Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enhancement of Induced Synchronization by Transient Uncoupling
Enhancement of Induced Synchronization by Transient Uncoupling
A. Arulgnanam∗
Department of Physics, St. John’s College,
Palayamkottai, Tamilnadu-627 002, India,
arXiv:1902.06049v2 [nlin.CD] 22 Feb 2019
A. N. Seethalakshmi
Department of Physics, The M.D.T Hindu College,
Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu-627 010, India,
Affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,
Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu - 627 012, India
y 1, y2
coupling factor given as 0
-1
(
1 if x2 ∈ A
χA = (3)
0 if x2 ∈/A -2
where, A is a region of phase space of the driven system -3
such that A ⊆ Rd in which the driven system is con-
trolled by the drive and the represents the region where -4
-1 0 1 2 3 4
the coupling is active. The subset A is obtained by clip- x 1, x2
ping a portion of the phase space of the driven system
along the direction of the coupled state variable of the
driven system given as FIG. 1. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the drive (blue)
d
A∆ = {x2 ∈ R : |x2 − x∗2 | ≤ ∆} (4) and driven systems (red) of the coupled Morse oscillator sys-
tem in the x1 − y1 and x2 − y2 planes under the uncoupled
∗
where x2 is a point considered as the center of the state (ǫ = 0) with clipping of phase space of the driven system
chaotic attractor and it lies along the coordinate axis through transient uncoupling.
of the state variable x2 . The variational equation of Eq.
2 is given by
ξ˙ = [IN ⊗ DF + ǫχA (G ⊗ E)]ξ (5) II. MORSE OSCILLATOR
where IN is an N ×N identity matrix, DF is the Jacobian
of the uncoupled system and ⊗ represents the inner or The classical Morse oscillator system has been used to
Kronecker product. On diagonalization of the matrix G, describe the dynamics of diatomic molecular vibrations.
Eq. 5 is written as The dynamical equations of the unidirectionally coupled
ξ˙k = [DF + δγk E)]ξk , (6) Morse oscillator system13,14 under transient uncoupling
is written as
where δ = ǫχA and γk are the eigenvalues of G with k =
0 or 1. In general, the quantity δγk are generally complex ẋ1 = y1 , (8a)
numbers which can be written in the form δγk = α + iβ. ẏ1 = −αy1 − βe−x1 (1 − e−x1 ) + f1 cos(z1 ), (8b)
Hence, the general dynamical system is
ż1 = ω1 , (8c)
ξ˙k = [DF + (α + iβ)E)]ξk , (7) ẋ2 = y2 + ǫχA (x1 − x2 ), (8d)
The largest transverse lyapunov exponent λ⊥ max of the ẏ2 = −αy2 − βe−x2 (1 − e−x2 ) + f2 cos(z2 ), (8e)
generic variational equation given by Eq. 7 depend- ż2 = ω2 , (8f)
ing on α and β values, is the master stability function
(MSF)6,12 . Under the coupling of the x-variables of the where x1 , y1 , z1 and x2 , y2 , z2 represents the normalized
system, the matrices G and E are given as state variables of the drive and driven systems, respec-
tively. The drive and the driven systems are coupled
1 0 0
−1 1 through the x-variables and the parameters of the system
G= , E = 0 0 0 .
0 0 are fixed as α = 0.8, β = 8, ω1,2 = 2 and f1,2 = 0.35.
0 0 0
The Morse oscillator system exhibits a period-doubling
The following are discussed in this paper. In Section route to chaos and the chaotic attractors of the drive
II, the enhancement of stable synchronization observed (blue) and the driven (red) systems obtained for the
in coupled Morse oscillator systems subjected to tran- amplitude of the external force f1,2 = 0.35 under the
sient uncoupling is presented. Section III deals with the unsynchronized state (ǫ = 0) is as shown in Fig. 1.
studies on coupled series LCR circuit systems with two The synchronization dynamics of the coupled system
different types of nonlinear elements and in Section IV under transient uncoupling is shown in Fig. 2. In the
coupled parallel LCR circuit systems are discussed. In absence of transient uncoupling the variation of the
Section V, the enhancement of synchronization observed MSF as a function of the coupling parameter shows
in coupled quasiperiodically forced series LCR circuit sys- stable synchronized states in the range 0.415 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.
tems exhibiting strange non-chaotic attractors (SNA) in Hence, the coupled system becomes unsynchronized
their dynamics is presented. for coupling strengths ǫ > 28 under normal coupling.
