You are on page 1of 10

Enhancement of induced synchronization by transient uncoupling

in coupled simple chaotic systems


G. Sivaganesh
Department of Physics,
Alagappa Chettiar Government College of Engineering & Technology,
Karaikudi, Tamilnadu-630 004, India

A. Arulgnanam∗
Department of Physics, St. John’s College,
Palayamkottai, Tamilnadu-627 002, India,
arXiv:1902.06049v2 [nlin.CD] 22 Feb 2019

Affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,


Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu - 627 012, India

A. N. Seethalakshmi
Department of Physics, The M.D.T Hindu College,
Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu-627 010, India,
Affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,
Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu - 627 012, India

(Dated: February 25, 2019)


In this paper, we report the enhanced stability of induced synchronization by transient uncoupling
observed in certain unidirectionally coupled second-order chaotic systems. The stability of synchro-
nization observed in the coupled systems subjected to transient uncoupling is analyzed using the
Master Stability Function. The existence of the coupled systems in stable synchronized states over
a certain range of the clipping fraction of the driven system is identified. The enhanced stable
synchronized states are obtained for fixed values of clipping fraction in certain second-order chaotic
systems. The two-parameter bifurcation diagram indicating the parameter regions over which stable
synchronization occurs is presented. The negative eigenvalue regions of the driven system enabling
induced synchronization is studied for all the systems. The enhancement of synchronization through
transient uncoupling observed in coupled second-order non-autonomous chaotic systems is reported
in the literature for the first time.
PACS numbers: 05.45.Gg; 05.45.Xt;
Keywords: induced synchronization; transient uncoupling; master stability function

I. INTRODUCTION mechanism for the emergence of enhanced synchroniza-


tion has been identified9–11 . However, the applicability
of the method of transient uncoupling for second-order,
The identical behavior of coupled chaotic systems has non-autonomous chaotic systems remains unexplored. In
been primarily challenged by the sensitive dependence this paper, we present the enhancement of induced syn-
nature of chaotic trajectories on initial conditions. With chronization by transient uncoupling observed in certain
the identification of chaos synchronization by Pecora et coupled second-order, non-autonomous chaotic systems.
al.1 , several nonlinear systems have been studied for the Enhancing the stability of synchronized states in coupled
dynamical process of chaos synchronization2–5 . The ex- chaotic systems becomes necessary in understanding the
istence of the drive and the driven systems in the syn- collective dynamics of these systems in networks7.
chronized state has been indicated by the negative val- Now, we discuss the method of transient uncoupling in
ues of the Master Stability Function (MSF)6,7 . Hence, brief. Under the uncoupled state, the isolated systems
in order to sustain synchronization in coupled chaotic are described by
systems the MSF has been expected to be in the nega-
tive valued regions for greater coupling strengths. Re-
cently, induced synchronization has been instigated in ẋ = F(x) (1)
unidirectionally coupled chaotic systems by the method
of transient uncoupling8 . In the method of transient un-
coupling, the coupling strength is activated only over a where, F(x) is the velocity field, x is a d-dimensional vec-
certain region of phase space of the chaotic attractor tor and d represents the dimension of the system. With
of driven system. This method has been applied for a the transient uncoupling factor introduced in the cou-
variety of higher dimensional chaotic systems and the pling parameter, the driven system which is coupled to
2

the drive can be written as


2∆
N
x2* -∆ x2* x2* + ∆
X
ẋ2 = F(x2 ) + ǫχA Gij E(x2 ), (2) 3
j=1
2
where G and E are the matrices representing coupling
coefficients and the information of the coupled variables, 1
respectively. The term χA represents the transient un-

y 1, y2
coupling factor given as 0
-1
(
1 if x2 ∈ A
χA = (3)
0 if x2 ∈/A -2
where, A is a region of phase space of the driven system -3
such that A ⊆ Rd in which the driven system is con-
trolled by the drive and the represents the region where -4
-1 0 1 2 3 4
the coupling is active. The subset A is obtained by clip- x 1, x2
ping a portion of the phase space of the driven system
along the direction of the coupled state variable of the
driven system given as FIG. 1. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the drive (blue)
d
A∆ = {x2 ∈ R : |x2 − x∗2 | ≤ ∆} (4) and driven systems (red) of the coupled Morse oscillator sys-
tem in the x1 − y1 and x2 − y2 planes under the uncoupled

