's chief war holiday reveals the most potent influence
upon the local social consciousness. Columbus is a military town,
facilitating one of the country's pilot training bases, and it is in the
military camp that the community's sentiments lie.
Columbus' two claims to fame replicate one of the most vexed issues
in American society today - the presumed incompatibility of homo-
sexuals with military service. Whereas the American military has
always been hostile toward homosexuals, the extent to which it was
willing to pursue soldiers with alternative sexual identities has varied
over the past century. Of course, the anti-gay element of the debate
would have us believe that the policy, partially overturned in 1993,
finds its origin in Leviticus, a sentiment that conveniently ignores
history. During the debate over gays in the military, Columbus was
relatively quiet, not because it was indifferent, but because it contin-
ued to observe the culturally imposed silence upon the issue of homo-
sexuality in spite of the national uproar. However, as Foucault has
taught us, we, as a culture, have devised multiple covert discourses for
talking about sex even as we tell ourselves that we are sexually
repressed. From this perspective, it is probable that Columbus' pro-
found hostility toward President Clinton is, at least partially, fueled by
his stand on gays in the military. Those ubiquitous bumper stickers
revealing yet another Bush supporter may be a clandestine means of
protesting Clinton's breach of the silence on homosexuality without
actually breaching the silence again with protest.
The Tennessee Williams house has not enjoyed its renaissance
because of the increased social tolerance of the community, but because
the playwright's reputation has been sanitized by time. The historical
marker commemorating the building recognizes Cat on a Hot Tin Roof
and Streetcar Named Desire as Williams' most important works, but,
of course, it does not mention that homosexuality is symbolically
and slips. Wh
Williams' sexua
it revives its
renewed vigo
and entrapme
campaigns spo
In the past fe
level, has been
hegemonic ma
homosexual w
deconstruction
prioritizing of
military man/g
civil rights of
the former un
effort to releg
The national
policy that lef
sions about ge
lution to the
recent memo
compromise, t
with gay men
cannot endure
ingly, the mil
maintain disci
permitted to a
even more un
discover that
discipline is so
is threatened
looking at his
argues that th
superior offic
when their un
that discipline
punishment an
lifting the ba
identity mak
military plain
The military
sent the split
The refusal to a
of heterosexua
within the pub
closeted, s/he
debate is the R
pilgrimage to O
the theme par
funerals of ga
deceased is in h
by Congress t
homosexuality
to deny tax mo
and lesbians, a
payers too. Th
same time that
it the object o
catalyst for un
political.
The same cultural practices identified at the national level have
begun to define local social relations. The split between public and
private space and between conscious and unconscious, the binary
opposition between military man and gay man have begun to
[re]segregate a community that previously only accepted integration
by compulsion. Of course, the objects of exclusion have changed. In
effect, Tennessee Williams has been assigned a closet in his own house.
His prominence on Main street relies entirely upon the sanitizing of
his image, the unspeakable remaining unspoken. The new Mississippi
Welcome Center does not so much welcome as marginalize and exclude
those who have a close affinity with the playwright.
A debate at Mississippi University for Women initiated one of the
worst local flare ups of the controversy regarding the place of gays in
American society. The university invited one of the nationally promi-
nent figures in the gays in the military issue, Tom Panacea, to
participate in a debate with a local retired colonel. The forum had been
planned entirely for the interest and benefit of the students and
faculty. However, that did not stop the community from getting
involved. The public outrage bordered on panic; the silence had been
broken. The President's office at the university was deluged with calls
from angry citizens who were evidently part of a telephone campaign
by a local ministry. The final tally was approximately three hundred
calls in just two days. They included such memorable suggestions as
that of a store owner who instructed the university to consult local
businessmen before it schedules any controversial presentations.
Another caller accused the university of inviting Panacea to campus to
their prejudic
sentiment neg
available to un
honest and pos
response of th
impressionable
be proud to kn
the room with
one walked out
Interestingly,
pute whether
whether it w
maintained that it should have been held downtown in the civic
center. Of course, had the event been scheduled at the civic center,
it would never have taken place. The implicit argument of the
opposition was that homosexuals should be excluded from public
space, specifically the university, and should have no opportunity to
influence college freshmen, to invest them with the most dreaded of
sentiments - social tolerance. More and more, the issue turned to a
dispute over the nature of a university. The agenda of the detractors
was to exclude gays and lesbians from public property under the
implicit assumption that any particular taxpayer who objects to a
program should have the right to shut it down (There goes the MX
missile and SDI). At one point, local homophobes sent a letter
demanding that the administration fire all faculty members believed
to be gay. Of course, the letter also included a list of names. If the
administration had circulated that letter among the faculty, I am
sure that the latter could have taught the perpetrators the meaning
of "libel" and "litigation." But the administration graciously sup-
pressed the document. Perhaps the most vituperative and certainly
the most persistent voice in the debate came from a prominent
businessman who wrote many editorials in the local paper denounc-
ing the university and calling for its closure. Since the university is
one of the town's principal employers, it is difficult to determine
whether this retailer is merely short-sighted or prepared to sacrifice
everything for his beliefs; the closure of Mississippi University for
Women would devastate the town financially.