3
2 0.5
Now we introduce the transient uncoupling factor in the
(a) (b) system equations and study its synchronization stability.
0
0.25
The stability of the synchronized states can be analyzed
for different regions of clipping of the phase space of
max
0
max
λ⊥
λ⊥
-2 -0.25
the
′
driven system expressed by the clipping fraction
∆ = 2∆/Ω where, Ω is the width of the attractor along
-4
-0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
the clipping coordinate axis (x-axis). The point x2 ∗ has
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’ been considered as the center of the chaotic attractor
1 40 and the phase space is clipped to a width of ∆ along the
(c) (d)
20
λ⊥
-1
10
a function of the clipping fraction with the coupling
strength fixed at ǫ = 29.5 is shown in Fig. 2(b). For
0
-2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 ∆ = 0, the two systems are uncoupled and hence
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
does not synchronize and for ∆ = Ω/2, the coupling
between the systems become normal and the original
FIG. 2. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed unsynchronized behavior of the systems under normal
in coupled Morse oscillator systems. (a) MSF obtained with- coupling is obtained. From Fig. 2(b) it is observed that
out transient uncoupling exists in negative valued regions in the coupled systems exist in stable synchronized states in
′ ′
the range 0.415 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28; (b) MSF as a function of ∆ for the range of the clipping fractions 0.0235 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.2383
ǫ = 29.5 indicating stable synchronized states in the lower ′
and 0.7576 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.9179, respectively. Figure 2(c)
′
and higher regions of clipping fractions 0.0235 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.2383 showing the variation of the MSF with the coupling
′
and 0.7576 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.9179, respectively; (c) Variation of MSF strength indicates a broader stable synchronized state
with ǫ under transient uncoupling obtained with x2 ∗ = 1.59 in′ the range 0.45 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.6 for a clipping fraction of
′
and ∆ = 0.85 indicating enhanced stable synchronized states ∆ = 0.85. The introduction of transient uncoupling
in the range of coupling strengths 0.45 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.6; (d) Two- induces synchronization at the values of higher coupling
′
parameter bifurcation diagram in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicat- strength for which synchronization is not been observed
ing the parameter regions for stable synchronized states (gray under normal coupling. The ′two-parameter bifurcation
color).
diagram obtained in the ∆ − ǫ plane showing the
parameter regions (gray) for the existence of the coupled
system in the synchronized state is as shown in Fig. 2(d).
βe−x1 (1 − e−x1 ) −α 0 0
-1 J = .
ǫχA 0 −ǫχA 1
-2 0 0 βe−x2 (1 − e−x2 )−α
(9)
-3 The synchronous of the driven system is observed only
when the trajectories of the driven system traces that of
-4
-1 0 1 2 3 4 the drive. Hence the eigenvalues corresponding to the
x2 driven system obtained from Eq. 9 must enable the tra-
jectories to converge towards the drive system. Figure 3
shows the chaotic attractor (blue) of the driven system
FIG. 3. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the driven Morse in the (x2 − y2 ) phase plane along with the values of x2
′
oscillator system (blue) in the x2 −y2 phase space with regions (red) within the clipping fraction ∆ = 0.85 for which the
of x2 (red) for which the real parts of the eigenvalues of the eigenvalues of the driven system have negative real parts
driven system is negative under a finite clipping fraction for and hence leading to the convergence of the trajectories.