where x2 is a point considered as the center of the state (ǫ = 0) with clipping of phase space of the driven system
chaotic attractor and it lies along the coordinate axis through transient uncoupling.
of the state variable x2 . The variational equation of Eq.
2 is given by
ξ˙ = [IN ⊗ DF + ǫχA (G ⊗ E)]ξ (5) II. MORSE OSCILLATOR
where IN is an N ×N identity matrix, DF is the Jacobian
of the uncoupled system and ⊗ represents the inner or The classical Morse oscillator system has been used to
Kronecker product. On diagonalization of the matrix G, describe the dynamics of diatomic molecular vibrations.
Eq. 5 is written as The dynamical equations of the unidirectionally coupled
ξ˙k = [DF + δγk E)]ξk , (6) Morse oscillator system13,14 under transient uncoupling
is written as
where δ = ǫχA and γk are the eigenvalues of G with k =
0 or 1. In general, the quantity δγk are generally complex ẋ1 = y1 , (8a)
numbers which can be written in the form δγk = α + iβ. ẏ1 = −αy1 − βe−x1 (1 − e−x1 ) + f1 cos(z1 ), (8b)
Hence, the general dynamical system is
ż1 = ω1 , (8c)
ξ˙k = [DF + (α + iβ)E)]ξk , (7) ẋ2 = y2 + ǫχA (x1 − x2 ), (8d)
The largest transverse lyapunov exponent λ⊥ max of the ẏ2 = −αy2 − βe−x2 (1 − e−x2 ) + f2 cos(z2 ), (8e)
generic variational equation given by Eq. 7 depend- ż2 = ω2 , (8f)
ing on α and β values, is the master stability function
(MSF)6,12 . Under the coupling of the x-variables of the where x1 , y1 , z1 and x2 , y2 , z2 represents the normalized
system, the matrices G and E are given as state variables of the drive and driven systems, respec-
  tively. The drive and the driven systems are coupled
  1 0 0
−1 1 through the x-variables and the parameters of the system
G= , E = 0 0 0 .
0 0 are fixed as α = 0.8, β = 8, ω1,2 = 2 and f1,2 = 0.35.
0 0 0
The Morse oscillator system exhibits a period-doubling
The following are discussed in this paper. In Section route to chaos and the chaotic attractors of the drive
II, the enhancement of stable synchronization observed (blue) and the driven (red) systems obtained for the
in coupled Morse oscillator systems subjected to tran- amplitude of the external force f1,2 = 0.35 under the
sient uncoupling is presented. Section III deals with the unsynchronized state (ǫ = 0) is as shown in Fig. 1.
studies on coupled series LCR circuit systems with two The synchronization dynamics of the coupled system
different types of nonlinear elements and in Section IV under transient uncoupling is shown in Fig. 2. In the
coupled parallel LCR circuit systems are discussed. In absence of transient uncoupling the variation of the
Section V, the enhancement of synchronization observed MSF as a function of the coupling parameter shows
in coupled quasiperiodically forced series LCR circuit sys- stable synchronized states in the range 0.415 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.
tems exhibiting strange non-chaotic attractors (SNA) in Hence, the coupled system becomes unsynchronized
their dynamics is presented. for coupling strengths ǫ > 28 under normal coupling.
3

2 0.5
Now we introduce the transient uncoupling factor in the
(a) (b) system equations and study its synchronization stability.
0
0.25
The stability of the synchronized states can be analyzed
for different regions of clipping of the phase space of

max
0
max

λ⊥
λ⊥

-2 -0.25
the

driven system expressed by the clipping fraction
∆ = 2∆/Ω where, Ω is the width of the attractor along
-4
-0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
the clipping coordinate axis (x-axis). The point x2 ∗ has
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’ been considered as the center of the chaotic attractor
1 40 and the phase space is clipped to a width of ∆ along the
(c) (d)

Coupling Strength (ε)


coordinate axis (x2 -axis) on either side of x2 ∗ , resulting
30
0 in a clipping width of 2∆. The variation of the MSF
of the coupled system under transient uncoupling as
max

20
λ⊥

-1
10
a function of the clipping fraction with the coupling
strength fixed at ǫ = 29.5 is shown in Fig. 2(b). For
0
-2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 ∆ = 0, the two systems are uncoupled and hence
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
does not synchronize and for ∆ = Ω/2, the coupling
between the systems become normal and the original
FIG. 2. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed unsynchronized behavior of the systems under normal
in coupled Morse oscillator systems. (a) MSF obtained with- coupling is obtained. From Fig. 2(b) it is observed that
out transient uncoupling exists in negative valued regions in the coupled systems exist in stable synchronized states in
′ ′
the range 0.415 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28; (b) MSF as a function of ∆ for the range of the clipping fractions 0.0235 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.2383
ǫ = 29.5 indicating stable synchronized states in the lower ′
and 0.7576 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.9179, respectively. Figure 2(c)

and higher regions of clipping fractions 0.0235 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.2383 showing the variation of the MSF with the coupling

and 0.7576 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.9179, respectively; (c) Variation of MSF strength indicates a broader stable synchronized state
with ǫ under transient uncoupling obtained with x2 ∗ = 1.59 in′ the range 0.45 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.6 for a clipping fraction of

and ∆ = 0.85 indicating enhanced stable synchronized states ∆ = 0.85. The introduction of transient uncoupling
in the range of coupling strengths 0.45 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.6; (d) Two- induces synchronization at the values of higher coupling

parameter bifurcation diagram in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicat- strength for which synchronization is not been observed
ing the parameter regions for stable synchronized states (gray under normal coupling. The ′two-parameter bifurcation
color).
diagram obtained in the ∆ − ǫ plane showing the
parameter regions (gray) for the existence of the coupled
system in the synchronized state is as shown in Fig. 2(d).