In symbolic contrast to the aforementioned fiasco, controversial
figure Oliver North was invited to Columbus to speak at the civic
center only a short time after Panacea's visit. There were no public
protests, no angry phone calls, no bomb threats, and no vituperative
letter writing campaigns. Many people from the university who
denounce the senatorial candidate attended the event and listened
sexual orientat
who, carried aw
desires in some
transgressors
location and ha
back seats of p
Sheriffs Depar
focused exclus
young officer,
this park, and
pre-Stonewall e
duced and teas
unsuspecting t
The remarkabl
officers themsel
is to talk about
selves. This dou
officers are be
While there is n
man, who is th
honest and sincere in his words and his intentions. So the whole
search and destroy mission rests upon a perception of intentionality.
The officer escapes the odium of arrest because he, by virtue of his
position in the exchange, can be presumed dishonest, whereas the gay
man is subject to arrest and public humiliation because he is perceived
to be truthful. Here again, this hot bed of fundamentalism values
covert action and lies above openness and sincerity, to the extent that
the hypocrite is construed to be the defender of community values and
the honest man the subject of exclusion and persecution.
In one exchange, a law enforcement officer told a visitor to the park
that he (the officer) was from El Paso, Texas, and, indeed, he sat in a
battered old car with Texas plates. He said that he had come to town
for a few weeks to work at Weyerhaeuser, a paper processing plant in
town, that he was staying at the Regency Park Motel on Highway 45
in Columbus, and that soon he would be leaving for Oregon to take
another temporary position. Of course, he was actually a Sheriffs
deputy from Aberdeen. He asked the gay man if there were any places
in the area where people went to be private, and he asked about some
of the other individuals driving around in the parking lot. The gay
man asked him if there were any clubs in El Paso and if he cheated on
his wife when he was at home or only when he traveled. Of course,
much more passed between them; nevertheless, before long, the
officer flashed his badge and explained that he was in the employ of
The driver of the first car turned into the lot of a bai
confronted by an undercover cop, who after much coq
dering, invited the driver to a room at the Regenc
Evidently, the driver found the solicitation appealing,
the undercover cop back to the room. When the two
the motel and before any groping transpired, two m
popped out of the rest room and arrested the, as yet
driver for attempted sodomy - a felony. After a time, st
arrived, this time from the Army Corp; of Engineers, wh
victim with still another crime. As they departed from t
the sodomite in cuffs, one cop promised to make the
AIDS test. It is uncertain whether at the time the cops
had nabbed a married man whose chief concern was to conceal the
arrest from his unsuspecting wife.
The sexual politics of this particular entrapment are quite com-
plex. Consider first the symbolic implications of two adult men hiding
in a motel bathroom waiting for a third to lure a sodomite into their
midst. Each will then have the opportunity to possess, victimize, and
humiliate the captive. The situation resembles a gang rape. Here the
boys club achieves its homosocial bonding by collectively objectifying
and symbolically excluding the man who dares to cross the boundary
between bonding and erotic desire. Just as the mutual longing to
objectify and sexually exploit women constitutes the single criterion
for inclusion in male homosocial bonding, the officers involved in the
arrest are further defining the parameters of that male world through
their dramatic humiliation and marginalization of queer sensibili-
ties.3 Thus at least subconsciously the officers are treating the gay
male as a woman and thus an object of exclusion through desire. They
demonstrate their fragile masculinity by competing to be the one
individual who most aggressively rejects and degrades the queer.
The operations at the damn exposed a whole buddy network in
which one organization encouraged another to participate in the
victimization of a particular social group. The initial purge of the boat
ramp was perpetrated by the County and the Army Corps of Engi-
neers, because the area lies outside the city limits. Apparently, the
city police felt left out of the fun. The more recent arrest involved a
conscious effort to lure the victim to a motel within the city limits so
that local officials could have their opportunity to prosecute and so
that the victim could be charged with the more serious crime of
attempted sodomy which is, evidently, a felony only within the city
limits. But the county and the Corp. were not left out. Although the
encounters with the undercover policeman did not take place on the
engineers' land, the assumption was made that because the victim
James Keller
Division of Humanities
Mississippi University for Women
Columbus, Mississippi 39701
Notes