′
the parameters x2 ∗ = 1.59 and ∆ = 0.85. These negative eigenvalue regions of the driven system
within the clipping fraction enables the synchronization
of the coupled systems.
4
(a) (b)
1 1
In this section, we present the enhanced stability of
induced synchronization observed in a class of coupled
y1, y2
y1, y2
0 0
sinusoidally forced series LCR circuit systems with three-
segmented piecewise-linear elements. The Chua’s diode -1 -1
and the simplified nonlinear element are the nonlinear el-
-1 0 1 -1 0 1
ements considered for the present study. The normalized x1, x2 x1, x2
state equations of the unidirectionally coupled chaotic
systems subjected to transient uncoupling can be writ- FIG. 4. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the drive (blue)
ten as and driven systems (red) of the series LCR circuit systems
with a three-segmented piecewise-linear element in the x1 −y1
ẋ1 = y1 − h(x1 ), (10a) and x2 − y2 planes under the uncoupled state (ǫ = 0) with
ẏ1 = −βy1 − νβy1 − βx1 + f1 sin(z1 ), (10b) clipping of phase space of the driven system through transient
uncoupling. (a) The Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuit system
ż1 = ω1 , (10c)
and (b) the forced series LCR circuit system with a simplified
ẋ2 = y2 − h(x2 ) + ǫχA (x1 − x2 ), (10d) nonlinear element.
ẏ2 = −βy2 − νβy2 − βx2 + f2 sin(z2 ), (10e)
ż2 = ω2 , (10f)
transient uncoupling is shown in Fig. 5. Under nor-
where x1 , y1 , z1 and x2 , y2 , z2 represents the normal-
mal coupling, the variation of the MSF with the cou-
ized state variables of the drive and driven systems, re-
pling strength indicates stable synchronized states in the
spectively. The terms h(x1 ), h(x2 ) represent the three-
range 0.0256 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.725 as shown in Fig. 5(a). Hence,
segmented piecewise-linear function of the drive and the
the coupled system becomes unsynchronized for coupling
driven systems given as
strengths ǫ > 28.725 under normal coupling. The vari-
ation of the MSF of the coupled system under transient
bx1,2 + (a − b) if x1,2 ≥ 1
uncoupling as a function of the clipping fraction with
h(x1,2 ) = ax1,2 if |x1,2 | ≤ 1 (11) the coupling strength fixed at ǫ = 29 is shown in Fig.
bx − (a − b) if x ≤ −1
1,2 1,2 5(b). From Fig. 5(b) it is observed that the coupled
system exists in stable synchronized ′states in the range
The driven system is coupled to the drive through the of the clipping fractions 0.4478 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.7624. Figure
x-variable by the factor ǫχA . When the piecewise-linear 5(c) showing the variation of the MSF with the coupling
function h(x) represents the characteristics of the Chua’s strength indicates stable synchronized state in the
′
range
diode the circuit is termed as the Murali-Lakshmanan- 0.0528 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.277 for a clipping fraction of ∆ = 0.67.
Chua circuit (MLC) circuit and when it represents the The
′
two-parameter bifurcation diagram obtained in the
simplified nonlinear element it is termed as the forced ∆ − ǫ plane showing the parameter regions (gray) for
series LCR circuit with a simplified nonlinear element . the existence of the coupled system in the synchronized
The parameters for the MLC and the circuit with a sim- state is shown in Fig. 5(d).