An analysis on the nature of the eigenvalues of the


2∆ driven system within the clipped region provides an un-
derstanding on the mechanism of induced synchroniza-
3 tion through transient uncoupling. The Jacobian of the
2 coupled Morse oscillator system subjected to transient
uncoupling can be written as
1
0 1 0 0
 
0
y2

βe−x1 (1 − e−x1 ) −α 0 0 
-1 J = .
ǫχA 0 −ǫχA 1 
-2 0 0 βe−x2 (1 − e−x2 )−α
(9)
-3 The synchronous of the driven system is observed only
when the trajectories of the driven system traces that of
-4
-1 0 1 2 3 4 the drive. Hence the eigenvalues corresponding to the
x2 driven system obtained from Eq. 9 must enable the tra-
jectories to converge towards the drive system. Figure 3
shows the chaotic attractor (blue) of the driven system
FIG. 3. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the driven Morse in the (x2 − y2 ) phase plane along with the values of x2

oscillator system (blue) in the x2 −y2 phase space with regions (red) within the clipping fraction ∆ = 0.85 for which the
of x2 (red) for which the real parts of the eigenvalues of the eigenvalues of the driven system have negative real parts
driven system is negative under a finite clipping fraction for and hence leading to the convergence of the trajectories.

the parameters x2 ∗ = 1.59 and ∆ = 0.85. These negative eigenvalue regions of the driven system
within the clipping fraction enables the synchronization
of the coupled systems.
4

III. SERIES LCR CIRCUITS 2∆ 2∆


x2* - ∆ x2* x2* + ∆ x2* - ∆ x2* x2* + ∆

(a) (b)
1 1
In this section, we present the enhanced stability of
induced synchronization observed in a class of coupled

y1, y2

y1, y2
0 0
sinusoidally forced series LCR circuit systems with three-
segmented piecewise-linear elements. The Chua’s diode -1 -1
and the simplified nonlinear element are the nonlinear el-
-1 0 1 -1 0 1
ements considered for the present study. The normalized x1, x2 x1, x2
state equations of the unidirectionally coupled chaotic
systems subjected to transient uncoupling can be writ- FIG. 4. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the drive (blue)
ten as and driven systems (red) of the series LCR circuit systems
with a three-segmented piecewise-linear element in the x1 −y1
ẋ1 = y1 − h(x1 ), (10a) and x2 − y2 planes under the uncoupled state (ǫ = 0) with
ẏ1 = −βy1 − νβy1 − βx1 + f1 sin(z1 ), (10b) clipping of phase space of the driven system through transient
uncoupling. (a) The Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuit system
ż1 = ω1 , (10c)
and (b) the forced series LCR circuit system with a simplified
ẋ2 = y2 − h(x2 ) + ǫχA (x1 − x2 ), (10d) nonlinear element.
ẏ2 = −βy2 − νβy2 − βx2 + f2 sin(z2 ), (10e)
ż2 = ω2 , (10f)
transient uncoupling is shown in Fig. 5. Under nor-
where x1 , y1 , z1 and x2 , y2 , z2 represents the normal-
mal coupling, the variation of the MSF with the cou-
ized state variables of the drive and driven systems, re-
pling strength indicates stable synchronized states in the
spectively. The terms h(x1 ), h(x2 ) represent the three-
range 0.0256 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.725 as shown in Fig. 5(a). Hence,
segmented piecewise-linear function of the drive and the
the coupled system becomes unsynchronized for coupling
driven systems given as
strengths ǫ > 28.725 under normal coupling. The vari-
 ation of the MSF of the coupled system under transient
bx1,2 + (a − b) if x1,2 ≥ 1

uncoupling as a function of the clipping fraction with
h(x1,2 ) = ax1,2 if |x1,2 | ≤ 1 (11) the coupling strength fixed at ǫ = 29 is shown in Fig.

bx − (a − b) if x ≤ −1
1,2 1,2 5(b). From Fig. 5(b) it is observed that the coupled
system exists in stable synchronized ′states in the range
The driven system is coupled to the drive through the of the clipping fractions 0.4478 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.7624. Figure
x-variable by the factor ǫχA . When the piecewise-linear 5(c) showing the variation of the MSF with the coupling
function h(x) represents the characteristics of the Chua’s strength indicates stable synchronized state in the

range
diode the circuit is termed as the Murali-Lakshmanan- 0.0528 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.277 for a clipping fraction of ∆ = 0.67.
Chua circuit (MLC) circuit and when it represents the The

two-parameter bifurcation diagram obtained in the
simplified nonlinear element it is termed as the forced ∆ − ǫ plane showing the parameter regions (gray) for
series LCR circuit with a simplified nonlinear element . the existence of the coupled system in the synchronized
The parameters for the MLC and the circuit with a sim- state is shown in Fig. 5(d).
plified nonlinear element take the values a = −1.02, b =
−0.55, β = 1, ν = 0.015, ω1,2 = 0.72 and a =
−1.148, b = 5.125, β = 0.9865, ν = 0, ω1,2 = 0.7084, B. Forced series LCR circuit with a simplified
respectively. nonlinear element

The forced series LCR circuit with a simplified non-


A. Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuit linear element introduced by Arulgnanam et al.20 is a
second-order, non-autonomous circuit that exhibits chaos
The Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuit circuit is the in its dynamics. The simplified nonlinear element is an
first second-order, non-autonomous circuit system found active circuit element that has been constructed with a
to exhibit chaos in its dynamics15 . The chaotic least number of circuit elements. The fractal dimension
and synchronization dynamics of the circuit has been of the chaotic attractors produced by the circuits with
completely studied experimentally, numerically and this nonlinear element has a greater value as compared
analytically16–19 . This system exhibits a double-band to the Chua’s diode. This circuit exhibits a prominent
chaotic attractor at the amplitude of the external force chaotic attractor at the value of the amplitude of the
f1,2 = 0.14. The chaotic attractors of the drive (blue) force f1,2 = 0.375. The chaotic attractors of the drive
and the driven (red) MLC circuit systems under the (blue) and the driven (red) systems represented by Eq.
unsynchronized state is as shown in Fig. 4(a). The 10 under the unsynchronized state is as shown in Fig.
synchronization dynamics of the coupled system under 4(b).
5

4 0.2 4 1
(a) (b) (a) (b)
2 2 0
0

max

max
max

max
-1

λ⊥

λ⊥
0 0
λ⊥

λ⊥
-0.2
-2
-2 -2

-0.4 -3
-4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’ 0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
1 40 1 40
(c) (d) (c) (d)

Coupling Strength (ε)

Coupling Strength (ε)


0 30 30
0
max

max
-1 20 20
λ⊥

λ⊥
10 -1 10
-2

0 0
-3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’ 0 10
ε
20 30
∆’

FIG. 5. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed FIG. 6. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed
in coupled Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuits. (a) MSF ob- in coupled forced series LCR circuit systems with simpli-
tained without transient uncoupling exists in negative valued fied nonlinear element. (a) MSF obtained without transient
regions in the range 0.0256 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.725; (b) MSF as a func- uncoupling exists in negative valued regions in the range
′ ′
tion of ∆ for ǫ = 29 indicating stable synchronized states 0.074 ≤ ǫ ≤ 27.006; (b) MSF as a function of ∆ for ǫ = 29

in the range of clipping fractions 0.4478 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.7624; (c) indicating the stable synchronized states in the range of clip-

Variation of MSF with ǫ under transient uncoupling obtained ping fractions 0.004 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.964; (c) Variation of MSF

with x2 ∗ = 0.0005 and ∆ = 0.67 indicating enhanced sta- with ǫ under transient uncoupling obtained with x2 ∗ = 0.0004

ble synchronized states in the range of coupling strengths and ∆ = 0.5 indicating enhanced stable synchronized states
0.0528 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.277; (d) Two-parameter bifurcation diagram in the range of coupling strengths 0.067 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.467; (d)
′ ′
in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicating the parameter regions for stable Two-parameter bifurcation diagram in the ∆ − ǫ plane in-
synchronized states (gray color). dicating the parameter regions for stable synchronized states
(gray color).

The synchronization dynamics of the coupled system un- 2∆ 2∆

der transient uncoupling is shown in Fig. 6. Under nor-


mal coupling, the variation of the MSF with the cou- 1
(a)
1
(b)

pling strength indicates stable synchronized states in the


range 0.074 ≤ ǫ ≤ 27.006 as shown in Fig. 6(a). The
y2

y2

0 0

variation of the MSF of the coupled system under tran-


sient uncoupling as a function of the clipping fraction -1 -1

with the coupling strength fixed at ǫ = 29 is shown in -1 0 1 -1 0 1


x2 x2
Fig. 6(b). From Fig. 6(b) it is observed that the coupled
system exists in stable synchronized ′states in the range
of the clipping fractions 0.004 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.964. Figure FIG. 7. (Color Online) (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of
6(c) showing the variation of the MSF with the coupling the response system (blue) in the x2 − y2 phase space with
strength indicates stable synchronized states in the

range regions of x2 (red) for which the real parts of the eigenval-
0.067 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.467 for a clipping fraction of ∆ = 0.5. ues of the driven system is negative under a finite clipping
The two-parameter bifurcation diagram obtained in the fraction. (a) Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua obtained for the pa-
′ ′
∆ − ǫ plane showing the parameter regions (gray) for rameters x2 ∗ = 0.0005 and ∆ = 0.67; (b) Forced series LCR
the existence of the coupled system in the synchronized circuit with simplified nonlinear element obtained for the pa-