plified nonlinear element take the values a = −1.02, b =
−0.55, β = 1, ν = 0.015, ω1,2 = 0.72 and a =
−1.148, b = 5.125, β = 0.9865, ν = 0, ω1,2 = 0.7084, B. Forced series LCR circuit with a simplified
respectively. nonlinear element
4 0.2 4 1
(a) (b) (a) (b)
2 2 0
0
max
max
max
max
-1
λ⊥
λ⊥
0 0
λ⊥
λ⊥
-0.2
-2
-2 -2
-0.4 -3
-4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’ 0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
1 40 1 40
(c) (d) (c) (d)
max
-1 20 20
λ⊥
λ⊥
10 -1 10
-2
0 0
-3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’ 0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
FIG. 5. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed FIG. 6. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed
in coupled Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuits. (a) MSF ob- in coupled forced series LCR circuit systems with simpli-
tained without transient uncoupling exists in negative valued fied nonlinear element. (a) MSF obtained without transient
regions in the range 0.0256 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.725; (b) MSF as a func- uncoupling exists in negative valued regions in the range
′ ′
tion of ∆ for ǫ = 29 indicating stable synchronized states 0.074 ≤ ǫ ≤ 27.006; (b) MSF as a function of ∆ for ǫ = 29
′
in the range of clipping fractions 0.4478 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.7624; (c) indicating the stable synchronized states in the range of clip-
′
Variation of MSF with ǫ under transient uncoupling obtained ping fractions 0.004 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.964; (c) Variation of MSF
′
with x2 ∗ = 0.0005 and ∆ = 0.67 indicating enhanced sta- with ǫ under transient uncoupling obtained with x2 ∗ = 0.0004
′
ble synchronized states in the range of coupling strengths and ∆ = 0.5 indicating enhanced stable synchronized states
0.0528 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.277; (d) Two-parameter bifurcation diagram in the range of coupling strengths 0.067 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.467; (d)
′ ′
in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicating the parameter regions for stable Two-parameter bifurcation diagram in the ∆ − ǫ plane in-
synchronized states (gray color). dicating the parameter regions for stable synchronized states
(gray color).
y2
0 0
y1, y2
y1, y2
0 0
parts. Hence, the trajectories of the driven system con-
verges towards the trajectories of the drive at greater
-1
values coupling strengths using transient uncoupling for
-1
which synchronization cannot be achieved under normal -2 -1 0
x1, x2
1 2 -1 0
x1, x2
1
coupling.
FIG. 8. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the drive (blue)
and driven systems (red) of the parallel LCR circuit systems
IV. PARALLEL LCR CIRCUITS
with three-segmented piecewise-linear elements in the x1 −
y1 and x2 − y2 planes under the uncoupled state (ǫ = 0)
In this section, we present the enhanced stability of in- with clipping of phase space of the driven system through
duced synchronization observed in coupled sinusoidally transient uncoupling. (a) The variant of Murali-Lakshmanan-
forced parallel LCR circuit systems with piecewise-linear Chua circuit system and (b) the forced parallel LCR circuit
elements. The Chua’s diode and the simplified nonlinear system with a simplified nonlinear element.
element are the nonlinear elements considered for the
present study. The normalized state equations of the
x-coupled chaotic systems subjected to transient uncou-
pling can be written as of the external force f1,2 = 0.375. The chaotic attractors
of the drive (blue) and the driven (red) MLCV circuit
ẋ1 = f1 sin(z1 ) − x1 − y1 − h(x1 ), (13a) systems under the unsynchronized state is as shown in
ẏ1 = βx1 , (13b) Fig. 8(a). The synchronization dynamics of the cou-
pled system under transient uncoupling is shown in Fig.
ż1 = ω1 , (13c) 9. Under normal coupling, the variation of the MSF with
ẋ2 = f2 sin(z2 ) − x2 − y2 − h(x2 ) + ǫχA (x1 − x2(13d)
), the coupling strength indicates stable synchronized states
ẏ2 = βx2 , (13e) in the range 0.0028 ≤ ǫ ≤ 27.746 as shown in Fig. 9(a).