state is shown in Fig. 6(d). rameters x2 ∗ = 0.0004 and ∆ = 0.5.
The Jacobian of the normalized state equations of the
series LCR circuit systems with any three-segmented
piecewise-linear element represented by Eq. 10 can be
written as The eigenvalues of the driven systems obtained using Eq.
 ′  12 can be used to analyze the mechanism of induced syn-
−h (x1 ) 1 0 0 chronization by transient uncoupling. Figure 7(a) and
 −β −σ 0 0  7(b) shows the chaotic attractors (blue) of the driven
J = ′
 . (12)
 ǫχA 0 −ǫχA − h (x2 ) 1  MLC and the simplified nonlinear element systems in the
0 0 −β −σ (x2 −y2 ) phase plane along with the values of x2 (red) for
6
′ ′
the parameters ǫ = 29, ∆ = 0.67 and ǫ = 29, ∆ = 0.5, 2∆ 2∆
x2* - ∆ x2* x2* + ∆ x2* - ∆ x2* x2* + ∆
respectively. The eigenvalues corresponding to each of 1
(a) (b)
the piecewise-linear regions within the clipping fraction 1

are either real or complex conjugates with negative real

y1, y2

y1, y2
0 0
parts. Hence, the trajectories of the driven system con-
verges towards the trajectories of the drive at greater
-1
values coupling strengths using transient uncoupling for
-1
which synchronization cannot be achieved under normal -2 -1 0
x1, x2
1 2 -1 0
x1, x2
1

coupling.
FIG. 8. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the drive (blue)
and driven systems (red) of the parallel LCR circuit systems
IV. PARALLEL LCR CIRCUITS
with three-segmented piecewise-linear elements in the x1 −
y1 and x2 − y2 planes under the uncoupled state (ǫ = 0)
In this section, we present the enhanced stability of in- with clipping of phase space of the driven system through
duced synchronization observed in coupled sinusoidally transient uncoupling. (a) The variant of Murali-Lakshmanan-
forced parallel LCR circuit systems with piecewise-linear Chua circuit system and (b) the forced parallel LCR circuit
elements. The Chua’s diode and the simplified nonlinear system with a simplified nonlinear element.
element are the nonlinear elements considered for the
present study. The normalized state equations of the
x-coupled chaotic systems subjected to transient uncou-
pling can be written as of the external force f1,2 = 0.375. The chaotic attractors
of the drive (blue) and the driven (red) MLCV circuit
ẋ1 = f1 sin(z1 ) − x1 − y1 − h(x1 ), (13a) systems under the unsynchronized state is as shown in
ẏ1 = βx1 , (13b) Fig. 8(a). The synchronization dynamics of the cou-
pled system under transient uncoupling is shown in Fig.
ż1 = ω1 , (13c) 9. Under normal coupling, the variation of the MSF with
ẋ2 = f2 sin(z2 ) − x2 − y2 − h(x2 ) + ǫχA (x1 − x2(13d)
), the coupling strength indicates stable synchronized states
ẏ2 = βx2 , (13e) in the range 0.0028 ≤ ǫ ≤ 27.746 as shown in Fig. 9(a).
ż2 = ω2 , (13f) The variation of the MSF of the coupled system under
transient uncoupling as a function of the clipping fraction
where x1 , y1 , z1 and x2 , y2 , z2 represents the normalized with the coupling strength fixed at ǫ = 29.25 as shown
state variables of the drive and driven systems, respec- in Fig. 9(b) indicates stable synchronized states in the

tively. The terms h(x1 ), h(x2 ) representing the three- range of the clipping fractions 0.0158 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.8964.
segmented piecewise-linear function is as given in Eq. Figure 9(c) shows the variation of the MSF with the cou-
11. The driven system is coupled to the drive through pling strength indicating enhanced stable synchronized
the x-variable by the factor ǫχA . When the piecewise- states in the ′ range 0.0087 ≤ ǫ ≤ 30.2414 for a clipping
linear function h(x) represents the characteristics of the fraction of ∆ = 0.6. The ′
two-parameter bifurcation dia-
Chua’s diode the circuit is termed the Variant of Murali- gram obtained in the ∆ − ǫ plane showing the parameter
Lakshmanan-Chua (MLCV) circuit and when it repre- regions (gray) for the existence of the coupled system in
sents the simplified nonlinear element it is termed the the synchronized state is as shown in Fig. 9(d).
forced parallel LCR circuit with a simplified nonlinear
element . The parameters for the MLCV and the cir-
cuit with a simplified nonlinear element take the values B. Forced parallel LCR circuit with a simplified
a = −1.121, b = −0.6047, β = 0.05, ω1,2 = 0.105 and nonlinear element
a = −1.148, b = 5.125, β = 0.2592, ω1,2 = 0.2402,
respectively. The sinusoidally forced parallel LCR circuit with a
simplified nonlinear element exhibiting chaotic dynamics
was introduced by Arulgnanam et al.24 . This circuit
A. Variant of Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuit exhibits a prominent chaotic attractor at the amplitude
of the force f1,2 = 0.695. The chaotic and the syn-
The forced parallel LCR circuit with the Chua’s diode chronization dynamics of the circuit has been studied
as the nonlinear element introduced by Thamilmaran et experimentally, numerically and analytically18,23 . The
al.21 exhibits a rich variety of bifurcations and chaos in chaotic attractors of the drive (blue) and the driven (red)
its dynamics22 . The chaotic and the synchronization dy- systems with simplified nonlinear elements represented
namics of the circuit has been extensively studied ex- by Eq. 13 under the unsynchronized state is as shown
perimentally, numerically and analytically18,19,23 . This in Fig. 8(b). The synchronization dynamics of the
system exhibits a torus-breakdown route to chaos and a coupled system under transient uncoupling is shown
prominent chaotic attractor is observed at the amplitude in Fig. 10. Under normal coupling, the variation of
7

0.1 0.01 0.5 0.1


(a) (b) (a) (b)
0
0 0
0
-0.01

max

max
max

max
-0.1

λ⊥

λ⊥
-0.1
λ⊥

λ⊥
-0.02
-0.5
-0.2
-0.2 -0.03

-0.04 -0.3
-0.3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’ 0 5 10
ε
15 20 25
∆’

40 0.2 40
(c) (c) (d)

Coupling Strength (ε)

Coupling Strength (ε)


0.1
30
(d) 0 30
0
max

max
20 -0.2 20
λ⊥

λ⊥
-0.1

10 10
-0.2 -0.4

0 0
-0.3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -0.6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10 20
ε
30 40
∆’ 0 10
ε
20 30
∆’

FIG. 9. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed FIG. 10. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization ob-
in coupled Variant of Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuits. (a) served in coupled forced parallel LCR circuits with a sim-
MSF obtained without transient uncoupling exists in negative plified nonlinear element. (a) MSF obtained without tran-
valued regions in the range 0.0028 ≤ ǫ ≤ 27.746; (b) MSF as a sient uncoupling exists in negative valued regions in the range
′ ′
function of ∆ for ǫ = 29.25 indicating the stable synchronized 0.051 ≤ ǫ ≤ 23.32; (b) MSF as a function of ∆ for ǫ = 28

states in the range of clipping fractions 0.0158 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.8964; indicating stable synchronized states in the range of clipping

(c) Variation of MSF with ǫ under transient uncoupling ob- fractions 0.0037 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.907; (c) Variation of MSF with ǫ

tained with x2 ∗ = −0.0025 and ∆ = 0.6 indicating enhanced under transient uncoupling obtained with x2 ∗ = 0.0006 and

stable synchronized states in the range of coupling strengths ∆ = 0.6 indicating enhanced stable synchronized states in
0.0087 ≤ ǫ ≤ 30.2414; (d) Two-parameter bifurcation dia- the range of coupling strengths 0.053 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.28; (d) Two-
′ ′
gram in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicating the parameter regions for parameter bifurcation diagram in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicat-
stable synchronized states (gray color). ing the parameter regions for stable synchronized states (gray
color).

the MSF with the coupling strength indicates stable 2∆ 2∆

synchronized states in the range 0.051 ≤ ǫ ≤ 23.32 as 1


shown in Fig. 10(a). The variation of the MSF of the (a) (b)
1
coupled system under transient uncoupling as a function
of the clipping fraction with the coupling strength
y2

y2

0 0

fixed at ǫ = 28 as shown in Fig. 10(b) indicates stable


synchronized′
states in the range of the clipping fractions -1

0.0037 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.907. Figure 10(c) showing the variation -1


-2 -1 0 1 2 -1 0 1
x2 x2
of the MSF with the coupling strength indicates stable
synchronized state in the′ range 0.053 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.28 for
a clipping fraction of ∆ = 0.6. The ′
two-parameter FIG. 11. (Color Online) (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of
bifurcation diagram obtained in the ∆ − ǫ plane showing the driven system (blue) in the x2 − y2 phase space with re-
the parameter regions (gray) for the existence of the gions of x2 (red) for which the real parts of the eigenvalues of
coupled system in the synchronized state is shown in the driven system is negative under a finite clipping fraction.
Fig. 10(d). (a) Variant of Murali-Lakshmanan-Chua circuit obtained for

the parameters x2 ∗ = −0.0025 and ∆ = 0.6; (b) Forced par-
The Jacobian of the normalized state equations of allel LCR circuit with a simplified nonlinear element obtained

the forced parallel LCR circuit systems with a three- for the parameters x2 ∗ = 0.0006 and ∆ = 0.6.
segmented piecewise-linear element represented by Eq.
13 can be written as
 ′ 
−1 − h (x1 ) −1 0 0 14 can be used to analyze the mechanism of induced syn-
 β 0 0 0 chronization by transient uncoupling. Figure 11(a) and
J = ′
.
 ǫχA 0 −ǫχA − 1 − h (x2 ) −1 11(b) shows the chaotic attractors (blue) of the driven
0 0 β 0 MLCV and the simplified nonlinear element systems in
(14) the (x2 − y2 ) phase plane along with the values of x2
The eigenvalues of the driven systems obtained from Eq. (red) corresponding to negative eigenvalues for the pa-
8