ż2 = ω2 , (13f) The variation of the MSF of the coupled system under
transient uncoupling as a function of the clipping fraction
where x1 , y1 , z1 and x2 , y2 , z2 represents the normalized with the coupling strength fixed at ǫ = 29.25 as shown
state variables of the drive and driven systems, respec- in Fig. 9(b) indicates stable synchronized states in the
′
tively. The terms h(x1 ), h(x2 ) representing the three- range of the clipping fractions 0.0158 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.8964.
segmented piecewise-linear function is as given in Eq. Figure 9(c) shows the variation of the MSF with the cou-
11. The driven system is coupled to the drive through pling strength indicating enhanced stable synchronized
the x-variable by the factor ǫχA . When the piecewise- states in the ′ range 0.0087 ≤ ǫ ≤ 30.2414 for a clipping
linear function h(x) represents the characteristics of the fraction of ∆ = 0.6. The ′
two-parameter bifurcation dia-
Chua’s diode the circuit is termed the Variant of Murali- gram obtained in the ∆ − ǫ plane showing the parameter
Lakshmanan-Chua (MLCV) circuit and when it repre- regions (gray) for the existence of the coupled system in
sents the simplified nonlinear element it is termed the the synchronized state is as shown in Fig. 9(d).
forced parallel LCR circuit with a simplified nonlinear
element . The parameters for the MLCV and the cir-
cuit with a simplified nonlinear element take the values B. Forced parallel LCR circuit with a simplified
a = −1.121, b = −0.6047, β = 0.05, ω1,2 = 0.105 and nonlinear element
a = −1.148, b = 5.125, β = 0.2592, ω1,2 = 0.2402,
respectively. The sinusoidally forced parallel LCR circuit with a
simplified nonlinear element exhibiting chaotic dynamics
was introduced by Arulgnanam et al.24 . This circuit
A. Variant of Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuit exhibits a prominent chaotic attractor at the amplitude
of the force f1,2 = 0.695. The chaotic and the syn-
The forced parallel LCR circuit with the Chua’s diode chronization dynamics of the circuit has been studied
as the nonlinear element introduced by Thamilmaran et experimentally, numerically and analytically18,23 . The
al.21 exhibits a rich variety of bifurcations and chaos in chaotic attractors of the drive (blue) and the driven (red)
its dynamics22 . The chaotic and the synchronization dy- systems with simplified nonlinear elements represented
namics of the circuit has been extensively studied ex- by Eq. 13 under the unsynchronized state is as shown
perimentally, numerically and analytically18,19,23 . This in Fig. 8(b). The synchronization dynamics of the
system exhibits a torus-breakdown route to chaos and a coupled system under transient uncoupling is shown
prominent chaotic attractor is observed at the amplitude in Fig. 10. Under normal coupling, the variation of
7
max
max
max
max
-0.1
λ⊥
λ⊥
-0.1
λ⊥
λ⊥
-0.02
-0.5
-0.2
-0.2 -0.03
-0.04 -0.3
-0.3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’ 0 5 10
ε
15 20 25
∆’
40 0.2 40
(c) (c) (d)
max
20 -0.2 20
λ⊥
λ⊥
-0.1
10 10
-0.2 -0.4
0 0
-0.3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -0.6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10 20
ε
30 40
∆’ 0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
FIG. 9. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed FIG. 10. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization ob-
in coupled Variant of Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuits. (a) served in coupled forced parallel LCR circuits with a sim-
MSF obtained without transient uncoupling exists in negative plified nonlinear element. (a) MSF obtained without tran-
valued regions in the range 0.0028 ≤ ǫ ≤ 27.746; (b) MSF as a sient uncoupling exists in negative valued regions in the range
′ ′
function of ∆ for ǫ = 29.25 indicating the stable synchronized 0.051 ≤ ǫ ≤ 23.32; (b) MSF as a function of ∆ for ǫ = 28
′
states in the range of clipping fractions 0.0158 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.8964; indicating stable synchronized states in the range of clipping
′
(c) Variation of MSF with ǫ under transient uncoupling ob- fractions 0.0037 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.907; (c) Variation of MSF with ǫ
′
tained with x2 ∗ = −0.0025 and ∆ = 0.6 indicating enhanced under transient uncoupling obtained with x2 ∗ = 0.0006 and
′
stable synchronized states in the range of coupling strengths ∆ = 0.6 indicating enhanced stable synchronized states in
0.0087 ≤ ǫ ≤ 30.2414; (d) Two-parameter bifurcation dia- the range of coupling strengths 0.053 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.28; (d) Two-
′ ′
gram in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicating the parameter regions for parameter bifurcation diagram in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicat-
stable synchronized states (gray color). ing the parameter regions for stable synchronized states (gray
color).