rameters ǫ = 28, ∆ = 0.6. The eigenvalues of the driven
2∆
system corresponding to each of the piecewise-linear re-
x2* -∆ x2* x2* + ∆
gions within the clipping fraction are either real or com- 1
plex conjugates with negative real parts and hence the
trajectories of the driven system converges towards the
trajectories of the drive inducing synchronization.
0

y 1, y2
V. QUASIPERIODICALLY FORCED SERIES
LCR CIRCUIT -1

The quasiperiodically forced series LCR circuit ex-


hibiting strange non-chaotic attractor (SNA) in its dy- -2
namics was introduced by Venkatesan et al.25 . The
synchronization of the SNA dynamics observed in 0 1 2
this circuit has been studied both numerically and x 1, x2
analytically26,27 . The normalized state equations of the
x-coupled quasiperiodically forced series LCR circuits
with the Chua’s diode as the nonlinear element subjected FIG. 12. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the drive (blue)
to transient uncoupling can be written as and driven systems (red) of the quasiperiodically forced series
LCR circuits with the Chua’s diode as the nonlinear element
ẋ1 = y1 − h(x1 ), (15a) in the x1 − y1 and x2 − y2 planes under the uncoupled state
ẏ1 = −βy1 − νβy1 − βx1 + f1 sinθ1 + f2 sinφ1 ,(15b) (ǫ = 0) with clipping of phase space of the driven system
through transient uncoupling.
θ̇1 = ω1 , (15c)
φ̇1 = ω2 , (15d)
ẋ2 = y2 − h(x2 ) + ǫχA (x1 − x2 ), (15e)
ẏ2 = −βy2 − νβy2 − βx2 + f3 sinθ2 + f4 sinφ2 ,(15f) 4 0.1
(a) (b)
θ̇2 = ω3 , (15g) 2 0

φ̇2 = ω4 , (15h)

max
-0.1
max

λ⊥
λ⊥

where x1 , y1 , z1 and x2 , y2 , z2 represents the normal- -2 -0.2

ized state variables of the drive and driven systems, re- -4


-0.3

spectively. The terms h(x1 ), h(x2 ) represents the three- 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
segmented piecewise-linear function corresponding to the
0.5
Chua’s diode as given in Eq. 11. The normalized param- (c)
40
(d)
Coupling Strength (ε)

eters of the system are fixed as β = 1.152 , ν = 0.01388, 0 30

a=-1.0944, b=-0.5904, ω1,3 = 2.1448, ω2,4 = 0.6627. The


max

-0.5 20
λ⊥

ratio of the frequencies ω1,2 /ω2,4 is an integral multi-


ple of the golden ratio. This system exhibits a promi- -1
10

nent chaotic attractor obtained by the torus doubling 0


-1.5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
or the Heagy-Hammel route through the evolution of 0 10
ε
20 30
∆’
SNA at the values of the amplitude of the external forces
f1,3 = 0.5184, f2,4 = 0.233. The chaotic attractors of the
FIG. 13. (Color Online) Stability of synchronization observed
drive (blue) and the driven (red) systems observed under in coupled quasiperiodically forced series LCR circuits with
the unsynchronized state (ǫ = 0) is as shown in Fig. 12. the Chua’s diode as the nonlinear element. (a) MSF ob-
The synchronization dynamics of the coupled system tained without transient uncoupling exists in negative valued
under transient uncoupling is shown in Fig. 13. Un- regions in the range 0.0203 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.76; (b) MSF as a func-
der normal coupling, the variation of the MSF with the ′
tion of ∆ for ǫ = 29 indicating stable synchronized states
coupling strength indicates stable synchronized states in ′
at the lower values of clipping fractions 0.006 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.493;
the range 0.0203 ≤ ǫ ≤ 28.76 as shown in Fig. 13(a). (c) Variation of MSF with ǫ under transient uncoupling ob-
The variation of the MSF of the coupled system under ′
tained with x2 ∗ = 0.825 and ∆ = 0.4 indicating enhanced
transient uncoupling as a function of the clipping frac- stable synchronized states in the range of coupling strengths
tion with the coupling strength fixed at ǫ = 29 is shown 0.056 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.738; (d) Two-parameter bifurcation diagram

in Fig. 13(b). From Fig. 13(b) it is observed that the in the ∆ − ǫ plane indicating the parameter regions for stable
coupled system exists in stable synchronized states′
in the synchronized states (gray color).
lower regions of clipping fractions 0.006 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.493.
Figure 13(c) showing the variation of the MSF with the
9

(blue) of the driven system in the (x2 − y2 ) phase plane


2∆
along with the values of x2 (red) indicating the region of
1 the negative eigenvalues. The eigenvalues corresponding
to each of the piecewise-linear regions within the clip-
ping fraction are either real or complex conjugates with
negative real parts leading to the convergence of the tra-
0
jectories of the driven system towards the drive.
y2

-1 VI. CONCLUSION

In this paper we have reported the stability of in-


-2 duced synchronized states observed in unidirectionally
coupled second-order chaotic systems subjected to tran-
0 1 2 sient uncoupling. The method of transient uncoupling
x2 has paved way for the enhancement of the stable syn-
chronized states over higher values of coupling strength
which are not observed under normal coupling. Fur-
FIG. 14. (Color Online) Chaotic attractors of the driven ther, a broader region of the clipping fraction over which
quasiperiodically forced series LCR circuit system (blue) in stable synchronization is identified results in obtaining
the x2 − y2 phase space with regions of x2 (red) for which the enhanced stability of synchronization over greater val-
real parts of the eigenvalues of the driven system is negative ues of coupling strength. This method has been suc-
under a finite clipping fraction for the parameters x2 ∗ = 0.825 cessfully applied for enhancing synchronization stability

and ∆ = 0.4. in higher dimensional chaotic systems8–11 . The present
study reveals the applicability of the method of tran-
sient uncoupling to second-order, non-autonomous sys-
tems exhibiting chaotic and strange non-chaotic behav-
ior in their dynamics and establishes the global behavior
coupling strength indicates stable synchronized state in of this method. All the simple chaotic systems present
the′
range 0.056 ≤ ǫ ≤ 29.738 for a clipping fraction of a broader region of clipping fraction over which stable
∆ = 0.4. The′ two-parameter bifurcation diagram ob- synchronization is achieved. Further, an enhanced stable
tained in the ∆ − ǫ plane showing the parameter regions synchronization at higher values of coupling strength is
(gray) for the existence of the coupled system in the syn- obtained for a finite clipping fraction and the parameter
chronized state is shown in Fig. 13(d). regions of stable synchronization is identified. Because
The Jacobian of the quasiperiodically forced series LCR the number of components required to design the sim-
circuit system is represented by the Eq. 12. The eigen- ple chaotic systems is minimum, these systems are much
values of the driven system is obtained using Eq. 12 helpful in sustaining the synchronization stability over
for′ the clipping fraction and coupling strength fixed at larger values of coupling strength for the practical appli-
∆ = 0.4, ǫ = 29. Figure 14 shows the chaotic attractor cations of secure communication.

9

Corresponding author: gospelin@gmail.com M. Schröder, S. Chakraborty, D. Witthaut, J. Nagler, and
1
M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, M. Timme, Scientific Reports 6, 37142 (2016).
10
Physical Review Letters 64, 821 (1990). A. Tandon, M. Schröder, M. Mannat-
2
til, M. Theory
M. J. Ogorzalek, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Fundamental Timme, and 40,
and Applications S. 693Chakraborty,
(1993).
3
N. F. Rulkov, M. M. Sushchik, L. S. Tsimring, and H. D. I. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 26, 094817 (
Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E 51, 980 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959141.
4 11
M. G. Rosenblum, A. S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, A. Ghosh, P. Godara, and S. Chakraborty,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804 (1996). Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 28, 053112 (
5
S.Boccaletti, J.Kurths, G.Osipov, D.L.Valladares, and https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016148.
12
C.S.Zhou, Physics Reports 366, 1 (2002). M. Pecora, T. L. Carroll, A. Johnson, J. Mar, and J. F.
6
M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Heagy, Chaos 7, 520 (1997).
13
Physical Review Letters 80, 2109 (1998). G. C. Lie and J. Yuan,
7
L. Huang, Q. Chen, Y. C. Lai, and M. Pecora, The Journal of Chemical Physics 84, 5486 (1986),
Physical Review E 80, 036204 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.449957.
8 14
M. Schröder, M. Mannattil, D. Dutta, S. Chakraborty, M.Lakshmanan and S.Rajasekar, Nonlinear dynamics: In-
and M. Timme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 054101 (2015). tegrability, Chaos and Patterns (Springer, Berlin, 2003).
10

15 21
K.Murali, M.Lakshmanan, and Leon.O.Chua, K.Thamilmaran, M.Lakshmanan, and K.Murali,
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Fundamental Theory and Applications
International Journal41, 462 (1994). and Chaos 10(7), 1175 (2000).
of Bifurcation
16 22
K.Murali and M.Lakshmanan, K.Thamilmaran and M.Lakshmanan,
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 5, 563 (1995). International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 12, 783 (2001).
17 23
G.Sivaganesh, Chinese Physics Letters 32, 010503 (2015). G. Sivaganesh and A. Arulgnanam,
18
G. Sivaganesh, A. Arulgnanam, and Seethalakshmi, Chinese Physics B 26, 050502 (2017).
24
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 113, 294 (2018). A. Arulgnanam, K. Thamilmaran, and M. Daniel,
19
G. Sivaganesh, A. Arulgnanam, and A. N. Seethalakshmi, Chinese Journal of Physics 53, 060702 (2014).
25
Pramana 92, 42 (2019). A. Venkatesan, K. Murali, and M. Lakshmanan,
20
A.Arulgnanam, K.Thamilmaran, and M.Daniel, Physics Letters A 259, 246 (1999).
26
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 42, 2246 (2009). G.Sivaganesh, Journal of the Korean Physical Society 68, 628 (2016).
27
G. Sivaganesh and A. Arulgnanam,
Journal of the Korean Physical Society 69, 1631 (2016).

You might also like