y2
0 0
y 1, y2
V. QUASIPERIODICALLY FORCED SERIES
LCR CIRCUIT -1
φ̇2 = ω4 , (15h)
max
-0.1
max
λ⊥
λ⊥
spectively. The terms h(x1 ), h(x2 ) represents the three- 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
segmented piecewise-linear function corresponding to the
0.5
Chua’s diode as given in Eq. 11. The normalized param- (c)
40
(d)
Coupling Strength (ε)
-0.5 20
λ⊥
-1 VI. CONCLUSION
9
∗
Corresponding author: gospelin@gmail.com M. Schröder, S. Chakraborty, D. Witthaut, J. Nagler, and
1
M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, M. Timme, Scientific Reports 6, 37142 (2016).
10
Physical Review Letters 64, 821 (1990). A. Tandon, M. Schröder, M. Mannat-
2
til, M. Theory
M. J. Ogorzalek, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Fundamental Timme, and 40,
and Applications S. 693Chakraborty,
(1993).
3
N. F. Rulkov, M. M. Sushchik, L. S. Tsimring, and H. D. I. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 26, 094817 (
Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E 51, 980 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959141.
4 11
M. G. Rosenblum, A. S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, A. Ghosh, P. Godara, and S. Chakraborty,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804 (1996). Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 28, 053112 (
5
S.Boccaletti, J.Kurths, G.Osipov, D.L.Valladares, and https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016148.
12
C.S.Zhou, Physics Reports 366, 1 (2002). M. Pecora, T. L. Carroll, A. Johnson, J. Mar, and J. F.
6
M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Heagy, Chaos 7, 520 (1997).
13
Physical Review Letters 80, 2109 (1998). G. C. Lie and J. Yuan,
7
L. Huang, Q. Chen, Y. C. Lai, and M. Pecora, The Journal of Chemical Physics 84, 5486 (1986),
Physical Review E 80, 036204 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.449957.
8 14
M. Schröder, M. Mannattil, D. Dutta, S. Chakraborty, M.Lakshmanan and S.Rajasekar, Nonlinear dynamics: In-
and M. Timme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 054101 (2015). tegrability, Chaos and Patterns (Springer, Berlin, 2003).
10
15 21
K.Murali, M.Lakshmanan, and Leon.O.Chua, K.Thamilmaran, M.Lakshmanan, and K.Murali,
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Fundamental Theory and Applications
International Journal41, 462 (1994). and Chaos 10(7), 1175 (2000).
of Bifurcation
16 22
K.Murali and M.Lakshmanan, K.Thamilmaran and M.Lakshmanan,
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 5, 563 (1995). International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 12, 783 (2001).
17 23
G.Sivaganesh, Chinese Physics Letters 32, 010503 (2015). G. Sivaganesh and A. Arulgnanam,
18
G. Sivaganesh, A. Arulgnanam, and Seethalakshmi, Chinese Physics B 26, 050502 (2017).
24
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 113, 294 (2018). A. Arulgnanam, K. Thamilmaran, and M. Daniel,
19
G. Sivaganesh, A. Arulgnanam, and A. N. Seethalakshmi, Chinese Journal of Physics 53, 060702 (2014).
25
Pramana 92, 42 (2019). A. Venkatesan, K. Murali, and M. Lakshmanan,
20
A.Arulgnanam, K.Thamilmaran, and M.Daniel, Physics Letters A 259, 246 (1999).
26
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 42, 2246 (2009). G.Sivaganesh, Journal of the Korean Physical Society 68, 628 (2016).
27
G. Sivaganesh and A. Arulgnanam,
Journal of the Korean Physical Society 69, 1631 (2016).